Skip to main content
Log in

Child Discipline and Conservative Protestantism: Why the Relationship Between Corporal Punishment and Child Behavior Problems May Vary by Religious Context

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Using data on 1,214 families from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, this study explored why and under what conditions parental conservative Protestant affiliation moderates the relationship between corporal punishment and children’s problem behavior. Previous scholars suggest that children raised by conservative Protestants may be less likely to experience negative outcomes associated with corporal punishment due to (1) adherence to guidelines that may minimize the risk of harm from corporal punishment, and (2) corporal punishment being used as part of a consistent parenting strategy. This study extended previous research by testing these hypotheses. Overall, corporal punishment was associated with increased externalizing and internalizing problem behavior among children. However, there was some support for our hypotheses. Specifically, children raised by conservative Protestant parents were less likely to display problem behavior if only the father spanked and if the father spanked infrequently, and were less likely to display externalizing behavior only if both parents were conservative Protestant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, Thomas M., and Leslie A. Rescorla. 2000. Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, John P. 1995. Spare the rod…, or spare the child? Divergent perspectives on conservative Protestant child discipline. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37: 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, John P., W. Bradford Wilcox, and Christopher G. Ellison. 2000. Charting the paradoxes of evangelical family life: Gender and parenting in conservative Protestant households. Family Ministry 14: 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, John P., and Christopher G. Ellison. 1995. Divergent perspectives on child rearing: Conservative PROTESTANTs vs. the secular experts. Sociology of Religion 56: 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, John P., Xu Xiaohe, and Martin L. Levin. 2008. Religion and child development: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Social Science Research 37: 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor Religion Survey, Wave 2. 2007. Retrieved from The Association of Religion Data Archives on March 21, 2011 http://www.thearda.com/quickstats/qs_58.asp.

  • Berlin, Lisa J., Jean M. Ispa, Mark A. Fine, Patrick S. Malone, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Christy Brady-Smith, Catherine Ayoub, and Yu. Bai. 2009. Correlates and consequences of spanking and verbal punishment for low-income White, African American, and Mexican American toddlers. Child Development 80(5): 1403–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Daphne. 2008. Parenting online and lay literature on infant spanking: Information readily available to parents. Social Work in Health Care 47: 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, Vaughn R.A., and Tim B. Heaton. 1997. Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36: 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, Larry. 1970. The Christian family. Minneapolis, MN: Bethany Fellowship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Randal D., Gary W. Peterson, and Coleen McCracken. 1998. Predicting spanking of younger and older children by mothers and fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family 60: 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deater-Deckard, Kirby, and Kenneth A. Dodge. 1997. Externalizing behavior problems and discipline revisited: Nonlinear effects and variation by culture, context, and gender. Psychological Inquiry 8: 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, James. 1978. The strong-willed child: Birth through adolescence. Wheaton, IL: Living Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, James. 1987. Parenting Isn’t for Cowards. Dallas, TX: Word Publishing.

  • Dobson, James. 1992. The New Dare to Discipline. Wheaton, IL: Living Books.

  • Dobson, James. 2010. Bringing Up Girls. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.

  • Ellison, Christopher G., John P. Bartkowski, and Michelle L. Segal. 1996. Conservative Protestantism and the parental use of corporal punishment. Social Forces 74: 1003–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Christopher G., Marc A. Musick, and George W. Holden. 2011. Does conservative Protestantism moderate the association between corporal punishment and child outcomes? Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 946–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Christopher G., and Darren E. Sherkat. 1993a. Conservative Protestantism and support for corporal punishment. American Sociological Review 58: 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Christopher G., and Darren E. Sherkat. 1993b. Obedience and autonomy: Religion and parental values reconsidered. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32:313–329.

  • Flynn, Clifton P. 1998. To spank or not to spank: The effect of situation and age of child on support for corporal punishment. Journal of Family Violence 13: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoff, Elizabeth T., Andrew Grogan-Kaylor, Jennifer E. Lansford, Lei Chang, Zelli Arnaldo, Kirby Deater-Deckard, and Kenneth A. Dodge. 2010. Parent discipline practices in an international sample: Associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Development 81: 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles-Sims, Jean, and Charles Lockhart. 2005. Culturally shaped patterns of disciplining children. Journal of Family Issues 26: 196–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles-Sims, Jean, Murray A. Straus, and David B. Sugarman. 1995. Child, maternal, and family characteristics associated with spanking. Family Relations 44: 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnoe, Marjorie L., and Carrie L. Mariner. 1997. Toward a developmental-contextual model of the effects of parental spanking on children’s aggression. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 151: 768–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnoe, Marjorie Lindner, E. Mavis Hetherington, and David Reiss. 2006. Differential impact of fathers’ authoritarian parenting on early adolescent adjustment in conservative Protestant versus other families. Journal of Family Psychology 4: 589–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrics 47: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Lynn M., and John P. Bartkowski. 2008. Scripture, sin, and salvation: Theological conservatism reconsidered. Social Forces 86: 1647–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, Anne E., Keith G. Scott, and Charles R. Bauer. 1992. The adaptive social behavior inventory (ASBI): A new assessment of social competence in high-risk five-year-olds. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 10: 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.Brad, and William L. Johnson. 1998. Self-help books used by religious practitioners. Journal of Counseling and Development 76: 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansford, Jennifer E., Lei Chang, Kenneth A. Dodge, Patrick S. Malone, Paul Oburu, Kerstin Palmerus, Dario Bacchini, Concetta Pastorelli, Anna Silvia Bombi, Arnaldo Zelli, Sombat Tapanya, Nandita Chaudhary, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Beth Manke, and Naomi Quinn. 2005. Physical discipline and children’s adjustment: Cultural normativeness as a moderator. Child Development 76: 1234–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansford, Jennifer E., Kirby Deater-Deckard, Kenneth A. Dodge, John E. Bates, and Gregory S. Pettit. 2004. Ethnic differences in the link between physical discipline and later adolescent externalizing behaviors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45: 801–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larzelere, Robert E., and Brett R. Kuhn. 2005. Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary practices: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 8: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larzelere, Robert E., Paul R. Sather, William N. Schneider, David B. Larson, and Patricia L. Pike. 1998. Punishment enhances reasoning’s effectiveness as a disciplinary response to toddlers. Journal of Marriage and Family 60: 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLloyd, Vonnie C., and Julia Smith. 2002. Physical discipline and behavior problems in African American, European American, and hispanic children. Emotional support as a moderator. Journal of Marriage and Family 64: 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, Elizabeth Oddone, and Claudio Violato. 2004. A meta-analysis of the published research on the affective, cognitive, and behavioral effects of corporal punishment. The Journal of Psychology 138: 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, Richard J. 2011. Parental religiosity, religious homogamy, and young children’s well-being. Sociology of Religion 72: 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, Richard J., and Chris Knoester. 2007. Parents’ religious heterogamy and children’s well-being. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46: 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, Nancy E., Julien O. Teitler, Irwin Garfinkel, and Sara McLanahan. 2001. The fragile families and child wellbeing study: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review 23: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Christina M., and Ryan C. Henderson. 2010. Who spares the rod? Religious orientation, social conformity, and child abuse potential. Child Abuse and Neglect 34: 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohner, Ronald P., Shana L. Bourque, and Carlos A. Elordi. 1996. Children’s perceptions of corporal punishment, caretaker acceptance, and psychological adjustment in a poor, biracial southern community. Journal of Marriage and Family 58: 842–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, Eliza R. 2000. Ethical beliefs, attitudes, and professional practices of psychologists regarding parental use of corporal punishment: A survey, 3 children’s services. Social Policy, Resolution, and Practice 23: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacks, Ann Michele, Toko Oshio, Jean Gerard, and Jacqueline Roe. 2009. The moderating effect of parental warmth on the association between spanking and child aggression: A longitudinal approach. Infant and Child Development 18: 178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Robert D. Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79: 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Murray A. 2001. Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families and its effects on children, 2nd ed. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Murray A., and Vera E. Mouradian. 1998. Impulsive corporal punishment by mothers and antisocial behavior and impulsiveness of children. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 16: 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Murray A., and Julie H. Stewart. 1999. Corporal punishment by American parents: National data on prevalence, chronicity, severity, and duration, in relation to child and family characteristics. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2: 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Heather A., and Paul A. Muller. 2004. Long-term effects of child corporal punishment on depressive symptoms in young adults: Potential moderators and mediators. Journal of Family Issues 25: 761–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittrup, Brigitte, and George W. Holden. 2010. Children’s assessments of corporal punishment and other disciplinary practices: The role of age, race, ses, and exposure to spanking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, W.Bradford. 2004. Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Christopher G. Ellison and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Petts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petts, R.J., Kysar-Moon, A.E. Child Discipline and Conservative Protestantism: Why the Relationship Between Corporal Punishment and Child Behavior Problems May Vary by Religious Context. Rev Relig Res 54, 445–468 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-012-0080-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-012-0080-3

Keywords

Navigation