Biological Theory

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 343–362 | Cite as

Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About Evolutionary Causes

Original Article

Abstract

This article discusses various dangers that accompany the supposedly benign methods in behavioral evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology that fall under the framework of “methodological adaptationism.” A “Logic of Research Questions” is proposed that aids in clarifying the reasoning problems that arise due to the framework under critique. The live, and widely practiced, “evolutionary factors” framework is offered as the key comparison and alternative. The article goes beyond the traditional critique of Stephen Jay Gould and Richard C. Lewontin, to present problems such as the disappearance of evidence, the mishandling of the null hypothesis, and failures in scientific reasoning, exemplified by a case from human behavioral ecology. In conclusion the paper shows that “methodological adaptationism” does not deserve its benign reputation.

Keywords

Adaptationism Behavioral biology Behavioral ecology Evolutionary methods Evolutionary psychology Evolutionary theory Female orgasm 

References

  1. Alcock J (1987) Ardent adaptationism. Nat Hist 96:4Google Scholar
  2. Alcock J (1998) Unpunctuated equilibrium and the Natural History essays of Stephen Jay Gould. Evol Hum Behav 19:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amundson R (1994) Two concepts of constraint: adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philos Sci 61:556–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amundson R (1998) Typology reconsidered: two doctrines on the history of evolutionary biology. Biol Philos 13:153–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amundson R (2001) Adaptation, development, and the quest for common ground. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationist and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 303–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amundson R (2005) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of evo-devo. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrews PW, Gangestad SW, Matthews D (2002a) Adaptationism—how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behav Brain Sci 25(4):489–504Google Scholar
  8. Andrews PW, Gangestad SW, Matthews D (2002b) Adaptationism, exaptationism, and evolutionary behavioral science. Behav Brain Sci 25(4):534–547Google Scholar
  9. Barash DP, Lipton JE (2009) How women got their curves and other just-so stories: evolutionary enigmas. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bateson P, Laland KN (2013) Tinbergen’s four questions: an appreciation and an update. Trends Ecol Evol 28:712–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beatty J (1987) Natural selection and the null hypothesis. In: Dupre J (ed) The latest on the best. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 53–75Google Scholar
  12. Birkhead TR, Miller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Breden FJ, Wade MJ (1987) An experimental study of the effect of group size on larval growth and survivorship in the imported willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera versicolora (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol 16:1082–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burian RM (1992) Adaptation: historical perspectives. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  15. Buss DM, Haselton MG, Shackelford TK et al (1998) Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. Am Psychol 54:533–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll SB (2005) Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke T (1972) The legacy of skepticism. J Philos 69(20):754–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cosmides L, Tooby J (1994) Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition 50(1):41–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawood K, Kirk KM, Bailey JM et al (2005) Genetic and environmental influences on the frequency of orgasm in women. Twin Res Hum Genet 8:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewsbury DA (1992) On the problems studied in ethology, comparative psychology, and animal behavior. Ethology 92:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dixson A (2012) Primate sexuality, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunn KM, Cherkas LF, Spector TD (2005) Genetic influences on variation in female orgasmic function: a twin study. Biol Lett 1:260–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Futuyma D (2013) Evolution, 3rd edn. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  25. Geary DC, Flinn MV (2001) Evolution of human parental behavior and the human family. Parenting 1(1–2):5–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Godfrey-Smith P (2001) Three kinds of adaptationism. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 344–362Google Scholar
  27. Gould SJ (1987) Freudian slip. Nat Hist 96(2):14–21Google Scholar
  28. Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15Google Scholar
  31. Griesemer J (2013) Integration of approaches in David Wake’s model-taxon research platform for evolutionary morphology. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C 44(4):525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Griesemer JR (2015) What salamander biologists have taught us about evo-devo. In: Love AC (ed) Conceptual change in biology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 271–301Google Scholar
  33. Griffiths PE (1996) The historical turn in the study of adaptation. Br J Philos Sci 47:511–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halliday T, Arnold SJ (1987) Multiple mating by females: a perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim Behav 35:939–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jamieson IG (1989) Levels of analysis or analyses at the same level. Anim Behav 37(4):696–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kinsey A, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH (1953) Sexual behavior in the human female. Indiana University Press, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  37. Komisaruk B, Beyer-Flores C, Whipple B (2006) The science of orgasm. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  38. Komisaruk BR, Wise N, Frangos E et al (2011) Women’s clitoris, vagina, and cervix mapped on the sensory cortex: fMRI evidence. J Sex Med 8(10):2822–2830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kreitman M (1983) Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 304:412–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levin R (2011) Can the controversy about the putative role of the human female orgasm in sperm transport be settled with our current physiological knowledge of coitus? J Sex Med 8:1566–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levin R (2014a) Recreation and procreation: a critical view of sex in the human female. Clin Anat. doi:10.1002/ca.22495 Google Scholar
  43. Levin R (2014b) Should the clitoris become a vestigial organ by personal ‘psychological clitoridectomy’? A critical examination of the literature. J Women’s Health Issues Care. doi:10.4172/2325-9795.1000159 Google Scholar
  44. Lewens T (2009) Seven types of adaptationism. Biol Philos 24(2):161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Linde-Medina M (2011) Adaptation or exaptation? The case of the human hand. J Biosci 36(4):575–585. doi:10.1007/s12038-011-9102-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Linquist SJ (2006) When is an orgasm just an orgasm? Elisabeth Lloyd’s The Case of the Female Orgasm: bias in the Science of Evolution. Metascience 15:411–419Google Scholar
  47. Lloyd EA (2005) The case of the female orgasm: bias in the science of evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Italian edition: Lloyd EA (2006) Il caso dell’orgasmo femminile: Pregiudizio nella scienza dell’evoluzione (trans: Faravelli E). Codice, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  48. Lloyd EA (2013) Units and levels of selection. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection-units/
  49. Lloyd EA, Gould SJ ([2002]2014) Exaptation revisited (Unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  50. Lloyd EA, Wilson DS, Sober E (2014) Evolutionary mismatch and what to do about it: a basic tutorial (Unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  51. Marrow P, Johnstone RA (1996) Riding the evolutionary streetcar: where population genetics and game theory meet. Trends Ecol Evol 11:445–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martins EP (2000) Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol 15:296–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mayr E (1983) How to carry out the adaptationist program? Am Nat 121:324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCauley DE, Wade MJ, Breden FJ, Wohltman M (1988) Kin selection: geographic variation in relatedness in the imported willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera versicolora. Evolution 42:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meehl PE (1954) Clinical versus statistical prediction: a theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2006-21565-000
  56. Millstein RL (2007) Hsp90-induced evolution: adaptationist, neutralist, and developmentalist scenarios. Biol Theory 2:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Millstein RL (2008) Distinguishing drift and selection empirically: ‘The Great Snail Debate’ of the 1950s. J Hist Biol 41:339–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitchell S (2002) Integrative pluralism. Biol Philos 17:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Newman SA (1988) Lineage and pattern in the developing vertebrate limb. Trends Genet 4:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Newman SA, Bhat R (2008) Dynamical patterning modules: physico-genetic determinants of morphological development and evolution. Phys Biol 5:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Newman SA, Bhat R (2011) Lamarck’s dangerous idea. In: Gissis SB, Jablonka E (eds) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2001) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  63. Otsuka J (2014) Causal foundations of evolutionary genetics. Br J Philos Sci. doi:10.1093/bjps/axu039 Google Scholar
  64. Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2000) The rise and fall of Dr. Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol Evol 15(2):66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pinker S (1999) How the mind works. Ann N Y Acad Sci 882:119–127. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08538.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Puts DA, Welling LLM, Burriss RP, Dawood K (2012) Men’s masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners’ reported orgasm frequency and timing. Evol Hum Behav 33:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raff RA (1996) The shape of life: genes, development and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  69. Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Q Rev Biol 68(1):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rose MR, Lauder GV (eds) (1996) Adaptation. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  71. Russell B (1919) Introduction to mathematical philosophy. McMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Sansom R (2003) Constraining the adaptationism debate. Biol Philos 18:493–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmitt DP, Pilcher JJ (2004) Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: how do we know one when we see one? Psychol Sci 15(10):643–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schwalm PA, Starrett PH, McDiarmid RW (1977) Infrared reflectance in leaf-sitting neotropical frogs. Science 196:1225–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seger J, Stubblefield JW (1996) Optimization and adaptation. In: Rose MR, Lauder GV (eds) Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 93–102Google Scholar
  76. Sherman P (1989) The clitoris debate and the levels of analysis. Anim Behav 37:697–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Singh RS, Krimbas CB (2000) Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith D (Hrdy) (2005) A critic takes on the logic of female orgasm. New York Times, May 17, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  79. Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Symons D (1990) Adaptiveness and adaptation. Ethol Sociobiol 11(4):427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thornhill R (1990) The study of adaptation. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Interpretation and explanation in the study of behavior. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 31–62Google Scholar
  82. Thornhill R (1997) The concept of an evolved adaptation. In: Daly M (ed) Characterizing human psychological adaptations. Wiley, New York, pp 4–22Google Scholar
  83. Van Fraassen BC (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wade MJ (1978) A critical review of the models of group selection. Q Rev Biol 53(2):101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wade MJ (1985) Soft selection, hard selection, kin selection, and group selection. Am Nat 125(1):61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wade MJ (1994) The biology of the willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera versicolora (Laicharting). In: Joliviet P, Cox M (eds) Novel aspects of the biology of chrysomelidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, pp 541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wade MJ (2016) Adaptation in metapopulations: how interactions change evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (in press)Google Scholar
  88. Wade MJ, Breden FJ (1986) Life history of natural populations of the imported willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera versicolora (coleoptera: chrysomelidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wake DB (1991) Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations? Am Nat 138:543–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wake DB (2009) What salamanders have taught us about evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:333–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wallen K, Lloyd EA (2011) Female sexual arousal: genital anatomy and orgasm in intercourse. Horm Behav 59:780–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. West-Eberhard M-J (1992) Adaptation: current usages. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–18Google Scholar
  93. Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. Curr Ornithol 7:331–369Google Scholar
  94. Wheatley JR, Puts DA (2015) Evolutionary science of female orgasm. In: Shackelford TK, Hansen RD (eds) The evolution of sexuality. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–148. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09384-0_7 Google Scholar
  95. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  96. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16(2):97–159Google Scholar
  97. Zietsch BP, Santtila P (2011) Genetic analysis of orgasmic function in twins and siblings does not support the by-product theory of female orgasm. Anim Behav 82:1097–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zietsch BP, Santtila P (2013) No direct relationship between human female orgasm rate and number of offspring. Anim Behav 86:253–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zietsch BP, Miller GF, Bailey JM, Martin NG (2011) Female orgasm rates are largely independent of other traits: implications for “female orgasmic disorder” and evolutionary theories of orgasm. J Sex Med 8:2305–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations