Advertisement

Current Obesity Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 37–45 | Cite as

New Media but Same Old Tricks: Food Marketing to Children in the Digital Age

  • Bridget Kelly
  • Stefanie Vandevijvere
  • Becky Freeman
  • Gabrielle Jenkin
Etiology of Obesity (T Gill, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Etiology of Obesity

Abstract

‘New media’ refers to digital technologies, which offer unmatched opportunities for food companies to engage with young people. This paper explores the emergence of food marketing using new media, the potential impact of this marketing on young people, and current and potential policy responses to limit exposure to these promotions. Foremost in any informed policy discussion is the need for robust evidence to demonstrate the need for intervention. In this case, such evidence relates to the extent of children’s exposures to commercial food promotions via new media, and the nature of these promotions. Approaches to, and challenges of, collecting and assessing these data are discussed. There is accumulating evidence that food marketing on new media is increasing and influences children’s food preferences and choices. The impact of integrated campaigns, which reinforce commercial messages across multiple platforms, and of new media, which engage personally with potential consumers, is likely to be greater than that of traditional marketing.

Keywords

Food Beverage Marketing Digital media New media 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Becky Freeman has received research grants from NHMRC and ANPHA. Gabrielle Jenkin has received the following: University of Otago Research Grant, and University of Otago Health Sciences Post-Doctoral Award.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Bridget Kelly and Gabrielle Jenkin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Stefanie Vandevijvere has received a Fellowship through the University of Auckland, and received travel/accommodations expenses covered or reimbursed for attending International conferences from Heart Foundation New Zealand, Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust New Zealand, and Auckland Medical Research Foundation.

Becky Freeman has been a consultant for NSW Ministry of Health, WHO, and NSW Cancer Council, and has received speaking honoraria from Sax Institute.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Silverstone R. What’s new about new media?: Introduction. New Media Soc. 1999;1(1):10–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wind Y, Mahajan V, editors. Digital marketing: global strategies from the world's leading experts. New York: Wiley 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Constantinides E, Fountain SJ. Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues. J Direct Data Digit Mark Pract. 2008;9(3):231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim KY, Lee BG. Marketing insights for mobile advertising and consumer segmentation in the cloud era: a Q-R hybrid methodology and practices. Source Doc Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Powell LM, Harris JL, Fox T. Food marketing expenditures aimed at youth. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(4):453–61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Project. PRI. Teens fact sheet. Washington DC: Pew Research; 2014 [25 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/teens-fact-sheet/.
  7. 7.
    Livingstone S, O’lafsson K, Staksrud E. Risky social networking practices among underage users: lessons for evidence-based policy. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2013;18:303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pew Research Internet Project. Social networking fact sheet. Washington DC: Pew Research 2014 [25 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/.
  9. 9.
    Digital Buzz Blog. Infographic: 2013 mobile growth statistics 2013 [13 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.digitalbuzzblog.com/infographic-2013-mobile-growth-statistics/.
  10. 10.
    Tsimonis G, Dimitriadis S. Brand strategies in social media. Mark Intell Plan. 2014;32:3328–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edwards J. These Are The 35 Biggest Advertisers On Facebook. Business Insider Australia; 2013 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.businessinsider.com.au/top-advertisers-on-facebook-2013-11.
  12. 12.
    Story M, French S. Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1:3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kunkel D, Wilcox B, Cantor J, et al. Report of the APA Taskforce on Advertising to Children. Section: Psychological issues in the increasing commercialization of childhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pechmann C, Levine L, Loughlin S, et al. Impulsive and self-conscious: adolescents' vulnerability to advertising and promotion. J Publ Policy Mark. 2005;24(2):202–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moschis GP. Consumer socialization: a theoretical and empirical analysis. J Mark Res. 1978;15(4):599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bandura A. Media effects advances in theory and research. In: Bryant IJ, Zillmann D, editors. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994. p. 61–90.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bachmann GR, John DR, Rao AR. Children’s susceptibility to peer group purchase influence: an exploratory investigation. Adv Consum Res. 1993;20:463–8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly B, King L, Chapman K, et al. A hierarchy of food promotion effects: identifying methodological approaches and knowledge gaps. American Journal of Public Health. 2014; Under Review.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buijzen M, Schuurman J, Bomhof E. Associations between children's television advertising exposure and their food consumption patterns: A household diary–survey study. Appetite. 2008;50(2–3):231–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mangold WG, Faulds DJ. Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus Horiz. 2009;52(4):357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ali M, Blades M, Oates C, et al. Young children’s ability to recognize advertisements in web page designs. Br J Dev Psychol. 2009;27:71–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.••
    Terlutter R, Capella ML. The gamification of advertising: analysis and research directions of in-game advertising, advergames, and advertising in social network games. J Advert. 2013;42(2-3):95–112. This study provides a thorough description of the types of promotions witin advergames, and an exploration of the impacts of in-game branding, as based on theoretical constructs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mallinckrodt V, Mizerski D. The effects of playing an advergame on young children's perceptions, preferences, and requests. J Advert. 2007;36(2):87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G. The extent nature and effects of food promotion to children: a review of the evidence to December 2008. Prepared for the World Health Organization. United Kingdom: Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling; 2009.Google Scholar
  25. 25.•
    Montgomery KC, Chester J, Grier SA, et al. The new threat of digital marketing. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2012;59(3):659–75. This paper provides a colourful description of contempory marketing approaches used by food and beverage companies to target youth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Redondo I. The effectiveness of casual advergames on adolescents’ brand attitudes. Eur J Mark. 2012;46(11/12):1671–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chapa S, Hernandez MD. Adolescents, advergames and snack foods: effects of positive affect and experience on memory and choice. J Mark Commun. 2010;16(1/2):59–68.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Folkvord F, Anschutz DJ, Buijzen M, et al. The effect of playing advergames that promote energy-dense snacks or fruit on actual food intake among children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:239–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dias M, Agante L. Can advergames boost children’s healthier eating habits? A comparison between healthy and non-healthy food. J Consum Behav. 2011;10:152–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scully M, Wakefield M, Niven P, et al. Association between food marketing exposure and adolescents' food choices and eating behaviors. Appetite. 2012;58(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Swinburn B, Sacks G, Vandevijvere S, et al. INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support): overview and key principles. Obes Rev. 2013;14:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    The Interactive Advertising Bureau. IAB Defines Cross Platform Ad Engagement And Identifies Core Digital Metrics As Part Of The Making Measurement Make Sense (3MS) Initiative. IAB; 2014 [9 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/recent_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/pr-021014_3ms.
  33. 33.
    Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair H. The Effect of Social Media Marketing Content on Consumer Engagement: Evidence from Facebook 2014. Social Science Research Network; 2014 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2290802.
  34. 34.
    O'Neal S. The Next Chapter of Social Media Marketing Is the Paid Promo Sponsored tweets, posts key to continuing success. Adweek; 2014 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/next-chapter-social-media-marketing-paid-promo-156290.
  35. 35.
    Nielsen V. Paid social media advertising 2013. Industry update and best practices. The Nielsen Company; 2013 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2013Reports/Nielsen-Paid-Social-Media-Adv-Report-2013.pdf.
  36. 36.
    Cheyne AD, Dorfman L, Bukofzer E, et al. Marketing sugary cereals to children in the digital age: a content analysis of 17 child-targeted websites. J Health Commun. 2013;18(5):563–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Culp J, Bell RA, Cassady D. Characteristics of food industry web sites and "Advergames" targeting children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(3):197–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weber K, Story M, Harnack L. Internet food marketing strategies aimed at children and adolescents: a content analysis of food and beverage brand Web sites. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(9):1463–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Freeman B, Kelly B, Baur L, et al. Digital Junk: food and beverage marketing on facebook. Am J Public Health. 2014. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302167.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Montgomery KC, Chester J. Interactive food and beverage marketing: targeting adolescents in the digital age. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(3, Supplement 1):S18–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jolly R. Marketing obesity? Junk food, advertising and kids. Parliament of Australia; 2011 [25 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1011/11rp09.
  42. 42.
    Scharl A, Dickinger A, Murphy J. Diffusion and success factors of mobile marketing. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2005;4(2):159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    comScore. About Us. comScore Fact Sheet. 2014 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.comscore.com/About-comScore/comScore-Fact-Sheet.
  44. 44.
    Creative Sandbox. The Happiness Flag. A crowd-sourced symbol to celebrate the World Cup. Think with Google; 2014 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/campaigns/coca-cola-the-happiness-flag.html.
  45. 45.
    Mindruta R. Top 10 Free Social Media Monitoring Tools. Brandwatch; 2013 [1 July 2014]; Available from: http://www.brandwatch.com/2013/08/top-10-free-social-media-monitoring-tools/.
  46. 46.
    Krikorian R. Introducing Twitter Data Grants. 2014 [1 July 2014]; Available from: https://blog.twitter.com/2014/introducing-twitter-data-grants.
  47. 47.
    He W, Zha S, Li L. Social media competitive analysis and text mining: a case study in the pizza industry. Int J Inf Manag. 2013;33(3):464–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jenkin G, Signal L, Smith M. In your face: food marketing to children on Facebook. Food Children and Youth: What’s eating?; Lisbon, Portugal 2014.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mehta K, Phillips C, Banytis F, et al. Marketing food and beverages to children, on three Internet platforms: company websites, popular websites and social network sites - children and food marketing project report to SA Health. Adelaide 2010.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee Y, Yoon J, Chung SJ, et al. Effect of TV food advertising restriction on food environment for children in South Korea. Health Promot International. 2013.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    World Cancer Research Fund. WCRF International Food Policy Framework for Healthy Diets: NOURISHING: Restrict food advertising and other forms of commercial promotion. London: WCRF; 2014 [4 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.wcrf.org/policy_public_affairs/nourishing_framework/food_marketing_advertising.
  52. 52.
    Breiner H, Parker L, Olson S. Challenges and opportunities for change in food marketing to children and youth: workshop summary. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vigo M. Peru’s President Humala signs 'junk food bill'. 2013 [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.peruthisweek.com/news-perus-president-humala-signsjunk-food-bill-14024.
  54. 54.
    Peruvian times. President Humala Signs Law to Curb Advertising of Junk Food. Available from: http://www.peruviantimes.com/17/president-humala-signs-law-to-curb-advertising-of-junk-food/19183/.
  55. 55.
    Consumers International. Advertising to children now illegal in Brazil. 2014 [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/news/2014/04/advertising-to-children-now-technically-illegal-in-brazil/.
  56. 56.
    Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. Pledges on Food Marketing to Children. 2014 [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/marketingpledges/search.aspx.
  57. 57.
    Obesity Policy Coalition. Policy brief: Advertising unhealthy product to children through advergames, online activities, apps and social media. Melbourne2014 [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.opc.org.au/paper.aspx?ID=policy-brief-new-media-online&Type=policydocuments.
  58. 58.•
    Galbraith-Emami S, Lobstein T. The impact of initiatives to limit the advertising of food and beverage products to children: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2013;14(12):960–74. This study identifies the limitations of industry codes of practice in reducing children’s exposures to unhealthy food and beverage marketing.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    World Health Organization. Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. Geneva: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mackay S, Antonopoulos N, Martin J, et al. A comprehensive approach to protecting children from unhealthy food advertising. Melbourne: Obesity Policy Coalition; 2011 [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.ada.org.au/app_cmslib/media/lib/1105/m308363_v1_protecting-children-email1%20final%2013.04.11.pdf.
  61. 61.
    Commonwealth Government. Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act 1992. ComLaw, 2012.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    World Health Organization. Draft action plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases 2013-2020. Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly Provisional Agenda item 13.2. Report by the Secretariat. Geneva: WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Federal Trade Commission. COPPA - Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://www.coppa.org/.
  64. 64.
    Williams S. Action needed to combat food and drink companies' social media marketing to adolescents. Perspect Public Health. 2013;133(3):146–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Verhellen Y, Oates C, De Pelsmacker P, et al. Children's responses to traditional versus hybrid advertising formats: the moderating role of persuasion knowledge. J Consum Policy. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10603-014-9257-1.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dietz WH. New strategies to improve food marketing to children. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(9):1652–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Center for Science in the Public Interest. The unhappy truth about soda. CSPI; 2013 [17 June 2014]; Available from: http://therealbears.org/.
  68. 68.
    Allianza por la Salud Alimentaria. For a Healthier Mexico - Campaign for a soda tax in Mexico. 2013 [17 June 2014]; Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yw5S9LhVeDA.
  69. 69.
    Dixon H, Scully M, Kelly B, et al. Can counter-advertising reduce pre-adolescent children's susceptibility to front-of-package promotions on unhealthy foods?: Experimental research. Soc Sci Med. 2014;116:211–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hebden L, Cook A, van der Ploeg HP, et al. A mobile health intervention for weight management among young adults: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27(4):322–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Montgomery KC, Chester J. Food marketing in the digital age: a conceptual framework and agenda for research. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:S18–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Feick LF, Price LL. The market maven: a diffuser of marketplace information. J Mark Commun. 1987;51(1):83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sprott D, Czellar S, Spangenberg E. The Importance of a general measure of brand engagement on market behavior: development and validation of a scale. J Mark Res. 2009;46(1):92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bridget Kelly
    • 1
  • Stefanie Vandevijvere
    • 2
  • Becky Freeman
    • 3
  • Gabrielle Jenkin
    • 4
  1. 1.Early Start Research Institute, School of Health and SocietyUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population HealthUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Social Psychiatry and Population Mental Health Research UnitUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations