Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 397–403 | Cite as

Melt-spun liquid core fibers: physical and morphological characteristics

Original Paper

Abstract

Application of different polymers and fillers in multi-component fibers has recently emerged as an effective approach in textile industries. Recent investigations have extensively demonstrated that hollow fibers can be melt-spun and subsequently filled with liquids; however, introduction of a liquid into a fiber core and filling it up with that liquid, specifically at extended lengths, remains challenging. In this study, based on the results previously obtained for the simulation and extrusion of polymer melt and liquid co-flowing, continuous production of the liquid core bi-component filaments via melt spinning through specially designed spinneret is discussed. In fact, core/shell bi-component filaments 50 μm in diameter consisting of polypropylene sheath and complex ester core were produced undergoing 1500 m/min continuous melt spinning with drawing ratio of 5. Physical properties of the developed fibers were investigated which were in acceptable condition with those of the reference solid and hollow fibers. Successful presence of a liquid in an eccentric channel 15 μm in diameter was demonstrated by microscopic observation. Furthermore, the ester oil was retained inside the fiber due to its low contact angle against polypropylene, thereby resolving the need for sealing the fiber’s outlet. Also, TGA and FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of liquid inside the bi-component fibers. DSC tests showed a similar crystallinity for liquid core and hollow fibers, which was about 37 %, while solid fiber had 5 % more crystallinity. Due to the vast available liquids and polymers with various properties, developed liquid core fibers will provide a suitable platform for a large number of applications in future.

Keywords

Bi-component Liquid core fiber Melt spinning Microfluidics Morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa) especially Dr. Rudolf Hufenus and Prof. Manfred Heuberger for their valuable scientific discussions, and Benno Wuest and Laura Gottardo for melt spinning of the fibers. Also, the authors acknowledged Iran Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) for the monetary support of research visit for accomplishment of this work at Empa, Switzerland.

References

  1. 1.
    Hufenus R, Affolter C, Camenzind M, Reifler FA (2013) Design and characterization of a bicomponent melt-spun fiber optimized for artificial turf applications. Macromol Mater Eng 298:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tavanaei M, Mousavi SS, Gouharpey F, Mohades MM (2008) Matrix-fibril morphology and structure of polyblend fibers in melt spinning process: a review. Iran J Polym Sci Tech 21:367–388 (In Persian) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houis S, Schreiber F, Gries T (2008) Fiber-Table: bicomponent fibers (Part 2). Chem Fibers Int 58:158–165Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Houis S, Schmid M, Lubben J (2007) New functional bicomponent fibers with core/sheath-configuration using poly(phenylene sulfide) and poly(ethylene terephthalate). J Appl Polym Sci 106:1757–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lund A, Jonasson C, Johansson C, Haagensen D, Hagstrom B (2012) Piezoelectric polymeric bicomponent fibers produced by melt spinning. J Appl Polym Sci 126:490–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Straat M, Rigdahl M, Hagstrom B (2012) Conducting bicomponent fibers obtained by melt spinning of PA6 and polyolefins containing high amounts of carbonaceous fillers. J Appl Polym Sci 123:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Naeimirad M, Zadhoush A, Neisiany RE (2016) Fabrication and characterization of silicon carbide/epoxy nanocomposite using silicon carbide nanowhisker and nanoparticle reinforcements. J Compos Mat 50:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu HL, Xiao CF, Huang QL, Fan ZL, Hu XY, Shu W (2015) Study on interface structure and performance of homogeneous-reinforced polyvinyl chloride hollow fiber membranes. Iran Polym J 24:491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox FM, Argyros A, Large MCJ (2006) Liquid-filled hollow core microstructured polymer optical fiber. Opt Express 14:4135–4140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang CY, Bai GX, Jim KL, Zhang XM, Fung KH, Chai Y, Tsang YH, Yao JQ, Xu DG (2014) Lensed water-core Teflon-amorphous fluoroplastics optical fiber. J Lightwave Technol 32:1538–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thakur VK, Kessler MR (2015) Self-healing polymer nanocomposite materials: a review. Polymer 69:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chao YY, Jian ZX, Tu YM, Wang HW, Huang YL (2013) An on-line push/pull perfusion-based hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction system for high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of alkylphenols in water samples. Analyst 138:3271–3279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morrison FA (2013) An introduction to fluid mechanics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park CW (1990) Extensional flow of a two-phase fiber. AIChE J 36:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blanco-Rodriguez FJ, Ramos JI (2011) Melt spinning of semi-crystalline compound fibers. Polymer 52:5573–5586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cramer C, Fischer P, Windhab EJ (2004) Drop formation in a co-flowing ambient fluid. Chem Eng Sci 59:3045–3058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heuberger M, Gottardo L, Dressler M, Hufenus R (2015) Biphasic fluid oscillator with coaxial injection and upstream mass and momentum transfer. Microfluid Nanofluidice 19:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gottardo L, Hufenus R, Dressler M, Heuberger M (2013) Design and development of liquid filled polymeric fibers with flexure rate viscoelastic properties. In: Proceedings of Polym Process Soc 29th Annual Meeting, PPS-29, July 15–19, 2013, Nuremberg (Germany)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hufenus R, Reifler FA, Maniura-Weber K, Spierings A, Zinn M (2012) Biodegradable bicomponent fibers from renewable sources: melt-spinning of poly(lactic acid) and poly[(3-hydroxybutyrate)-co-(3-hydroxyvalerate)]. Macromol Mater Eng 297:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leal A, Naeimirad M, Gottardo L, Schuetz P, Zadhgoush A, Hufenus R (2016) Microfluidic behavior in melt-spun hollow and liquid core fibers. Int J Polym Mat 65:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagner M (2009) Thermal analysis in practice. Collected applications thermal analysis. Mettler-Toledo AG, SchwerzenbachGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gil-Castell O, Badia JD, Teruel-Juanes R, Rodriguez I, Meseguer F, Ribes-Greus A (2015) Novel silicon microparticles to improve sunlight stability of raw polypropylene. Eur Polym J 70:247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith BC (1998) Infrared spectral interpretation: a systematic approach. CRC Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammadreza Naeimirad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ali Zadhoush
    • 1
  • Afshin Abrishamkar
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ahmadreza Pishevar
    • 5
  • A. Andres Leal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Textile EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Laboratory for Advanced FibersEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologySt. GallenSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry and Applied BiosciencesSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich)ZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Laboratory for Protection and PhysiologyEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologySt. GallenSwitzerland
  5. 5.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations