Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The effect of prescribed burning on the drought resilience of Pinus nigra ssp. salzmannii Dunal (Franco) and P. sylvestris L.

  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

Key message

Prescribed burning applied after a dry year increased (fall burns) or had no effect (spring burns) on pine resilience, measured as the capacity to reach pre-drought growth levels compared with unburned pines. In fall burns, there was a larger increase in resilience when the impact of drought and burning on pines was low and burning caused a significant release from tree competition.

Context

Prescribed burning after a dry year can decrease a tree’s resistance (inverse of growth reduction during disturbance); however, burning can increase resource availability and consequently tree resilience (capacity to reach pre-disturbance growth levels). In addition, the burning season can affect the latewood to earlywood ratio (latewood:earlywood) and thus have an impact on tree-ring density.

Aims

To study the effects of two consecutive disturbances (drought and burning) on Pinus nigra spp. salzmannii and Pinus sylvestris in terms of (i) total tree-ring resistance, (ii) total tree-ring, earlywood and latewood resilience, and (iii) post-stress latewood:earlywood.

Methods

We selected drought-affected trees (control) and drought-and-burning-affected trees (burned) for tree-ring sampling. For each tree, we measured total tree-ring, earlywood, and latewood widths to determine resilience and resistance indices and calculated pre- and post-stress latewood:earlywood as indicators of tree-ring density. We used linear mixed-effects models to relate these response variables to the pine species, burning characteristics, and competition release.

Results

Resistance was higher in control trees than burned trees. P. nigra showed lower resistance than P. sylvestris but higher resilience. Resistance positively influenced resilience. Specifically, as resistance increased, total tree-ring and latewood resilience increased significantly in pines burned during the fall compared with those burned in spring or control pines. In fall burns, the pines’ resilience increased, especially when pines were significantly released from tree competition. In P. nigra, post-stress latewood:earlywood increased after fall burns as pre-stress latewood:earlywood decreased.

Conclusion

Prescribed burning can be a valuable management tool for overcoming the effects of a dry year on tree growth by increasing resilience, especially in P. nigra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository (Valor et al. 2019) at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3520731.

References

  1. Alfaro-Sánchez R, Camarero JJ, Sánchez-Salguero R, Trouet V, Heras JL (2018) How do droughts and wildfires alter seasonal radial growth in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forests? Tree-Ring Res 74:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-74.1.1

  2. Bansal S, Hallsby G, Löfvenius MO, Nilsson MC (2013) Synergistic, additive and antagonistic impacts of drought and herbivory on Pinus sylvestris: leaf, tissue and whole-plant responses and recovery. Tree Physiol 33:451–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt019

  3. Bär A, Nardini A, Mayr S (2018) Post-fire effects in xylem hydraulics of Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica. New Phytol 217:1484–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14916

  4. Battipaglia G, Strumia S, Esposito A, Giuditta E, Sirignano C, Altieri S, Rutigliano FA (2014) The effects of prescribed burning on Pinus halepensis mill. As revealed by dendrochronological and isotopic analyses. For Ecol Manag 334:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.010

  5. Battipaglia G, Savi T, Ascoli D, Castagneri D, Esposito A, Mayr S, Nardini A (2016) Effects of prescribed burning on ecophysiological, anatomical and stem hydraulic properties in Pinus pinea L. Tree Physiol 36:1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw034

  6. Biondi F (1999) Comparing tree-ring chronologies and repeated timber inventories as forest monitoring tools. Ecol Appl 9:216–227

  7. Bodig J, Jayne B (1993) Mechanics of wood composites, Reprinted edn. Kreiger Publishing Company, USA

  8. Bottero A, D'Amato AW, Palik BJ, Kern CC, Bradford JB, Scherer SS (2017) Influence of repeated prescribed fire on tree growth and mortality in Pinus resinosa forests, northern Minnesota. For Sci 63:94–100. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.16-035

  9. Bunn AG (2008) A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 26:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2008.01.002

  10. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644

  11. Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8

  12. Collins BM, Das AJ, Battles JJ, Fry DL, Krasnow KD, Stephens SL (2014) Beyond reducing fire hazard: fuel treatment impacts on overstory tree survival. Ecol Appl 24:1879–1886. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0971.1

  13. Cown DJ (1977) Partial defoliation and wood properties of 5-year-old Pinus radiata. NZ J Forestry Sci 7:192–198

  14. De Micco V, Zalloni E, Balzano A, Battipaglia G (2013) Fire influence on Pinus halepensis: wood responses close and far from the scars. IAWA J 34:446–458. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-00000036

  15. Domec JC, Gartner BL (2002) How do water transport and water storage differ in coniferous earlywood and latewood? J Exp Bot 53:2369–2379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf100

  16. Eilmann B, Buchmann N, Siegwolf R, Saurer M, Cherubini P, Rigling A (2010) Fast response of scots pine to improved water availability reflected in tree-ring width and δ13C. Plant Cell Environ 33:1351–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02153.x

  17. FAO I (2006) Working group WRB (2007). World reference base for soil resources

  18. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443

  19. Fernandes PM, Vega JA, Jiménez E, Rigolot E (2008) Fire resistance of European pines. For Ecol Manag 256:246–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.032

  20. Francey R, Allison C, Etheridge D, Trudinger C, Enting I, Leuenberger M, Langenfelds R, Michel E, Steele L (1999) A 1000-year high precision record of δ13C in atmospheric CO2. Tellus B 51:170–193. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v51i2.16269

  21. Fritts H (1976) Tree rings and climate, 567 pp. Academic, San Diego, Calif

  22. Galiano L, Martinez-Vilalta J, Lloret F (2011) Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode. New Phytol 190:750–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03628.x

  23. Garcia O (2014) Siplab, a spatial individual-based plant modelling system. Comput Ecol and Softw 4:215–222

  24. Hegyi F (1974) A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. Growth models for tree and stand simulation 30:74–90

  25. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

  26. Kaufman LH (1982) Stream aufwuchs accumulation: disturbance frequency and stress resistance and resilience. Oecologia 52:57–63

  27. Linares JC, Camarero JJ, Carreira JA (2009) Plastic responses of Abies pinsapo xylogenesis to drought and competition. Tree Physiology 29 (12):1525–1536

  28. Lloret F, Keeling EG, Sala A (2011) Components of tree resilience: effects of successive low-growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos 120:1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19372.x

  29. Martin-Benito D, Beeckman H, Canellas I (2013) Influence of drought on tree rings and tracheid features of Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris in a Mesic Mediterranean forest. Euro J Forest Res 132:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0652-3

  30. Martinez-Meier A, Sanchez L, Pastorino M, Gallo L, Rozenberg P (2008) What is hot in tree rings? The wood density of surviving Douglas-firs to the 2003 drought and heat wave. For Ecol Manag 256:837–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.041

  31. Martinez-Vilalta J, Piñol J (2002) Drought-induced mortality and hydraulic architecture in pine populations of the NE Iberian Peninsula. For Ecol Manag 161:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00495-9

  32. Mayr S, Cochard H (2003) A new method for vulnerability analysis of small xylem areas reveals that compression wood of Norway spruce has lower hydraulic safety than opposite wood. Plant Cell Environ 26:1365–1371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01060.x

  33. Mazerolle M (2019) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2:2–2 https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg

  34. McCandliss DS (2002) Prescribed burning in the kings river ecosystems project area: lessons learned. In: proceedings of a symposium on the kings river sustainable Forest ecosystems project: progress and current status. USDA Forest Service general technical report PSW-GTR-183, pp. 37-46

  35. Michaletz ST, Johnson E, Tyree M (2012) Moving beyond the cambium necrosis hypothesis of post-fire tree mortality: cavitation and deformation of xylem in forest fires. New Phytol 194:254–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04021.x

  36. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x

  37. Niccoli F, Esposito A, Altieri S, Battipaglia G (2019) Fire severity influences ecophysiological responses of Pinus pinaster Ait. Front Plant Sci 10:539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00539

  38. Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM (2000) A methodological approach of climatological modelling of air temperature and precipitation through GIS techniques. Int J Climatol 20:1823–1841. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0088(20001130)20:14<1823::AID-OC566>3.0.CO;2-B

  39. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, the R Core team DS (2007). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–86, https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme

  40. Sánchez-Costa E, Poyatos R, Sabaté S (2015) Contrasting growth and water use strategies in four co-occurring Mediterranean tree species revealed by concurrent measurements of sap flow and stem diameter variations. Agric For Meteorol 207:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.03.012

  41. Saurer M, Siegwolf RT, Schweingruber FH (2004) Carbon isotope discrimination indicates improving water-use efficiency of trees in northern Eurasia over the last 100 years. Glob Chang Biol 10:2109–2120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00869.x

  42. Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1968) An introduction to tree-ring dating. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

  43. Thornthwaite CW (1954) A re-examination of the concept and measurement of potential evapotranspiration. Publications in climatology, vol. VII, 1, Centerton, New Jersey, pp. 200–209

  44. Valor T, Pique M, Lopez BC, Gonzalez-Olabarria JR (2013) Influence of tree size, reduced competition, and climate on the growth response of Pinus nigra Arn. salzmannii after fire. Ann For Sci 70:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0284-x

  45. Valor T, González-Olabarria JR, Piqué M, Casals P (2017) The effects of burning season and severity on the mortality over time of Pinus nigra spp. salzmannii (Dunal) Franco and P. sylvestris L. For Ecol Manag 406:172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.027

  46. Valor T, Battipaglia G, Piqué M, Altieri S, Gonzalez-Olabarria JR, Casals P. (2019). Data set of resilience indices to drought and prescribed burning of Pinus nigra ssp. salzmannii and P. sylvestris L. trees. Zenodo. [dataset]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3520731

  47. Van der Maaten-Theunissen M, van der Maaten E, Bouriaud O (2015) PointRes: an R package to analyze pointer years and components of resilience. Dendrochronologia 35:34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2015.05.006

  48. Van Mantgem PJ, Caprio AC, Stephenson NL, Das AJ (2016) Does prescribed fire promote resistance to drought in low elevation forests of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA? Fire Ecol 12:13–25. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.1201013

  49. Van Mantgem PJ, Falk DA, Williams EC, Das AJ, Stephenson NL (2018) Pre-fire drought and competition mediate post-fire conifer mortality in western U.S. National Parks. Ecol Appl 28:1730–1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1778

  50. Varner JM, Putz FE, O'Brien JJ, Hiers JK, Mitchell RJ, Gordon DR (2009) Post-fire tree stress and growth following smoldering duff fires. For Ecol Manag 258:2467–2474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.028

  51. Wigley TM, Briffa KR, Jones PD (1984) On the average value of correlated time series, with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. J Climate App Meteor 23:201–213. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0201:OTAVOC>2.0.CO;2

  52. Wyant JG, Omi PN, Laven RD (1986) Fire induced tree mortality in a Colorado ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir stand. For Sci 32:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/32.1.49

  53. Zang C, Biondi F (2015). Treeclim: an R package for the numerical calibration of proxy-climate relationships. Ecography, 38(4), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01335

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank GRAF (Bombers, Generalitat de Catalunya) who kindly executed the PB and the EPAF team, Dani Estruch, Ana I. Ríos, and Alba Mora, for their technical assistance in the field.

Funding

This research was funded by the Life Pinassa Project.

(LIFE13NAT/ES/000724) and by the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (projects, AGL2015–70425-R; EEBB-I-16-11003and BES-2013-065031 to T.V.) and by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RTI2018-098778-B-I00).

Author information

TV and PC conceived the ideas and TV, PC, MP and JG designed methodology; TV and PC collected the data; GB and SA analyzed the isotopic data; TV, PC analyzed data and GB, MP, SA and JG help with the interpretation of the data; TV and PC led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Correspondence to Teresa Valor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling Editor: Paulo Fernandes

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

Appendices

Annex 1 Analysis of pointer years

To ascertain that the 2012 event was a year with significant growth reduction in both species we used the package PointRes (van der Maaten-Theunissen et al. 2015). For each tree and year, we calculate the relative growth change (in percentage) (RGC) of a specific year compared with the 3 preceding years in each species. A threshold of 25% was established, below which RGC in a specific tree and a year was considered a negative pointer year or a positive pointer year when the RGC was above 60%. For each year, when more than 50% of all trees within the control chronologies exceed the 25% or 60% threshold, the year was considered a negative or positive pointer year, respectively (Fig. 5).

Annex 2 Growth-climate relationships in P. sylvestris and P. nigra

Climate-growth relationships were analyzed for each species, by calculating Pearson correlations between control residual chronologies (total tree-ring, earlywood, and latewood) and P-PET of monthly data, and data of two and three consecutive months using the package TreeClim (Zang and Biondi 2015).

In P. sylvestris, total tree-ring was positively correlated with accumulated P-PET of previous November and December and current January and with current summer P-PET (June, July and August) (Fig. 6a). Earlywood showed higher positive correlations with P-PET of November–December-January (Fig. 6c) and latewood with the accumulate P-PET of summer months (Fig. 6e). In the 2012 dry year accumulated P-PET in previous November–December and current January, as well as in the summer months, was the lowest respect to the historical values (Fig. 7).

In P. nigra, total tree-ring was significantly correlated with accumulated P-PET of April–May-June and current fall (September, October, and November) (Fig. 6, b). Earlywood was highly correlated with P-PET in April–May–June and latewood with accumulated P-PET in the fall months (Fig. 6, d and f). In the 2012 dry year, accumulated P-PET in April–May–June and fall were lower compared with the historical values (Fig. 7).

Fig. 5
figure5

Mean growth deviation for the period 1983–2015 for P sylvestris (a) and P. nigra (b). In gray, years identified as positive or negative pointer years are highlighted

Fig. 6
figure6

Correlation between the TRW index of the residual chronologies of control pines and P-PET of three consecutive months in P. sylvestris for total tree ring (a), earlywood (c), and latewood (d) and in P. nigra for total tree ring (b), earlywood (d), and latewood (f). Months with small letters denote months of the year before tree-ring formation. The correlation showed for a given month includes the two preceding months (e.g., correlation showed in August represents the correlation of June, July and August). Significant coefficients are in dark gray

Fig. 7
figure7

Precipitation minus Potential Evapotranspiration (P-PET) for the temporal windows that significantly correlated with the growth of P. nigra and P. sylvestris (see Fig. 6) during the period 2011–2015. The mean and standard deviation of P-PET over the entire period (1975–2015) is showed as a reference of historical values. Months with small letters denote months of the year before tree-ring formation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valor, T., Battipaglia, G., Piqué, M. et al. The effect of prescribed burning on the drought resilience of Pinus nigra ssp. salzmannii Dunal (Franco) and P. sylvestris L.. Annals of Forest Science 77, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0912-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Resistance
  • Recovery
  • Prescribed fire
  • Carbon isotope
  • Tree rings
  • Fire ecology