Advertisement

Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 735–748 | Cite as

Microstructure Evolution and Tensile Behavior of Dissimilar Friction Stir-Welded Pure Copper and Dual-Phase Brass

  • I. DinaharanEmail author
  • R. Thirunavukkarasu
  • N. Murugan
  • E. T. Akinlabi
Technical Article

Abstract

6-mm-thick pure copper and dual-phase brass plates were joined using friction stir welding (FSW). The role of plate location prior to welding and the tool rotational speed on the microstructure evolution was evaluated and correlated to the tensile properties of the joint. All the joints with copper on advancing side produced defects. Typical zones commonly found in FSW joints were observed. TMAZ was not found on the copper side, and no coarsening of grains was noticed in the HAZ on the brass side. The microstructure of the weld zone was heterogeneous and grouped into three categories. The plate position and the tool rotational speed influenced the material flow and the formation of different structures. The weld zone was further characterized by ultra-fine grains, dislocations and annealing twins. The hardness across the weld zone was varying considerably. The process parameter had an opposite effect on the hardness of brass and copper portion of the weld zone. The joints with brass on advancing side showed higher tensile strength. The fracture location and surfaces were further reported.

Keywords

Copper Brass Friction stir welding Microstructure Tensile strength 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Welding Research Cell at Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Microscopy Lab at University of Johannesburg, OIM and Texture Lab at Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, PSG Institute of Advanced Studies and Centre of Excellence at Karunya University for providing the facilities to carry out this investigation.

References

  1. 1.
    Y.H. Wang, L.R. Xiao, X.J. Zhao, W. Hu, Y.F. Song, W. Zhang, H. Zhou, Microstructure and mechanical properties of columnar-grained copper produced by the Ohno continuous casting technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 639, 122–130 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Das, V. Verma, C.B. Basak, Elucidating microstructure of spinodal copper alloy through annealing. Mater. Charact. 120, 152–158 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.J. Keast, J. Ewald, K.S.B. De Silva, M.B. Cortie, B. Monnier, D. Cuskelly, E.H. Kisi, Optical properties and electronic structure of the Cu–Zn brasses. J. Alloy. Compd. 647, 129–135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Hanief, M.F. Wani, M.S. Charoo, Modeling and prediction of cutting forces during the turning of red brass (C23000) using ANN and regression analysis. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20, 1220–1226 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y.L. Shabtaya, M. Ainali, A. Lea, New brazing processes using anneal-resistant copper and brass alloys. Mater. Des. 25, 83–89 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Barlas, Effect of friction stir spot weld parameters on Cu/CuZn30 bimetal joints. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 80, 161–170 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.J. Zhang, J. Ning, X.J. Zhang, G.F. Zhang, J.X. Zhang, Single pass hybrid laser–MIG welding of 4-mm thick copper without preheating. Mater. Des. 74, 1–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.G. Oztoprak, E. Akman, M.M. Hanon, M. Günes, S. Gumus, E. Kacar, O. Gundogdu, M. Zeren, A. Demir, Laser welding of copper with stellite 6 powder and investigation using LIBS technique. Opt. Laser Technol. 45, 748–755 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Meran, M. Yuksel, A. Gulsoz, T. Sekercioglu, The welding problems of thin brass plates and TIG pulse welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 9, 131–137 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Meran, R. Konig, M. Yuksel, Effect of process parameters on joint properties of brass CuZn37 welded with a pulsed TIG welding power source. Weld. Cut. 8, 36–44 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Elangovan, S. Venkateshwaran, K. Prakasan, Experimental investigations on optimization of ultrasonic welding parameters for copper to brass joints using response surface method and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Stud. 1, 55–64 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.E. Murr, A review of FSW research on dissimilar metal and alloy systems. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 19(8), 1071–1089 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.S. Mishra, Z.Y. Ma, Friction stir welding and processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 50, 1–78 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Cam, Friction stir welded structural materials: beyond Al-alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 56, 1–48 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Guo, P. Gougeon, X.G. Chen, Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded joints between AA1100-B4C MMC and AA6063 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 553, 149–156 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Venkateswaran, A.P. Reynolds, Factors affecting the properties of Friction Stir Welds between aluminum and magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 545, 26–37 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.F.X. Muthu, V. Jayabalan, Tool travel speed effects on the microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum–copper joints. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 217, 105–113 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K.K. Ramachandran, N. Murugan, S. ShashiKumar, Effect of tool axis offset and geometry of tool pin profile on the characteristics of friction stir welded dissimilar joints of aluminum alloy AA5052 and HSLA steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 639, 219–233 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Song, K. Nakata, A. Wu, J. Liao, L. Zhou, Influence of probe offset distance on interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded joint of Ti6Al4V and A6061 dissimilar alloys. Mater. Des. 57, 269–278 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Barlas, H. Uzun, Microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded dissimilar Cu/CuZn30 sheets. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 30, 182–186 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Meran, V. Kovan, Microstructures and mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar copper/brass joints. Mater. Werkst. 39, 521–530 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Barlas, H. Uzun, Microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded dissimilar pure copper/brass alloy plates. Int. J. Mater. Res. 101, 801–807 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Erdem, Investigation of structure and mechanical properties of copper-brass plates joined by friction stir welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 76, 1583–1592 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Zhou, W.L. Zhou, J.C. Feng, W.X. He, Y.X. Huang, S.S. Dong, Effect of rotation speed on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir-welded copper/brass metals. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84, 1335–1343 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S.S. Sekhon, H. Kumar, S. Sehgal, Effect of tool pin profile on performance of friction stir welding of brass–copper-based butt welded joint. Int. J. Mater. Eng. Innov. 7, 236–252 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Beraha, B. Shpigler, Color Metallography (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1977)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. Dinaharan, E.T. Akinlabi, Application of color metallography to study the microstructure of friction stir-welded dual-phase brass using various etchants. Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. 6, 99–105 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    W.B. Lee, S.B. Jung, The joint properties of copper by friction stir welding. Mater. Lett. 58, 1041–1046 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    H.J. Liu, J.J. Shen, Y.X. Huang, L.Y. Kuang, C. Liu, C. Li, Effect of tool rotation rate on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded copper. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 14, 577–583 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    K.P. Mehta, V.J. Badheka, A review on dissimilar friction stir welding of copper to aluminum: process, properties, and variants. Mater. Manuf. Process. 31, 233–254 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Emami, T. Saeid, Effects of welding and rotational speeds on the microstructure and hardness of friction stir welded single phase brass. Acta Metall. Sin. 28, 766–771 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y.S. Sato, H. Takauchi, S.H.C. Park, H. Kokawa, Characteristics of the kissing-bond in friction stir welded Al alloy 1050. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 405, 333–338 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. Palanivel, P.K. Mathews, N. Murugan, I. Dinaharan, Effect of tool rotational speed and pin profile on microstructure and tensile strength of dissimilar friction stir welded AA5083-H111 and AA6351-T6 aluminum alloys. Mater. Des. 40, 7–16 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. Xue, G.M. Xie, B.L. Xiao, Z.Y. Ma, L. Geng, Effect of heat input conditions on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction-stir-welded pure copper. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 41, 2010–2021 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering ScienceUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDhaanish Ahmed Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Robotics and Automation EngineeringPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringCovenant UniversityOtaNigeria

Personalised recommendations