Advertisement

Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 176–183 | Cite as

Analysis of Grain Size Evolution of Sintered Al–4wt.%B4C Preforms Subjected to Hot Compression

  • R. Seetharam
  • S. Kanmani Subbu
  • M. J. Davidson
Technical Article

Abstract

The objective of this present work is to study the effect of initial relative density (IRD) on microstructure evolution of sintered Al–4wt.%B4C preforms during hot compression tests with different temperatures and strain rates. The hot compression tests of sintered Al–4wt.%B4C preforms were performed in a hydraulic press for different range of temperature (300–500) °C, strain rate (0.1–0.3 s−1), IRD (80–90)%, and deformation degree (10–50)%. The microstructure of sintered Al–4wt.%B4C preforms was characterized by optical microscope, and the average dynamic recrystallization grain size was calculated by intercept line method. It is found that the average grain size of sintered Al–4wt.%B4C deformed preforms is increased with increasing deformation temperature and IRD, whereas it decreased with increasing the strain rate and deformation degree. On the other hand, the average grain size of sintered Al–4wt.%B4C deformed preforms is dependent on the Zener–Hollomon (Z) parameter.

Keywords

Al–4wt.%B4C preform Grain size Hot compression test Deformation degree 

Notes

Acknowledgments

R. Seetharam thanks National Institute of Technology Warangal (NITW) for providing research fellowship of the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Abenojar, F. Velasco, M.A. Martinez, Optimization of processing parameters for the Al + 10% B4C system obtained by mechanical alloying. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 184, 441–446 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    X.G. Chen, L. St-Georges, M. Roux, Mechanical behavior of high boron content Al-B4C metal matrix composites at elevated temperatures. Mater. Sci. Forum 706, 631–637 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Alizadeh, M. Alizadeh, R. Amini, Structural and mechanical properties of Al/B4C composites fabricated by wet attrition milling and hot extrusion. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 29(8), 725–730 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Gangolu, A.G. Rao, N. Prabhu, V.P. Deshmukh, B.P. Kashyap, Microstructure evolution and flow behavior of hot-rolled aluminum–5% B4C composite. Mater. Des. 53, 581–587 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Gangolu, A.G. Rao, N. Prabhu, V.P. Deshmukh, B.P. Kashyap, Hot workability and flow characteristics of aluminum–5 wt% B4C composite. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23, 1366–1373 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0891-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Harichandran, N. Selvakumar, Effect of nano/micro B4C particles on the mechanical properties of aluminium metal matrix composites fabricated by ultrasonic cavitation-assisted solidification process. Arch. Civil. Mech. Eng. 16, 147–158 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.M. Sharifi, F. Karimzadeh, M.H. Enayati, Fabrication and evaluation of mechanical and tribological properties of boron carbide reinforced aluminum matrix nano composites. Mater. Des. 32, 3263–3271 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Alalhessabi, S.A. Manafi, E. Borhani, The structural and mechanical properties of Al–2.5%wt. B4C metal matrix nano-composite fabricated by the mechanical alloying. Mech. Adv. Compos. Struct. 2, 39–44 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.22075/MACS.2015.330 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Seetharam, S.K. Subbu, M.J. Davidson, Influence of temperature on the workability and hardness of sintered Al–4%B4C in upsetting. Proc. Eng. 173, 910–917 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Seetharam, S.K. Subbu, M.J. Davidson, Hot workability and densification behavior of sintered powder metallurgy Al–B4C preforms during upsetting. J. Manuf. Processes 28, 309–318 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Zener, J.H. Hollomon, Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J. Appl. Phys. 15(1), 22–32 (1944).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1707363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. Hui, C. Rong, H. Xu-dong, C. Jiang-hua, Microstructural evolution of 2026 aluminum alloy during hot compression and subsequent heat treatment. Trans. Nonferous. Met. Soc. China 21, 955–961 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(11)60807-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y.C. Lin, M.S. Chen, J. Zhong, Microstructural evolution in 42CrMo steel during compression at elevated temperatures. Mater. Lett. 62, 2132–2135 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.11.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Li, Q. Guo, S. Guo, H. Peng, Z. Wu, The microstructure evolution and nucleation mechanisms of dynamic recrystallization in hot-deformed Inconel 625 superalloy. Mater. Des. 2, 696–705 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Shaban, B. Eghbali, Characterization of austenite dynamic recrystallization under different Z parameters in a microalloyed steel. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 7(4), 359–363 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1005-0302(11)60074-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.A.J. Taleghani, E.M.R. Navas, M. Salehi, J.M. Torralba, Hot deformation preforms and flow stress prediction of 7075 aluminium alloy powder compacts during compression at elevated temperatures. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 534, 624–631 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Zhang, K. Zhang, S. Jiang, H. Zhou, C. Zhao, X. Yang, Dynamic recrystallization behavior of a γ′-hardened nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. J. Alloys Compd. 623, 374–385 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Zhang, K. Zhang, H. Zhou, Z. Lu, C. Zhao, X. Yang, Effect of strain rate on microstructure evolution of a nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. Mater. Des. 80, 51–62 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Q.M. Guo, D.F. Li, S.L. Guo, Microstructural models of dynamic recrystallization in hot-deformed Inconel 625 superalloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes 27, 990–995 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.610088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Seetharam, S.K. Subbu, M.J. Davidson, Microstructure modeling of dynamically recrystallization grain size of Al–4%B4C composite during hot upsetting. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 1401(2), 021003 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037660 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Seetharam
    • 1
  • S. Kanmani Subbu
    • 1
  • M. J. Davidson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyWarangalIndia

Personalised recommendations