Absence of Transovarial Transmission of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ in the Vector Amplicephalus curtulus Linnavuori & DeLong (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): Is It a Rule More Than an Exception?
- 150 Downloads
‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ (Elm yellows, 16SrV-A), transmitted by Amplicephalus curtulus Linnavuori & DeLong (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), has been found in native Chilean plants, and transovarial transmission has been considered as a possible form of transmission. An analysis to detect the presence of ‘Ca. Phytoplasma ulmi’ and other phytoplasmas in A. curtulus eggs, nymphs of the first and fifth instars were carried out in two experiments using nested PCR and DNA sequencing. The first experiment showed the natural acquisition of phytoplasma by adult females, and the second demonstrated the acquisition of phytoplasma in controlled conditions. Results showed that eggs and the first and fifth instars were not positive for phytoplasmas in nested PCR. ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ was detected and identified on average 10 and 47% of the adult females used in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Other phytoplasma (X-disease group) was also found in adult females used in the experiment 1. We demonstrate that although gravid females contain phytoplasmas, they are not able to transmit them to their progeny, confirming that transovarial transmission of ‘Ca. Phytoplasma ulmi’ does not occur in A. curtulus.
KeywordsElm yellows leafhopper phytoplasma transovarial transmission X-disease
This work was supported by Grant for Doctoral thesis AT-24100081 and Chilean program of scholarship for graduate students D-21080534 by the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research, CONICYT, Chile.
- Arismendi N, González F, Zamorano A, Andrade N, Pino AM, Fiore N (2011a) Molecular identification of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma fraxini’ in murta and peony in Chile. Bull Insectol 64:S95–S96Google Scholar
- Arismendi N, Andrade N, Riegel R, Zamorano A, Fiore N (2011) Molecular identification of 16SrIII-J and 16SrV-A phytoplasmas in Ugni molinae and Amplicephalus curtulus. Proceedings of 20th “Congreso Chileno de Fitopatología”, Santiago (Chile), 29 November - 01 December 2011 pp. 11–12Google Scholar
- Bai X, Zhang J, Ewingh A, Miller SA, Radek AJ, Schevchenko D, Tsukerman K, Walunas T, Lapidus A, Campbell JW, Hogenhout SA (2006) Living with genome instability: the adaptation of phytoplasmas to diverse environments of their insect and plant hosts. J Bacteriol 188:3682–3696PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis RE, Jomantiene R, Dally EL, Wolf TK (1998) Phytoplasmas associated with grapevine yellows in Virginia belong to group 16SrI, subgroup A (tomato big bud phytoplasma subgroup) and group 16SrIII, new subgroup I. Vitis 37:131–137Google Scholar
- Fiore N, Prodan S, Paltrinieri S, Gajardo A, Botti S, Pino AM, Montealegre J, Bertaccini A (2007) Molecular characterization of phytoplasmas in Chilean grapevines. Bull Insectol 60:331–332Google Scholar
- Galdeano E, Torres LE, Meneguzzi N, Guzman F, Gomez GG, Docampo DM, Conci LR (2004) Molecular characterization of 16S ribosomal DNA and phylogenetic analysis of two X-disease group phytoplasmas affecting China-tree (Melia azedarach L.) and garlic (Allium sativum L.) in Argentina. J Phytopathol 152:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- González F, Zamorano A, Pino AM, Paltrinieri S, Bertaccini A, Fiore N (2011) Identification of phytoplasma belonging to X-disease group in cherry in Chile. Bull Insectol 64:S235–S236Google Scholar
- Gundersen DE, Lee I-M (1996) Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol Mediterr 35:144–151Google Scholar
- Hepp R, Vargas M (2002) Detección por PCR del agente causal de la marchitez amarilla de la remolacha en cicadélidos (Homóptera: Cicadellidae) asociados al cultivo de la remolacha. Fitopatología 37:67–108Google Scholar
- Kakizawa S, Oshima K, Namba S (2010) Functional genomics of phytoplasmas. In: Weintraub PG, Jones P (eds) Phytoplasmas, genomes, plant hosts and vectors. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 37–50, 331 pGoogle Scholar
- Navrátil M, Pribylová J, Válová P, Fialová R, Šafárová D, Špak J, Ubelková DK, Etrzik KP, Arešová RK, Špaková V (2007) Detection and identification of phytoplasmas in Ribes rubrum. Bull Insectol 60:123–124Google Scholar
- Weintraub PG (2007) Insect vectors of phytoplasmas and their control—an update. Bull Insectol 60:169–173Google Scholar
- Zhao Y, Wei W, Lee I-M, Shao J, Suo X, Davis RE (2009) Construction of an interactive online phytoplasma classification tool, iPhyClassifier, and its application in analysis of the peach X-disease phytoplasma group (16SrIII). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2582–2593PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar