Potential of remote sensing-based forest attribute models for harmonising large-scale forest inventories on regional level: a case study in Southwest Germany

  • Melanie KirchhoeferEmail author
  • Johannes Schumacher
  • Petra Adler
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Forest information for bioeconomy outlooks at European level


Key message

Image-based 3D information can provide metrics for forest attribute modelling that are robust within the study region. This enables transferability of predictive models to other data sets of the same region without loss of accuracy. As a result, aerial images can potentially provide auxiliary data for supporting different large-scale forest inventories within a geographic region.


Due to their high spatial coverage and acquisition frequencies, aerial imagery can provide auxiliary data to support large-scale forest inventories. If the methods are applicable to different data sets and forest inventory protocols, they will also facilitate harmonisation of forest inventory data.


This study aims to investigate the level of transferability of such image-based methods. This is crucial for their applicability across different large-scale forest inventories. The investigation focusses on one geographic region.


Three blocks of aerial images were used to generate models of forest canopies and extract 3D metrics. These were utilised for building timber volume models separately for each image block. The models were applied to the respective other blocks and the achieved accuracy of timber volume prediction was assessed. Additionally, 3D metric changes between blocks were also assessed.


Some metrics were found more robust than others. Transferring models based on robust metrics achieved RMSE% between 38 and 45%, which is similar to the model accuracy.


This indicates transferability of models within the study region without loss of accuracy, and there is potential for further improvement of model accuracy. Therefore, forest attribute models based on remote sensing have potential to support harmonisation of large-scale forest inventories within the study region.


Aerial images Canopy height model Forest inventory Timber volume Model transferability 



We acknowledge the provision of the remote sensing data by the land surveying authority of Baden-Württemberg (LGL).


This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 633464 (DIABOLO).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (n.d.) BMEL - Federal Forest Inventory:Home. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
  2. COST Action E43 (n.d.) Harmonisation of National Forest Inventories in Europe: techniques for common reporting.|Name:overview. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
  3. COST Action FP1001 (2014) Improving data and information on the potential supply of wood resources—a European Approach from multisource National Forest Inventories. Accessed 26 Oct 2018
  4. Deo RK, Froese RE, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT (2016) Optimizing variable radius plot size and LiDAR resolution to model standing volume in conifer forests. Can J Remote Sens 42:428–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DIABOLO (n.d.) Distributed, Integrated and Harmonised Forest Information for Bioeconomy Outlooks. Accessed 26 Oct 2018
  6. Fekety PA, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT (2015) Temporal transferability of LiDAR-based imputation of forest inventory attributes. Can J For Res 45:422–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GEOsat (n.d.-b) DGNSS-Sensor Mxbox hybrid – Technische Daten. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  8. Giannetti F, Chirici G, Gobakken T, Næsset E, Travaglini D, Puliti S (2018) A new approach with DTM-independent metrics for forest growing stock prediction using UAV photogrammetric data. Remote Sens Environ 213:95–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ginzler C, Hobi ML (2015) Countrywide stereo-image matching for updating digital surface models in the framework of the Swiss National Forest Inventory. Remote Sens 7(4):4343–4370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haala N (2014) Dense image matching final report. EuroSDR Official Publication, pp 115–145Google Scholar
  11. Höhle J, Höhle M (2009) Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64:398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Immitzer M, Stepper C, Böck S, Straub C, Atzberger C (2016) Use of WorldView-2 stereo imagery and National Forest Inventory data for wall-to-wall mapping of growing stock. For Ecol Manag 359:232–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirchhoefer M, Schumacher J, Adler P, Kändler G (2017) Considerations towards a novel approach for integrating angle-count sampling data in remote sensing based forest inventories. Forests 8:18Google Scholar
  14. Leberl F, Irschara A, Pock T, Meixner P, Gruber M, Scholz S, Wiechert A (2010) Point clouds: Lidar versus 3D vision. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76:1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LGL (n.d.) Das digitale Geländemodell (DGM) von Baden-Württemberg. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  16. Maack J, Kattenborn T, Fassnacht FE, Enßle F, Hernández J, Corvalán P, Koch B (2015) Modeling forest biomass using Very-High-Resolution data - combining textural, spectral and photogrammetric predictors derived from spaceborne stereo images. Eur J Remote Sens 48Google Scholar
  17. McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO (2007) Remote sensing support for national forest inventories. Remote Sens Environ 110:412–419Google Scholar
  18. McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO, Schadauer K, Vidal C, Ståhl G, Chirici G, Lanz A, Cienciala E, Winter S, Smith WB (2009) Harmonizing national forest inventories. J For 107(4):179–187Google Scholar
  19. McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO, Næsset E (2010) Advances and emerging issues in national forest inventories. Scand J For Res 25:368–381Google Scholar
  20. McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO, Schadauer K, Ståhl G (2012) Harmonizing national forest inventories. For Sci 58(3):189–190Google Scholar
  21. McRoberts RE, Næsset E, Gobakken T, Bollandsås OM (2015) Indirect and direct estimation of forest biomass change using forest inventory and airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens Environ 164:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moser P, Vibrans AC, McRoberts RE, Næsset E, Gobakken T, Chirici G, Mura M, Marchetti M (2016) Methods for variable selection in LiDAR-assisted forest inventories. For Int J For Res 90(1):112–124Google Scholar
  23. nFrames (2018) SURE aerial. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  24. Rahlf J (2017) Forest resource mapping using 3D remote sensing: combining national forest inventory data and digital aerial photogrammetry. Norwegian University of Life SciencesGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahlf J, Breidenbach J, Solberg S, Astrup R (2015) Forest parameter prediction using an image-based point cloud: a comparison of semi-ITC with ABA. Forests 6:4059–4071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Remondino F, Grazia Spera M, Nocerino E, Menna F, Nex F (2014) State of the art in high density image matching. Photogramm Rec 29:144–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riedel T, Hennig P, Kroiher F, Polley H, Schmitz F, Schwitzgebel F (2017) Die dritte Bundeswaldinventur (BWI2012). Inventur und Auswertmethoden:124 pagesGoogle Scholar
  28. Sass J (2011) GNSS Accuracy – specifications versus reality. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  29. Scrinzi G, Clementel F, Floris A (2015) Angle count sampling reliability as ground truth for area-based LiDAR applications in forest inventories. NRC Research PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Sloboda J, Gaffrey D, Matsumura N (1993) Regionale und lokale Systeme von Höhenkurven gleichartiger Waldbestände. Allg Forst Jagdzeitung 164(12):225–228Google Scholar
  31. Stepper C, Straub C, Pretzsch H (2015) Using semi-global matching point clouds to estimate growing stock at the plot and stand levels: application for a broadleaf-dominated forest in central Europe. Can J For Res 45:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stepper C, Straub C, Immitzer M, Pretzsch H (2017) Using canopy heights from digital aerial photogrammetry to enable spatial transfer of forest attribute models: a case study in central Europe. Scand J For Res 32:748–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Straub C, Stepper C (2016) Using digital aerial photogrammetry and the random forest approach to model forest inventory attributes in Beech-and Spruce-dominated Central European Forests. Photogramm Fernerkund Geoinf 2016:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Straub C, Stepper C, Seitz R, Waser LT (2013) Potential of UltraCamX stereo images for estimating timber volume and basal area at the plot level in mixed European forests. Can J For Res 43:731–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomppo EO, Schadauer K (2012) Harmonization of National Forest Inventories in Europe: advances under COST Action 43. For Sci 58(3):191–200Google Scholar
  36. Tomppo E, Gschwantner T, Lawrence M, McRoberts RE (eds) (2010) National forest inventories. Pathways for Common Reporting. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  37. Ullah S, Dees M, Datta P, Adler P, Koch B (2017) Comparing airborne laser scanning, and image-based point clouds by semi-global matching and enhanced automatic terrain extraction to estimate forest timber volume. Forests 8:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Véga C, Renaud J-P, Durrieu S, Bouvier M (2016) On the interest of penetration depth, canopy area and volume metrics to improve Lidar-based models of forest parameters. Remote Sens Environ 175:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vexcel (n.d.) Vexcel imaging – home of the UltraCam. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
  40. Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists (statistics in practice), 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White JC, Stepper C, Tompalski P, Coops NC, Wulder MA (2015) Comparing ALS and image-based point cloud metrics and modelled forest inventory attributes in a complex coastal forest environment. Forests 2016:6Google Scholar
  42. White JC, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Vastaranta M, Hilker T, Tompalski P (2016) Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: a review. Can J Remote Sens 42:619–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zald HS, Wulder MA, White JC, Hilker T, Hermosilla T, Hobart GW, Coops NC (2016) Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with lidar plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada. Remote Sens Environ 176:188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biometry and InformaticsForest Research Institute (FVA) Baden-WürttembergFreiburg i. BrGermany

Personalised recommendations