Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, 76:80 | Cite as

Multi-temporal dataset of stand and canopy structural data in temperate and Mediterranean coppice forests

  • Francesco ChianucciEmail author
  • Carlotta Ferrara
  • Giada Bertini
  • Gianfranco Fabbio
  • Clara Tattoni
  • Duccio Rocchini
  • Piermaria Corona
  • Andrea Cutini
Data Paper

Abstract

Key message

We provided long-term stand and canopy structural data from permanent monitoring plots representative of some most diffuse temperate and Mediterranean forests, under different coppice management regimes. Periodic inventories were performed in the surveyed plots since the 1970s. Annual litterfall production and its partitioning (leaf, woody, reproductive parts) and optical canopy measurements using the LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer were performed every year in fully equipped plots since the 1990s. These data can be used for evaluating the influence of coppice management in the stand and canopy structure, the parametrization of radiative transfer models that require accurate ground truth data, and the calibration of high to medium resolution remotely sensed data. Dataset access is at  https://doi.org/10.17632/z8zm3ytkcx.2. Associated metadata is available at https://agroenvgeo.data.inra.fr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/2bd2d77f-3cf8-43da-b1b5-9f8196dc017f .

Keywords

Coppice management Canopy gap fraction Leaf area index Conversion Litterfall 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous Reviewer and the handling Editor Marianne Peiffer for the constructive comments, which improved the original version of the manuscript. We are grateful for all technicians of CREA, who contributed to field data collection, with particular reference to Maurizio Piovosi, Luca Marchino, Tessa Giannini, Umberto di Salvatore, Leonardo Tonveronachi, Valter Cresti, Eligio Bucchioni, Umberto Cerofolini, and Luigi Mencacci.

Funding

The dataset has partly been compiled within the LIFE 14 ENV/IT/000514 “Shaping future forestry for sustainable coppices in southern Europe: the legacy of past management trials”—FutureForCoppiceS (www.futureforcoppices.eu).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amorini E, Bruschini S, Cutini A, Di Lorenzo MG, Fabbio G (1998a) Treatment of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) coppices. Structure, biomass and silvicultural options. Ann Ist Sper Selv 27(1996):121–129Google Scholar
  2. Amorini E, Bruschini S, Cutini A, Fabbio G, Manetti MC (1998b) Silvicultural treatment of holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppices in Southern Sardinia: thinning and related effects on stand structure and canopy cover. Ann Ist Sper Selv 27(1996):167–176Google Scholar
  3. Barbati A, Marchetti M, Chirici G, Corona P (2014) European forest types and forest Europe SFM indicators: tools for monitoring progress on forest biodiversity conservation. For Ecol Manag 321:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisi F, Chirichella R, Chianucci F, Von Hardenberg J, Cutini A, Martinoli A, Apollonio M (2018) Climate, tree masting and spatial behaviour in wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): insight from a long-term study. Ann For Sci 75(2):46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell GS (1986) Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agric For Meteorol 36:317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cañellas I, Del Rìo M, Roig S, Montero G (2004) Growth response to thinning in Quercus pyrenaica Willd. coppice stands in Spanish central mountain. Annals of Forest. Sciences 61:243–250Google Scholar
  7. Chianucci F, Cutini A (2013) Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography. Agric For Meteorol 160:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chianucci F, Disperati L, Guzzi D, Bianchini D, Nardino V, Lastri C, Rindinella A, Corona P (2016a) Estimation of canopy attributes in beech forests using true colour digital images from a small fixed-wing UAV. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 47:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chianucci F, Salvati L, Giannini T, Chiavetta U, Corona P, Cutini A (2016b) Long-term response to thinning in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) coppice stand under conversion to high forest in Central Italy. Silva Fennica 50Google Scholar
  10. Chianucci F, Ferrara C, Bertini G, Fabbio G, Tattoni C, Rocchini D, Corona P, Cutini A (2018) Multi-temporal dataset of stand and canopy structural data in temperate and Mediterranean coppice forests. Mendeley Data. V2. [Dataset].  https://doi.org/10.17632/z8zm3ytkcx.2
  11. Chianucci F, Zou J, Leng P, Zhuang Y, Ferrara C (2019) A new method to estimate clumping index integrating gap fraction averaging with the analysis of gap size distribution. Can J For Res (early view.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cutini A (2002) Litterfall and leaf area index in the CONECOFOR Permanent Monitoring Plots. J Limnol 61:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cutini A, Matteucci G, Scarascia Mugnozza G (1998) Estimation of leaf area index with the Li-Cor LAI 2000 in deciduous forests. For Ecol Manag 105:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutini A, Chianucci F, Giannini T, Manetti MC, Salvati L (2015) Is anticipated seed cutting an effective option to accelerate transition to high forest in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) coppice stands? Ann For Sci 72(5):631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Europe F (2015) State of Europe’s forests. Martin M, Forest Europe. Liaison Unit Madrid, Europe's Status & Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. Project coordinator, p 2015Google Scholar
  16. Fabbio G (2016) Coppice forests, or the changeable aspect of things, a review. Ann Silvicult Res 40(2):108–132Google Scholar
  17. Genet H, Bréda N, Dufrêne E (2010) Age-related variation in carbon allocation at tree and stand scales in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) using a chronosequence approach. Tree Physiol 30:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonsamo A, Walter JM, Chen JM, Pellikka P, Schleppi P (2018) A robust leaf area index algorithm accounting for the expected errors in gap fraction observations. Agric For Meteorol 248:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuusk A, Kuusk J, Lang M (2009) A dataset for the validation of reflectance models. Remote Sens Environ 113(5):889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuusk A, Kuusk J, Lang M (2014) Modeling directional forest reflectance with the hybrid type forest reflectance model FRT. Remote Sens Environ 149:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lang ARG (1987) Simplified estimate of leaf area index from transmittance of the sun’s beam. Agric And For Meteor 41:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meier IC, Leuschner C (2008) Leaf size and leaf area index in Fagus sylvatica forests: competing effects of precipitation, temperature and nitrogen availability. Ecosystems 11:655–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller JB (1967) A formula for average foliage density. Aust J Bot 15:141–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nilson T (1999) Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands. Agric For Meteorol 98:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perry SG, Fraser AB, Thomson DW, Norman JM (1988) Indirect sensing of plant canopy structure with simple radiation measurements. Agric And For Meteor 42:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryu Y, Nilson T, Kobayashi H, Sonnentag O, Law BE, Baldocchi DD (2010) On the correct estimation of effective leaf area index: does it reveal information on clumping effects? Agric For Meteorol 150:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vacchiano G, Hacket-Pain A, Turco M, Motta R, Maringer J, Conedera M, Ascoli D (2017) Spatial patterns and broad-scale weather cues of beech mast seeding in Europe. New Phytol 215(2):595–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Widlowski JL, Pinty B, Lopatka M, Atzberge C, Buzica D, Chelle M, Disney M, Gastellu-Etchegorry JP, Gerboles M, Gobron N, Grau E (2013) The fourth radiation transfer model intercomparison (RAMI-IV): proficiency testing of canopy reflectance models with ISO-13528. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(13):6869–6890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodgate W, Disney M, Armston JD, Jones SD, Suarez L, Hill MJ, Wilkes P, Soto-Berelov M, Haywood A, Mellor A (2015) An improved theoretical model of canopy gap probability for leaf area index estimation in woody ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 358:303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREA-FL, Research Centre for Forestry and WoodArezzoItaly
  2. 2.Fondazione Edmund MachTrentoItaly
  3. 3.University of Trento, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO)PovoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental SciencesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePraha – SuchdolCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations