An integrated method for high-resolution definition of new diameter-based fine root sub-classes of Fagus sylvatica L.
Compared to the traditional approach, applying micrometric image analysis to fine root samples of Fagus sylvatica with subsequent data treatment through principal component and cluster analysis yielded specific diameter sizes for fine root sub-classes having better resolution of the corresponding branching orders, and a more coherent relationship with the values of annual production and turnover rate.
Fine root traits are poorly understood, impeding an accurate representation of terrestrial biogeochemical models. Traditionally used, arbitrary diameter thresholds lead to a misestimation of fine root traits such as branching order, environmental relationship, annual production, and turnover rate.
Here, we present, as modification of the traditional method, an integrated approach to segregate, at high-resolution, fine root populations of Fagus sylvatica into new diameter sub-classes that better correspond with the traits mentioned above.
Samples, collected with a sequential soil coring method, were subjected to a micrometric image analysis, and resultant data were treated with principal component and cluster analysis.
Results showed that fine roots were distributed into diameter-size sub-classes (0–0.3 mm, 0.3–1 mm, and 1–2 mm) different from those determined by traditional methods (0–0.5 mm, 0.5–1 mm, and 1–2 mm). New sub-classes provided a better resolution of the corresponding branching-orders, and the values of annual production and turnover rate were more coherent with diameter class and soil depth. Moreover, new sub-classes provided a more precise match with soil temperature than traditional methods.
Our method may help to unveil fine root dynamics and development, reduce data analysis time, and make the diameter-based classification more precise and trustworthy even in the case of non-intact samples.
KeywordsBranching order Fine root production Fine root turnover rate Soil temperature Root diameter PCA
We are grateful to Dr. Kasten Dumroese (USDA Forest Service, Moscow, ID, USA) for critically reviewing the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by the University of Insubria (FAR) and the EC FP7 Project ZEPHYR-308313.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Brunner I, Bakker MR, Björk RG, Hirano Y, Lukac M, Aranda X, Børja I, Eldhuset TD, Helmisaari HS, Jourdan C, Konôpka B, López BC, Miguel Pérez C, Persson H, Ostonen I (2013) Fine- root turnover rates of European forests revisited: an analysis of data from sequential coring and ingrowth cores. Plant Soil 362:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eissenstat DM, McCormack ML, Du Q (2013) Global change and root lifespan. In: Eshel A, Beeckman T (eds) Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–13Google Scholar
- Freschet GT, Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Tucker CM, Craine JM, McCormack ML, Violle C, Fort F, Blackwood CB, Urban-Mead KR, Iversen CM, Bonis A, Comas LH, Cornelissen JHC, Dong M, Guo D, Hobbie SE, Holdaway RJ, Kembel SW, Makita N, Onipchenko VG, Picon-Cochard C, Reich PB, de la Riva EG, Smith SW, Soudzilovskaia NA, Tjoelker MG, Wardle DA, Roumet C (2017) Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine-root trait variation. J Ecol 105:1182–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harteveld M, Hertel D, Wiens M, Leuschner C (2007) Spatial and temporal variability of fine root abundance and growth in tropical moist forests and agroforestry systems (Sulawesi, Indonesia). Ecotropica 13:111–120Google Scholar
- Holdaway RJ, Richardson SJ, Dickie IA, Peltzer DA, Coomes DA (2011) Species- and community-level patterns in fine root traits along a 120 000-yr soil chronosequence in temperate rain forest. J Ecol 99: 954–963Google Scholar
- Iversen CM, McCormack ML, Powell AS, Blackwood CB, Freschet GT, Kattge J, Roumet C, Stover DB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Valverde-Barrantes OJ, van Bodegom PM, Violle C (2017) A global fine-root ecology database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology. New Phytol 215:15–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson RB, Schenk HJ, Jobbagy EG, Canadell J, Colello GD, Dickinson RE, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Heimann M, Hibbard K, Kicklighter DW, Kleidon A, Neilson RP, Parton WJ, Sala OE, Sykes MT (2000) Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecol Appl 10:470–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Joslin JD, Henderson GS (1982) A test of the budget method: a revised approach to the measurement of fine root turnover. In: Muller RN (ed) Central hardwood Forest conference: proceedings of the fourth meeting, 1982. University of Kentucky, Lexington, pp 220–228Google Scholar
- Maeght J-L, Gonkhamdee S, Clément C, Na Ayutthaya SI, Stokes A, Pierret A (2015) Seasonal patterns of fine root production and turnover in a mature rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.) stand – differentiation with soil depth and implications for soil carbon stocks. Front Plant Sci 6:1022–1033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM, Fahey TJ, Fernandez CW, Guo D, Helmisaari HS, Hobbie EA, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Norby RJ, Phillips RP, Pregitzer KS, Pritchard SG, Rewald B, Zadworny M (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of belowground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207:505–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ostonen I, Truu M, Helmisaari H-S, Lukac M, Borken W, Vanguelova E, Godbold DL, Lõhmus K, Zang U, Tedersoo L, Preem J-K, Rosenvald K, Aosaar J, Armolaitis K, Frey J, Kabral N, Kukumägi M, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Lindroos A-J, Merilä P, Napa Ü, Nöjd P, Parts K, Uri V, Varik M, Truu J (2017) Adaptive root foraging strategies along a boreal-temperate forest gradient. New Phytol 215:977–991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogt KA, Persson H (1991) Measuring growth and development of roots. In:Lassoie JP, Hickenly TM (eds) Techniques and approaches in forest tree ecophysiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 477–501Google Scholar