Advertisement

Titanium electrode modified by nano-PMDAH as a highly efficient polymer for removal of Reactive Red 13 using solar cells for energy-harvesting applications

  • Azam Pirkarami
  • Leila FereidooniEmail author
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Reactive and Azo dyes are among the major pollutants of surface water. As these dyes can be toxic, carcinogenic, and mutagenic, their contamination can bring about detrimental effects on public health. This study is an attempt to decolorization of a dye solution Reactive Red 13 (RR13), using a titanium electrode modified by a nano-polymer of methacryloxyethyl dimethylbenzyl ammoniumchloride homopolymer (PMDAH). The energy for conducting the experiment was supplied by solar cells. The optimum value of adsorbent (PMDAH) dose was shown to be 30 mg L− 1. Maximum dye removal occurred at pH 7, dye concentration 100 mg L− 1, and 25 °C. Stirring the solution during the treatment significantly improved the removal of dye. Langmuir equation was used to quantify the amount of RR13 adsorbed on PMDAH surface. Furthermore, UV irradiation had a positive effect on dye removal. FT-IR spectrometry results for PMDAH and PMDAH + RR13 verified the treatment efficiency. Finally, the adsorbent was surveyed by SEM, TGA, and H-NMR characterization. GS–MS analysis and cost analysis were used to identify the compounds of post-treatment products.

Keywords

Reactive Red 13 Adsorption Nano-poly-methacryloxyethyl dimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride homopolymer (PMDAH) Modified electrode Solar cell 

References

  1. 1.
    W. Wang et al., Photocatalytic color switching of transition metal hexacyanometalate nanoparticles for high-performance light-printable rewritable paper. Nano Lett. 17(2), 755–761 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Pirkarami, M.E. Olya, F. Najafi, Removal of azo dye from aqueous solution using an anionic polymeric urethane absorbent (APUA). J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21, 387–393 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.H. Chu et al., Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production from aqueous sulfide/sulfite solution by ZnO0.6S0.4 with simultaneous dye degradation under visible-light irradiation. Chemosphere, 183(Supplement C), 219–228 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.E. Olya et al., Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of acid dye using Ni–TiO2 with the energy supplied by solar cell: mechanism and economical studies. J. Environ. Manag. 121, 210–219 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Bansal, G.R. Chaudhary, S. Mehta, Comparative study of catalytic activity of ZrO2 nanoparticles for sonocatalytic and photocatalytic degradation of cationic and anionic dyes. Chem. Eng. J. 280, 475–485 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Fereidooni et al., Removal of methyl tert-butyl ether from contaminated water using ZnO and CuO nanocatalyst and investigation of effect of nanoparticle structure in removal efficiency. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 16(1), 301 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.C. Yatmaz, N. Dizge, M.S. Kurt, Combination of photocatalytic and membrane distillation hybrid processes for reactive dyes treatment. Environ. Technol. 38(21), 2743–2751 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Jiang et al., Degradation of azo dye using non-thermal plasma advanced oxidation process in a circulatory airtight reactor system. Chem. Eng. J. 204, 32–39 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Pirkarami, L. Fereidooni, K. Tahvildari, Contributing factors on the removal of Azo-dyes from industrial wastewater: a comparison of the efficiency of sonocataysis and photocatalysis process. J. Appl.Chem. Res. 10(4), 15–23 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.M. Haque, W.T. Smith, D.K. Wong, Conducting polypyrrole films as a potential tool for electrochemical treatment of azo dyes in textile wastewaters. J. Hazard. Mater. 283, 164–170 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Kalpana, V. Selvaraj, Development of ZnS/SnS/A-FA nanorods at ambient temperature: binary catalyst for the removal of congo red dye and pathogenic bacteria from wastewater. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 41, 105–113 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Mondal, B. Adhikary, D. Mukherjee, Room-temperature synthesis of air stable cobalt nanoparticles and their use as catalyst for methyl orange dye degradation. Colloids Surf. A 482, 248–257 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Xu et al., Fenton reagent oxidation and decolorizing reaction kinetics of Reactive Red SBE. Energy Proc. 16, 58–64 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Szeto et al., VUV/TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation process of methyl orange and simultaneous utilization of the lamp-generated ozone. Chem. Eng. Sci. 177, 380–390 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Shan et al., Investigation on decolorization of biologically pretreated cellulosic ethanol wastewater by electrochemical method. Chem. Eng. J. 323, 455–464 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Shakeri, M. Shoda, Efficient decolorization of an anthraquinone dye by recombinant dye-decolorizing peroxidase (rDyP) immobilized in silica-based mesocellular foam. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 62(3), 277–281 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N.M. Mahmoodi, F. Najafi, Preparation of surface modified zinc oxide nanoparticle with high capacity dye removal ability. Mater. Res. Bull. 47(7), 1800–1809 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Fereidooni et al., Decreasing the Pollution Load of Acid Black 29 in Textile Wastewater by Electrocoagulation with the Use of Aluminium and Steel ElectrodesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Katal, H. Pahlavanzadeh, Influence of different combinations of aluminum and iron electrode on electrocoagulation efficiency: application to the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Desalination 265(1), 199–205 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Das, R.K. Dutta, A novel method of synthesis of small band gap SnS nanorods and its efficient photocatalytic dye degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 457, 339–344 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.S. Budhwar et al., Modified iron oxide nanoparticles as burn rate enhancer in composite solid propellants. Vacuum 156, 483–491 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Pirkarami, M.E. Olya, N.Y. Limaee, Decolorization of azo dyes by photo electro adsorption process using polyaniline coated electrode. Prog. Org. Coat. 76(4), 682–688 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Hassani et al., Optimization of comparative removal of two structurally different basic dyes using coal as a low-cost and available adsorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 45(4), 1597–1607 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Senthilkumaar, P. Kalaamani, C. Subburaam, Liquid phase adsorption of crystal violet onto activated carbons derived from male flowers of coconut tree. J. Hazard. Mater. 136(3), 800–808 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.N. Mahamad, M.A.A. Zaini, Z.A. Zakaria, Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from pineapple waste biomass for dye removal. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 102, 274–280 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y.-S. Ho, W.-T. Chiu, C.-C. Wang, Regression analysis for the sorption isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust. Bioresour. Technol. 96(11), 1285–1291 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. Gupta, Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal–a review. J. Environ. Manag. 90(8), 2313–2342 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Pahlavan et al., ZnO/CNTs nanocomposite/ionic liquid carbon paste electrode for determination of noradrenaline in human samples. Electrochim. Acta 123, 456–462 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    V.K. Gupta, A.K. Jain, S.K. Shoora, Multiwall carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrode as voltammetric sensor for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and caffeine. Electrochim. Acta 93, 248–253 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Ghaedi et al., Modeling of competitive ultrasonic assisted removal of the dyes–methylene blue and safranin-O using Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 268, 28–37 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. Nekouei et al., Kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm studies for acid blue 129 removal from liquids using copper oxide nanoparticle-modified activated carbon as a novel adsorbent. J. Mol. Liq. 201, 124–133 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    V. Gupta, A. Nayak, Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 180, 81–90 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    V.K. Gupta et al., Potential of activated carbon from waste rubber tire for the adsorption of phenolics: effect of pre-treatment conditions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 417, 420–430 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    G. Crini et al., The removal of Basic Blue 3 from aqueous solutions by chitosan-based adsorbent: Batch studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 153(1), 96–106 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Arami et al., Removal of dyes from colored textile wastewater by orange peel adsorbent: equilibrium and kinetic studies. J. Colloid interface Sci. 288(2), 371–376 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    N. Chouhan, R.-S. Liu, Electrochemical Technologies for Energy Storage and Conversion, in Electrochemical Technologies for Energy Storage and Conversion (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, New York, 2011), pp. 1–43Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.K.K. Kyaw, M.F. Yang, X.W. Sun, Solar Cell as an Energy Harvesting Device, in Electrochemical Technologies for Energy Storage and Conversion (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, New York, 2011), pp. 463–539Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    C. Namasivayam, S. Sumithra, Removal of direct red 12B and methylene blue from water by adsorption onto Fe (III)/Cr (III) hydroxide, an industrial solid waste. J. Environ. Manag. 74(3), 207–215 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Arami et al., Equilibrium and kinetics studies for the adsorption of direct and acid dyes from aqueous solution by soy meal hull. J. Hazard. Mater. 135(1), 171–179 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y. Liu et al., Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by highly effective TiO2 nanopore arrays electrode. J. Hazard. Mater. 171(1), 678–683 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.E. Olya, A. Pirkarami, M. Mirzaie, Adsorption of an azo dye in an aqueous solution using hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB). Chemosphere 91(7), 935–940 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.I. El-Khaiary, Kinetics and mechanism of adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by nitric-acid treated water-hyacinth. J. Hazard. Mater. 147(1), 28–36 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. Crini, P.-M. Badot, Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: a review of recent literature. Progress Polym. Sci. 33(4), 399–447 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    G. Crini, Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Progress Polym. Sci. 30(1), 38–70 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    B. Noroozi et al., Equilibrium and kinetic adsorption study of a cationic dye by a natural adsorbent—Silkworm pupa. J. Hazard. Mater. 139(1), 167–174 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    H. Shangguan et al., Start-up of a spiral periphyton bioreactor (SPR) for removal of COD and the characteristics of the associated microbial community. Bioresour. Technol. 193, 456–462 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. Zeng, A. Soric, N. Roche, Calibration of hydrodynamic behavior and biokinetics for TOC removal modeling in biofilm reactors under different hydraulic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 144, 202–209 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S.V. Mohan, J. Karthikeyan, Removal of lignin and tannin colour from aqueous solution by adsorption onto activated charcoal. Environ. Pollut. 97(1), 183–187 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    I. Langmuir, The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40(9), 1361–1403 (1918)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    K. Parida, A.C. Pradhan, Removal of phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto manganese nodule leached residue. J. Hazardous Mater. 173(1), 758–764 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    X.-F. Gao et al., CdTe quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 113(18), 7531–7535 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Q. Kang et al., A ternary hybrid CdS/Pt–TiO2 nanotube structure for photoelectrocatalytic bactericidal effects on Escherichia Coli. Biomaterials 31(12), 3317–3326 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    L. D’Souza, D.S.M. Prabha Devi, C.G. Naik, Use of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to study cadmium-induced changes in Padina tetrastromatica (Hauck). Anal. Chem. Insights 3, 135 (2008)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    P. Dumas, L. Miller, The use of synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy in biological and biomedical investigations. Vib. Spectrosc. 32(1), 3–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    M. López-Sánchez, M.a.J. Ayora-Cañada, A. Molina-Díaz, Olive fruit growth and ripening as seen by vibrational spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58(1), 82–87 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    F.S. Parker, Applications of Infrared, Raman, and Resonance Raman Spectroscopy in Biochemistry (Springer, New York, 1983)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    W.F. Wolkers et al., A Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy study of sugar glasses. Carbohydr. Res. 339(6), 1077–1085 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    N. Yee et al., Characterization of metal —cyanobacteria sorption reactions: a combined macroscopic and infrared spectroscopic investigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(3), 775–782 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    S.Y. Song, Y.K. Lee, I.-J. Kim, Sugar and acid content of Citrus prediction modeling using FT-IR fingerprinting in combination with multivariate statistical analysis. Food Chem 190, 1027–1032 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    P. Manara et al., Mediterranean agri-food processing wastes pyrolysis after pre-treatment and recovery of precursor materials: a TGA-based kinetic modeling study. Food Res. Int. 73, 44–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    M.C.I.M. Amin et al., Synthesis and characterization of thermo-and pH-responsive bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery. Carbohyd. Polym. 88(2), 465–473 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Y. Qiu, L. Gao, Metal-urea complex—a precursor to metal nitrides. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 87(3), 352–357 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    J. Kuang et al., Influence of processing parameters on synthesis of nano-sized AlN powders. J. Cryst. Growth 263(1), 12–20 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    M.E. Olya, A. Pirkarami, Cost-effective photoelectrocatalytic treatment of dyes in a batch reactor equipped with solar cells. Sep. Purif. Technol. 118, 557–566 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    G. Gibbs, J.M. Tobin, E. Guibal, Sorption of Acid Green 25 on chitosan: influence of experimental parameters on uptake kinetics and sorption isotherms. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 90(4), 1073–1080 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    M.-S. Chiou, W.-S. Kuo, H.-Y. Li, Removal of reactive dye from wastewater by adsorption using ECH cross-linked chitosan beads as medium. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 38(11), 2621–2631 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    B.V. Crist, XPS in industry—Problems with binding energies in journals and binding energy databases. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2018.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    F. Yu et al., Three-dimensional nanoporous iron nitride film as an efficient electrocatalyst for water oxidation. ACS Catal. 7(3), 2052–2057 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    L. Fereidooni, K. Tahvildari, M. Mehrpooya, Trans-esterification of waste cooking oil with methanol by electrolysis process using KOH. Renew. Energy, 116(Part A), 183–193 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    L. Fereidooni, A. Pirkarami, Improvement of methyl ester production through modified Rice Bran as a heterogeneous catalyst. Phys. Chem. Res. 6(4), 805–814 (2018)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    L. Fereidooni, M. Mehrpooya, Experimental assessment of electrolysis method in production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using zeolite/chitosan catalyst with a focus on waste biorefinery. Energy Convers. Manag. 147, 145–154 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    L. Fereidooni, R. Khalilnezhad, A. Pirkarami, Evaluation of methyl ester production using cement as a heterogeneous catalyst. Phys. Chem. Res. 6(2), 323–333 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iranian Chemical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nanomaterials and NanocoatingsInstitute for Color Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of ChemistryIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations