Quantitative Characterization of Microscale Fracture Features in Titanium Alloys
- 154 Downloads
Abstract
Quantification of the fracture mechanisms is important for design and sustainment of fatigue–critical components and for improved life prediction models. The traditional fractography in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) provides important, but qualitative, information on fracture mechanisms. In this study, the fatigue fracture features at the crack-initiation site in a near-α titanium alloy were characterized quantitatively in an SEM. The crack initiated in a surface-located primary α grain, with the resultant formation of a facet. A serrated feature was observed on the fatigue crack-initiating facet within an α grain for the first time in this study. The spatial orientations of the crack-initiating facet and the fracture lines forming the serration were determined in 3D with the quantitative tilt fractography technique, which consists of analyzing an SEM image pair acquired at different stage tilt angles. The electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data were collected nondestructively from the grain associated with faceted crack-initiation, without recourse to cross-sectional polishing. Combining the spatial orientation and the EBSD data established that the facet plane was basal and the lines forming the serrated feature were along 〈a〉 \( \left(\text{i.e.,}\; {\left\langle {2\bar{1}\bar{1}0} \right\rangle } \right) \)-type slip directions. The methodology presented in this study is applicable to quantification of crystallography for other planar and linear features in crystalline materials.
Keywords
Crystallography Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) Quantitative tilt fractography Facets Fatigue Titanium alloyNotes
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under the Multi-scale Structural Mechanics and Prognosis Portfolio (Program Managers: Dr. David S. Stargel and Mr. James M. Fillerup) and performed at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, AFRL/RXCM, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
References
- 1.M.J. Blackburn, J.C. Williams, Metallurgical aspects of the stress corrosion cracking of Titanium alloys, Proceedings of Conference on the Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, NACE, p 620 (1969)Google Scholar
- 2.J. Kameda, R. Inoguchi, D.J. Prior, T. Kogure, Morphological analyses of minute crystals by using stereo-photogrammetric scanning electron microscopy and electron back-scattered diffraction. J. Microsc. 228(Pt 3), 358–365 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.S. Ghosh, M. Mills, S. Rokhlin, V. Sinha, W. Soboyejo, J. Williams (2007) The evaluation of cold dwell fatigue in Ti-6242”, Final Report, Federal Aviation Administration, DOT/FAA/AR-06/24Google Scholar
- 4.D.J. Dingley, S.I. Wright, M.M. Nowell, Dynamic background correction of electron backscatter diffraction patterns. Microsc. Microanal. 11(Suppl 2), 528–529 (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.S.K. Jha, C.J. Szczepanski, P.J. Golden, W.J. Porter III, R. John, Characterization of fatigue crack-initiation facets in relation to lifetime variability in Ti–6Al–4V. Int. J. Fatigue 42, 248–257 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.J. Miao, T.M. Pollock, J.W. Jones, Acta Mater. 57, 5964–5974 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.J. Miao, T.M. Pollock and J.W. Jones, Superalloys 2008, pp. 589–597Google Scholar
- 8.G. Themelis, S. Chikwembani, J. Weertman, Mater. Charact. 24, 27 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.V. Sinha, M.J. Mills, J.C. Williams, J. Mater. Sci. 42(19), 8334–8341 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Y.J. Ro, S.R. Agnew, R.P. Gangloff, Uncertainty in the determination of fatigue crack facet crystallography. Scripta Mater. 52, 531–536 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.F.J. Humphreys, Grain and subgrain characterisation by electron backscatter diffraction. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 3833–3854 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. Kamaya, Assessment of local deformation using EBSD: quantification of accuracy of measurement and definition of local gradient. Ultramicroscopy 111, 1189–1199 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.D.L. Davidson, D. Eylon, Metall. Trans. A 11A, 837–843 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.V. Sinha, M.J. Mills, J.C. Williams, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 37A, 2015–2026 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.A.L. Pilchak, A. Bhattacharjee, A.H. Rosenberger, J.C. Williams, Low ∆K faceted crack growth in titanium alloys. Int. J. Fatigue 31, 989–994 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.A.L. Pilchak, R.E.A. Williams, J.C. Williams, Crystallography of fatigue crack initiation and growth in fully lamellar Ti–6Al–4V. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 41A, 106–124 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.J.R. Michael, B.B. McKenzie, D.F. Susan, Application of electron backscatter diffraction for crystallographic characterization of tin whiskers. Microsc. Microanal. 18, 876–884 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.L. Vescan, K. Grimm, C. Dieker, Facet investigation in selective epitaxial growth of Si and SiGe on (001) Si for optoelectronic devices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 16, 1549 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.C.I. Drowley, G.A. Reid, R. Hull, Model for facet and sidewall defect formation during selective epitaxial growth of (001) silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 546 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar