Progress in Artificial Intelligence

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 37–46 | Cite as

Automatic profile generation for UAV operators using a simulation-based training environment

  • Víctor Rodríguez-Fernández
  • Héctor D. Menéndez
  • David Camacho
Regular Paper

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are becoming a hot topic in the last few years for several research areas, such as aeronautics or computer science. Big companies such as Airbus or Amazon aim to incorporate this technology to their current systems to improve the quality of their services while reducing the human costs. However, current UAV technology requires a strong human supervisory control and this supposes an important potential risk. Therefore, it is critical to keep track of the pilot behavior to be able to determine whether he is ready or not to operate with this technology. To deal with this problem, we have developed a methodology based on different performance metrics to automatically evaluate planning and monitoring skills of new users trained in a multi-UAV simulation environment. This methodology, based on unsupervised learning and fuzzy logic, can automatically generate a profile of future operators and use it to assess their skills.

Keywords

Unmanned aerial vehicles Simulation-based training User profile Clustering Fuzzy control system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the next research projects: TIN2014-56494-C4-4-P, CIBERDINE S2013/ICE-3095, SeMaMatch EP/K032623/1 and Airbus Defence and Space (FUAM-076914 and FUAM-076915). The authors would like to acknowledge the support obtained from Airbus Defence and Space, specially from Savier Open Innovation project members: José Insenser, Gemma Blasco, Juan Antonio Henríquez and César Castro. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the students from Video Games Programming course at Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, for their valuable collaboration in these experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Amigó, E., Gonzalo, J., Artiles, J., Verdejo, F.: A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints. Inf. Retr. 12(4), 461–486 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beard, R.W., McLain, T.W.: Multiple UAV cooperative search under collision avoidance and limited range communication constraints. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1, pp. 25–30. IEEE, Mani, Hawaii, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Begis, G.: Adaptive gaming behavior based on player profiling. In: US Patent US6106395 A (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boussemart, Y., Cummings, M.L., Fargeas, J.L., Roy, N.: Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for operator state modeling in unmanned vehicle settings. J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 8(3), 71–85 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brock, G., Pihur, V., Datta, S., Datta, S.: clValid, an R package for cluster validation. J. Stat. Softw. (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., Chang, D.: Unmanned aerial vehicle flight control: false alarms versus misses. In: 48th Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drury, J.L., Scholtz, J., Yanco, H.A.: Awareness in human–robot interactions. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 912–918. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eddy, S.R.: Hidden Markov models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6(3), 361–365 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X.: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: KDD, vol. 96, pp. 226–231 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodrich, M.A., Schultz, A.C.: Human–robot interaction: a survey. Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact. 1(3), 203–275 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Günnemann, S., Färber, I., Müller, E., Assent, I., Seidl, T.: External evaluation measures for subspace clustering. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1363–1372. ACM, Glasgow, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartigan, J.A., Wong, M.A.: Algorithm as 136: a \(k\)-means clustering algorithm. Appl. Stat. 100–108 (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson, S.C.: Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32(3), 241–254 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.: Clustering by means of medoids (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, vol. 344. Wiley (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kendoul, F.: Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems. J. Field Robotics 29(2), 315–378 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klir, G., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, vol. 4. Prentice Hall (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larose, D.T.: Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining. Wiley (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, Y., Li, Z., Xiong, H., Gao, X., Wu, J.: Understanding of internal clustering validation measures. In: 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 911–916. IEEE, Sydney, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maulik, U., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Performance evaluation of some clustering algorithms and validity indices. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(12), 1650–1654 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKinley, R.A., McIntire, L.K., Funke, M.A.: Operator selection for unmanned aerial systems: comparing video game players and pilots. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 82(6), 635–642 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pavlas, D., Burke, C.S., Fiore, S.M., Salas, E., Jensen, R., Fu, D.: Enhancing unmanned aerial system training: a taxonomy of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and methods. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 53, pp. 1903–1907. SAGE Publications, San Antonio, Texas, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodríguez-Fernández, V., Menéndez, H.D., Camacho, D.: Analyzing planning and monitoring skills of users in a multi-UAV simulation environment. In: 16th Conference of the Spanish Association for Articial Intelligence. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, CAEPIA 2015, Albacete, 9–12 November 2015 Proceedings, pp. 255–264 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, V., Menendez, H.D., Camacho, D.: Design and development of a lightweight multi-UAV simulator. In: 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF), pp. 255–260. IEEE, Gydnia, Poland (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, V., Ramirez-Atencia, C., Camacho, D.: A multi-UAV mission planning videogame-based framework for player analysis. In: 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1490–1497. IEEE, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stulberg, A.N.: Managing the unmanned revolution in the US air force. Orbis 51(2), 251–265 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu, R., Wunsch, D., et al.: Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 16(3), 645–678 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P.: Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control. New York (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zadeh, L.A., Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers, vol. 6. World Scientific (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang, G.P.: Neural networks for classification: a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 30(4), 451–462 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Víctor Rodríguez-Fernández
    • 1
  • Héctor D. Menéndez
    • 2
  • David Camacho
    • 1
  1. 1.MadridSpain
  2. 2.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations