Advertisement

Controlling gelation time of in situ polymerization of gel system through AGET ATRP principle

  • Ming-lu Shao
  • Xiang-an YueEmail author
  • Jie He
Review
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

To better control the gelation time of in situ polymerization of gel system in reservoir, an activator regenerated by AGET (activator generated by electron transfer) ATRP (atom transfer radical polymerization) initiating system was developed. The AGET ATRP initiating system was composed of an initiator 1,2-dibromoethane, a catalyst ferric chloride and a reducing agent vitamin C, and the effects of these three component proportions on the gelation time and gel viscosity were systematically investigated. Results of bottle tests indicated that the gelation time can even be more than 20 h at 60 °C at optimal concentration ratios. Moreover, the viscosity decreased and the gelation time increased with the increase of salinity and temperature. The gelation time of the core test was 1.5 times or even longer in comparison with that of the bottle test owing to the influences of dilution, adsorption, and rock skeleton isolation. It was also confirmed that the AGET ATRP initiating system can initiate the cross-link gelation of monomers in the core. The enhanced oil recovery result indicated that the oil recovery increased by 9.17% after the gelation of the gelling solutions, and final oil recovery was 40.05%. This research provided a brand-new method to control the gelation time of the in situ polymerization of gel system.

Keywords

Low permeability reservoir Deep profile control In situ polymerization Gelation time AGET ATRP initiating system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Projects (Grant No. 2017ZX05009-004 and Grant No. 2016ZX05050012) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51334007).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary material

13726_2020_791_MOESM1_ESM.docx (644 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 644 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Solbakken JS, Skauge A, Aarra MG (2014) Foam performance in low permeability laminated sandstones. Energy Fuels 28:803–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yao CJ, Lei GL, Li L, Gao XM (2012) Selectivity of pore-scale elastic microspheres as a novel profile control and oil displacement agent. Energy Fuels 26:5092–5101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bai YR, Xiong CM, Wei FL, Li JJ, Shu Y, Liu DX (2015) Effects of fracture and matrix on propagation behavior and water shutoff performance of a polymer gel. Energy Fuels 29:5534–5543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnaji MJ, Pourafshary P, Rasaie MR (2016) Visual investigation of the effects of clay minerals on enhancement of oil recovery by low salinity water flooding. Fuel 184:826–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-hoshoudy AN, Desouky SEM, Al-Sabagh AM, Betiha MA, El-kady MY, Mahmoud S (2017) Evaluation of solution and rheological properties for hydrophobically associated polyacrylamide copolymer as a promised enhanced oil recovery candidate. Egypt J Pet 26:779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bai BJ, Zhou J, Yin MF (2015) A comprehensive review of polyacrylamide polymer gels for conformance control. Pet Explor Dev 42:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu DY, Bai BJ, Hou JR (2017) Polymer gel systems for water management in high-temperature petroleum reservoirs: a chemical review. Energy Fuels 31:13063–13087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yadav US, Mahto V (2014) In situ gelation study of organically crosslinked polymer gel system for profile modification jobs. Arab J Sci Eng 39:5229–5235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jia H, Pu WF, Zhao JZ, Liao R (2011) Experimental investigation of the novel phenol-formaldehyde cross-linking HPAM gel system: based on the secondary cross-linking method of organic cross-linkers and its gelation performance study after flowing through porous media. Energy Fuels 25:727–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang XF, Li YX, Cai ZJ (1996) Water control in production wells by constructing isolating plate of crosslinked polyacrylamide aqueous gels between oil and bottom water layers. Oilfield Chem 13:219–223 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woods P, Schramko K, Turner D, Dalrymple D, Vinson E (1986) In situ polymerization controls CO2/water channeling at Lick Creek. In: SPE 14958-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp 437–447. https://doi.org/10.2118/14958-MS
  12. 12.
    Vossoughi S (2000) Profile modification using in situ gelation technology—a review. J Pet Sci Eng 26:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li Y (1988) Research of TP-910 profile control technology. Oil Drilling Prod Technol 21:179–192 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang L, Pu CS, Zheng L, Gu XY (2016) Synthesis and performance evaluation of a new kind of gel used as water shutoff agent. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 6:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pu WF, Hu SB, Chen G, Wang ZF (1997) Evaluation of water shut off system XN-PP. Drill Fluid Complet Fluid 14:3–7 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang H (2002) A new technology combining single and double-fluid processes for performing water plugging/profile modifying operations. Oilfield Chem 19:33–35Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wei FL, Liu YZ, Yue XA, Hou JR, Tang XF, Li YK, Xiong CM, Liu GH (2008) Thermal stability and transport property of multiple emulsions used as delayed crosslinker. Acta Pet Sin 29:423–426Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao J, Dai CL, Wang LS, Jin YX, Li D, Zhao FL (2009) Research of polymer/chromium acetate in multiple emulsion aqueous fluid for in depth control. Oilfield Chem 26:304–307Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ren FQ, Jia H, Yu D, Pu WF, Wang LL, Li B, Yang JJ, Ni JH, Chen L (2014) New insights into phenol-formaldehyde-based gel systems with ammonium salt for low-temperature reservoirs. J Appl Polym Sci 131:590–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jia H, Pu WF, Sun L (2012) An in situ polymerized plugging hydrogel used for delaying gel-forming in high temperature oil reservoirs. China Patent No. 102382244Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Odell PG, Veregin RPN, Michael LM, Georges MK (1997) Characteristics of the stable free radical polymerization of styrene in the presence of 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate. Macromolecules 30:2232–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang LZ, Long YF, Bai BJ (2018) Low temperature applicable polyelectrolyte gelator to covalently bridged partially hydrolyzed poly(acrylamide) in situ gel for fossil energy recovery. Chem Eng J 334:2558–2567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang LZ, Liu JP, Long YF (2018) Delayed gelation kinetics of hydrogel formation by ionic nano-gel cross-linkers. J Mater Sci 53:14789–14800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matyjaszewski K (2012) Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): current status and future perspectives. Macromolecules 45:4015–4039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oh JK, Min K, Matyjaszewski K (2006) Preparation of poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether methacrylate) by homogeneous aqueous AGET ATRP. Macromolecules 39:3161–3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu YM, Wan GM, Xu J, Chen SJ, Fang P (2013) Reverse atom transfer radical emulsion polymerization of styrene and butyl acrylate catalyzed by Iron complexes. Adv Polym Technol 32:5153–5162.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chan N, Cunningham MF, Hutchinson RA (2008) ARGET ATRP of methacrylates and acrylates with stoichiometric ratios of ligand to copper. Macromol Chem Phys 209:1797–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Siegwart DJ, Leiendecker M, Langer R, Anderson DG (2012) Automated ARGET ATRP accelerates catalyst optimization for the synthesis of thiol-functionalized polymers. Macromolecules 45:1254–1261PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang YJ, Tian C, Jiang HJ, Zhang LF, Zhu XL (2018) Surface modification of carbon nanotubes by using iron-mediated activators generated by electron transfer for atom transfer radical polymerization. RSC Adv 8:11150–11156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shen XR, Xia DZ, Xiang YX, Gao JG (2019) γ-Valerolactone (GVL) as a bio-based green solvent and ligand for iron-mediated AGET ATRP. e-Polymers 19:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu JL, He WW, Zhang LF, Zhang ZB, Zhu J, Yuan L, Chen H, Cheng ZP, Zhu XL (2011) Bifunctional nanoparticles with fluorescence and magnetism via surface-initiated AGET ATRP mediated by an iron catalyst. Langmuir 27:12684–12692PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miao J, He WW, Zhang LF, Wang Y, Cheng ZP, Zhu XL (2012) AGET ATRP of water-soluble PEGMA: fast living radical polymerization mediated by iron catalyst. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 50:2194–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moineau G, Dubosi P, Jerome R, Senninger T, Teyssié P (1998) Alternative atom transfer radical polymerization for MMA using FeCl3 and AIBN in the presence of triphenylphosphine: an easy way to well-controlled PMMA. Macromolecules 31:545–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simakova A, Averick SE, Konkolewicz D, Matyjaszewski K (2012) Aqueous ARGET ATRP. Macromolecules 45:6371–6379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jewrajka SK, Mandal BM (2003) Living radical polymerization. 1. The case of atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylamide in aqueous-based medium. Macromolecules 36:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Min K, Jakubowski W, Matyjaszewski K (2006) AGET ATRP in the presence of air in miniemulsion and in bulk. Macromol Rapid Commun 27:594–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cordero R, Jawaid A, Hsiao M-S, Lequeux Z, Vaia RA, Ober CK (2018) Mini monomer encapsulated emulsion polymerization of PMMA using aqueous ARGET ATRP. ACS Macro Lett 7:459–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sydansk RD, Argabright PA (1987) Conformance improvement in a subterranean hydrocarbon-bearing formation using a polymer gel. US Patent 4683949AGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tao MX, Zhang LF, Jiang HJ, Zhang ZB, Zhu J, Cheng ZP, Zhu XL (2011) Iron(III)-mediated AGET ATRP of methyl methacrylate using vitamin C sodium salt as a reducing agent. Macromol Chem Phys 212:1481–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bai LJ, Zhang LF, Zhu J, Cheng ZP, Zhu XL (2009) Iron(III)-mediated AGET ATRP of styrene using tris(3,6-dioxaheptyl)amine as a ligand. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 47:2002–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tan Y, Yang QB, Sheng DK, Su XF, Xu K, Song CL, Wang PX (2008) AGET ATRP of acrylamide in aqueous media. e-Polymers 25:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly.2008.8.1.266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang Y, Bai LJ, Chen WW, Chen L, Liu Y, Xu TC, Cheng ZP (2013) Iron-mediated AGET ATRP of MMA using acidic/basic salts as reducing agents. Polym Bull 70:631–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu SM, Yan DY, Van Beylen M (2003) Organic acids used as new ligands for atom transfer radical polymerization. ACS Symp Ser Adv Control Liv Radic Polym 854:221–235.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2003-0854.ch016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhu SM, Yan DY (2000) New ligands for atom-transfer radical polymerization. Macromol Rapid Commun 21:1209–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang WB, Wang HW, Zhao XG (1996) Study on the complexation reaction of ascorbic acid with Fe(II) by thin layer chromatography/in situ absorption spectrometry. Chin J Anal Chem 24:828–831Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    He WW, Zhang LF, Miao J, Cheng ZP, Zhu XL (2012) Facile Iron-mediated AGET ATRP for water-soluble poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether methacrylate in water. Macromol Rapid Commun 33:1067–1073PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Peng CH, Kong J, Seeliger F, Matyjaszewski K (2011) Mechanism of halogen exchange in ATRP. Macromolecules 44:7546–7557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang XT, Zhao L, Liu QQ, Song J, Huang WY, Zhai GQ (2018) Correlation of reactivity ratios, transition-metal salts and ester hydrolysis to radical polymerization of electron-deficient comonomers with 2-(N,N-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate as the inimer. Eur Polym J 100:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yeow J, Chapman R, Gormley AJ, Boyer C (2018) Up in the air: oxygen tolerance in controlled/living radical polymerisation. Chem Soc Rev 47:4357–4387PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Carter BM, Sengupta A, Qian XH, Ulbricht M, Wickramasinghe M (2018) Controlling external versus internal pore modification of ultrafiltration membranes using surface-initiated AGET-ATRP. J Membr Sci 554:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Seeliger F, Matyjaszewski K (2009) Temperature effect on activation rate constants in ATRP: new mechanistic insights into the activation process. Macromolecules 42:6050–6055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ma JY, Yu PZ, Xia BR, An YX (2019) Effect of salt and temperature on molecular aggregation behavior of acrylamide polymer. e-Polymers 19:594–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Paso K, Silset A, Sørland G, de Gonçalves M, SjÖblom J (2009) Characterization of the formation, flowability, and resolution of Brazilian crude oil emulsions. Energy Fuels 23:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liu JX, Lu XG, Sui SL (2012) Synthesis, evaluation, and gelation mechanism of organic chromium. J Appl Polym Sci 124:3669–3677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jia H, Chen H, Guo SS (2017) Fluid loss control mechanism of using polymer gel pill based on multi-crosslinking during overbalanced well workover and completion. Fuel 210:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Goudarzi A, Zhang H, Varavei A, Taksaudom P, Hu YP, Delshad M, Bai BJ, Sepehrnoori K (2015) A laboratory and simulation study of preformed particle gels for water conformance control. Fuel 140:502–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bai YR, Xiong CM, Wei FL, Li JJ, Shu Y, Liu DX (2015) Gelation study on a hydrophobically associating polymer/polyethylenimine gel system for water shut-off treatment. Energy Fuels 29:447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and ProspectingChina University of Petroleum (Beijing)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering Ministry of EducationChina University of Petroleum (Beijing)BeijingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Applied Chemistry of Sichuan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations