The Causality Horizon and the Developmental Bases of Morphological Evolution
- 294 Downloads
With the advent of evolutionary developmental research, or EvoDevo, there is hope of discovering the roles that the genetic bases of development play in morphological evolution. Studies in EvoDevo span several levels of organismal organization. Low-level studies identify the ultimate genetic changes responsible for morphological variation and diversity. High-level studies of development focus on how genetic differences affect the dynamics of gene networks and epigenetic interactions to modify morphology. Whereas an increasing number of studies link independent acquisition of homoplastic or convergent morphologies to similar changes in the genomes, homoplasies are not always found to have identical low-level genetic underpinnings. This suggests that a combination of low- and high-level approaches may be useful in understanding the relationship between genetic and morphological variation. Therefore, as an empirical and conceptual framework, we propose the causality horizon to signify the lowest level that allows linking homoplastic morphologies to similar changes in the development. A change in a system below the causality horizon cannot be generalized. In more concrete terms, homoplastic morphologies cannot be reduced to the same change in gene regulation when that change occurs below the causality horizon; rather, a higher-level mechanism should be identified.
KeywordsCausality horizon EvoDevo Genotype–Phenotype map Patterning
We thank Jeffrey Schwartz for providing a forum to develop ideas presented in the article, and David Polly and Kate MacCord for critically reviewing the manuscript.
- Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD (2001) From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
- Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Goodwin BC (1994) How the leopard changed its spots. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Haldane JBS (1932) The causes of evolution. Longmans, London. Reprint: Princeton University Press, Princeton (1990)Google Scholar
- Hallgrímsson B, Brown JJY, Hall BK (2005) The study of phenotypic variability: an emerging research agenda for understanding the developmental-genetic architecture underlying phenotypic variation. In: Hallgrímsson B, Hall BK (eds) Variation: a central concept in biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 525–551Google Scholar
- Meinhardt H (1982) Models of biological pattern formation. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Nebot A, Medina S, Cellier FE (1994) The causality horizon: limitations to predictability of behavior using fuzzy inductive reasoning. Proc Conf Model Simul 3:492–496Google Scholar
- Newman SA, Comper WD (1990) “Generic” physical mechanisms of morphogenesis and pattern formation. Development 110:1–18Google Scholar
- Shvartsman SY, Muratov CB, Lauffenburger DA (2002) Modeling and computational analysis of EGF receptor-mediated cell communication in Drosophila oogenesis. Development 129:2577–2589Google Scholar