Evaluating hexavalent chromium reduction and electricity production in microbial fuel cells with alkaline cathodes
- 597 Downloads
The work investigated the efficiency of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for the treatment of alkaline hexavalent chromium containing wastewater. When lactate was used as the metal chelator in alkaline (pH 8) abiotic cathodes, hexavalent chromium concentration dropped from 10 mg l−1 to undetectable levels within the first 45 h of operation. Power density produced in the pH 8 abiotic cathodes was up to 21.4 mW m−2, and in the pH 9 cathodes up to 2.4 mW m−2; these values were well comparable with other values found in the literature for biologically catalysed cathodes, even at lower pH values. When Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 was present in a hexavalent chromium reducing cathode at pH 8, current production contributed by 26 % to the total hexavalent chromium reduced during the 36 days of operation. On the other hand, when hexavalent chromium (10 mg l−1) was controllably added in the anode where S. oneidensis MR-1 was present, up to 73 % of current decreased immediately after every hexavalent chromium addition; this toxic effect remained even after hexavalent chromium was depleted in the anode and strongly indicates that the presence of hexavalent chromium in the anodes of MFCs must be avoided. Overall, our results indicate that alkaline hexavalent chromium wastewater can be effectively remediated in the cathodes of MFCs, provided that a metal chelator is present in the cathodes and that hexavalent chromium is not present in the anodes.
KeywordsBioelectrochemical systems Hexavalent chromium remediation Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 Lactate High pH Hexavalent chromium toxicity
Funding in support of this work was provided by the Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, UK.
- APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st-Centennial edn. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Brandhuber P, Frey M, McGuire MJ, Chao P, Seidel C, Amy G, Yoon J, McNeill L, Banerjee K (2004) Low-level hexavalent chromium treatment options: bench-scale evaluation. American water works association Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
- Brodie EL, Joyner DC, Faybishenko B, Conrad ME, Rios-Velazquez C, Malave J, Martinez R, Mork B, Willett A, Koenigsberg S, Herman DJ, Firestone MK, Hazen TC (2011) Microbial community response to addition of polylactate compounds to stimulate hexavalent chromium reduction in groundwater. Chemosphere 85(4):660–665. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palmer CD, Puls RW (1994) Natural attenuation of hexavalent chromium in groundwater and soils. EPA Ground Water Issue. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
- Pinchuk GE, Geydebrekht OV, Hill EA, Reed JL, Konopka AE, Beliaev AS, Fredrickson JK (2011) Pyruvate and lactate metabolism by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 under fermentative, oxygen-limited and fumarate-respiring conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol:AEM.05382-05311. doi: 10.1128/aem.05382-11
- Rabaey K, Ossieur W, Verhaege M, Verstraete W (2005) Continuous microbial fuel cells convert carbohydrates to electricity. Water Sci Technol 52(1):515–523Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum M, Cotta MA, Angenent LT (2010) Aerated Shewanella oneidensis in continuously fed bioelectrochemical systems for power and hydrogen production. Biotechnol Bioeng 105(5):880–888Google Scholar
- U.S.E.P.A. (2000) In situ treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with chromium-technical resource guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Zhang B, Feng C, Ni J, Zhang J, Huang W (2012) Simultaneous reduction of vanadium (V) and chromium (VI) with enhanced energy recovery based on microbial fuel cell technology. J Power Sour. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.013