Advertisement

Functional Response of Hyperaspis polita (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) to the Recently Invaded Mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae)

  • F. Seyfollahi
  • M. EsfandiariEmail author
  • M. S. Mossadegh
  • A. Rasekh
Biological Control
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Hyperaspis polita Weise is the major predator of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in southwestern Iran. The functional response of fourth instar larva, adult female and male of the ladybird, H. polita, preying upon different stages of the mealybug P. solenopsis was evaluated. All stages of H. polita exhibited type II functional responses against all stages of P. solenopsis with an exception that the functional response of the adult female stage of H. polita to first instar P. solenopsis nymphs was type III. Changing prey and predator stages did not result in significant differences in attack rates. Handling times, however, differed for different prey and predator stages. This parameter was the shortest for any stage of predator fed on first instar P. solenopsis nymphs and was estimated to be 0.1100, 0.1868, and 0.2939 h for fourth instar larval stage, adult females and males, respectively. Also, the handling time was the shortest for the fourth instar larval stage followed by adult females and males to different prey stages. Maximum predation rate (T/Th) decreased as P. solenopsis developed from one life stage to another, the lowest estimated value being obtained by feeding on adult female mealybug and the fourth instar larval stage was the most predatory. According to these results, the feeding potential of H. polita is noticeable with the fourth larval instar stage being considered the most efficient predatory stage for use in biological control programs. Further field-based studies are needed, however, before a comprehensive estimation of the biocontrol abilities of H. polita toward P. solenopsis can be made.

Keywords

Attack rate handling time prey density stage dependence species invasion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. F.R. Hunter Fujita from Reading University, UK, for the English editing of the text.

Author Contributions

ME designed experimental work and provided laboratory facilities; FS carried out the laboratory work and conducted data analysis; MSM helped in planning experiments and edited the text; AR helped in interpreting the results; ME, MSM, and AR wrote the manuscript.

Funding Information

This study received financial assistance from Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran (grant #27176).

References

  1. Alizadeh MS, Mossadegh MS, Esfandiari M (2013) Natural enemies of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their population fluctuations in Ahvaz, southwest of Iran. J Crop Prot 2:13–21Google Scholar
  2. Alizadeh MS, Esfandiari M, Mossadegh MS, Mashayekhi M (2017) Biology of pink hibiscus mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on Chinese hibiscus shrubs in Khuzestan Province. J Plant Prot 31(2):232–241Google Scholar
  3. Aljetlawi AA, Sparrevik E, Leonardsson K (2004) Prey–predator size-dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real world. J Anim Ecol 73:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allahyari H, Fard PA, Nozari J (2004) Effects of host on functional response of offspring in two populations of Trissolcus grandis on the sunn pest. J Appl Entomol 128:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arif MI, Rafiq M, Wazir S, Mehmodd N, Ghaffar A (2012) Studies on cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera), and its natural enemies in Punjab. Pakistan Int J Agric Biol 14:557–562Google Scholar
  6. Atlihan R, Guldal H (2009) Prey density-dependent feeding activity and life history of Scymnus subvillosus Goeze. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Phytoparasitica 37:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atlihan R, Bora Kaydan M, Yarimbatman A, Okut H (2010) Functional response of the coccinellid predator Adalia fasciatopunctata revelierei to walnut aphid (Callaphis juglandis). Phytoparasitica 38:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayoumy MH (2011) Foraging behavior of the coccinellid Nephus includens (coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in response to Aphis gossypii (hemiptera: Aphididae) with particular emphasis on larval parasitism. Environ Entomol 40:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behnazar T, Madadi H (2015) Functional response of different stages of Hippodamia variegata (Col.: Coccinellidae) to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on two wheat cultivars. Biocontrol Sci Tech 25:1180–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell WJ (1990) Searching behaviour: the behavioural ecology of finding resources. Chapman and Hall, London 358 pp CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabral S, Soares AO, Garcia P (2009) Predation by Coccinella undecimpunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Myzus persicae Sulzer (Homoptera: Aphididae): effect of prey density. Biol Control 50:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Clercq P, Mohaghegh J, Tirry L (2000) Effect of host plant on the functional response of the predator Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol Control 18:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding-Xu L, Juan T, Zuo-Rui S (2007) Functional response of the predator Scolothrips takahashii to hawthorn spider mite, Tetranychus viennensis: effect of age and temperature. BioControl 52:41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esfandiari M, Mossadegh MS, Eslamizadeh R (2007) Biology of the cottony cushion scale, Icerya purchasi Mask. (Hom.: Margarodidae) in laboratory and it’s seasonal fluctuations in citrus orchards of northern Khuzestan. J Sci Technol Agric Nat Res 10(4B):393–403Google Scholar
  15. Fand BB, Gautam RD, Suroshe SS (2010) Effect of developmental stage and density of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on the predatory performance of four coccinellid predators. J Biol Control 24:110–115Google Scholar
  16. Fand BB, Tonnang HEZ, Kumar M, Bal SK, Singh NP, Rao DVKN, Kamble AL, Nangare DD, Minhas PS (2014) Predicting the impact of climate change on regional and seasonal abundance of the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) using temperature-driven phenology model linked to GIS. Ecol Model 288:62–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farhadi R, Allahyari H, Juliano H (2010) Functional response of Hippodamia variegata (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) to different densities of Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 39:1586–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farhadi Z, Esfandiari M, Mossadegh MS, Shishehbor P (2017) Prey stage preference and functional response of the coccinellid Hyperaspis polita Weise by feeding on the mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead). Plant Pest Res 7(4):63–78Google Scholar
  19. Gupta RK, Pervez A, Guroo MA, Srivastava K (2012) Stage-specific functional response of an aphidophagous ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), to two aphid species. Int J Trop Insect Sci 32:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassanpour M, Mohaghegh J, Iranipour S, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Enkegaard A (2011) Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): effect of prey and predator stages. Insect Sci 18:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassell MP (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator–prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton 237 p Google Scholar
  22. Hertlein MB, Thorarinsson K (1987) Variable patch times and the functional response of Leptopilina baulardi (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae). Environ Entomol 16:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodek L, Van Emden HF, Honek A (2012) Ecology and behavior of ladybird beetles (Col.: Coccinellidae). Wiley-Blackwell, UK 600 p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodgson CJ, Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Karar H (2008) Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), an invasive mealybug damaging cotton in Pakistan and India, with a discussion on seasonal morphological variation. Zootaxa 19:1–35Google Scholar
  25. Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple type of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomol 91:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeschke JM, Kopp M, Tollrian R (2002) Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecol Monogr 72:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Juliano SA (2001) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 178–196Google Scholar
  29. Kaur H, Virk JS (2012) Feeding potential of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri against the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. Phytoparasitica 40:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khodaman A (1993) Biological study of mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis and possibility of its biological control, by crypt ladybird and other available coccinellids in Khuzestan province (southwest Iran), MSc thesis. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, IranGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar B, Mishra G, Omkar (2014a) Functional response and predatory interactions in conspecific and heterospecific combinations of two congeneric species (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur J Entomol 111:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar R, Nagrare VS, Nitharwal M, Swami D, Prasad YG (2014b) Within-plant distribution of an invasive mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis, and associated losses in cotton. Phytoparasitica 42:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lv J, Yang K, Wang E, Xu X (2016) Prey diet quality affects predation, oviposition and conversion rate of the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Syst Appl Acarol 21:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maselou D, Perdikis DA, Fantinou A (2015) Effect of hunger level on prey consumption and functional response of the predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. Bull Insect 68:211–218Google Scholar
  35. Mills NJ, Lacan I (2004) Ratio dependence in the functional response of insect parasitoids: evidence from Trichogramma minutum foraging for eggs in small host patches. Ecol Entomol 29:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Milonas PG, Kontodimas DC, Martinou AF (2011) A predator’s functional response: influence of prey species and size. Biol Control 59:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moezipour M, Kafil M, Allahyari H (2008) Functional response of Trichogramma brassicae at different temperatures and relative humidities. Bull Insect 61:245–250Google Scholar
  38. Moghaddam M, Bagheri NA (2010) A new record of mealybug pest in the south of Iran, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). J Entomol Soc Iran 30:67–69Google Scholar
  39. Moghaddam M, Esfandiari M, Khosravi M (2015) First record of Icerya aegyptiaca (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Monophlebidae) from Iran. In Manzari S (Ed.), 1st Proceedings of the Iranian International Congress of Entomology (p 42). Karaj, Iran: University of TehranGoogle Scholar
  40. Mossadegh MS, Eslamizadeh R, Esfandiari M (2008) Biological study of mealybugs Nipaecoccus viridis (News.) and possibility of its biological control by Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mul. in citrus orchards of north Khuzestan. In Manzari S (Ed.), 18th proceedings of the Iranian plant protection congress (p 24–27). Hamedan, Iran: University of Bu-Ali SinaGoogle Scholar
  41. Mossadegh MS, Vafaei Sh, Zarghami S, Farsi A, Sedighi Dehkordi F, Fazelinejad A, Esfandiari M, Alizadeh MS (2012) The mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) in Khuzestan and Kish island, Iran. In Sarafrazi A, Asef MR, Mozhdehi M, Solhjouy Fard S, Abdollahi T. (eds), 20th proceedings of the Iranian Plant Prot congress (p 174). Shiraz, Iran: University of ShirazGoogle Scholar
  42. Mossadegh MS, Vafaei Sh, Razaie N, Zarghami S (2013) Mass release of Cryptolaemous montrouzieri Mul. for biological control of the cotton mealy bug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in north of Kuzestan. In Talaei-Hassanloui R (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference of Biological Control in Agriculture and Natural Resources (p 70). Karaj, Iran: University of TehranGoogle Scholar
  43. Mossadegh MS, Vafaei Sh, Farsi A, Zarghami S, Esfandiari M, Sedighi Dehkordi F, Fazelinejad A, Seyfollahi F (2015) Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), its natural enemies and host plants in Iran. In Manzari S (Ed.), 1st Proceedings of the Iranian International Congress of Entomology (p 159–167). Karaj, Iran: University of TehranGoogle Scholar
  44. Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:2–131Google Scholar
  45. Nakhaei Madih S, Ramezani L, Zarghami S, Zandi Sohani N (2016) Functional response of different life stages of Hyperaspis polita feeding on cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. Iran J Plant Prot Sci 47:303–311Google Scholar
  46. Paini DR, Sheppard AW, Cook DC, De Barro PJ, Worner SP, Thomas MB (2016) Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(27):7575–7579.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602205113 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Papanikolaou N, Martinou A, Kontodimas D, Matsions Y, Milonas P (2011) Functional responses of immature stages of Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Eur J Entomol 108:391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pervez A, Omkar (2005) Functional responses of coccinellid predators: an illustration of a logistic approach. J Insect Sci 5:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Price PW, Denno RF, Eubanks MD, Finke DL, Kaplan I (2011) Insect ecology: behavior, populations and communities. Cambridge University Press, New York 801 p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rogers D (1972) Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol 41:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rossi MN, Reigada C, Godoy WAC (2006) The role of habitat heterogeneity for the functional response of the spider Nesticodes rufipes (Araneae: Theridiidae) to houseflies. Appl Entomol Zool 41:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarmento RA, Pallini A, Venzon M, de Souza OFFA, Molina-Rugama J, de Oliveira CL (2007) Functional response of the predator Eriopis connexa (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to different prey types. Braz Arch Biol Tech 50:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. SAS® (2012) SAS Institute,Version 9.3. Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  54. Seyfollahi F, Esfandiari M, Mossadegh MS, Rasekh A (2016) Life table parameters of the coccinellid Hyperaspis polita, a native predator in Iran, feeding on the invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. J Asia Pac Entomol 19:835–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seyfollahi F, Esfandiari M, Mossadegh MS, Rasekh A (2017) Field biology of the cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hem.: Pseudococcidae) on Chinese hibiscus shrubs in Ahvaz, Iran. Plant Pest Res 7(1):1–12Google Scholar
  56. Siddiqui A, Omkar PSC, Mishra G (2015) Predatory responses of selected lines of developmental variants of ladybird, Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in relation to increasing prey and predator densities. Biocontrol Sci Tech 25:992–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Skovgard H, Nachman G (2015) Temperature-dependent functional response of Spalangia Cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a parasitoid of Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ Entomol 44:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tazerouni Z, Talebi AA, Fathipour Y, Soufbaf M (2016) Age-specific functional response of Aphidius matricariae and Praon volucre (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotrop Entomol 45:642–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson DJ (1975) Towards a predator-prey model incorporating age structure: the effects of predator and prey size on the predation of Daphnia magna by Ischnura elegans. J Anim Ecol 44:907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Timms JE, Oliver TH, Straw NA, Leather SR (2008) The effects of host plant on the coccinellid functional response: is the conifer specialist Aphidecta obliterate (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) better adapted to spruce than the generalist Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)? Biol Control 47:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trexler JC, Travis J (1993) Nontraditional regression analysis. Ecology 74:1629–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang Y, Watson GW, Zhang R (2010) The potential distribution of an invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis and its threat to cotton in Asia. Agric For Entomol 12:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yu JZ, Chi H, Chen B (2013) Comparison of the life tables and predation rates of Harmonia dimidiata (F.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fed on Aphis gossypii glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) at different temperatures. Biol Control 64:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zarghami S, Mossadegh MS, Kocheili F, Allahyari H, Rasekh A (2016) Functional responses of Nephus arcuatus Kapur (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), the most important predator of spherical mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead). Psyche, 2016, article ID 9417496, 9 pagesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept of Plant Protection, Faculty of AgricultureShahid Chamran Univ of AhvazAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations