Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Updates on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management
- 41 Downloads
Purpose of Review
To describe updates on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).
Sequencing studies revealed that MCCs have either a low mutational burden and integrated Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), or they have a high number of ultraviolet-associated somatic mutations and no MCPyV. Clinically, prognosis was better for stage III MCC of unknown primary than known primary. Similarly, lack of immunosuppression conferred better prognosis. The immunogenicity of MCC was reflected in high response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.
MCC is a rare but aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer associated with advanced age and immunosuppression. Approximately 80% of MCCs are MCPyV driven, whereas MCPyV-negative tumors have mutations in genes such as p53 and RB1. MCC is highly immunogenic, and recently, the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab was approved to treat metastatic MCC. Here, we summarized features of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of MCC.
KeywordsMerkel cell carcinoma Merkel cell polyomavirus Pathogenesis Diagnosis Management
This research was supported by the NIH Intramural Research Program, Center of Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Brownell reports work prepared as part of official duties as a US government employee for Intramural Research Program, CCR, NCI, during the conduct of the study.
Jannett Nguyen and Natasha Hill declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
- 8.Kwun HJ, Guastafierro A, Shuda M, Meinke G, Bohm A, Moore PS, et al. The minimum replication origin of merkel cell polyomavirus has a unique large T-antigen loading architecture and requires small T-antigen expression for optimal replication. J Virol. 2009;83(23):12118–28.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.• Goh G, Walradt T, Markarov V, Blom A, Riaz N, Doumani R, et al. Mutational landscape of MCPyV-positive and MCPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas with implications for immunotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7(3):3403–15. Defined the mutation spectra of MCPyV-negative and MCPyV-positive MCC tumors CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.• Theiss JM, Gunther T, Alawi M, et al. A comprehensive analysis of replicating Merkel cell polyomavirus genomes delineates the viral transcription program and suggests a role for mcv-miR-M1 in episomal persistence. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(7):e1004974. Explored MCPyV transcriptional programming using RACE, RNA-seq and ChIP-seq. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.• Abdul-Sada H, Muller M, Mehta R, et al. The PP4R1 sub-unit of protein phosphatase PP4 is essential for inhibition of NF-kappaB by merkel polyomavirus small tumour antigen. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25418–32. Identified the complex between PP4R1 and PP4C that bridges MCPyV sT antigen to NEMO adaptor protein. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Borchert S, Czech-Sioli M, Neumann F, Schmidt C, Wimmer P, Dobner T, et al. High-affinity Rb binding, p53 inhibition, subcellular localization, and transformation by wild-type or tumor-derived shortened Merkel cell polyomavirus large T antigens. J Virol. 2014;88(6):3144–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.• Wong SQ, Waldeck K, Vergara IA, Schroder J, Madore J, Wilmott JS, et al. UV-associated mutations underlie the etiology of MCV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2015;75(24):5228–34. Detected tumor harboring mutations of MCPyV-negative tumors in Rb1 , p53 , PIK3CA , AKT1 , PIK3CG , HRAS , NF1 and FGFR2 . Also investigated the status of T cell infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in MCC tumors. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.• Harms PW, Collie AM, Hovelson DH, et al. Next generation sequencing of cytokeratin 20-negative Merkel cell carcinoma reveals ultraviolet-signature mutations and recurrent TP53 and RB1 inactivation. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(3):240–8. Identified mutations in Rb1 , p53 , PIK3CA , BAP1 , AKT1 and EZH2 in MCPyV-negative MCC tumor samples. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.• Pulitzer MP, Brannon AR, Berger MF, Louis P, Scott SN, Jungbluth AA, et al. Cutaneous squamous and neuroendocrine carcinoma: genetically and immunohistochemically different from Merkel cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(8):1023–32. Compared gene signatures and mutational rates of combined squamous and Merkel cell carcinoma versus pure Merkel cell carcinoma CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.• Harms PW, Vats P, Verhaegen ME, Robinson DR, Wu YM, Dhanasekaran SM, et al. The distinctive mutational spectra of polyomavirus-negative Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2015;75(18):3720–7. Identified mutations in Rb1 , p53 , PIK3CA , HRAS , PRUNE2 and NOTCH in MCPyV-negative MCC. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.• Hill NT, Zhang J, Leonard MK, Lee M, Shamma HN, Kadakia M. 1alpha, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) and the vitamin D receptor regulates DeltaNp63alpha levels and keratinocyte proliferation. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1781. Correlated increased expression of VDR and p63 in basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Merkel Cell Carcinoma. 2017; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/mcc.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2017.
- 45.•• Shibayama Y, Imafuku S, Takahashi A, Nakayama J. Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: statistical analysis of 403 reported cases. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(1):188–93. Established that patients with clinically node negative disease frequently have positive SLNB. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Hawryluk EB, O'Regan KN, Sheehy N, Guo Y, Dorosario A, Sakellis CG, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma: a study of 270 scans in 97 patients at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(4):592–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.• Nghiem P, Kaufman HL, Bharmal M, Mahnke L, Phatak H, Becker JC. Systematic literature review of efficacy, safety and tolerability outcomes of chemotherapy regimens in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2017. Comprehensive review describing the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in MCC;13:1263–79.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 64.Iwasaki T, Matsushita M, Nonaka D, Kuwamoto S, Kato M, Murakami I, et al. Comparison of Akt/mTOR/4E-BP1 pathway signal activation and mutations of PIK3CA in Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive and Merkel cell polyomavirus-negative carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(2):210–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 69.Sestini R, Orlando C, Peri A, Tricarico C, Pazzagli M, Serio M, et al. Quantitation of somatostatin receptor type 2 gene expression in neuroblastoma cell lines and primary tumors using competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2(10):1757–65.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 76.Afanasiev OK, Yelistratova L, Miller N, Nagase K, Paulson K, Iyer JG, et al. Merkel polyomavirus-specific T cells fluctuate with merkel cell carcinoma burden and express therapeutically targetable PD-1 and Tim-3 exhaustion markers. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(19):5351–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 78.•• Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O, et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1374–85. Randomized clinical trial that led to avelumab being the first FDA-approved drug for metastatic MCC. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 79.Topalian SL, Bhatia S, Hollebecque A, et al. Non-comparative, open-label, multiple cohort, phase 1/2 study to evaluate nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with virus-associated tumors (CheckMate 358): Efficacy and safety in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) [abstract]. In. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Res; 2017 Apr 1–5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; 2017. Abstract nr CT074 2017.Google Scholar