Advertisement

Comparative evaluation of Clusia multiflora wood flour, against mineral fillers, as reinforcement in SBR rubber composites

  • Emilio DelgadoEmail author
  • Anny Espitia
  • William Aperador
Original Research
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Clusia multiflora sawdust (CMS) was evaluated as filler in rubber composites. CMS at 40 phr was mixed with synthetic styrene butadiene rubber (SBR 1502), the blend was compatibilized with 8 phr of maleated polyethylene (MAPE). To evaluate the curing and mechanical behavior of CMS, it was compared with precipitated silica (reinforcing filler); calcium carbonate and kaolin (non-reinforcing minerals). The addition of CMS reduced the mechanical properties of rubber compound compared to silica rubber/silica composite. The tensile and tear strength values for SBR/CMS were similar to SBR/CaCO3 and SBR/kaolin. The addition of MAPE to SBR/CMS composite slightly improved the tensile strength, tear strength, abrasion resistance and hardness. In general, CMS performed as diluent filler which reduced the weight of the composite. CMS slightly affected curing speed of SBR/CMS blends. CMS is a waste generated by the use of Clusia multiflora (a timber species endemic of mountains region of Colombia) in the furniture industry. The novelty of this research consists of evaluating the CMS as an alternative to mineral fillers in rubber compounding to improve its mechanical properties, seeking to contribute to the sustainability and to reduce environmental impacts.

Keywords

Clusia multiflora MAPE SBR Rubber composites Sawdust 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdul Khalil HPS, Suraya NL (2011) Anhydride modification of cultivated kenaf bast fibers: morphological, spectroscopic, and thermal studies. BioResources 6:1122–1135Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stelescu MD, Airinei A, Manaila E, Craciun G, Fifere N, Varganici C (2017) Property correlations for composites based on ethylene propylene diene rubber reinforced with flax fibers. Polym Test 59:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferreira DP, Cruz J, Fangueiro R (2019) Surface modification of natural fibers in polymer composites. In: Koronis G, Silva A (eds) Green composites for automotive applications. Woodhead Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mishra V (2014) Physical, mechanical and abrasive wear behaviour of jute fiber reinforced polymer composites. National Institute of Technology, PhD Thesis, Rourkela IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craciun G, Manaila E, Stelescu MD, Vasilescu A (2015) Characteristics of wood sawdust/natural rubber composites processed by electron beam irradiation. Mater Plast 52:234–238Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yadav S, Kamal Y (2015) Mechanical and physical properties of wood-plastic composites made of polypropylene, wood flour and nanoclay. Int J Agric Forest Plant 1:52–58Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosário F, Pachekoski WM, Silveira AP, Dos Santos SF, Júnior HS, Casarin SA (2011) Resíduos de sisal como reforço em compósitos de polipropileno virgem e reciclad. Polímeros 21:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohammed L, Ansari MN, Pua G, Jawaid M, Islam MS (2015) A review on natural fiber reinforced polymer composite and its applications. Int J Polym Sci 2015:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adole M, Mohamad J, Abubakar S, Mizal N (2018) Potentials of wood fibre reinforced polymeric composites: an overview. J Polym Sci Tech 33:19–31Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghanbari A, Madhoushi M, Ashori A (2014) Wood plastic composite panels: influence of the species, formulation variables and blending process on the density and withdrawal strength of fasteners. J Polym Environ 22:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos Part B Eng 43:2883–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teaca CA, Tanasa F, Zanoaga M (2018) Multi-component polymer systems comprising wood as bio-based component and thermoplastic polymer matrices: an overview. BioResources 13:4728–4769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Danladi A, Kolawole EG, Bello KA (2009) Preparation and study of the mechanical properties of kenaf/natural rubber composites. PTJ 42–45Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kabir MM, Wang H, Aravinthan T, Cardona F, Lau KT (2007) Effects of natural fibre surface on composite properties: a review. Energy Environ Sustain 94–99Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen Y, Tshabalala MA, Gao J, Stark NM, Fan Y (2014) Color and surface chemistry changes of extracted wood flour after heating at 120 ºC. Wood Sci Technol 48:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cao Z, Liao Z, Wang X, Su S, Feng J, Zhu J (2013) Preparation and properties of NBR composites filled with a novel black liquor-montmorillonite complex. J Appl Polym Sci 127:3725–3730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conzatti L, Giunco F, Stagnaro O, Patrucco A, Tonin C, Marano C, Rink M, Marsano E (2014) Wool fibres functionalised with a silane-based coupling agent for reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 61:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buitrago O, Delgado A, Aperador W (2014) Surface treatment of straigh retamo fiber (Telinne monspessulana) by silane coupling agents (SCA). Vitivinicola 29:11–23Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orue A, Eceiza A, Arbelaiz A (2018) Pretreatments of natural fibers for polymer composite materials. In: Kalia S (ed) Lignocellulosic composite materials. Springer, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hemanth R, Sekar M, Suresha B (2014) Effects of fibers and fillers on mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites. Indian J Adv Chem Sci 2:28–35Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cucinelli R, Amantes B, Melo R, Marques MFV (2017) Chemical treatment and modification of jute fiber surface. Chem Chem Technol 11:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pickering KL, Efendy MG, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos A 83:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Glukhikh VV, Shkuro AE, Mukhin NM, Ostanina EI, Grigorov IG, Stoyanov OV (2014) Properties of wood-polymer composites with a polymer matrix containing sevilens. Polym Sci Ser D 7:122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fang L, Chang L, Guo W, Chen Y, Wang Z (2014) Influence of silane surface modification of veneer on interfacial adhesion of wood/plastic plywood. Appl Surf Sci 288:682–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keener TJ, Stuart RK, Brown TK (2004) Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 35:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poletto M (2016) Effect of styrene maleic anhydride on physical and mechanical properties of recycled polystyrene wood flour composites. Maderas Cienc y Tecnol 18:533–542Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dong Z, Liu M, Jia D, Zhou Y (2013) Synthesis of natural rubber-g-maleic anhydride and its use as a compatibilizer in natural rubber/short nylon fiber composites. Chin J Polym Sci 31:1127–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wongsorat W, Suppakarn N, Jarukumjorn K (2014) Effects of compatibilizer type and fiber loading on mechanical properties and cure characteristics of sisal fiber/natural rubber composites. J Compos Mater 48:2401–2411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boonsong K, Phenanurak E (2014) Effect of NR-g-PMMA as coupling agent on properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch fibre filled natural rubber. RMUTP Res J Spec 89:88–96Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sajeev J, Jeoju JI, Roselin A (2014) Mechanical properties of natural rubber composites reinforced with lignin from Caryota fibre. IJETAE 4:567–570Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maya J, Rajesh A, Sabu T (2009) Lignocellulosic fiber reinforced rubber composites. In: Thomas S, Pothan L (eds) Natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: from macro to nanoscale. Old City Publishing, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Valles-Rosales DJ, Rodríguez-Picon LA, Méndez-González LC, Del Valle-Carrasco A, Alodan H (2016) Analysis of the mechanical properties of wood-plastic composites based on agriculture Chili pepper waste. Maderas Cienc y Tecnol 18:43–54Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khalf AI, Ward AA (2010) Use of rice husks as potential filler in styrene butadiene rubber/linear low density polyethylene blends in the presence of maleic anhydride. Mater Des 31:2414–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prasantha R, Manikandan KC, Thomas S, Schit SC, Ramamurthy K (2000) Morphology and melt rheological behaviour of short-sisal fibre reinforced SBR composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:1737–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anad GS, Jayamohan KE (2016) Synthesis of rice straw fiber reinforced natural rubber composite and effects of surface treatment in its mechanical properties. Int J Adv Eng Res Sci 3:82–89Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chukwujike IC, Odo JU, Ihekweme GO (2015) Studies on the mechanical properties of carbonized/uncarbonized cornhub powder filled natural rubber/acrylonitrile butadiene rubber bicomposite. Int J Sci Res Pub 5:1–13Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Datta J, Włoch M (2017) Preparation, morphology and properties of natural rubber composites filled with untreated short jute fibres. Polym Bull 74:763–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Imoisili PE, Ukoba KO, Adejugbe IT, Adgidzi D, Olusunle S (2013) Mechanical properties of rice husk/carbon black hybrid natural rubber composite. Chem Mater Res 3:12–17Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Oyetunji A, Bakare IO, Umunakwe R, Adeyemo AO (2018) Properties characterization of vulcanized natural rubber filled with uncarbonized particulate cow bone. FUOYE J Eng Technol 3:40–44Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Satyanarayana KG, Flores-Sahagun TH, Bowman P (2018) Lignocellulosic materials of Brazil-their characterization and applications in polymer composites and art works. In: Kalia S (ed) Lignocellulosic composite materials. Springer, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sisti L, Totaro G, Vannini M, Celli A (2018) Retting process as a pretreatment of natural fibers for the development of polymer composites. In: Kalia S (ed) Lignocellulosic composite materials. Springer, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mat Rasat MS, Wahab R, Shafie A, Moktar J (2013) Influence of wood particle size on strength properties of wood plastics composite (WPC) from laran species. J Appl Sci Res 9:2585–2590Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mente P, Motaung TE, Hlangothi SP (2016) Natural rubber and reclaimed rubber composites – a systematic review. Polym Sci 2:1–19Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ismail H, Shaari SM, Othman N (2011) The effect of chitosan loading on the curing characteristics, mechanical and morphological properties of chitosan-filled natural rubber (NR), epoxidised natural rubber (ENR) and styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) compounds. Polym Test 30:784–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wisittanawat U, Thanawan S, Amornsakchai T (2014) Mechanical properties of highly aligned short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced-nitrile rubber composite: effect of fiber content and bonding agent. Polym Test 35:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mu B, Wang H, Hao X, Wang Q (2018) Morphology, mechanical properties and dimensional stability of biomass particles/high density polyethylene composites: effect of species and composition. Polymers (Basel) 10:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Egwaikhide P, Akporhonor EE, Okieimen FE (2007) Effect of coconut fibre filler on the cure characteristics physico–mechanical and swelling properties of natural rubber vulcanisates. Int J Phys Sci 2:39–46Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vladkova TG, Dineff PD, Gospodinova DN (2004) Wood flour: a new filler for the rubber processing industry. II. Cure characteristics and mechanical properties of NBR compounds filled with corona-treated wood flour. J Appl Polym Sci 91:883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Manaila E, Stelescu MD, Craciun G, Ighigeanu D (2016) Wood sawdust/natural rubber ecocomposites cross-linked by electron beam irradiation. Materials (Basel) 9:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kengkhetkit N, Wongpreedee T, Amornsakchai T (2018) Pineapple leaf fiber: from waste to high-performance green reinforcement for plastics and rubbers. In: Kalia S (Ed.) Lignocellulosic composite materials, Springer, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chigondo F, Shoko P, Nyamunda BC, Moyo M (2013) Maize stalk as reinforcement in natural rubber composites. Int J Sci Technol Res 2:263–271Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ezema IC, Ravindranatha AR, Obayi CS, Omah AD (2014) Effect of surface treatment and fiber orientation on the tensile and morphological properties of banana stem fiber reinforced natural rubber composite. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 2:216–222Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ahmed K (2015) Hybrid composites prepared from Industrial waste: mechanical and swelling behavior. J Adv Res 6:225–232PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cisneros-López EO, Perez-Fonseca AA, Fuentes-Talavera FJ, Anzaldo J, Gonzalez-Nunez R, Rodrigue D, Robledo-Ortiz JR (2016) Rotomolded polyethylene-agave fiber composites: effect of fiber surface treatment on the mechanical properties. Polym Eng Sci 56:856–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sun E, Sun F, Zhang Z, Dong Y (2016) Interface morphology and thermoplasticization behavior of bamboo fibers benzylated with benzyl chloride. Surf Interf Anal 48:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wisittanawat U, Thanawan S, Amornsakchai T (2014) Remarkable improvement of failure strain of preferentially aligned short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced nitrile rubber composites with silica hybridization. Polym Test 38:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Prukkaewkanjana K, Thanawan S, Amornsakchai T (2015) High performance hybrid reinforcement of nitrile rubber using short pineapple leaf fiber and carbon black. Polym Test 45:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Boonchouytan W, Ratanawilai T, Thongruang W, Homkhiew C, Rawangwong S (2018) Composites from thermoplastic natural rubber reinforced rubberwood sawdust: effects of sawdust size and content on thermal, physical, and mechanical properties. Int J Polym Sci 2018:1–11Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Leblanc JL (2010) Typical fillers for polymers. In: Filled polymers: science and industrial applications, CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kumar RG, Rajesh R (2016) A study on the abrasion resistance, compressive strength and hardness of banana–fibre reinforced natural rubber composites. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol 7:42–55Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dechojarassri D, Ratikant N, Charoenrat S, Danwanichakul P (2017) Mechanical properties of natural rubber composites filled with starch sludge compared with other waste and commercial fillers. Int J Chem Eng Appl 8:210–215Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Monteiro S, Martins J, Magalhães FD, Carvalho L (2018) Lightweight wood composites: challenges, production and performance. In: Kalia S (Ed.) Lignocellulosic composite materials, Springer, DehradunGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad El BosqueBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad Militar Nueva GranadaBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations