Advertisement

Neotropical Entomology

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 490–498 | Cite as

Got Dung? Resource Selection by Dung Beetles in Neotropical Forest Fragments and Cattle Pastures

  • A Bourg
  • F EscobarEmail author
  • I MacGregor-Fors
  • C E Moreno
Ecology, Behavior and Bionomics

Abstract

Both the impact of habitat modification on the food preferences of species and its impact on ecosystem functioning are poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed food selection by dung beetles in 80 tropical forest fragments and their adjacent cattle pastures in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Ten pitfall traps were placed at each site, half baited with human dung and the other half with fish carrion. We assessed dung beetle food selection and classified any specialization in resource use quantitatively using a multinomial classification model. We collected 15,445 beetles belonging to 42 species, 8747 beetles (38 species) in forest fragments and 6698 beetles (29 species) in cattle pastures. Twenty-five species were present in both habitats. Of all the beetles captured, 76% were caught in dung traps (11,727 individuals) and 24% in carrion traps (3718 individuals). We found 21 species of dung specialists, 7 carrion specialists, 8 generalists, and 6 species too rare to classify. The bait most frequently selected by beetles in this study was dung in both forests and pastures. Specialists tended to remain specialists in both habitats, while generalists tended to change their selection of bait type depending on the habitat. In summary, our results show that replacing forests with cattle pastures modifies the patterns of resource selection by dung beetles and this could affect ecosystem functioning.

Keywords

Los Tuxtlas, Mexico, multinomial classification model, pasture, resource use, Scarabaeinae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Fernando Escobar Hernández for confirming our dung beetle identifications, Susan G. Letcher for the assistance with the CLAM analysis, Juan José Von Thaden for the help with the maps, Andrés J. Quesada and Bianca Delfosse for the style correction of the manuscript, and two anonymous reviewers for the comments that greatly improved the manuscript. This research was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México (CONACYT scholarship 477922 and CONACYT project 37514-V).

References

  1. Amézquita S, Favila ME (2010) Removal rates of native and exotic dung by dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in a fragmented tropical rain forest. Environ Entomol 39:328–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andressen E (2002) Dung beetles in a central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecol Entomol 27:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbero E, Guerrero Y (1992) Some considerations on the dispersal power of Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius 1787) in the new world (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). Trop Zool 5:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barragán F, Moreno CE, Escobar F, Bueno-Villegas J, Halffter G (2014) The impact of grazing on dung beetle diversity depends on both biogeographical and ecological context. J Biogeogr 41:1991–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bikhofer K, Smith HG, Weisser WW, Wolters V, Gossner MM (2015) Land-use effects on the functional distinctness of arthropod communities. Ecography 38:001–012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogoni JA, Hernandez MIM (2014) Attractiveness of native mammal’s feces of different trophic guilds to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). J Insect Sci 14:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castillo-Campos G, Laborde J (2004) La vegetación. In: Guevara S, Laborde J, Sánches-Ríos G (eds) Los Tuxtlas. El paisaje de la sierra. Instituto de Ecología, A. C., and European Union, Xalapa, pp 231–265Google Scholar
  8. Chao A, Lin SY (2011) Program CLAM (Classification Method) program and user’s guide. Available from: http://www.purl.oclc.org/clam. Accessed 20 Apr 2015
  9. Chazdon RL, Chao A, Colwell RK, Lin SK, Norden N, Letcher SG, Clark DB, Finegan B, Arroyo JP (2011) A novel statistical method for classifying habitat generalists and specialists. Ecology 92:1332–1343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester, p 942Google Scholar
  11. Delgado L, Kohlmann B (2007) Revisión de las especies del genero Uroxys Westwood de México y Guatemala. Folia Entomol Mex 46:1–35Google Scholar
  12. Dirzo R, García MC (1992) Rates of deforestation in Los Tuxtlas, a Neotropical area in Southeast Mexico. Conserv Biol 6:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doube BM (1991) Dung beetles of southern Africa. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 133–155Google Scholar
  14. Edmonds WD (1994) Revision of Phanaeus Macleay, a new world genus of Scarabaeinae dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). Contrib Sci 443:1–105Google Scholar
  15. Edmonds WD (2000) Revision of the Neotropical dung beetle genus Sulcophanaeus (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae: Scarabaeinae). Folia Heyrovskyana Suppl 6:1–60Google Scholar
  16. Edmonds WD, Zidek J (2004) Revision of the Neotropical dung beetle genus Sulcophaphaeus (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae: Scarabaeinae). Folia Heyrovskyana Suppl 11:1–58Google Scholar
  17. Edmonds WD, Zidek J (2010) A taxonomic review of the Neotropical genus Coprophanaeus Olsoufieff, 1924 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). Insecta Mundi 0129:1–111Google Scholar
  18. Edmonds WD, Zidek J (2012) Taxonomy of Phanaeus revisited: revised keys to and comments on species of the new world dung beetle genus Phanaeus MacLeay, 1819 Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Phanaeini). Insecta Mundi 0274:1–108Google Scholar
  19. Escobar F (2003) Feeding habits and distributional records of 11 species of Neotropical Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Coleopt Bull 57:131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Escobar F, Halffter G, Solís A, Halffter V, Navarrete D (2008) Temporal shifts in dung beetle community structure within a protected area of tropical wet forest: a 35-year study and its implications for long-term conservation. J Appl Ecol 45:1584–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (2002) Dung beetles in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 11:1903–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Estrada A, Halffter G, Coates-Estrada R, Meritt DA Jr (1993) Dung beetles attracted to mammalian herbivore (Alouatta palliata) and omnivore (Nasua narica) dung in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. J Trop Ecol 9:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fauth JE, Bernardo J, Camara M, Resetarits WJ Jr, Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1996) Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: a conceptual approach. Am Nat 147:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Favila ME (2014) Historical, biogeographical and ecological factors explain the success of some native dung beetles after the introduction of cattle in Mexico. Pastos 42:161–181Google Scholar
  26. Favila ME, Ortiz-Domínguez M, Chamorro-Florescano I, Cortez-Gallardo V (2012) Comunicación química y comportamiento reproductor de los escarabajos rodadores de estiércol (Scarabaeinae: Scarabaeini): aspectos ecológicos y evolutivos, y sus posibles aplicaciones. In: Rojas JC, Malo EA (eds) Temas selectos en ecología química de insectos. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Chiapas, pp 141–164Google Scholar
  27. Flint Hughes R, Kauffman JB, Jaramillo VJ (2000) Ecosystem-scale impacts of deforestation and land use in a humid tropical region of Mexico. Ecol Appl 10:515–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Génier F (1996) A revision of the Neotropical genus Ontherus. Mem Entomol Soc Can 170:3–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Génier F (2009) Le genre Eurysternus Dalman, 1824 révision taxonomique et clés de détermination illustrées. Pensoft Series Faunistica 85:1–430Google Scholar
  30. Gill BD (1991) Dung beetles in tropical American forests. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 211–229Google Scholar
  31. Giller PS, Doube BM (1994) Spatial and temporal co-occurrence of competitors in southern African dung beetle communities. J Anim Ecol 63:629–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. González-Alvarado A, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2014) Taxonomic review of the subgenus Hybomidium Shipp 1897 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Deltochilum). Ann Soc Entomol France (NS) 50:431–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Halffter G, Matthews EG (1966) The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol Mex 12–14:3–312Google Scholar
  34. Hanski I, Cambefort Y (1991) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 481Google Scholar
  35. Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, La Seta H, Ymstad AJS, Andermeer JV, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Howden HF, Nealis VG (1975) Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). Biotropica 7:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohlmann B (1984) Biosistemática de las especies norteamericanas del género Ateuchus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Folia Entomol Mex 60:3–81Google Scholar
  38. Kohlmann B, Solís A (1997) El género Dichotomius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en Costa Rica. G Ital Entomol 8:343–382Google Scholar
  39. Kohlmann B, Solís A (2001) El género Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en Costa Rica. G Ital Entomol 49:159–261Google Scholar
  40. Kohlmann B, Solís A (2004) El género Canthidium (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en Costa Rica. G Ital Entomol 52:1–73Google Scholar
  41. Kohlmann B, Solís A (2006) El género Canthidium (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en Norteamerica. G Ital Entomol 53:235–295Google Scholar
  42. Larsen TH, Forsyth A (2005) Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies. Biotropica 37:322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larsen TH, Lopera A, Forsyth A (2006) Extreme trophic and habitat specialization by Peruvian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Coleopt Bull 60:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lobo J, Montes de Oca E (1994) Local distribution and coexistence of Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) and Onthophagus batesi Howden and Cartwright 1963 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Elytron 8:117–127Google Scholar
  45. Melo FPL, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Fahrig L, Martínez-Ramos M, Tabarelli M (2013) On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 28:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morón MA (1979) Fauna de coleópteros lamelicornios de la estación de biología tropical “Los Tuxtlas”, Veracruz, UNAM. México. An Esc Nac Cienc Biol Mex. Ser Zool 1:375–454Google Scholar
  47. Morón MA (2003) Atlas de los escarabajos de México Coleoptera: Lamellicornia Vol. 11 Familias Scarabaeidae, Trogidae, Passalidae y Lucanidae. Argania editio, Barcelona, p 227Google Scholar
  48. Morón MA, Villalobos FJ, Deloya C (1985) Fauna de coleópteros lamelicornios de Boca del Chajul, Chiapas, México. Folia Entomol Mex 66:57–118Google Scholar
  49. Nichols ES, Gardner TA (2011) Dung beetles as a candidate study taxon in applied biodiversity conservation research. In: Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (eds) Ecology and evolution of dung beetles. Blackwell Publishing, Sussex, pp 267–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nichols E, Gómez A (2014) Dung beetles and fecal helminth transmission: patterns, mechanisms and questions. Parasitology 141:614–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada, Larsen JT, Amézquita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Conser 141:1461–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pfrommer A, Krell FT (2004) Who steals the eggs? Coprophanaeus telamon (Erichson) buries decomposing eggs in western Amazonian rain forest (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Coleopt Bull 58:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Philips TK (2011) The evolutionary history of diversification of dung beetles. In: Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (eds) Ecology and evolution of dung beetles. Blackwell Publishing, Sussex, pp 21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Price DL, May ML (2009) Behavioral ecology of Phanaeus dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): review and new observations. Acta Zool Mex 25:211–238Google Scholar
  55. Rivera-Cervantes LE, Halffter G (1999) Monografía de las especies mexicanas de Canthon del subgenero Glaphyrocanthon. Acta Zool Mex 77:23–150Google Scholar
  56. Rosenfeld JS (2002) Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rzedowski J (1963) El extremo boreal del bosque tropical siempre verde en Norteamérica continental. Vegetatio 11:173–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scholtz CDA, Kryger U (2009) Evolutionary biology and conservation of dung beetles. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, p 587Google Scholar
  59. Silva FAB, Costa CMQ, Moura RC, Faria AI (2010) Study of the dung beetle coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) community at two sites: Atlantic forest and clear-cut, Pernambuco, Brazil. Environ Entomol 39:359–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (2011) Reproductive competition and its impact on the evolution and ecology of dung beetles. In: Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (eds) Ecology and evolution of dung beetles. Blackwell Publishing, Sussex, pp 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Solís A, Kohlmann B (2002) El género Canthon (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en Costa Rica. G Ital Entomol 50:1–68Google Scholar
  62. Soto A (2004) El clima. In: Guevara S, Laborde J, Sánches-Ríos G (eds) Los Tuxtlas. El paisaje de la sierra. Instituto de Ecología, A. C., and European Union, Xalapa, pp 195–198Google Scholar
  63. Whipple SD, Hoback WW (2012) A comparison of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) attraction to native and exotic mammal dung. Environ Entomol 41:238–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolters V (2001) Biodiversity of soil animals and its function. Eur J Soil Biol 37:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yamanaka H, Shiomi K, Kikuchi T (1989) Cadaverine as a potential index for decomposition of salmonoid fishes. Food Hyg Saf Sci 30:170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zunino M, Halffter G (1997) Sobre Onthophagus Latreille, 1802 americanos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Elytron 11:157–178Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A Bourg
    • 1
  • F Escobar
    • 1
    Email author
  • I MacGregor-Fors
    • 1
  • C E Moreno
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de Ecología A. C.XalapaMexico
  2. 2.Centro de Investigaciones BiológicasUniversity Autónoma del Estado de HidalgoPachucaMexico

Personalised recommendations