Current Nutrition Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 286–293 | Cite as

Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Child Health: Implications for Policy

  • Shabnam R. Momin
  • Alexis C. Wood
Maternal and Childhood Nutrition (AC Wood, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Maternal and Childhood Nutrition


Purpose of Review

Various policies to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption in children have been implemented. Here, we review the evidence on whether these policies are effective in reducing SSB intake and whether a reduction in SSB intake results in a concomitant reduction in child obesity. We also highlight ethical concerns with such efforts.

Recent Findings

The evidence supporting relationship between SSB consumption and child body mass index (BMI) is consistently small and lacks causality. The effects of policies are unclear; taxation has no clear relationship to SSB purchasing, innovative marketing outlets make it difficult to examine the effects of restricting marketing on SSB consumption, and there is no evidence that reducing SSB availability in schools decreases consumption.


Research studies with rigorous and reproducible study designs are needed to examine whether reducing SSB consumption reduces child obesity, and to identify implementable policies that not only reduce SSB consumption but also child weight.


Sugar-sweetened beverage Child obesity Policies Soda tax Nutrition labeling Food advertising Food marketing School nutrition SSB consumption Beverage consumption 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Shabnam Momin and Alexis C. Wood declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Park S, Pan L, Sherry B, Li R. The association of sugar-sweetened beverage intake during infancy with sugar-sweetened beverage intake at 6 years of age. Pediatrics. 2014;134:S56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosinger A, Herrick K, Gahche J, Park S. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among US youth, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2017;271:1–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lieb DC, Snow RE, DeBoer MD. Socioeconomic factors in the development of childhood obesity and diabetes. Clin Sports Med. 2009;28:349–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Hu FB. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obes Rev. 2013;14:606–19. This study using the key criteria of causality evaluates observational and clinical trial evidence for the link between SSB consumption and prevalence of obesity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nguyen S, Choi HK, Lustig RH, Hsu C-Y. Sugar-sweetened beverages, serum uric acid, and blood pressure in adolescents. J Pediatr. 2009;154:807–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deboer MD, Scharf RJ, Demmer RT. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in 2-to 5-year-old children. Pediatrics. 2013;132:413–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He B, Long W, Li X, Yang W, Chen Y, Zhu Y. Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption positively associated with the risks of obesity and hypertriglyceridemia among children aged 7–18 years in South China. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017;25:81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Forshee RA, Anderson PA, Storey ML. Sugar-sweetened beverages and body mass index in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1662–71. This is a meta-analysis of 12 studies (10 logitudinal and 2 randomized controlled trails) examining the association between SSB consumption and weight gain among children and adolescents.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and BMI in children and adolescents: reanalyses of a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:438–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:667–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han E, Powell LM. Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sleddens EF, Gerards SM, Thijs C, Vries NK, Kremers SP. General parenting, childhood overweight and obesity-inducing behaviors: A review. Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Horst K, Kremers S, Ferreira I, Singh A, Oenema A, Brug J. Perceived parenting style and practices and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by adolescents. Health Educ Res 2006;22:295-304.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frary CD, Johnson RK, Wang MQ. Children and adolescents' choices of foods and beverages high in added sugars are associated with intakes of key nutrients and food groups. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Gillman M, Colditz GA. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obesity. 2004;12:778–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newby P, Peterson KE, Berkey CS, Leppert J, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Beverage consumption is not associated with changes in weight and body mass index among low-income preschool children in North Dakota. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1086–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blum JW, Jacobsen DJ, Donnelly JE. Beverage consumption patterns in elementary school aged children across a two-year period. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005;24:93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mundt CA, Baxter-Jones A, Whiting SJ, Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, Mirwald RL. Relationships of activity and sugar drink intake on fat mass development in youths. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1245–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Striegel-Moore RH, Thompson D, Affenito SG, Franko DL, Obarzanek E, Barton BA, et al. Correlates of beverage intake in adolescent girls: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. J Pediatr. 2006;148:183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson L, Mander AP, Jones LR, Emmett PM, Jebb SA. Is sugar-sweetened beverage consumption associated with increased fatness in children? Nutrition. 2007;23:557–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Libuda L, Alexy U, Sichert-Hellert W, Stehle P, Karaolis-Danckert N, Buyken AE, et al. Pattern of beverage consumption and long-term association with body-weight status in German adolescents–results from the DONALD study. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:1370–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vanselow MS, Pereira MA, Neumark-Sztainer D, Raatz SK. Adolescent beverage habits and changes in weight over time: findings from Project EAT. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:1489–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carlson JA, Crespo NC, Sallis JF, Patterson RE, Elder JP. Dietary-related and physical activity-related predictors of obesity in children: a 2-year prospective study. Child Obes. 2012;8:110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Olsen NJ, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N, Kristensen PL, Heitmann BL. Intake of liquid and solid sucrose in relation to changes in body fatness over 6 years among 8-to 10-year-old children: the European Youth Heart Study. Obes Facts. 2012;5:506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laska MN, Murray DM, Lytle LA, Harnack LJ. Longitudinal associations between key dietary behaviors and weight gain over time: transitions through the adolescent years. Obesity. 2012;20:118–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laurson K, Eisenmann JC, Moore S. Lack of association between television viewing, soft drinks, physical activity and body mass index in children. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:505–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Viner RM, Cole TJ. Who changes body mass between adolescence and adulthood? Factors predicting change in BMI between 16 year and 30 years in the 1970 British Birth Cohort. Int J Obes. 2006;30:1368–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    •• Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1084–102. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis anlayzes prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials seprately in children and adults to provide evidence that SSB consumption promotes weight gain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Frazier-Wood A. Nutritional epidemiology data should be analyzed by nutritional epidemiologists. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Willett W, Stamfer M. Implications of total energy intake for epidemiologic analyses. In: Willet W, editor. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1220S–31S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    James J, Thomas P, Kerr D. Preventing childhood obesity: two year follow-up results from the Christchurch obesity prevention programme in schools (CHOPPS). BMJ. 2007;335:762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VR, Antonelli TA, Gortmaker SL, Osganian SK, et al. A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Osganian SK, Chomitz VR, Ellenbogen SJ, Ludwig DS. Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:673–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sichieri R, Trotte AP, De Souza RA, Veiga GV. School randomised trial on prevention of excessive weight gain by discouraging students from drinking sodas. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    De Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, Katan MB. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jou J, Techakehakij W. International application of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation in obesity reduction: factors that may influence policy effectiveness in country-specific contexts. Health Policy. 2012;107:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    WHO. Taxes on sugary drinks: Why do it [Internet]? World Health Organization; 2016:2–5. [cited 2018 July 14] Available from:;jsessionid=794038651F8DF37E27A9C42A62BBF7C2?sequence=1.
  40. 40.
    Frieden TR, Dietz W, Collins J. Reducing childhood obesity through policy change: acting now to prevent obesity. Health Aff. 2010;29:357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sonneville KR, Long MW, Ward ZJ, Resch SC, Wang YC, Pomeranz JL, et al. BMI and healthcare cost impact of eliminating tax subsidy for advertising unhealthy food to youth. Am J Prev Med. 2012;49:124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Long MW, Gortmaker SL, Ward ZJ, Resch SC, Moodie ML, Sacks G, et al. Cost effectiveness of a sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax in the US. Am J Prev Med. 2012;49:112–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhen C, Finkelstein EA, Nonnemaker JM, Karns SA, Todd JE. Predicting the effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on food and beverage demand in a large demand system. Am J Agric Econ. 2013;96:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cawley J, Frisvold DE. The Pass-Through of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Retail Prices: The Case of Berkeley, California. J Policy Anal Manage. 2017;36:303–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    • Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, Mcculloch CE, Madsen KA. Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:1865–71. This study evaluates the impact of the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in Berkeley, California, which became the first US jurisdiction to implement such a tax.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;h6704:352.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Colchero MA, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff. 2017;36:564–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Taillie LS, Induni M, Miles DR et al. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar- sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leibowitz J, Rosch JT, Ramirez E, Brill J, Ohihausen M. A Review of Food Marketing to Children and Adolescents: Federal Trade Commission, Follow-Up Report. 2012.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Powell LM, Szczypka G, Chaloupka FJ, Braunschweig CL. Nutritional content of television food advertisements seen by children and adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics. 2007;120:576–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Harris JL, Schwartz MB, Lodolce M, Munsell C, Fleming-Milici F, et al. Sugary drink FACTS 2014 some progress but much room for improvement in marketing to youth [Internet]. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity; 2017 [cited 2018 July 27]. Available from:
  52. 52.
    Swinburn B, Sacks G, Lobstein T, Rigby N, Baur LA, Brownell KD, et al. Sydney Principles’ for reducing the commercial promotion of foods and beverages to children. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:881–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Finkelstein DM, Hill EL, Whitaker RC. School food environments and policies in US public schools. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Johnston LD, Delva J, O’Malley PM. Soft drink availability, contracts, and revenues in American secondary schools. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:S209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    USDA. Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act Smart Snacks in School [Internet]. United States Department of Agriculture; 2015. [updated 2017 Nov 28; cited 2018 June 20]. Available from:
  56. 56.
    Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Terry-Mcelrath YM. School policies and practices to improve health and prevent obesity: National secondary school survey results: School Years 2006–07 through 2012–14. Ann Arbor Michigan. 2015;6.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Taber DR, Chriqui JF, Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ. Banning all sugar-sweetened beverages in middle schools: reduction of in-school access and purchasing but not overall consumption. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:256–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    • Terry-Mcelrath YM, Chriqui JF, O’Malley PM, Chaloupka FJ, Johnston LD. Regular soda policies, school availability, and high school student consumption. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48:436–44. This study provides evidence on state and district level policies on soda ban in high school and its effect on availability and consumption among students.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cradock AL, Mchugh A, Mont-Ferguson H, Grant L, Barrett JL, Gortmaker SL, et al. Peer Reviewed: Effect of School District Policy Change on Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Among High School Students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004-2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8:A74.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Johnson DB, Bruemmer B, Lund AE, Evens CC, Mar CM. Impact of school district sugar-sweetened beverage policies on student beverage exposure and consumption in middle schools. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:S30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    USFDA. Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label [Internet]. United States Food and Drug Administration; 2017. [updated 2018 June 6; cited 2018 June 10]. Available from:
  62. 62.
    Popova L. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Labels: Lessons learned from the tobacco industry. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2016;44:633.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    American Beverage Associaion. Really? Warning labels on soda [Internet]? ABA Blog; 2014. [cited 2018 June 14]. Available from:
  64. 64.
    Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, Barraclough S, Levy DE. A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Roberto CA, Wong D, Musicus A, Hammond D. The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage health warning labels on parents’ choices. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20153185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gollust SE, Barry CL, Niederdeppe J. Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Prev Med. 2014;63:52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    WHO. World Health Organization global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: Marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2010. [cited 2018 June 16]. Available from:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research CenterBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations