Review of Religious Research

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 43–59 | Cite as

The Secularization of Sunday: Real or Perceived Competition for Churches

Original Paper

Abstract

In a survey of pastors and members of 16 declining congregations in the US and Canada, respondents most commonly identified competing Sunday activities as the primary reason for the decline in Sunday worship attendance. The repeal of “blue laws” that kept stores closed on Sundays has resulted in many more people working or shopping on Sundays, and children’s athletic activities are often scheduled on Sunday mornings at the very time when many churches traditionally have provided religious education. Based on a study of 16 mainline and conservative Protestant congregations in decline, this article considers the effect—both real and perceived—of the secularization of Sunday on congregations with declining worship attendance.

Keywords

Secularization Congregation Sunday Attribution Church decline 

References

  1. Berger, Peter. 1969. The sacred canopy. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bibby, Reginald. 2006. The Boomer factor. Toronto: Bastien Books.Google Scholar
  3. Casterelli, Sandro. 2009. Intergroup threat and experienced affect: The distinct roles of causal attributions and in-group identification. The Journal of Social Psychology 149(3): 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaves, Mark. 1994. Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces 72(3): 749–775.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, Warren. 2008. Kids’ sports. Canadian Social Trends 85: 54–61.Google Scholar
  6. Finke, Roger. 1997. The consequences of religious competition. In Rational choice theory and religion, ed. Lawrence Young, 46–65. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Finke, Roger and Rodney Stark. 2005. The churching of America 17762005. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gruber, Jonathan and Daniel M. Hungerman. 2008. The church versus the mall: What happens when religion faces increased secular competition? Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2): 831–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hadaway, C. Kirk. 2009. Congregationally-based religion: Boon or bane for faith in the west? Review of Religious Research 51(2): 117–133.Google Scholar
  10. Hunter, James Davison. 1983. American Evangelicalism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Iannaccone, Lawrence R. 1997. Rational choice. In Rational choice theory and religion, ed. Lawrence Young, 25–45. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, Frank. 1999. Are children going to religious services? Canadian Social Trends 54:13–16.Google Scholar
  13. McMullin, Steve. 2010. A new paradigm for the study of religion: A re-examination. Implicit Religion 13(1): 3–16.Google Scholar
  14. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, Christian. 2005. Soul searching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stark, Rodney and Roger Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Stolz, Jörg. 2010. A silent battle: Theorizing the effects of competition between churches and secular institutions. Review of Religious Research 51(3): 253–277.Google Scholar
  18. Warner, R. Stephen. 1993. Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 98(5): 1044–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weiner, B. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement, motivation, and emotion. Psychological Review 4: 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Acadia Divinity CollegeAcadia UniversityWolfvilleCanada

Personalised recommendations