Advertisement

The dynamics of carbon accumulation in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River delta region

  • Hui Zhang
  • HuaBo Duan
  • MingWei Song
  • DongSheng Guan
Original Paper

Abstract

Key message

Plantation type and age strongly influence the quantity of carbon stored in forest ecosystems. The marked increase in total ecosystem carbon stock achieved over time by the Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations has confirmed that the afforestation of degraded soils can contribute positively to carbon sequestration.

Context

Reforestation has been widely conducted to restore and protect the eroded red soil in south China in recent decades. The question as to whether the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) can be boosted by establishing plantations of fast-growing tree species remains unresolved.

Aims

We addressed whether the afforestation of degraded soils can contribute positively to carbon sequestration, and whether the accumulation of SOC is more effective under a nitrogen fixing species such as Acacia than under Eucalyptus.

Methods

Here, a study was undertaken to measure the quantity of total ecosystem carbon (TEC) accumulated by plantations of both Eucalyptus and Acacia spp. in the Pearl River Delta region of southern China.

Results

The quantity of TEC increased significantly with stand age in both plantation types (P < 0.05). The largest single component of TEC was SOC, with stand age having a considerable effect on both SOC and overall biomass. The accumulation of SOC in the top 100 cm of the soil profile was higher under Acacia than under Eucalyptus (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In terms of carbon sequestration, the afforestation of Eucalyptus and Acacia represent an effective forest management practice. The accumulation of SOC is more effective under Acacia than under Eucalyptus.

Keywords

Total ecosystem carbon Forest type Stand age Biomass Soil organic carbon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 51039007, 41101494, and 40971054). Experimental facilities were provided by Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, the School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Assefa D, Rewald B, Sanden H, Rosinger C, Abiyu A, Yitaferu B, Godbold DL (2017) Deforestation and land use strongly effect soil organic carbon and nitrogen stock in Northwest Ethiopia. Catena 153:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attiwill PM (1994) Ecological disturbance and the conservative management of eucalypt forests in Australia. For Ecol Manag 63:301–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batjes NH (2014) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 65:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauhus J, Khanna P, Menden N (2000) Aboveground and belowground interactions in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii. Can J For Res 30:1886–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya SS, Kim K-H, Das S, Uchimiya M, Jeon BH, Kwon E, Szulejko JE (2016) A review on the role of organic inputs in maintaining the soil carbon pool of the terrestrial ecosystem. J Environ Manag 167:214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao Y, Fu S, Zou X, Cao H, Shao Y, Zhou L (2010) Soil microbial community composition under Eucalyptus plantations of different age in subtropical China. Eur J Soil Biol 46:128–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen D, C Zhang JW, Zhou L, Y Lin SF (2011) Subtropical plantations are large carbon sinks: evidence from two monoculture plantations in South China. Agric For Meteorol 151:1214–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Yu S, Liu S, Wang X, Zhang Y, Liu T, Zhou L, W Zhang SF (2017) Reforestation makes a minor contribution to soil carbon accumulation in the short term: evidence from four subtropical plantations. For Ecol Manag 384:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng J, Lee X, BK Theng LZ, Fang B, Li F (2015) Biomass accumulation and carbon sequestration in an age-sequence of Zanthoxylum bungeanum plantations under the Grain for Green Program in karst regions, Guizhou province. Agric For Meteorol 203:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Press CS (2005) China energy statistical yearbook 2004. China Statistics Press. Access 3(/2005):2005Google Scholar
  12. Cook RL, Binkley D, Stape JL (2016) Eucalyptus plantation effects on soil carbon after 20years and three rotations in Brazil. For Ecol Manag 359:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon RK, Solomon A, Brown S, Houghton R, Trexier M, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dou X, Deng Q, Li M, Wang W, Zhang Q, Cheng X (2013) Reforestation of Pinus massoniana alters soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics in eroded soil in south China. Ecol Eng 52:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farley KA (2007) Grasslands to tree plantations: forest transition in the Andes of Ecuador. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 97:755–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inagaki M, Kamo K, Miyamoto K, Titin J, Jamalung L, Lapongan J, Miura S (2011) Nitrogen and phosphorus retranslocation and N:P ratios of litterfall in three tropical plantations: luxurious N and efficient P use by Acacia mangium. Plant & Soil 341:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inagaki M, Kamo K, Titin J, Jamalung L, Lapongan J, Miura S (2010) Nutrient dynamics through fine litterfall in three plantations in Sabah, Malaysia, in relation to nutrient supply to surface soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 88:381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasel S, Singh S, Sanders GJ, Bennett LT (2011) Species-specific effects of native trees on soil organic carbon in biodiverse plantings across north-central Victoria, Australia. Geoderma 161:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelty MJ (2006) The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. For Ecol Manag 233:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laclau P (2003) Biomass and carbon sequestration of ponderosa pine plantations and native cypress forests in northwest Patagonia. For Ecol Manag 180:317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laik R, Kumar K, Das D, Chaturvedi O (2009) Labile soil organic matter pools in a calciorthent after 18 years of afforestation by different plantations. Appl Soil Ecol 42:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lemma B, Kleja DB, Nilsson I, Olsson M (2006) Soil carbon sequestration under different exotic tree species in the southwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Geoderma 136:886–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lieth H, Whittaker RH (1975) Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu E, Liu S (2012) The research of carbon storage and distribution feature of the Mytilaria laosensis plantation in south sub-tropical area. Acta Ecol Sin 32:5103–5109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu R (1999) Analytical methods of soil agricultural chemistry. Agriculture Science and Technology Press of China, Beijing, pp 15–20Google Scholar
  26. Mishra A, Sharma S, Khan G (2003) Improvement in physical and chemical properties of sodic soil by 3, 6 and 9 years old plantation of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Biorejuvenation Sodic Soil For Ecol Manage 184:115–124Google Scholar
  27. Peichl M, Arain MA (2006) Above-and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an age-sequence of temperate pine plantation forests. Agric For Meteorol 140:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Razakamanarivo RH, Grinand C, MA Razafindrakoto MB, Albrecht A (2011) Mapping organic carbon stocks in Eucalyptus plantations of the central highlands of Madagascar: a multiple regression approach. Geoderma 162:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Resh SC, Binkley D, Parrotta JA (2002) Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with eucalyptus species. Ecosystems 5:217–231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0067-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I (2011) Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant Soil 338:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santana GS, Knicker H, González-Vila FJ, González-Pérez JA, Dick DP (2015) The impact of exotic forest plantations on the chemical composition of soil organic matter in Southern Brazil as assessed by Py–GC/MS and lipid extracts study. Geoderma Regional 4:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SFA (2005) The sixth National Forest Resources Inventory (1999-2003). State Forestry Administration (SFA)Google Scholar
  33. Song M, Duan H, Guan DS, Zhang H (2018) The dynamics of carbon accumulation in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River delta region. V3. FigShare [Dataset].  https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5853420.v3
  34. Souza-Alonso P, Guisande-Collazo A, González L (2015) Gradualism in Acacia dealbata Link invasion: impact on soil chemistry and microbial community over a chronological sequence. Soil Biol Biochem 80:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun L, Guan D (2014) Carbon stock of the ecosystem of lower subtropical broadleaved evergreen forests of different ages in Pearl River Delta, China. J Trop For Sci:249–258Google Scholar
  36. Tang G, Li K (2013) Tree species controls on soil carbon sequestration and carbon stability following 20years of afforestation in a valley-type savanna. For Ecol Manag 291:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thuille A, Schulze ED (2006) Carbon dynamics in successional and afforested spruce stands in Thuringia and the Alps. Glob Chang Biol 12:325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang G, Guan D, Zhang Q, MR Peart YC, Peng Y, Ling X (2014) Spatial patterns of biomass and soil attributes in an estuarine mangrove forest (Yingluo Bay, South China). Eur J Forest Res 133:993–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0817-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wei X, Li Q, Liu Y, Liu S, Guo X, Zhang L, Niu D, Zhang W (2013) Restoring ecosystem carbon sequestration through afforestation: a sub-tropic restoration case study. For Ecol Manag 300:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiesmeier M, Prietzel J, Barthold F, Spörlein P, Geuß U, Hangen E, Reischl A, Schilling B, Lützow MV, Kögel-Knabner I (2013) Storage and drivers of organic carbon in forest soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria) – implications for carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 295:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xian J, Y Zhang TH, Wang K, Yang H (2009) Carbon stock and allocation of five restoration ecosystems in subalpine coniferous forest zone in Western Sichuan Province, Southwest China. Acta Ecol Sin 29:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xie J, Guo J, Yang Z, Huang Z, Chen G, Yang Y (2013) Rapid accumulation of carbon on severely eroded red soils through afforestation in subtropical China. For Ecol Manag 300:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang J, Wang C (2005) Soil carbon storage and flux of temperate forest ecosystems in northeastern China. Acta Ecol Sin 25:2875–2882Google Scholar
  44. Yang L, Liu N, Ren H, Wang J (2009) Facilitation by two exotic Acacia: Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium as nurse plants in South China. For Ecol Manag 257:1786–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang F, Wang X, Guo T, Zhang P, Wang J (2015) Soil organic and inorganic carbon in the loess profiles of Lanzhou area: implications of deep soils. Catena 126:68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang H, Guan D, Song M (2012) Biomass and carbon storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River Delta, South China. For Ecol Manag 277:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang X, Xu Z, Zeng F, Hu X, Han Q (2011) Carbon density distribution and storage dynamics of forest ecosystem in Pearl River Delta of low subtropical China. China Environ Sci 31:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang XY (2009) Allocation characteristics of three chief forest biomass and carbon stock in Guangzhou. Ph.D. Thesis., Sun Yat Sen University,ChinaGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao J, Kang F, L Wang XY, Zhao W, Song X, Zhang Y, Chen F, Sun Y, He T (2014) Patterns of biomass and carbon distribution across a chronosequence of Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) forests. PLoS One 9:e94966CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhou Y, Yu Z, Zhao S (2000) Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types. Chin J Plant Ecol 24:518–522Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen universityShenzhenChina
  2. 2.College of Resources and EnvironmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Science, School of Environmental Science and EngineeringSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation TechnologySun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations