Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 851–859 | Cite as

Structure and functional properties of glycerol-plasticized starch/TiO2 nanocomposite materials obtained through resonant wave mixing

  • Nataliya E. KochkinaEmail author
  • Olga A. Skobeleva
Original Research


Resonant wave mixing is a promising technology based on employing non-linear waves to intensify heat and mass transfer and enhancing dispersion processes in mixed materials. In the present work, for the first time, resonant wave mixing was used to prepare film-forming dispersions based on gelatinized maize starch and spherical TiO2 nanoparticles (0.5–1.5 wt%) synthesized by sol–gel technique. Then, nanocomposite films were obtained by solution casting method. The dynamic viscoelastic properties, including relaxation spectra of the film-forming dispersions were investigated by oscillatory squeeze film rheometry, while the structure of the nanocomposite films was studied by X-ray diffraction, FTIR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The mechanical, water-related and UV-protective properties of the film materials were evaluated. It was shown that nanofiller incorporation enhanced the density of the 3D network structure of a gelatinized starch dispersion. The resonant wave treatment favored homogenous dispersion of the TiO2 nanoparticles in the nanocomposites. All nanocomposite film samples displayed higher tensile strength and lower water vapor permeability in comparison with starch films without the nanofiller. The obtained nanocomposites possessed UV-protective properties, which could be potentially applied to produce biodegradable packaging materials with improved functional characteristics.


Starch film TiO2 nanoparticles Resonant wave mixing Rheology UV-protective properties 



The authors would like to thank the Upper Volga Region Centre for Physicochemical Research (located at the G.A. Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry of the RAS, Ivanovo, Russia) for providing the equipment of the Centre to carry out some of the measurements.


  1. 1.
    Jiménez A, Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A (2012) Edible and biodegradable starch films: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:2058–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Torres FG, Commeaux S, Troncoso OP (2013) Starch-based biomaterials for wound-dressing applications. Starch Stärke 65:543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koch K (2018) In: Sjöö M, Nilsson N (eds) Starch in food: structure, function and applications. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pérez S, Baldwin PM, Gallant DJ (2009) In: BeMiller J, Whistler R (eds) Starch: chemistry and technology, 3rd edn, Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xie F, Pollet E, Halley PJ, Avérous L (2013) Starch-based nano-biocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 38:1590–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen X, Mao SS (2007) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications and applications. Chem Rev 107:2891–2959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Subhapriya S, Gomathipriya P (2018) Green synthesis of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles by Trigonella foenum-graecum extract and its antimicrobial properties. Microb Pathog 116:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu Y, Li Z, Green M, Just M, Li YY, Chen X (2017) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials for photocatalysis. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:193003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Archana D, Singh BK, Dutta J, Dutta PK (2013) In vivo evaluation of chitosan–PVP–titanium dioxide nanocomposite as wound dressing material. Carbohydr Polym 95:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Díaz-Visurraga J, Melendrez MF, Garcia A, Paulraj M, Cardenas G (2010) Semi-transparent chitosan–TiO2 nanotubes composite film for food package applications. J Appl Polym Sci 116:3503–3515Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garusinghe UM, Raghuwanshi VS, Batchelor W, Garnier G (2018) Water resistant cellulose–titanium dioxide composites for photocatalysis. Sci Rep 8:2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hejri Z, Seifkordi AA, Ahmadpour A, Zebarjad SM, Maskooki A (2013) Biodegradable starch/poly(vinyl alcohol) film reinforced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Int J Miner Metall Mater 20:1001–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yun Y-H, Youn Y-N, Yoon S-D, Lee J-U (2012) Preparation and physical properties of starch-based nanocomposite films with the addition of titanium oxide nanoparticles. J Ceram Process Res 13:59–64Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oleyaei SA, Zahedi Y, Ghanbarzadeh B, Moayedi AA (2016) Modification of physicochemical and thermal properties of starch films by incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 89:256–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yun Y-H, Hwang K-J, Wee Y-J, Yoon S-D (2010) Synthesis, physical properties, and characterization of starch-based blend films by adding nano-sized TiO2/poly(methyl metacrylate-co-acrylamide). J Appl Polym Sci 120:1850–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ostafińska A, Mikešová J, Krejčíková S, Nevoralová M, Šturcová A, Zhigunov A, Michálková D, Šlouf M (2017) Thermoplastic starch composites with TiO2 particles: preparation, morphology, rheology and mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 101:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ganiev RF, Ganiev SR, Kasilov VP, Pustovgar AP (2015) Wave technology in mechanical engineering: industrial applications of wave and oscillation phenomena. Wiley and Scrivener Publishing LLC, SalemCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ganiev RF, Fomin VN, Malyukova EB (2005) Effect of wave treatment in polymer synthesis on the formation of properties of polymer composites. Dokl Chem 402:91–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    am Ende DJ, Anderson SR, Salan JS (2014) Development and scale-up of cocrystals using resonant acoustic mixing. Org Process Res Dev 18:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Osorio JG, Muzzio FJ (2015) Evaluation of resonant acoustic mixing performance. Powder Technol 278:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ganiev RF, Kasilov VP, Kislogubova ON, Pustovgar AP, Kurmenev DV (2013) Obtaining fine emulsions of a controlled level of dispersion by wave methods. J Mach Manuf Reliab 42:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ganiev RF, Berlin AA, Fomin VN (2002) Effect of wave treatment on polymer composites. Dokl Chem 385:225–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aldoshin SM, Badamshina ER, Grishchuk AA, Tarasov AE, Estrin YI, Ganiev RF, Ganiev SR, Kasilov VP, Kurmenev DV, Pustovgar AP (2015) Study of the influence of single-wall carbon nanotube dispersion techniques upon the properties of epoxy resin-based nanocomposites. J Mach Manuf Reliab 44:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agafonov AV, Redozubov AA, Kozik VV, Kraev AS (2015) Photocatalytic activity of titania nanopowders prepared by a sol–gel process at various pHs. Russ J Inorg Chem 60:906–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Phan-Thien N, Field JS, Swain MV (1996) Micro-Fourier rheometer: inertial effect. Rheol Acta 35:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hansen S (2008) Estimation of the relaxation spectrum from dynamic experiments using Bayesian analysis and a new regularization constraint. Rheol Acta 47:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solution of ill-posed problems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hansen P-C (1992) Numerical tools for analysis and solution of Fredholm integral equations of the first kind. Inverse Probl 8:849872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASTM (2000) Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting, ASTM D882-00 method. American society for Testing and Materials International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cheng W, Chen J, Liu D, Ye X, Ke F (2010) Impact of ultrasonic treatment on properties of starch film-forming dispersion and the resulting films. Carbohydr Polym 81:707–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Picout DR, Ross-Murphy SB (2003) Rheology of biopolymer solutions and gels. Sci World J 3:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miles MJ, Morris VJ, Orford PD, Ring SG (1985) The roles of amylose and amylopectin in the gelation and retrogradation of starch. Carbohydr Res 135:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ortega-Ojeda F, Larsson H, Eliasson A-C (2003) On the dispersion and small-amplitude oscillation measurements of high amylopectin potato starch. Starch Stärke 55:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garcia-Diaz S, Hernandez-Jaimes C, Escalona-Buendia HB, Bello-Perez LA, Vernon-Carter EJ, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2016) Effects of CaCO3 treatment on the morphology, crystallinity, rheology and hydrolysis of gelatinized maize starch dispersions. Food Chem 207:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Garcia-Hernandez A, Vernon-Carter EJ, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2017) Impact of ghosts on the mechanical, optical, and barrier properties of corn starch films. Starch Stärke 69:543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Capron I, Robert P, Colonna P, Brogly M, Planchot V (2007) Starch in rubbery and glassy states by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 68:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jing Z, Wang C, Wang G, Li W, Lu D (2010) Preparation and antibacterial activities of undoped and palladium doped titania nanoparticles. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 56:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Falguera V, Pagán J, Garza S, Garvín A (2011) Ultraviolet processing of liquid food: a review. Part 2: effects on microorganisms and on food components and properties. Food Res Int 44:1580–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of “Chemistry of Hybrid Nanomaterials and Supramolecular Systems”G.A. Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry of the Russian Academy of SciencesIvanovoRussia
  2. 2.Laboratory of Nonlinear Waves GenerationBranch of the Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences - Research Center for Nonlinear Wave Mechanics and TechnologyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations