Fabrication of gas sensor device using poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly (styrenesulfonate)-doped reduced graphene oxide organic thin films for detection of ammonia gas at room temperature

  • Apsar PashaEmail author
  • Syed Khasim
  • Faheem Ahmed Khan
  • N. Dhananjaya
Original Research


A low cost and simple method for fabrication of a gas sensor device was developed using reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-doped poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT-PSS) organic thin film for the detection of ammonia gas at room temperature. Scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photospectrometry and thermogravimetric analysis were used for the analysis of morphological, structural and thermal behavior of the prepared thin films. The doping of reduced graphene oxide in PEDOT-PSS was observed to increase the conductivity of pristine PEDOT-PSS thin films by threefold. The gas sensing mechanism of pure and doped PEDOT-PSS thin films were studied at room temperature by fabricating the sensor device on indium tin oxide-coated glass substrate. The gases such as ammonia, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen were used to test the sensing performance in the prepared thin films. The reduced graphene oxide-doped PEDOT-PSS thin films show improved sensitivity towards all test gases, mainly toward ammonia gas with fast response and recovery times. The gas sensitivity of 10 wt% rGO-doped PEDOT-PSS thin film was observed to be about 87% for ammonia gas. The sensor stability test shows that, the prepared sensor is highly stable even after a period of 1 month. Due to improved sensitivity, stability and improved response and recovery times, these rGO-doped PEDOT-PSS organic thin films could be used to detect ammonia gas at low concentrations at room temperature.


PEDOT-PSS Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) Conductivity Sensitivity Gas sensor devices 



The authors thankfully acknowledge all the support and help extended by the authorities and the managements in carrying out this research work. Funding was provided by Visvesvaraya Technological University (Ref.12/2018, VTU-2302-10-18).


  1. 1.
    Ott P, Vilstrup H (2014) Cerebral effects of ammonia in liver disease: current hypotheses. Metab Brain Dis 9:901–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arshak K, Gaidan I (2005) Development of a novel gas sensor based on oxide thick films. Mater Sci Eng B 118:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shinde VR, Gujar TP, Lokhande CD (2007) LPG sensing properties of ZnO films prepared by spray pyrolysis method: effect of molarity of precursor solution. Sens Actuators B 120:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nazar LF, Zang Z, Zinkweg D (1992) Insertion of poly (p-phenylenevinylene) in layered MoO3. J Am Chem Soc 114:6239–6240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pasha A, Roy AS, Murugendrappa MV, Al-Hartomy OA, Khasim S (2016) Conductivity and dielectric properties of PEDOT-PSS doped DMSO nano composite thin films. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:8332–8339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun Y, Yang S, Du P, Yan F, Qu J, Zhu Z, Zuo J, Zhang C (2017) Investigate the effects of EG doping PEDOT-PSS on transmission and antireflection properties using terahertz pulsed spectroscopy. Opt Express 25:1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasha A, Khasim S, Al-Hartomy OA, Lakshmi M, Manjunatha KG (2018) Highly sensitive ethylene glycol-doped PEDOT-PSS organic thin films for LPG sensing. RSC Adv 8:18074–18083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seekaew Y, Lokavee S, Phokharatkul D, Wisitsoraat A, Kerdcharoen T, Wongchoosuk C (2014) Low-cost and flexible printed graphene-SPEDOT:PSS gas sensor for ammonia detection. Org Electron 15:2971–2981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soltani-Kordshuli F, Zabihi F, Eslamian M (2016) Graphene-doped PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite thin films fabricated by conventional and substrate vibration-assisted spray coating (SVASC). Eng Sci Technol Int J 19:1216–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin CY, Chen JG, Hu CW, Tunney JJ (2009) Using PEDOT-PSS modified electrode for detecting nitric oxide gas. Sens Actuator B 140:402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karaduman I, Er E, Çelikkan H, Acar S (2017) Room-temperature ammonia gas sensor based on reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites decorated by Ag, Au and Pt nanoparticles. J Alloys Compd 722:569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang W, Zhao Y, He X, Chen Y, Xu J, Li S, Yang Y, Jiang Y (2015) Flexible conducting polymer-reduced graphene oxide films: synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical performance. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zheng Y, Lee D, Koo HY, Maeng S (2015) Chemically modified graphene-PEDOT-PSS nanocomposite films for hydrogen gas sensing. Carbon 81:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fang X, Fan Z, Gu Y, Shi J, Chen M, Chen X, Qiu S, Zabihi F, Eslamian M, Chen Q (2018) A solution processable flexible transparent conductive graphene-PEDOT-PSS film fabricated by spin and blade coating. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Sci) 23:106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen Q, Zabihi F, Eslamian M (2016) Improved functionality of PEDOT: PSS thin films via graphene doping, fabricated by ultrasonic substrate vibration-assisted spray coating. Synth Met 222:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parveen A, Koppalkar A, Roy AS (2013) Liquified petroleum gas sensing of polyaniline–titanium dioxide. Nanocompos Sens Lett 11:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Machappa T, Sasikala M, Ambika Prasad MVN (2010) Design of gas sensor setup and study of gas (LPG) sensing behavior of conducting polyaniline/magnesium chromate (MgCrO4) composites. IEEE Sens J 10:807–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lang U, Muller E, Naujoks N, Dual J (2009) Microscopical investigations of PEDOT-PSS thin films. Adv Funct Mater 19:1215–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mengistie DA, Ibrahem MA, Wang PC, Chu CW (2014) Highly conductive PEDOT-PSS treated with formic acid for ITO-free polymer solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:2292–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reyes-Reyes M, Cruz-Cruz I, López-Sandoval R (2010) Enhancement of the electrical conductivity in PEDOT-PSS films by the addition of dimethyl sulfate. J Phys Chem C 114:20220–20224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ouyang J (2013) Secondary doping methods to significantly enhance the conductivity of PEDOT-PSS for its application as transparent electrode of optoelectronic devices. Display 34:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petraki F, Kennou S, Nespurek S (2008) The electronic properties of the interface between nickel phthalocyanine and a PEDOT-PSS film. J Appl Phys 103:033710(1)–033710(15)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crispin X, Marciniak S, Osikowic W, Zothi G (2003) Conductivity, morphology, interfacial chemistry, and stability of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)–poly(styrene sulfonate): a photoelectron spectroscopy study. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 41:2561–2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen Y, Xu J, Yang Y, Li S, Yang W, Peng T, Mao X, Zhao Y (2015) PEDOT-PSS/graphene/PEDOT ternary film for high performance electrochemical electrode. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 26:8292–8300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vitoratos E, Petraki F, Kennou S, Choulis SA (2009) Thermal degradation mechanisms of PEDOT:PSS. Org Electron 10:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chiu WW, Travaš-Sejdić J, Cooney RP, Bowmaker GA (2005) Spectroscopic and conductivity studies of doping in chemically synthesized poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Synth Met 155:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chiu WW, Travaš-Sejdić J, Cooney RP, Bowmaker GA (2006) Studies of dopant effects in poly (3, 4-ethylenedi-oxythiophene) using Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 37:1354–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahajan MS, Marathe DM, Ghosh SS, Ganesan V, Sali JV (2015) Changes in in-plane electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS thin films due to electric field induced dipolar reorientation. RSC Adv 5:86393–86401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Valtakari D, Liu J, Kumar V, Xu C, Toivakka M, Saarinen JJ (2015) Conductivity of PEDOT:PSS on spin-coated and drop cast nanofibrillar cellulose thin films. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    El Ghanem HM, Abdul Jawad SD, Al-Saleh MH, Hussain YA, Abu-Surrah AS (2014) Electrical impedance spectroscopic study of CNT/ethylene-alt-CO/propylene-alt-CO polyketones nanocomposite. J Macromol Sci Part B 53:878–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neha B, Manjula KS, Srinivasulu B, Subhas SC (2012) Synthesis and characterization of exfoliated graphite/ABS composites. Open J Org Polym Mater 2:75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Apsar Pasha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Syed Khasim
    • 2
    • 3
  • Faheem Ahmed Khan
    • 4
  • N. Dhananjaya
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsGhousia College of EngineeringRamanagaramIndia
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of TabukTabukKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsPES University-EC campusBangaloreIndia
  4. 4.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringGhousia College of EngineeringRamanagaramIndia
  5. 5.Department of PhysicsBMS Institute of Technology and ManagementBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations