Current Obesity Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 432–439 | Cite as

Evaluating the Health Impacts of Food and Beverage Taxes

Metabolism (R Pasquali, Section Editor)

Abstract

Several jurisdictions are now imposing taxes on food and beverages to prevent obesity (and related conditions). Existing evidence concerning their effects comes largely from simulation studies and trials in closed settings, both of which have limitations. Rigorous evaluation of actual taxes may provide richer evidence with greater external validity to support policy making. This article describes existing evaluation studies and outlines an implicit underlying theoretical framework for how taxes are expected to affect health. It then explores three important issues for future studies: selection of an appropriate evaluative perspective (comparing realist and biomedical experimental paradigms); approaches to causal inference; and the challenge of a low signal-to-noise ratio. We argue that evaluation should be informed by a realist perspective as well as making appropriate use of established empirical quasi-experimental approaches to testing causal effects. This should be underpinned by a theoretical framework that acknowledges complexity and the potential diversity of impacts.

Keywords

Food Beverages Tax Evaluation Obesity 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Mytton OT, Clarke D, Rayner M. Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health. BMJ Br Med J. 2012;2931(May):1–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brownell KD, Frieden TR. Ounces of prevention–the public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1805–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Measuring up: the medical professions’s prescription for the nation's obesity crisis. London; 2013.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shemilt I, Hollands GJ, Marteau TM, Nakamura R, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, et al. Economic instruments for population diet and physical activity behaviour change: a systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75070.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Powell LM, Chriqui JF, Khan T, Wada R, Chaloupka FJ. Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes. Obes Rev. 2013;14:110–28.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eyles H, Ni Mhurchu C, Nghiem N, Blakely T. Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001353.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mytton O, Gray A, Rayner M, Rutter H. Could targeted food taxes improve health? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:689–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Smith RD, Ogilvie D. Biting off more than we can chew? Limitations in the use of modelling to inform policy on food tax and subsidy. Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mytton O, Clarke D, Rayner M, Mytton OT. Taxes on unhealthy food and drinks. 2012;2931(May):1–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smed S, Robertson A. Are taxes on fatty foods having their desired effects on health? BMJ. 2012;345:e6885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boseley S. Mexico enacts soda tax in effort to combat world’s highest obesity rate. Theguardian.com. 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pipe S. St Helena shows UK the way with fizzy drinks tax. St Helena Online 2014. http://sthelenaonline.org/2014/03/28/st–helena–sho.
  13. 13.
    Sustain. A children’ s future fund. London; 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    FIZZ - Fighting sugar in softdrinks. http://www.fizz.org.nz/.
  15. 15.
    Brunner J. Mayor McGinn suggest soft-drink tax for parks money. The Seattle Times. 2013.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kearney L. California city tests waters for soft drinks tax. Reuters. 2014.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beesley A. Reilly sought 20 % tax on sugary drinks in Budget, records who. The Irish Times. 2014.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chriqui JF, Chaloupka FJ, Powell LM, Eidson SS. A typology of beverage taxation: multiple approaches for obesity prevention and obesity prevention-related revenue generation. J Public Health Policy. 2013;34:403–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stafford N. Denmark cancels “fat tax” and shelves “sugar tax” because of threat of job losses. BMJ. 2012;345:e7889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ogilvie D, Bull F, Powell J, Cooper AR, Brand C, Mutrie N, et al. An applied ecological framework for evaluating infrastructure to promote walking and cycling: the iConnect study. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:473–81.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogilvie D, Cummins S, Petticrew M, White M, Jones A, Wheeler K. Assessing the evaluability of complex public health interventions: five questions for researchers, funders, and policymakers. Milbank Q. 2011;89:206–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bahl R. The uneasy case against discriminatory excise taxation: soft drink taxes in Ireland. Public Financ Rev. 2003;31. doi:10.1177/1091142103253753.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Faculty of Public Health. A duty on sugar sweetened beverages. London; 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Landon J, Graff H. What is the role of health-related food duties? London; 2012.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Powell LM, Chriqui J, Chaloupka FJ. Associations between state-level soda taxes and adolescent body mass index. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(3 Suppl):S57–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thow AM, Quested C, Juventin L, Kun R, Khana N, Swinburn B. Taxing soft drinks in the Pacific: implementation lessons for improving health. Health Promot Int. 2011;26:55–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smed S, Jensen JD, Denver S. Socio-economic characteristics and the effect of taxation as a health policy instrument. Food Policy. 2007;32:624–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20 % sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ. 2013;347:f6189.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Finkelstein EA, Zhen C, Nonnemaker J, Todd JE. Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower-income households. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:2028–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.•
    Petticrew M, Anderson L, Elder R, Grimshaw J, Hopkins D, Hahn R, et al. Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:1209–14. A discussion fo complexity within public health interventions and its implications for evaluation of interventions, with a particular focus on how to piece together information from different studies in diffferent contexts.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim D, Kawachi I. Food taxation and pricing strategies to “thin out” the obesity epidemic. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30:430–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.•
    Jensen JD, Smed S. The Danish tax on saturated fat – Short run effects on consumption, substitution patterns and consumer prices of fats. Food Policy. 2013;42:18–31. An example of an evaulation of an actual tax on food with the use of robust statistical techniques and consideration of appropriate confounding influences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Berardi N, Sevestere P, Tepaut M, Vigneron A. The impact of a “soda Tax” on prices: evidence from French micro data. Paris; 2012.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sturm R, Powell LM, Chriqui JF, Chaloupka FJ. Soda taxes, soft drink consumption, and children’s body mass index. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1052–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Victora CG, Habicht J-P, Bryce J. Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:400–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:568.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Finegood DT, Merth TDN, Rutter H. Implications of the foresight obesity system map for solutions to childhood obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18 Suppl 1:S13–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, McPherson K, Thomas S, Mardell J, et al. Foresight Tackling Obesities: Future Choices. London; 2007.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rutter H. Where next for obesity? Lancet. 2011;378:746–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: guidance for producers and users of evidence. London: MRC; 2011.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Humphreys DK, Panter J, Sahlqvist S, Goodman A, Ogilvie D. A framework for considering exposure in place-based natural experimental studies in public health. Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Edwards P, Steinbach R, Green J, Petticrew M, Goodman A, Jones A, et al. Health impacts of free bus travel for young people: evaluation of a natural experiment in London. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:641–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownell KD. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:216–22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Howel D. Trends in the prevalence of obesity and overweight in English adults by age and birth cohort, 1991-2006. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lin B-H, Smith TA, Lee J-Y, Hall KD. Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9:329–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MRC Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR)University of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineCambridgeUK
  2. 2.National Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population HealthThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations