Genetic variation and genotype by environment interaction in the susceptibility of Abies nordmanniana (Steven) Spach to the fungus Neonectria neomacrospora (Booth & Samuels) Mantiri & Samuels
- 154 Downloads
Pronounced clonal variation and moderate to high broad-sense heritability estimates of susceptibility to Neonectria neomacrospora were found in Abies nordmanniana in three sites. Significant genotype by environment (G × E) interaction was detected across sites.
Nordmann fir, a widely used Christmas tree species in Europe, has, since 2011, been increasingly damaged by a canker disease caused by Neonectria neomacrospora.
The objective was to study the genetic variation and genotype by environment interaction in the susceptibility of Nordmann fir to N. neomacrospora.
Damage caused by N. neomacrospora was evaluated using a visual scale in three Nordmann fir clonal seed orchards in Denmark, partly containing the same clones.
Damage due to N. neomacrospora was substantial at all three sites, and no clone was completely resistant to N. neomacrospora, but a large genetic variation in the susceptibility was detected among clones. Estimates of single-site individual broad-sense heritability for susceptibility varied between 0.38 and 0.47. The average type-B genetic correlation for damage score across sites was 0.34.
Genetic variation was very pronounced, and significant G × E interactions were detected for susceptibility. Further investigations of narrow-sense heritability, expression of the trait in younger material, and identification of the cause of G × E for N. neomacrospora susceptibility in Nordmann fir across different sites are recommended.
KeywordsBroad-sense heritability Resistance breeding Spatial genetic analysis
We give thanks to Timothy Robert Dowse and Lars Nørgaard Hansen who carried out the field evaluations and to Knud Nor Nielsen for helping with data transformation in R. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewer and the associate editors Cécile Robin and Erwin Dreyer for their critical reviews and suggestions.
The GB Hartmann family foundation grant no. 11, 2014–2015, part 3, Danish Nature Agency and Vemmetofte Kloster, which we gratefully acknowledge for supporting this study. We also thank the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) for providing the Ph.D. scholarship to Jing Xu.
- Agrios GN (1980) Insect involvement in the transmission of fungal pathogens. In: Harris FK, Maramorosch K (eds) Vectors of plant pathogens. Academic Press, New York, pp 293–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-326450-3.50017-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26:5–6Google Scholar
- Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual. The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Carson SD, Carson MJ (1989) Breeding for resistance in forest trees—a quantitative genetic approach. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27(1):373–395. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.27.090189.002105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Danish Agrifish Agency (2016) Kårede frøavlsbevoksninger i Danmarks skove. Ministry of Food and Environment. http://naturerhverv.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/NaturErhverv/Filer/Landbrug/Skovbrug/Kaaring/3153KAAR_Liste_over_dansk_grundmateriale.pdf Accessed, December 2016
- De Zutter N, Audenaert K, Ameye M, De Boevre M, De Saeger S, Haesaert G, Smagghe G (2017) The plant response induced in wheat ears by a combined attack of Sitobion avenae aphids and Fusarium graminearum boosts fungal infection and deoxynivalenol production. Mol Plant Pathol 18(1):98–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12386 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drakulic J, Caulfield J, Woodcock C, Jones SPT, Linforth R, Bruce TJA, Ray RV (2015) Sharing a host plant (wheat [Triticum aestivum]) increases the fitness of Fusarium graminearum and the severity of Fusarium head blight but reduces the fitness of grain Aphids (Sitobion avenae). Appl Environ Microbiol 81(10):3492–3501. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00226-15 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2008) Selection and breeding for insect and disease resistance. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/forestry/26445/en/ Accessed, December 2016
- Garkava-Gustavsson L, Zborowska A, Sehic J, Rur M, Nybom H, Englund JE, Lateur M, Van de Weg E, Holefors A. (2013) Screening of apple cultivars for resistance to European canker, Neonectria ditissima. In: Proceeding of the 13th Eucarpia Symposium on Fruit Breeding and Genetics, Leuven, Belgium. Acta Hort 976:529–536. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.976.75
- Ghasemkhani M, Liljeroth E, Sehic J, Zborowska A, Nybom H (2015) Cut-off shoots method for estimation of partial resistance in apple cultivars to fruit tree canker caused by Neonectria ditissima. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 65(5):412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2015.1016101 Google Scholar
- Gómez-Cortecero A, Saville RJ, Scheper RWA, Bowen JK, De Medeiros H, Kingsnorth J, Xu X, Harrison RJ (2016) Variation in host and pathogen in the Neonectria/Malus interaction; toward an understanding of the genetic basis of resistance to European canker. Front Plant Sci 7:1365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01365 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- John R (2011) Tannen-Rindennekrose in Baumhölzern. AFZ - Der Wald 66:30–33Google Scholar
- Lang KJ (1981) Cylindrocarpon cylindroides var. tenue als pathogen an Abies concolor und einigen Tannenbastarden. Eur J Forest Pathol 11(3):191–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1981.tb00086.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu T (1971) A Monograph of the Genus Abies. Dissertation, Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture, National Taiwan UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Løfting ECL (1973) Statusopgørelse for nordmannsgran. Det forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark 33:305–326Google Scholar
- Mantiri FR, Samuels GJ, Rahe JE, Honda BM (2001) Phylogenetic relationships in Neonectria species having Cylindrocarpon anamorphs inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Can J Bot 79:334–340Google Scholar
- Martín J, Solla A, Venturas M, Collada C, Domínguez J, Miranda E, Fuentes P, Burón M, Iglesias S, Gil L (2015) Seven Ulmus minor clones tolerant to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi registered as forest reproductive material in Spain. iForest 8(2):172–180. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1224-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCracken AR, Berrie A, Barbara DJ, Locke T, Cooke LR, Phelps K, Swinburne TR, Brown AE, Ellerker B, Langrell SRH (2003) Relative significance of nursery infections and orchard inoculum in the development and spread of apple canker (Nectria galligena)in young orchards. Plant Pathol 52(5):553–566. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00924.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McKeand S, Li B, Amerson H (1999) Genetic variation in fusiform rust resistance in loblolly pine across a wide geographic range. Silvae Genet 48:255–259Google Scholar
- Nielsen UB (1994) Breeding noble fir (Abies procera Rehder) and Nordmann fir (Abies nordmanniana (Stev.) Spach) for Christmas trees and greenery in Denmark. Lee SJ (ed) In: Proceedings of the Nordic Group for Tree Breeding, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1993. 118–127Google Scholar
- Pliūra A, Baliuckas V (2007) Genetic variation in adaptive traits of progenies of Lithuanian and western European populations of Fraxinus excelsior L. Balt For 13:28–38Google Scholar
- Pliūra A, Lygis V, Marciulyniene D, Suchockas V, Bakys R (2016) Genetic variation of Fraxinus excelsior half-sib families in response to ash dieback disease following simulated spring frost and summer drought treatments. iForest 9(1):12–22. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1514-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proschowsky GF (2014) Naturstyrelsen Nordsjælland-Brancheindsats mod Neonectria. Skovplanteringens årsmøde, 14. januar 2014. http://www.danskeplanteskoler.dk/Skovplanteringen/pics/6.pdf
- Resende MDV, Thompson R, Welham SJ (2006) Multivariate spatial statistical analysis of longitudinal data in perennial crops. Rev Mat Estatíst 24:147–169Google Scholar
- Rietman LM (2004) Assessment of Neonectria neomacrospora as a potential biological control agent for hemlock dwarf mistletoe. Dissertation, The University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
- Robak H (1951) Observations on the relationship between climatic damages and fungi damage on conifers [Noen iagttagelser til belysning av forholdet mellom klimatiske skader og soppangrep på nåletrær]. Meddr Vestland forstl ForsStn. 8:1–43(in Norwegian)Google Scholar
- Sasnauskas A, Gelvonauskienė D, Gelvonauskis B, Bendokas V, Baniulis D (2006) Resistance to fungal diseases of apple cultivars and hybrids in Lithuania. Agron Res 4:349–352Google Scholar
- Scheper RWA, Frijters L, Fisher BM, Hedderley DI (2015) Effect of freezing of Neonectria ditissima inoculum on its pathogenicity. N Z Plant Prot 68:257–263Google Scholar
- Skulason B, Hansen OK, Thomsen IM, Talgø V, Nielsen UB (2017) Damage by Neonectria neomacrospora and Adelges piceae in provenance trials of subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) in Denmark. For Pathol 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12326
- Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Buron M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Broeck AV (2005) Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For Sci 51:134–141Google Scholar
- Talgø V, Thomsen IM, Nielsen UB, Brurberg MB, Stensvand A (2012) Neonectria canker on subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) in Denmark. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference, Eichgraben, pp 92–96Google Scholar
- Talgø V, Brurberg MB, Stensvand A, Thomsen IM (2013) Neonectria neomacrospora is threatening the true fir production in Scandinavia. In: Proceeding of The 11th International Christmas Tree Research and Extension Conference, Faculty of Agriculture, , Nova Scotia, Canada, p 28Google Scholar
- Townsend AM, Bentz SE, Douglass LW (2005) Evaluation of 19 American elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. J Environ Hortic 23:21–24Google Scholar
- Wollenweber HW (1913) Ramularia, mycosphaerella, nectria, calorectria. Phytopathology 3(4):198–243Google Scholar