Advertisement

Uncertainty analysis for nonpoint source pollution modeling: implications for watershed models

  • Z. Shen
  • H. Xie
  • L. Chen
  • J. Qiu
  • Y. Zhong
Review

Abstract

Uncertainty is inherent in watershed modeling but it is not fully acknowledged in model applications. This review focuses on uncertainty issues related to the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, which is one of the most useful tools for simulating nonpoint source (NPS) pollution processes. We considered numerous studies that addressed three types of uncertainty in detail, i.e., the model inputs, parameters, and model structure. It has been shown that rainfall data, in terms of the spatial rainfall variability and the accuracy of the measured data, play a key role in the accuracy of the SWAT model. Geographic information system inputs, including the digital elevation model, land use map, and soil type map, have also been identified as key sources of input errors. With respect to the parameter uncertainty and model structural uncertainty, it is anticipated that the complex, nonlinear structure, and numerous parameters included in the SWAT model may lead to a failure to identify parameters, as well as equifinality phenomenon. We also compared some widely used uncertainty analysis methods, such as the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation and first-order error analysis, to provide reliable guidance for the application of the SWAT model. This study benefits a wide range of researchers, who are concerned with uncertainty issues in NPS pollution modeling, and it provides insights into the application of watershed models in the development of watershed programs.

Keywords

Model input Model parameter Model structure Soil and Water Assessment Tool Uncertainty Uncertainty analysis methods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by several grants from the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 51025933), the National Science Foundation for Innovative Research Group (No. 51121003), and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project, 2010CB429003).

References

  1. Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, Van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1340–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabi M, Frankenberger JR, Engel BA, Arnold JG (2008) Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT. Hydrol Process 22(16):3042–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arhonditsis GB, Perhar G, Zhang W, Massos E, Shi M, Das A (2008) Addressing equifinality and uncertainty in eutrophication models. Water Resour Res 44(1):W01420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardossy A, Das T (2008) Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12(1):77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlund I, Kirkkala T, Malve O, Kamari J (2007) Assessing SWAT model performance in the evaluation of management actions for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in a Finnish catchment. Environ Model Softw 22(5):719–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck MB (1987) Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour Res 23(8):1393–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beven K (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320(1–2):18–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beven KJ, Alcock RE (2012) Modelling everything everywhere: a new approach to decision-making for water management under uncertainty. Freshw Biol 57(s1):124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models—model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6(3):279–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bobba AG, Singh VP, Bengtsson L (1996) Application of first-order and monte carlo analysis in watershed water quality models. Water Resour Manag 10(3):219–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bobba AG, Singh VP, Bengtsson L (2000) Application of environmental models to different hydrological systems. Ecol Model 125(1):15–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter JG, White I (2012) Environmental planning and management in an age of uncertainty: the case of the Water Framework Directive. J Environ Manage 113:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaubey I, Haan CT, Salisbury JM, Grunwald S (1999) Quantifying model output uncertainty due to spatial variability of rainfall. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35(5):1113–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaubey I, Cotter AS, Costello TA, Soerens TS (2005) Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol Process 19(3):621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen CF, Ma HW, Reckhow KH (2007) Assessment of water quality management with a systematic qualitative uncertainty analysis. Sci Total Environ 374(1):13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen L, Liu RM, Huang Q, Chen YX, Gao SH, Sun CC, Shen ZY (2013) Integrated assessment of nonpoint source pollution of a drinking water reservoir in a typical acid rain region. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10(4):651–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cho J, Bosch D, Lowrance R, Strickland T, Vellidis G (2009) Effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on temporal and spatial uncertainty of SWAT output. Trans ASABE 52(5):1545–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dechmi F, Burguete J, Skhiri A (2012) SWAT application in intensive irrigation systems: model modification, calibration and validation. J Hydrol 470:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dixon B, Earls J (2009) Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 23(12):1714–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglas-Mankin KR, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG (2010) Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: current developments and applications. Trans ASABE 53(5):1423–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fu S, Sonnenborg TO, Jensen KH, He X (2011) Impact of precipitation spatial resolution on the hydrological response of an integrated distributed water resources model. Vadose Zone J 10(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghebremichael LT, Veith TL, Hamlett JM (2013) Integrated watershed- and farm-scale modeling framework for targeting critical source areas while maintaining farm economic viability. J Environ Manage 114:381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gong Y, Shen Z, Hong Q, Liu R, Liao Q (2011) Parameter uncertainty analysis in watershed total phosphorus modeling using the GLUE methodology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142(3–4):246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gong Y, Shen Z, Liu R, Hong Q, Wu X (2012) A comparison of single- and multi-gauge based calibrations for hydrological modeling of the Upper Daning River Watershed in China’s Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Hydrol Res 43(6):822–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4(1):11–24Google Scholar
  26. Harrison RM, Lambert GD, Chapple CL (1993) Spectral estimation and contrast calculation in the design of contrast-detail test objects for radiotherapy portal imaging. Phys Med Biol 38(4):545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong Q, Sun Z, Chen L, Liu RM, Shen ZY (2012) Small-scale watershed extended method for non-point source pollution estimation in part of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(4):595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Z, Xu Z, Shao Q, Yang J (2009) Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of SWAT model in upper reaches of the Heihe river basin. Hydrol Process 23(19):2744–2753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Z, Shao Q, Xu Z, Cai X (2010) Analysis of parameter uncertainty in semi-distributed hydrological models using bootstrap method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Yingluoxia watershed in northwest China. J Hydrol 385(1–4):76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin S, Jing C, Coles NA, Chaplot V, Moore NJ, Wu J (2013) Evaluating DEM source and resolution uncertainties in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(1):209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu Y, Freer J, Beven K, Matgen P (2009) Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: extending observation error. J Hydrol 367(1–2):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin S, Jing C, Chaplot V, Yu X, Zhang Z, Moore N, Wu J (2010) Effect of DEM resolution on SWAT outputs of runoff, sediment and nutrients. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7(4):4411–4435Google Scholar
  33. Maringanti C, Chaubey I, Popp J (2009) Development of a multi objective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control. Water Resour Res 45(6):W06406. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007094
  34. Masih I, Maskey S, Uhlenbrook S, Smakhtin V (2011) Assessing the impact of areal precipitation input on streamflow simulations using the SWAT Model1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47(1):179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melching CS, Yoon CG (1996) Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River. J Water Resour Plan ASCE 122(2):105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33(2):161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nandakumar N, Mein RG (1997) Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change. J Hydrol 192(1–4):211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ng TL, Eheart JW, Cai XM (2010) Comparative calibration of a complex hydrologic model by stochastic methods GLUE and PEST. Trans ASABE 53(6):1773–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osborn HB, Hundley JF, Lane LJ (1972) Optimum gaging of thunderstorm rainfall in southeastern arizona. Water Resour Res 8(1):259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parasuraman K, Elshorbagy A (2008) Toward improving the reliability of hydrologic prediction: model structure uncertainty and its quantification using ensemble-based genetic programming framework. Water Resour Res 44(12):W12406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Park JH, Duan L, Kim B, Mitchell MJ, Shibata H (2010) Potential effects of climate change and variability on watershed biogeochemical processes and water quality in Northeast Asia. Environ Int 36(2):212–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pohlert T, Huisman JA, Breuer L, Frede HG (2007) Integration of a detailed biogeochemical model into SWAT for improved nitrogen predictions—model development, sensitivity, and GLUE analysis. Ecol Model 203(3–4):215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Post J, Hattermann FF, Krysanova V, Suckow F (2008) Parameter and input data uncertainty estimation for the assessment of long-term soil organic carbon dynamics. Environ Model Softw 23(2):125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rouhani H, Willems P, Feyen J (2009) Effect of watershed delineation and areal rainfall distribution on runoff prediction using the SWAT model. Hydrol Res 40(6):505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schuurmans JM, Bierkens MFP (2007) Effect of spatial distribution of daily rainfall on interior catchment response of a distributed hydrological model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(2):677–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. SCS, Us. (1972) National engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. USPGO, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Setegn SG, Srinivasan R, Melesse AM, Dargahi B (2010) SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 24(3):357–367Google Scholar
  49. Shen ZY, Hong Q, Yu H (2008) Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Sci Total Environ 405(1–3):195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shen ZY, Hong Q, Yu H, Niu JF (2010) Parameter uncertainty analysis of non-point source pollution from different land use types. Sci Total Environ 408(8):1971–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shen ZY, Chen L, Chen T (2012a) Analysis of parameter uncertainty in hydrological and sediment modeling using GLUE method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(1):121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shen ZY, Chen L, Liao Q, Liu R, Hong Q (2012b) Impact of spatial rainfall variability on hydrology and nonpoint source pollution modeling. J Hydrol 472:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shen ZY, Chen L, Chen T (2013a) The influence of parameter distribution uncertainty on hydrological and sediment modeling: a case study of SWAT model applied to the Daning watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(1):235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shen ZY, Chen L, Hong Q, Qiu J, Xie H, Liu R (2013b) Assessment of nitrogen and phosphorus loads and causal factors from different land use and soil types in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Sci Total Environ 454–455:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shen ZY, Chen L, Liao Q, Liu RM, Huang Q (2013c) A comprehensive study of the effect of GIS data on hydrology and non-point source pollution modeling. Agric Water Manage 118:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shen ZY, Huang Q, Liao Q, Chen L, Liu RM, Xie H (2013d) Uncertainty in flow and water quality measurement data: a case study in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Desalin Water Treat 51(19–21):3995–4001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sohrabi T, Shirmohammadi A, Chu T, Montas H, Nejadhashemi A (2003) Uncertainty analysis of hydrologic and water quality predictions for a small watershed using SWAT2000. Environ Forensics 4(4):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spear R, Hornberger G (1980) Eutrophication in Peel Inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis. Water Res 14(1):43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tanik A, Ozalp D, Seker DZ (2013) Practical estimation and distribution of diffuse pollutants arising from a watershed in Turkey. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10(2):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tapiador FJ, Turk FJ, Petersen W, Hou AY, García-Ortega E, Machado LAT, Angelis CF, Salio P, Kidd C, Huffman GJ, de Castro M (2012) Global precipitation measurement: methods, datasets and applications. Atmos Res 104:70–97Google Scholar
  61. Tian P, Zhao G, Li J, Gao J, Zhang Z (2012) Integration of monthly water balance modeling and nutrient load estimation in an agricultural catchment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(1):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tripp DR, Niemann JD (2008) Evaluating the parameter identifiability and structural validity of a probability-distributed model for soil moisture. J Hydrol 353(1–2):93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tu J (2011) Spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality across an urbanization gradient explored by geographically weighted regression. Appl Geogr 31(1):376–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vischel T, Lebel T (2007) Assessing the water balance in the Sahel: impact of small scale rainfall variability on runoff. Part 2: Idealized modeling of runoff sensitivity. J Hydrol 333(2–4):340–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bouten W, Sorooshian S (2003) A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 39(8):1201–1216Google Scholar
  66. Vrugt JA, Ter Braak CJ, Gupta HV, Robinson BA (2009) Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(7):1011–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams JR (1975) Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 11(5):965–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood GB, Wiant HV, Loy RJ, Miles JA (1990) Centroid sampling—a variant of importance sampling for estimating the volume of sample trees of radiata pine. For Ecol Manage 36(2–4):233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wu Y, Liu S (2012) Automating calibration, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models using the R package Flexible Modeling Environment (FME): SWAT as an example. Environ Model Softw 31:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC (2007) Bayesian uncertainty analysis in distributed hydrologic modeling: a case study in the Thur River basin (Switzerland). Water Resour Res 43(10):W10401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zak SK, Beven KJ (1999) Equifinality, sensitivity and predictive uncertainty in the estimation of critical loads. Sci Total Environ 236(1–3):191–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Bosch D (2009) Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging. J Hydrol 374(3–4):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhao X, Shen ZY, Xiong M, Qi J (2011) Key uncertainty sources analysis of water quality model using the first order error method. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(1):137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of EnvironmentBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations