Improvement in phase-change hybrid nanocomposites material based on polyethylene glycol/epoxy/graphene for thermal protection systems

  • Samire Sabagh
  • Ahmad Reza BahramianEmail author
  • Majid Haghir Madadi
Original Research


Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is established as an organic solid–liquid phase-change material (PCM) offering a wide range of enthalpies and phase transition temperatures as a function of its molecular weight. PCMs are known for their high-energy absorbance; however, they also have two main drawbacks of leakage and enthalpy reduction during melting. In this work, polyethylene glycol as a phase-change material and graphene oxide (GO), expanded graphene (EG), and epoxy resin (EP) as shape stabilizing materials were used and designed based on experimental design—Taguchi method to find the composition with the least molten PEG leakage and the highest enthalpy of melting. Based on improvements made on main drawbacks, two samples were introduced, while their only difference was epoxy content. The results showed that the epoxy resin and graphene oxide caused a significant reduction in molten PEG leakage by hydrogen bonding and trapping of PEG between GO plates and the barrier effect. Also, the expanded graphene by heterogeneous nucleation of molten PEG in a cooling cycle caused a dramatic increment in crystallinity and enthalpy of melting. Among the achievements of this research is the attainment of hybrid nanocomposites samples without leakage (less than 5 wt%) and samples with enthalpy of melting more than that of pure polyethylene glycol (8%).


Phase-change materials Graphene oxide Expanded graphene Shape stability Melt leakage 



The authors would also like to thank the Research Department of Tarbiat Modares University (provided Grant No. IG-39710 for the research group of Phase-Change Materials) for the financial supports during this research.


  1. 1.
    Sundararajan S, Kumar A, Chakraborty AC, Samui AB, Kulkarni PS (2018) Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-modified epoxy phase change polymer with dual properties of thermal storage and vibration damping. Sustain Energy Fuels 2:688–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dakhli D, Chaffar K, Lafhaj Z (2019) The effect of phase change materials on the physical, thermal and mechanical properties of cement. Science 1:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang J, Tang LS, Bai L, Bao RY, Liu ZY, Xie BH, Yang MB, Yang W (2019) High-performance composite phase change materials for energy conversion based on macroscopically three-dimensional structural materials. Mater Horiz 6:250–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleischer A (2015) Thermal energy storage using phase change materials fundamentals and applications. Springer, New York, pp 37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang W, Yang X, Fang Y, Ding J (2009) Preparation and performance of form-stable polyethylene glycol/silicon dioxide composites as solid–liquid phase change materials. Appl Energy 86:170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shchukina EM, Graham M, Zheng Z, Shchukin DG (2018) Nanoencapsulation of phase change materials for advanced thermal energy storage systems. Chem Soc Rev 11:4156–4175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arce ME, Feijoo MAA, Garcia AS, Luhrs CC (2018) Novel formulations of phase change materials-epoxy composites for thermal energy storage. Materials 11:195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qian T, Li J, Min X, Deng Y, Guan W, Ma H (2015) Polyethylene glycol/mesoporous calcium silicate shape-stabilized composite phase change material: preparation, characterization, and adjustable thermal property. Energy 82:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giro-Paloma J, Martínez M, Cabeza LF, Fernández AI (2016) Types, methods, techniques, and applications for microencapsulated phase change materials (MPCM): a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:1059–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qi G, Liang C, Bao R, Liu Z, Yang W, Xie B (2014) Polyethylene glycol based shape-stabilized phase change material for thermal energy storage with ultra-low content of graphene oxide. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 123:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sundararajan S, Samui AB, Kulkarni PS (2017) Versatility of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in designing solid-solid phase change materials (PCMs) for thermal management and their application to innovative technologies. J Mater Chem A 5:18379–18396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Samani F, Bahramian AR, Sharif AR (2018) Shape-stable phenolic/polyethylene glycol phase change material: kinetics study and improvements in thermal properties of nanocomposites. Iran Polym J 27:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latibari ST, Mehrali MM, Mahlia TM, Cornelis SH (2013) Synthesis, characterization and thermal properties of nanoencapsulated phase change materials via sol-gel method. Energy 61:664–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Min X, Fang M, Huang Z, Liu YG, Huang Y, Wen R (2015) Enhanced thermal properties of novel shape-stabilized PEG composite phase change materials with radial mesoporous silica sphere for thermal energy storage. Sci Rep 5:12964–12975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang J, Tang LS, Bao RY, Bai L, Liu ZY, Xie BH, Yang MB, Yang W (2018) Hybrid network structure of boron nitride and graphene oxide in shape stabilized composite phase change materials with enhanced thermal conductivity and light-to-electric energy conversion capability. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 174:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giro-Paloma J, Al-Shannaq R, Fernández AI, Farid MM (2016) Preparation and characterization of microencapsulated phase change materials for use in building applications. Materials 9:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li J, Li Y, Jia L, Cheng Z (2017) Synthesis, characterization and thermal properties of microencapsulated phase change materials via microfluidic device. In: Proceedings of the Asian conference on thermal sciences, 1st ACTS2017, March 26–30, 2017, Jeju IslandGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giro-Paloma J, Alkan C, Chimenos JM, Fernández AI (2017) Comparison of microencapsulated phase change materials prepared at laboratory containing the same core and different shell material. Appl Sci 7:723–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang N, Yuan Y, Cao X, Du Y, Zhang Z, Gui Y (2018) Latent heat thermal energy storage systems with solid-liquid phase change materials: a review. Adv Eng Mater 20:1700753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rezaei B, Askari M, Shoushtari AM, Malek RAM (2014) The effect of diameter on the thermal properties of the modeled shape-stabilized phase change nanofibers (PCNs). J Therm Anal Calorim 118:1619–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang X, Alva G, Liu L, Fang G (2017) Microstructure and thermal properties of cetyl alcohol/high density polyethylene composite phase change materials with carbon fiber as shape-stabilized thermal storage materials. Appl Energy 200:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chavan S, Gumtapure V, Perumal A (2020) Numerical and experimental analysis on thermal energy storage of polyethylene/functionalized graphene composite phase change materials. J Energy Storage 27:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang B, Wang L, Xu Y, Xiu J, Zhang S (2016) Hexadecanol/phase change polyurethane composite as form-stable phase change material for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 144:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hu Q, Chen Y, Hong JS, Zou G, Chen L (2019) A smart epoxy composite based on phase change microcapsules: preparation, microstructure, thermal and dynamic mechanical performances. Molecules 24:916–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su JF, Wang XY, Huang Z, Zhao YH (2011) Thermal conductivity of microPCMs-filled epoxy matrix composites. Colloid Polym Sci 289:1535–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tumirah K, Hussein MZ, Zulkarnain Z, Rafeadah R (2014) Nano-encapsulation organic phase change material based on copolymer nenocomposites fir thermal energy storage. Energy 66:881–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qi G, Yang J, Bao R, Liu Z, Yang W, Xie B (2015) Enhanced comprehensive performance of polyethylene glycon based phase change material with hybrid graphene nanomaterials for thermal energy storage. Carbon 88:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang J, Qi GQ, Liu Y, Bao RY, Liu ZY, Yang W, Xie BH, Yang MB (2016) Hybrid graphene aerogels/phase change material composites: thermal conductivity, shape stabilization, and light-to-thermal energy. Carbon 100:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Z, Zhang X, Jia S, Zhu Y, Chan L, Fu L (2017) Influences of dynamic impregnating on morphologies and thermal properties of polyethylene glycol-based composite as shape stabilized PCMs. J Therm Anal Calorim 128:1039–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang C, Feng L, Li W, Zheng J, Tian W, Li X (2012) Shape-stabilized phase change materials based on polyethylene glycol/porous carbon composite: the influence of the pore structure of the carbon materials. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 105:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tang B, Wang Y, Qiu M, Zhang S (2014) A full-band sunlight-driven carbon nanotube/PEG/SiO2 composites for solar energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 123:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seraji MM, Seifi A, Bahramian AR (2015) Morphology and properties of silica/novolac hybrid xerogels synthesized using sol–gel polymerization at solvent vapor-saturated atmosphere. Mater Design 69:190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deng Y, Li J, Nian H, Li Y, Yin X (2017) Design and preparation of shape-stabilized composite phase change material with high thermal reliability via encapsulating polyethylene glycol into flower-like TiO2 nanostructure for thermal energy storage. Appl Therm Eng 114:328–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xiong W, Chen Y, Hao M, Zhang L, Mei T, Wang J, Li J, Wang X (2015) Facile synthesis of PEG based shape-stabilized phase change materials and their photo-thermal energy conversion. Appl Therm Eng 91:630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fallahi A, Guldentops G, Tao M, Granados-Focil S (2017) Review on solid-solid phase change materials for thermal energy storage: molecular structure and thermal properties. Appl Therm Eng 127:1427–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yuan Y, Yuan Y, Zhang N, Du Y, Cao X (2014) Preparation and thermal characterization of capric–myristic–palmitic acid/expanded graphite composite as phase change material for energy storage. Mater Lett 125:154–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kong Y, Hay JN (2003) The enthalpy of fusion and degree of crystallinity of polymers as measured by DSC. Eur Polym J 39:1721–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hajizadeh A, Bahramian AR, Seifi A, Naseri I (2016) Effect of initial sol concentration on the microstructure and morphology of carbon aerogels. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 73:220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polymer Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemical EngineeringTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations