To mitigate climate relevant air emissions from freight transportation, policy makers stimulate the application of intermodal freight transport chains. The evaluation and selection of intermodal routes based on the key objectives, i.e., greenhouse gas emission, transportation cost and transit time improvements, are the main challenges in the design of intermodal networks. It is the aim of this paper to provide decision support in intermodal freight transportation planning concerning route and carrier choice in transport service design and the assessment of emission abatement potentials. Core of this approach is a capacitated multi-commodity network flow model considering multiple criteria and in-transit inventory. Thereby two processes are modeled, i.e., the transport and transshipment of full truckloads (FTL), to define the material flow of goods through the network. The objective function of the developed network flow model minimizes the number of transported and transshipped FTL assessed by the weighted and normalized criteria (i.e., CO2-equivalents, cost, time) taking into account tied in-transit capital and the distance traveled. Thereby, the model regards carrier and terminal capacities, the option to transfer or either shift the mode and/or change the carrier at predefined terminal transshipment points. The model is incorporated in a decision support system and applied in an example application with industry data from an automotive supplier to demonstrate its application potentials. Within the application among others the potential benefits of the developed optimization model in comparison to a status quo are analyzed. Different criteria weightings and the influence of various levels of in-transit holding costs are investigated. In addition, the introduction of new transportation means such as the Eurocombi is assessed.
Intermodal transport planning Full truckload Multi-commodity network flow model In-transit holding costs Greenhouse gas emissions Eurocombi
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors wish to thank the editor and three anonymous referees for their most valuable and constructive comments which helped to improve the article.
Arnold D, Isermann H, Kuhn A, Tempelmeier H, Furmans K (2008) Handbuch logistik, 3rd edn. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer J, Bektas T, Crainic TG (2010) Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions in intermodal freight transport: an application to rail service design. J Oper Res Soc. doi:10.1057/jors.2009.102Google Scholar
Bektas T, Crainic T (2008) A brief overview of intermodal transportation. In: Taylor GD (ed) Logistics engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–16 chapter 28Google Scholar
Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Nygreen B, Ronen D (2007) Chapter 4 Maritime transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Transportation. Handbooks in operations research and management science, vol 14, pp 189–284. doi:10.1016/S0927-0507(06)14004-9
Christopher M (2011) Logistics and supply chain management, 4th edn. Pearson, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Cirovic G, Pamucar D, Bozanic D (2014) Green logistic vehicle routing problem: routing light delivery vehicles in urban areas using a neuro-fuzzy model. Expert Syst Appl 41(2014):4245–4258. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett JJ, Winebrake JJ, Hatcher J, Farrel AE (2007) Emissions analysis of freight transport comparing land-side and water-side short-sea routes: development and demonstration of a freight routing and emissions analysis tool (FREAT). US Department of Transportation. http://climate.dot.gov/documents/emissions_analysis_of_freight.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2013
Dekker R, Bloemhof J, Mallidis I (2012) Operations Research for green logistics: an overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. Euro J Oper Res. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010Google Scholar
Goetschalckx M, Vidal CJ, Dogan K (2002) Modeling and design of global logistics systems: a review of integrated strategic and tactical models and design algorithms. Euro J Oper Res. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00142-XGoogle Scholar
Gross WF, Hayden C, Butz C (2012) About the impact of rising oil price on logistics networks and transportation greenhouse gas emission. Log Res 4:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudehus T (2011) Logistik: Grundlagen—Strategien—Anwendungen, 4th edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Helmreich S, Keller H (2011) Freightvision: sustainable European freight transport 2050. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoen KMR, Tan T, Fransoo JC, van Houtum GJ (2012) Effect of carbon emission regulations on transport mode selection under stochastic demand. Flex Serv Manuf J. doi:10.1007/s10696-012-9151-6Google Scholar
Hoff A, Andersson H, Christiansed M, Hasle G, Lokkerangen A (2010) Industrial aspects and literature survey: fleet composition and routing. Comput Oper Res. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2010.03.015Google Scholar
Janic M, Regglani A, Nijkamp P (1999) Sustainability of the European freight transport system: evaluation of innovative bundling networks. Transp Plan Technol. doi:10.1080/03081069908717644Google Scholar
Kallrath J, Wilson JM (1997) Business Optimisation Using Mathematical Programming. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
Kranke A, Schmied M, Schön A (2011) CO2-Berechnung in der Logistik. Vogel, MunichGoogle Scholar
Kumar S (2008) Inventory logistics cost analysis model for the proposed EU intermodal loading unit: a business case. Inf Knowl Syst Manag 7:335–355Google Scholar