Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 53–58 | Cite as

Preparation and properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes/poly(butylene terephthalate) nanocomposites

Original Paper

Abstract

A neat poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) polymer and functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (F-SWNTs)/PBT nanocomposite films were prepared by solution casting technique. The SWNTs were functionalized by acid treatment, which introduced carboxylic groups onto the SWNTs. The morphological studies showed that the F-SWNTs were embedded and dispersed well within the PBT polymer matrix. The POM study illustrated that a neat PBT showed Maltese-type spherulites. It was also observed that the size of neat PBT spherulites was larger than F-SWNTs/PBT nanocomposite spherulites, which might be due to the nucleation effect of F-SWNTs in the case of nanocomposites. The thermal stabilities and mechanical properties such as stress yield and moduli of F-SWNTs/PBT nanocomposites were enhanced as compared to neat PBT. The DSC study showed that the melting temperature (T m) of PBT was slightly increased by addition of F-SWNTs. This increase in T m might be due to the formation of compact structure, which was formed through different types of molecular interactions with addition of F-SWNTs. It was also found that initially the solvent (distilled water, kerosene, 2 M HNO3 solution) uptake by neat PBT polymer and its nanocomposites increased gradually, which became steady after specific intervals for each sample. The results also exhibited that the solvent uptake of F-SWNTs/PBT nanocomposites was less than neat PBT.

Keywords

Single-walled carbon nanotubes Spherulites Nanocomposites PBT 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) (Project #0.20-1470/R&D/HEC/2009/5060).

References

  1. 1.
    Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saeed K (2010) Review on properties, dispersion and toxicology of carbon nanotubes. J Chem Soc Pakistan 32:559–564Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Journet C, Master WK, Bernier P, Loiseau A, de La C, Lamy M, Lefrant S, Deniard P, Lee R, Fischer JE (1997) Large-scale production of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the electric-arc technique. Nature 388:756–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thess A, Lee R, Nikolaev P, Dai H, Petit P, Robert J, Xu C, Lee YH, Kim SG, Rinzler AG, Colbert DT, Scuseria GE, Tomanek D, Fischer JE, Smalley RE (1996) Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science 273:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endo M, Takeuchi K, Igarashi S, Kobori K, Shiraishi M, Kroto HW (1993) The production and structure of pyrolytic carbon nanotubes (PCNTs). J Phys Chem Solids 54:1841–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walgraef D (2007) On the mechanics of deformation instabilities in carbon nanotubes. Eur Phys J Special Topics 146:443–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong EW, Sheehan PE, Lieber CM (1997) Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes. Science 277:1971–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsui H, Holtman C (2002) Organic nanotube bridge fabrication by controlling molecular self-assembly processes between spherical and tubular formations. Nano Lett 2:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu C, Fan YY, Liu M, Cong HT, Cheng HM, Dresselhaus MS (1999) Hydrogen storage in single-walled carbon nanotubes at room temperature. Science 286:1127–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baughman RH, Cui C, Zakhidov AA, Iqbal Z, Barisci JN, Spinks GM, Wallace GG, Mazzoldi A, Rossi DD, Rinzler AG, Jaschinski O, Roth S, Kertesz M (1999) Carbon nanotube actuators. Science 284:1340–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chapline MG, Peng S, Cho K, Dai H (2002) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287:622–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Saeed K, Park S-Y (2007) Preparation and properties of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycaprolactone (MWNT/PCL) nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 104:1957–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu D, Wang Z (2008) Role of multi-wall carbon nanotube network in composites to crystallization of isotactic polypropylene matrix. Polymer 49:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ratna D, Divekar S, Samui AB, Chakraborty BC, Banthia AK (2006) Poly(ethylene oxide)/clay nanocomposite: thermomechanical properties and morphology. Polymer 47:4068–4074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen HW, Chang FC (2001) The novel polymer electrolyte nanocomposite composed of poly(ethylene oxide), lithium triflate and mineral clay. Polymer 42:9763–9767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deka H, Karak N (2009) Vegetable oil-based hyperbranched thermosetting polyurethane/clay nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 4:758–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chuang WY, Young TH, Wang DM, Luo RL, Sun YM (2000) Swelling behavior of hydrophobic polymers in water/ethanol mixtures. Polymer 41:8339–8347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mishra JK, Kim GH, Kim I, Chung IJ, Ha CS (2004) A new thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV)/organoclay nanocomposite: preparation, characterization, and properties. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 42:2900–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MalakandDir (Lower)Pakistan

Personalised recommendations