Screen Time, Other Sedentary Behaviours, and Obesity Risk in Adults: A Review of Reviews
Purpose of Review
The aim of this paper is to assess the association between sedentary behaviours, including screen time, and risk of obesity in adults. A review of 10 systematic reviews was undertaken.
Available evidence is generally not supportive of associations between sedentary behaviour and obesity in adults. Most studies that found significant associations indicated mostly small effect sizes. Somewhat more consistent associations were shown for screen time (mainly TV viewing), among older adults, and for pre-adult sedentary behaviour to increase the risk of obesity in adulthood. Some evidence also exists for breaks in sedentary time to be associated with a more favourable BMI, and for use of a car to be associated with greater risk of obesity.
There is limited evidence for an association between sedentary behaviour in adulthood and obesity and any association that exists does not seem to be causal. Future research is required investigating potentially positive effects for frequent breaks from sitting, less car use, and an uncoupling of TV viewing and dietary intake.
KeywordsSedentary behaviour Screen time TV viewing Sedentary breaks Obesity Adults Systematic review Causality Motorised transport
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Stuart J.H. Biddle received a sit-to-stand desk from Ergotron from 2012 to 2014; consultancy fees from Halpern PR paid to Victoria University; professional advice has been requested by and offered to Active Working and Get Britain Standing; professional advice has been requested by and offered to Bluearth.
Enrique García Bengoechea declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Zeljko Pedisic declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Jason Bennie has a research fellowship partially funded by Fitness Australia, a not-for-profit, member-based industry association representing the interests of over 30,000 Australian registered exercise professionals, fitness service providers, and industry suppliers.
Ineke Vergeer declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Glen Wiesner declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 5.• Henson J, Davies MJ, Bodicoat DH, Edwardson CL, Gill JMR, Stensel DJ, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting with standing or walking attenuates the postprandial metabolic response in postmenopausal women: a randomized acute study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(1):130–8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1240. Found that breaking up prolonged sitting with 5-min bouts of standing or walking reduced postprandial glucose, insulin, and nonesterified fatty acids in women at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
- 6.•• Biddle SJH, Bennie J, Bauman A, Chau J, Dunstan D, Owen N, et al. Too much sitting and all-cause mortality: is there a causal link? BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3307-3. A review of reviews and primary studies showing some evidence for sedentary behaviour being causally associated with all-cause mortality. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.•• Rezende LFM, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López JP, Matsudo VKR, Luiz OC. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620. Systematic synthesis of sedentary behaviour and health outcomes. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.•• Rezende LFM, Rey-López JP, Matsudo VKR, Luiz OC. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:333. 1471-2458/14/333. Systematic synthesis of evidence linking sedentary behaviour to poor health outcomes in older adults. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.• McCormack GR, Virk JS. Driving towards obesity: a systematized literature review on the association between motor vehicle travel time and distance and weight status in adults. Prev Med. 2014;66:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.002. Review linking the sedentary behaviour of car travel with adiposity in adults. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.•• Neuhaus M, Eakin EG, Straker L, Owen N, Dunstan DW, Reid N, et al. Reducing occupational sedentary time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations. Obes Rev. 2014;15(10):822–38. doi: 10.1111/obr.12201. Systematic review of interventions that have been used in the workplace, including sit-to-stand desks. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.• Chastin S, Buck C, Freiberger E, Murphy M, Brug J, Cardon G, et al. Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2015;12(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0292-3. Comprehensive review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in older adults—an age group of increasing focus in this area. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.O'Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, Bernaards C, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2841-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.•• Chastin SF, Egerton T, Leask C, Stamatakis E. Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health. Obesity. 2015;23(9):1800–10. doi: 10.1002/oby.21180. First systematic review addressing the health effects of breaks in sedentary time. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc Royal Soc Med. 1965;58(5):295–300.Google Scholar
- 28.• Pedisic Z. Measurement issues and poor adjustments for physical activity and sleep undermine sedentary behaviour research—the focus should shift to the balance between sleep, sedentary behaviour, standing and activity. Kinesiology. 2014;46(1):135–46. The first paper highlighting the importance of accounting for the full 24-h day in the measurement and analysis of sedentary behaviour and physical activity, in addition to looking at the displacement of one behaviour to another. Google Scholar
- 33.• Martin A, Fitzsimons C, Jepson R, Saunders DH, van der Ploeg HP, Teixeira PJ, et al. Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit J Sport Med. 2015;49(16):1056–63. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094524. Meta-analysis of the effects of interventions designed to reduce sedentary behaviour in adults. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Vernikos J. Sitting kills, moving heals. Fresno, CA: Quill Driver Books; 2011.Google Scholar
- 35.de Bruin A, Della SS. How biases inflate scientific evidence. The Psychologist. 2016;29(1):36–9.Google Scholar
- 37.Khaw K, Wareham N, Bingham S, Welch A, Luben R, Day N. Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med. 2007;5(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050012.
- 39.• Hobbs M, Pearson NL, Foster P, Biddle SJH. Sedentary behaviour and diet across the lifespan: an updated systematic review. Brit J Sport Med. 2015;49(18):1179–88. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093754. An update of the Pearson & Biddle (2011) systematic review showing a link between TV/screen time as a sedentary behaviour and unhealthy dietary intake. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Bjork-Petersen C, Bauman A, Grønbæk M, Helge JW, Thygesen LC, Tolstrup JS. Total sitting time and risk of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in a prospective cohort of Danish adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.•• Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302–10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1. Large scale meta-analysis suggesting that high levels of physical activity may be protective of deliterious health effects of sitting. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar