Advertisement

Review of Religious Research

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 401–420 | Cite as

Initiation Rites in the Contemporary Catholic Church: What Difference Do They Make?

  • David YamaneEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Since 1988, well over one million individuals in the United States have been initiated into the Roman Catholic Church through the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA). Studying the RCIA today promises to enrich understanding of contemporary rites of initiation for both basic and applied researchers. To this end, this article asks and answers two key questions: Do individuals who participate in the RCIA process in the Catholic Church experience an increase in ecclesial involvement and spiritual practice? If so, is the extent of that growth explained by aspects of the RCIA process itself? To answer these questions, I employ a quasi-experimental (noequivalent group, pre-test/post-test) design—collecting data on individuals at the beginning of their involvement in the RCIA process and after their initiation (N = 159)—to identify the extent of change in different domains of religiosity over the course of the RCIA process. I then use organizational-level data on characteristics of the RCIA process in 32 different parishes to explain differences in the extent of individual change. I find those who were initiated in parishes in which the RCIA process was more fully implemented were not only more actively engaged with their parishes (ecclesial involvement) but also grew in their level of spiritual practice. Substantive and methodological contributions of this research are discussed.

Keywords

Initiation rituals Roman Catholicism Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults Quasi-experimentation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research on which this article is based was supported by grants from the Institute for Scholarship in the Liberal Arts and the Office of Research at the University of Notre Dame, the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Religious Research Association, and the Louisville Institute for the Study of American Religion. Sarah MacMillen was a wonderful collaborator on this project in its early stages. Regular conversations with professional lay ministers Regina Wilson and Jay Landry kept me theologically and pastorally honest along the way, and Lynn Neal served as an ideal writing accountability partner. The efforts of the RRR editor and anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. And I cannot forget that nearly 200 individuals gave literally hundreds of hours to the project by completing surveys and interviews. For all of this assistance I am grateful, and for any remaining densities in the work I am solely responsible.

References

  1. Ammerman, Nancy T., Jackson W. Carroll, Carl S. Dudley, and William McKinney. 1998. Studying congregations: A new handbook. Nashville: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, James, and Werner Wothke. 1999. Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago: SmallWaters.Google Scholar
  3. Bentler, Peter M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107: 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, Kenneth. 1989. A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research 17: 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne, Michael W., and Robert Cudeck. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models, ed. Kenneth Bollen, and J.S. Long, 1162–1360. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Carmines, Edward G., and John P. McIver. 1981. Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In Social measurement: Current issues, ed. G.W. Borhrnstedt, and E.F. Borgatta. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. D’Ambrosio, Marcellino. 1991. Ressourcement Theology, Aggiornamento, and the Hermeneutics of Tradition. Communio 18 (Winter). www.crossroadsinitiative.com/library.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2007.
  8. D’Antonio, William, James Davidson, Dean Hoge, and Mary Gautier. 2007. American Catholics today: New realities of their faith and their Church. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Eliade, Mircea. 1958. Rites and symbols of initiation: The mysteries of birth and rebirth. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson, Richard. 1995. Late have I loved thee: Stories of religious conversion and commitment in later life. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  11. Grimes, Ronald. 2000. Deeply into the bone: Re-inventing rites of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, Maxwell. 1999a. The rites of Christian initiation: Their evolution and interpretation. Collegeville: Pueblo.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, Maxwell. 1999b. Let’s stop making ‘converts’ at Easter. Catechumenate: A Journal of Christian Initiation 21: 10–20.Google Scholar
  14. Kavanagh, Aidan. 1991. The shape of baptism: The rite of Christian initiation. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lewinski, Ron. 1983. Welcoming the new catholic. Chicago: Liturgy Training Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Maines, David, and Michael McCallion. 2007. Transforming Catholicism: Liturgical change in the Vatican II Church. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Mark, Melvin M., and Jennifer Mills. 2007. Experiments and quasi-experiments for decision making: Why, how, and how good? In Handbook of decision making, ed. G. Morcol, 459–482. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mark, Melvin M., and Charles S. Reichardt. 2009. Quasi-experimentation. In Sage handbook of applied social research methods, 2nd ed, ed. L. Bickman, and Debra Rog, 182–213. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. McCallion, Michael J. 2000. Lay and professional views on tabernacle location in Catholic Parishes. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29: 717–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCallion, Michael J., and David R. Maines. 2002. Spiritual gatekeepers: Time and the rite of Christian initiation of adults. Symbolic Interaction 25: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCallion, Michael J., David R. Maines, and Steven Wolfel. 1996. Policy as practice: Holy communion as a contested situation. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 25: 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morris, Thomas. 1997. The RCIA: Transforming the Church. A resource for pastoral implementation. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pelikan, Jaroslav. 1988. The melody of theology: A philosophical dictionary. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Snow, David, and Richard Machalek. 1984. The sociology of conversion. Annual Review of Sociology 10: 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stark, Rodney, and Roger Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Turner, Victor. 1969. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  27. Woolever, Cynthia, and Deborah Bruce. 2010. A field guide to U.S. congregations: Who’s going where and why, 2nd ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  28. Yamane, David. Forthcoming. Becoming Catholic: Finding Rome in the American religious landscape. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Yamane, David, Sarah MacMillen, and Kelly Culver. 2006. Real stories of Christian initiation: Lessons for and from the RCIA. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations