Review of Religious Research

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 471–497 | Cite as

Anti-pornography Narratives as Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Religious Variation in the Effect that Pornography Viewing has on the Marital Happiness of Husbands

  • Jeremy N. Thomas
  • Becka A. Alper
  • Shane A. Gleason
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Using a mixed methods design that compares quantitative content analysis of popular religious magazines with statistical analysis of national survey data, we show how the anti-pornography narratives that are predominant within different religious traditions can influence the effect that pornography viewing has on the marital happiness of husbands within those traditions. More specifically, we propose a causal chain that explains how meso-level anti-pornography narratives can influence micro-level pornography-effect scripts and, in turn, influence the effect that pornography viewing has on the marital happiness of husbands. We suggest, then, that this kind of causal chain can be thought of as a type of self-fulfilling prophecy. However, instead of operating exclusively at the micro-level as self-fulfilling prophecies have typically been theorized as doing, we apply the notion of the self-fulfilling prophecy to the meso-level, so that rather than just considering how individual thinking can lead to individual outcomes, we also consider how collective thinking can lead to collective outcomes.

Keywords

Self-fulfilling prophecy Moral narratives Religious influence Pornography Marital happiness 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the following persons for their helpful comments and suggestions: Jim Aho, Candace Christensen, Gesine Hearn, Dan Olson, Trina Running, Jim Stoutenborough, Laura Thomas, and three anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Abend, Gabriel. 2008. Two main problems in the sociology of morality. Theory and Society 37 (2): 87–125. doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9044-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ai, Chunrong, and Edward C. Norton. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 80 (1): 123–129. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Theological Library Association. 2011. ATLA Religion Database. http://www.atla.com/.
  4. Benjamin, Orly, and Dmitry Tlusten. 2010. Intimacy and/or degradation: Heterosexual images of togetherness and women’s embracement of pornography. Sexualities 13 (5): 599–623. doi: 10.1177/1363460710376492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beres, Melanie A., Edward Herold, and Scott B. Maitland. 2004. Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior 33 (5): 475–486. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergner, Raymond M., and Ana J. Bridges. 2002. The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 28 (3): 193–206. doi: 10.1080/009262302760328235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, William D., Jacqueline H.R. DeMeritt, and Justin Esarey. 2010. Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 248–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00429.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyerlein, Kraig, and Stephen Vaisey. 2013. Individualism revisited: Moral worldviews and civic engagement. Poetics 41 (4): 384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blair-Loy, Mary. 2001. Cultural constructions of family schemas: The case of women finance executives. Gender and Society 15 (5): 687–709. doi: 10.1177/089124301015005004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braithwaite, Scott R., Gwen Coulson, Krista Keddington, and Frank D. Fincham. 2015. The influence of pornography on sexual scripts and hooking up among emerging adults in college. Archives of Sexual Behavior 44 (1): 111–123. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0351-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brett, Edward T. 2002. The U.S. Catholic press on Guatemala. Journal of Church and State 44 (1): 115–134. doi: 10.1093/jcs/44.1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronstein, Carolyn. 2011. Battling pornography: The American feminist anti-pornography movement, 1976–1986. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzzell, Timothy. 2005. Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality and Culture 9 (1): 28–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02908761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byers, E. Sandra. 1996. How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 8 (1–2): 7–25. doi: 10.1300/J056v08n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caughlin, John P., Ted L. Huston, and Renate M. Houts. 2000. How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (2): 326–336. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coffman, Elesha J. 2013. The Christian Century and the rise of the protestant mainline. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, Al, David L. Delmonico, and Ron Burg. 2000. Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity 7 (1–2): 5–29. doi: 10.1080/10720160008400205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corra, Mamadi, Shannon K. Carter, J. Scott Carter, and David Knox. 2009. Trends in marital happiness by gender and race, 1973 to 2006. Journal of Family Issues 30 (10): 1379–1404. doi: 10.1177/0192513X09336214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daneback, Kristian, Bente Traeen, and Sven-Axel Mansson. 2009. Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior 38 (5): 746–753. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darr, Asaf, and Trevor Pinch. 2013. Performing sales: Material scripts and the social organization of obligation. Organization Studies 34 (11): 1601–1621. doi: 10.1177/0170840612470228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Djupe, Paul A., and Christopher P. Gilbert. 2003. The prophetic pulpit: Clergy, churches, and communities in American politics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Doran, Kirk, and Joseph Price. 2014. Pornography and marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 35 (4): 489–498. doi: 10.1007/s10834-014-9391-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Döring, Nicola M. 2009. The Internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (5): 1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Downey, Geraldine, Antonio L. Freitas, Benjamin Michaelis, and Hala Khouri. 1998. The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (2): 545–560. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Durkheim, Emile. 1915. The elementary forms of religious life. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  27. EBSCO Information Services. 2014. EBSCO Academic Search Premier. https://www.ebscohost.com/.
  28. Farrell, Justin. 2011. Environmental activism and moral schemas: Cultural components of differential participation. Environment and Behavior 45 (3): 399–423. doi: 10.1177/0013916511422445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Firat, Rengin, and Chad M. McPherson. 2010. Toward an integrated science of morality: Linking mind, society, and culture. In Handbook of the sociology of morality, ed. Steven Hitlin, and Stephen Vaisey, 361–384. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gagnon, John H., and William Simon. 2011. Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality, 2nd ed. Piscataway: AldineTransaction.Google Scholar
  31. General Social Survey. 2014. National Opinion Research Center. http://gss.norc.org/.
  32. Gioia, Dennis A. 1992. Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5): 379–389. doi: 10.1007/BF00870550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gioia, Dennis A., and Peter P. Poole. 1984. Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review 9 (3): 449–459. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1984.4279675.Google Scholar
  34. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  35. Grov, Christian, Brian Joseph Gillespie, Tracy Royce, and Janet Lever. 2011. Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: A U.S. online survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior 40 (2): 429–439. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9598-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108 (4): 814–834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haidt, Jonathan. 2008. Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1): 65–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haidt, Jonathan, Jesse Graham, and Craig Joseph. 2009. Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry 20 (2–3): 110–119. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hamman, John A., Shane A. Gleason, and Charles DiStefano. 2014. Incumbent vulnerability and entry in gubernatorial elections: The case of former governors. The Social Science Journal 51 (2): 212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2013.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heaphy, Brian, and Anna Einarsdottir. 2012. Scripting civil partnerships: Interviewing couples together and apart. Qualitative Research 13 (1): 53–70. doi: 10.1177/1468794112454997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hertlein, Katherine M. 2006. Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal 14 (4): 366–371. doi: 10.1177/1066480706290508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hitlin, Steven, and Stephen Vaisey. 2013. The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology 39: 51–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoffmann, John P. 2014. Religiousness, social networks, moral schemas, and marijuana use: A dynamic dual-process model of culture and behavior. Social Forces 93 (1): 181–208. doi: 10.1093/sf/sou053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ignatow, Gabriel. 2009. Why the sociology of morality needs Bourdieu’s habitus. Sociological Inquiry 79 (1): 98–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00273.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson, Luke Timothy. 2014. The Commonweal Catholic. Commonweal, October 24, 16–19.Google Scholar
  46. Kavolis, Vytautas. 1988. Contemporary moral cultures and ‘The return of the sacred’. Sociology of Religion 49 (3): 203–216. doi: 10.2307/3711585.Google Scholar
  47. Kwee, Alex W., Amy W. Dominguez, and Donald Ferrell. 2007. Sexual addiction and Christian college men: Conceptual, assessment, and treatment challenges. Journal of Psychology and Christianity 26 (1): 3–13.Google Scholar
  48. Lambert, Nathaniel M., Sesen Negash, Tyler F. Stillman, Spencer B. Olmstead, and Frank D. Fincham. 2012. A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 31 (4): 410–438. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.4.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, Kristen Schultz, and Hiroshi Ono. 2008. Specialization and happiness in marriage: A U.S.–Japan comparison. Social Science Research 37 (4): 1216–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lumpkins, Crystal Y., K. Allen Greiner, Christine Daley, Natabhona M. Mabachi, and Kris Neuhaus. 2013. Promoting healthy behavior from the pulpit: Clergy share their perspectives on effective health communication in the African American church. Journal of Religion and Health 52 (4): 1093–1107. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9533-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maddox, Amanda M., Galena K. Rhoades, and Howard J. Markman. 2011. Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior 40 (2): 441–448. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manning, Jill C. 2006. The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity 13 (2–3): 131–165. doi: 10.1080/10720160600870711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McAdams, Dan P., Michelle Albaugh, Emily Farber, Jennifer Daniels, Regina L. Logan, and Brad Olson. 2008. Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (4): 978–990. doi: 10.1037/a0012650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCormick, Naomi B. 1987. Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Marital Therapy 2 (1): 3–27. doi: 10.1080/02674658708407734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McQuillan, Kevin. 2004. When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review 30 (1): 25–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00002.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Merton, Robert K. 1948. The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review 8 (2): 193–210. doi: 10.2307/4609267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murray, Sandra L., John G. Holmes, and Dale W. Griffin. 1996. The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (6): 1155–1180. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Murray, Sandra L., Gina M. Bellavia, Paul Rose, and Dale W. Griffin. 2003. Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (1): 126–147. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Narvaez, Darcia. 1998. The influence of moral schemas on the reconstruction of moral narratives in eighth graders and college students. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (1): 13–24. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olmstead, Spencer B., Sesen Negash, Kay Pasley, and Frank D. Fincham. 2013. Emerging adults’ expectations for pornography use in the context of future committed romantic relationships: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior 42 (4): 625–635. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9986-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parmar, Bidhan. 2014. From intrapsychic moral awareness to the role of social disruptions, labeling, and actions in the emergence of moral issues. Organization Studies 35 (8): 1101–1126. doi: 10.1177/0170840613517595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The social system. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  63. Patterson, Richard, and Joseph Price. 2012. Pornography, religion, and the happiness gap: Does pornography impact the actively religious differently? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51 (1): 79–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01630.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perry, Samuel L. 2016a. Does viewing pornography reduce marital quality over time? Evidence from longitudinal data. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0770-y.Google Scholar
  65. Perry, Samuel L. 2016b. From bad to worse? Pornography consumption, spousal religiosity, gender, and marital quality. Sociological Forum 31 (2): 441–464. doi: 10.1111/socf.12252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Perry, Samuel L., and Kara J. Snawder. 2017. Pornography, religion, and parent-child relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0927-8.Google Scholar
  67. Powell, Christopher. 2010. Four concepts of morality. In Handbook of the sociology of morality, ed. Steven Hitlin, and Stephen Vaisey, 35–56. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Resch, Marley N., and Kevin G. Alderson. 2013. Female partners of men who use pornography: Are honesty and mutual use associated with relationship satisfaction? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 40 (5): 410–424. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2012.751077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sandler, Kevin S. 2001. The naked truth: Showgirls and the fate of the X/NC-17 rating. Cinema Journal 40 (3): 69–93. doi: 10.1353/cj.2001.0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schafer, Markus H. 2014. Schema via structure? Personal network density and the moral evaluation of infidelity. Sociological Forum 29 (1): 120–136. doi: 10.1111/socf.12072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schiavone, Deborah Burdett. 2009. The effects of exposure to community violence on aspects of adolescent identity development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing 22 (2): 99–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2009.00178.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sewell Jr., William H. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Simon, William, and John H. Gagnon. 1986. Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior 15 (2): 97–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01542219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Simon, William, and John H. Gagnon. 2003. Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology 26 (4): 491–497. doi: 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith, Christian. 2003. Moral, believing animals: Human personhood and culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Starks, Brian, and Robert V. Robinson. 2007. Moral cosmology, religion, and adult values for children. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46 (1): 17–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00338.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Steensland, Brian, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, and Robert D. Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79 (1): 291–318. doi: 10.1093/sf/79.1.291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stets, Jan E., and Michael J. Carter. 2012. A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review 77 (1): 120–140. doi: 10.1177/0003122411433762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Štulhofer, Aleksandar, Vesna Buško, and Ivan Landripet. 2010. Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39 (1): 168–178. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9387-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sumerau, J.Edward, and Ryan T. Cragun. 2015a. Avoid that pornographic playground’: Teaching pornographic abstinence in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Critical Research on Religion 3 (2): 168–188. doi: 10.1177/2050303214567669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sumerau, J.Edward, and Ryan T. Cragun. 2015b. ‘Don’t push your immorals on me’: Encouraging anti-porn advocacy in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Sexualities 18 (1–2): 57–79. doi: 10.1177/1363460714531433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swidler, Ann. 2001. What anchors cultural practices. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, pp 83–101, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Tappan, Mark, and Lyn Mikel Brown. 1989. Stories told and lessons learned: Toward a narrative approach to moral development and moral education. Harvard Educational Review 59 (2): 182–206. doi: 10.17763/haer.59.2.d364up55vx875411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas, Jeremy N. 2013. Outsourcing moral authority: The internal secularization of evangelicals’ anti-pornography narratives. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (3): 457–475. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thomas, Jeremy N. 2016. The Development and Deployment of the Idea of Pornography Addiction Within American Evangelicalism. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity 23 (2–3): 182–195. doi: 10.1080/10720162.2016.1140603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thomas, Jeremy N., and Daniel V.A. Olson. 2012a. Beyond the culture war: Managing sexual relationships inside a congregation of gay evangelicals. Review of Religious Research 54 (3): 349–370. doi: 10.1007/s13644-012-0051-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thomas, Jeremy N., and Daniel V.A. Olson. 2012b. Evangelical elites’ changing responses to homosexuality 1960–2009. Sociology of Religion 73 (3): 239–272. doi: 10.1093/socrel/srs031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thomas, Jeremy N., and Andrew L. Whitehead. 2015. Evangelical elites’ anti-homosexuality narratives as a resistance strategy against attribution effects. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54 (2): 345–362. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vaisey, Stephen. 2009. Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology 114 (6): 1675–1715. doi: 10.1086/597179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watzlawick, Paul. 2011. Self-fulfilling prophecies. In The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction, ed. Jodi O’Brien, 392–408. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  91. Weber, Max. 1930. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Wiederman, Michael W. 2005. The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal 13 (4): 496–502. doi: 10.1177/1066480705278729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Willoughby, Brian J., Jason S. Carroll, Dean M. Busby, and Cameron C. Brown. 2015. Differences in pornography use among couples: Associations with satisfaction, stability, and relationship processes. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0562-9.Google Scholar
  94. Wright, Paul J. 2012. A longitudinal analysis of US adults’ pornography exposure: Sexual socialization, selective exposure, and the moderating role of unhappiness. Journal of Media Psychology 24 (2): 67–76. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wright, Paul J. 2013. U.S. males and pornography, 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, correlates. Journal of Sex Research 50 (1): 60–71. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.628132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Social Work, and CriminologyIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA
  2. 2.Pew Research CenterWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations