Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, 76:69 | Cite as

Hybrid breakdown and inbreeding depression for seed yield and early growth in 2nd-generation interspecific hybrids of larch (Larix x eurolepis x L.x eurolepis)

  • Luc E. PâquesEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Key message

Advanced hybridization between first-generation interspecific hybrids is an attractive alternative to breed and mass-produce hybrid seed lots. Nevertheless it faces two major drawbacks, namely hybrid depression and inbreeding depression. Their impact may be highly detrimental on some traits (seed yield) especially for the highest level of consanguinity, but much less on some others (seed quality and early growth) as shown in this study for hybrid larch ( Larix x eurolepis ).

Context

Mass-production of 1st-generation larch hybrids (Larix x eurolepis) in interspecific hybridization orchards is problematic. Alternatives are searched such as advanced-generation orchards combining 1st-generation hybrid clones.

Aims

Our aim was to investigate how important hybrid and inbreeding depressions can be in 2nd-generation hybrids with a special focus on reproductive success (and early growth) and their consequences on the success of advanced-generation hybridization seed orchards.

Methods

Second-generation hybrids were created by control crosses among 18 1st-generation (F1) hybrid clones with 3 different levels of relatedness (OC (outcrossed), HS (half-sib) and FS (full-sib)). Seed yield and quality and growth in nursery were assessed for the 3 groups and compared with related F1 crosses. Hybrid breakdown and inbreeding depression were then estimated.

Results

F1 hybrids are fertile and mating among them is feasible. Nevertheless hybrid depression is observed when passing to 2nd-generation hybrids for crossing success rate (− 20%) and for seed yield (> 50% less filled seed/cone). Hybrid depression is reinforced by inbreeding and more severely with increasing consanguinity levels: negligible for HS, a supplementary drop of over 50% of seed yield is observed for FS. In contrast, seed quality traits as well as first-year growth are little impacted by both hybrid and inbreeding depressions. Nevertheless a great variation in inbreeding depression level exists among mother clones. Overall, total depression overpasses 70% for the FS parent group but is limited to less than 34% for OC parents for a synthetic trait (number of germinated seed/cone) and remains negligible for growth.

Conclusion

Advanced hybridization is possible with larch but with a more or less severe impact on reproductive success depending on level of relatedness among the parents. Growth seems much less impacted than reproduction and this is a promising result. The proper choice of 1st-generation parents is unavoidable for success of 2nd-generation seed orchards.

Keywords

Interspecific hybridization Hybrid breakdown Inbreeding Reproduction Seed Height 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Bernard Lhomel, Patrick Simmer and Michel Vallance who conducted the technical work linked to control crossing, seed extraction and characterisation, and seed sowing.

Funding

This study received the financial support of EU-DG XII for the project ‘Towards a European larch Wood Chain’ (grant FAIR5-CT98-3354).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson NO, Ascher PD, Widmer RE (2010) Lethal equivalents and genetic load. In Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews pp 93–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC (1994) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bingham RT (1973) Possibilities for improvement of western white pine by inbreeding. USDA For Serv Res Pap INT-144Google Scholar
  4. Bonnet-Masimbert M, Baldet P, Pâques LE (1998) From flowering to artificial pollination in larch for breeding and seed orchard production. For Chron 74(2):195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colas F, Perron M, Tousignant D, Parent C, Pelletier M, Lemay P (2008) A novel approach for the operational production of hybrid larch seeds under northern climatic conditions. For Chron 84(1):95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dieckert H (1964) Einige Untersuchungen zur Selbststerilität und Inzucht bei Fichte und Lärche. Silvae Genet 13:77–86Google Scholar
  7. Dietze W (1974) Beurteilung von Züchterischen Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung quantitativer und qualitativer eigenschaften bei Europäischer Lärche (Larix decidua Mill.). Diss. zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität zu MünchenGoogle Scholar
  8. Doerksen TK, Bousquet J, Beaulieu J (2014) Inbreeding depression in intra-provenance crosses driven by founder relatedness in white spruce. Tree Genet Genomes 10(1):203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumont-BeBoux N, Bradley RA, Aderkas (von) P (2000) In vitro germination of western larch pollen. Can J For Res 30: 329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dungey HS (2001) Pine hybrids - a review of their use performance and genetics. For Ecol Manag 148:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996) Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ford GA, McKeand SE, Jett JB, Isik F (2015) Effects of inbreeding on growth and quality traits in loblolly pine. For Sci 61(3):579–585Google Scholar
  13. Franklin EC (1970) Survey of mutant forms and inbreeding depression in species of the family Pinaceae. USDA For Serv Res Pap SE:61Google Scholar
  14. Griffin AR, Lindgren D (1985) Effect of inbreeding on production of filled seed in Pinus radiata – experimental results and a model of gene action. Theor Appl Genet 71(2):334–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall JP, Brown IR (1977) Embryo development and yield of seed in Larix. Silvae Genet 26(2–3):77–84Google Scholar
  16. Hyun SK (1974) The possibility of F2 utilization of Pinus rigida x taeda. Korean J Breeding 6(2):45–55Google Scholar
  17. Hyun SK (1976) Inter-specific hybridization in pines with special reference to Pinus rigida x taeda. Silvae Genet 25:188–191Google Scholar
  18. Kain DP (2003) Genetic parameters and improvement strategies for the Pinus elliottii var elliottii x Pinus caribaea var.hondurensis hybrid in Queensland, Australia. PhD thesis Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosinski G (1986) Megagametogenesis, fertilization, and embryo development in Larix decidua. Can J For Res 16:1301–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosinski G (1987) Empty seed production in European larch (Larix decidua). For Ecol Manag 19:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lelu-Walter MA, Thompson D, Harvengt L, Sanchez L, Toribio M, Pâques LE (2013) Somatic embryogenesis in forestry with a focus on Europe: state-of-the-art, benefits, challenges and future direction. Tree Genet Genomes 9:883–899.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0620-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levin DA (1978) The origin of isolating mechanisms in flowering plants. Evol Biol 11:185–317Google Scholar
  23. Marchal A, Munoz F, Millier F, Sanchez L, Pâques LE (2017) Hybrid larch heterosis : for which traits and under which genetic control ? Tree Genet Genomes 13:92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-017-1177-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nanson A (2004) Génétique et amélioration des arbres forestiers. Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux. GemblouxGoogle Scholar
  25. Nikles DG (1984) Establishment and progeny testing of clonal seed orchards of Pinus elliottii×P. caribaea F1 hybrids in Queensland. In Barnes RD, Gibson GL (ed), Proceedings of Provenance and Genetic Improvement Strategies in Tropical Forest Trees. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford, pp 567–568Google Scholar
  26. Owens JN (2008) The reproductive biology of western larch. FGC extension note 08Google Scholar
  27. Orr-Ewing AL (1954) Inbreeding experiments with the Douglas fir. For Chron 30:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pâques LE (1995) Croisements contrôlés de mélèze. Bilan des activités 1987–1994. INRA, AGPF, Doc.interneGoogle Scholar
  29. Pâques, LE (2019) “Impact of hybrid and consanguinity depression on reproduction and early growth of second generation hybrid larch”. V1. Portail data Inra. [Dataset].  https://doi.org/10.15454/AMNDTO ,
  30. Pâques LE, Foffová E, Heinze B, Lelu-Walter MA, Liesebach M, Philippe G (2013) Larches (Larix sp.). Chapter 2. In Pâques LE (ed) Forest tree breeding in Europe. Current state-of-the-art and perspectives pp 13–122. Managing Forest Ecosystems, 25. Dordrecht, NLD: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6146-9_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Philippe G, Buret C, Matz S, Pâques LE (2016) Composition of hybrid larch (Larix × eurolepis Henry) forest reproductive materials: how much does hybrid percentage affect stand performance? New For 47:541–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Park YS, Fowler DP (1982) Effects of inbreeding and genetic variances in a natural population of tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K.Koch) in eastern Canada. Silvae Genet 31(1):21–26Google Scholar
  33. Potts BM, Barbour RC, Hingston AB, Vaillancourt RE (2003) Turner review no 6: genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools: identifying the risks. Aust J Bot 51:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Potts BM, Dungey HS (2004) Interspecific hybridization of Eucalyptus: key issues for breeders and geneticists. New For 27:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarvas R (1962) Investigations of the flowering and seed crop of Pinus sylvestris. Commun Inst For Fenn 53:1–198Google Scholar
  37. Shearer RC (1990) Seed and pollen cone production in Larix occidentalis. In Turnbull JW (ed), ACIAR Proc on Tropical Tree seed research, series 28: pp 14–17Google Scholar
  38. Sloobodnik B, Guttenberger H (2005) Zygotic embryogenesis and empty seed formation in European larch (Larix decidua Mill.). Ann For Sci 62:129–134.  https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sorensen FC (1999) Relationship between self-fertility, allocation of growth, and inbreeding depression in three coniferous species. Evolution 53(2):417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Squillace AE, Kraus JF (1963) Effects of inbreeding on seed yield, germination, rate of germination, and seedling growth in Slash pine. In: Proc For Gen Workshop. Southern For Tree Imp Committee, Macon Ga, pp 59–63Google Scholar
  41. Stettler RF, Fenn RC, Heilman PE, Stanton BJ (1988) Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids for short rotation culture: variation patterns and 4-year field performance. Can J For Res 18(6):745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoehr MU (2000) Seed production of western larch in seed-tree systems in the southern interior of British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 130:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stoehr MU, Ott P, Woods J (2015) Inbreeding in mid-rotation coastal Douglas-fir: implications for breeding. Ann For Sci 72:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verger M, Pâques LE (1993) Multiplication végétative du mélèze hybride (Larix x eurolepis Henry) par bouturage en vrac. Ann Sci For 50:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams CG, Barnes RD, Nyoka I (1999) Embryonic genetic load for a neotropical conifer, Pinus patula Schiede et Deppe. J Hered 90(3):394–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 42(1):102–117Google Scholar
  47. Woods JH, Heaman JC (1989) Effect of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 19:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu HX, Matheson AC, Spencer D (1998) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. I. The effect of inbreeding on growth, survival and variance. Theor Appl Genet 97:1256–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu HX, Owen JV, Abarquez A, Matheson AC (2004) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata - V. The effects of inbreeding on fecundity. Silvae Genet 53(2):80–87.  https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2004-0015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zobel BJ, Talbert JT (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. J Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRA Unité BioForAArdonFrance

Personalised recommendations