Pertinence of reactive, active, and robust adaptation strategies in forest management under climate change
- 175 Downloads
Pertinence of alternative adaptation strategies to business as usual, namely reactive, active, and robust adaptation strategies, can be evaluated by incorporating the expected costs and benefits of adaptation, climate change uncertainty, and the risk attitudes of decision-makers.
Forest management is used to coping with risky and uncertain projections and estimates. However, climate change adds a major challenge and necessitates adaptation in many ways.
This paper highlights the dependency of the decisions on adaptation strategies to four aspects of forest management: (i) the costs of mitigating undesirable climate change impacts on forests, (ii) the value of ecosystem goods and services to be sustained, (iii) uncertainties about future climate trajectories, and (iv) the attitude of decision-makers towards risk (risk aversion level).
We develop a framework to evaluate the pertinence of reactive, active, and robust adaptation strategies in forest management in response to climate change.
Business as usual may still be retained if the value of the forest and cost of climate impacts are low. Otherwise, it is crucial to react and facilitate the resilience of affected forest resources or actively adapt in advance and improve forest resistance. Adaptation should be robust under any future climate conditions, if the value of the ecosystem, the impacts from climatic changes, and the uncertainty about climate scenarios are very high.
The decision framework for adaptation should take into account multiple aspects of forest management under climate change towards an active and robust strategy.
KeywordsAdaptive management Climate target Forest growth Climate risks Forest economics
We are grateful for the constructive comments made by associate editor Dr. Barry Gardiner and three anonymous reviewers and improved the manuscript. Moreover, we acknowledge that this study benefited from participation of authors in SuFuRun project (http://suforun.ctfc.cat/) funded by European commission with grant agreement Number 691149.
- Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kizberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernier P, Schoene D (2009) Adapting forests and their management to climate change: an overview. Unasylva 60:5–11Google Scholar
- Hanewinkel M, Cullmann D, Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE (2013) Climate change may cause severe loss in economic value of European forestland. Nat Clim Chang 3:204–207Google Scholar
- Herman JD, Reed PM, Zeff HB, Characklis GW (2015) How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change? J Water Resour Plan Manag 141. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000509
- Innes J, Joyce LA, Kellomaki S, Louman B, Ogden A, Parrotta J, Thompson I, Ayres M, Ong C, Santoso H, Sohngen B, Wreford A (2009) Management for adaptation. In: Adaptation of forests and people to climate change. IUFRO World Series Volume 22, Helsinki, pp 135-185.Google Scholar
- IPCC. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (2014) part a: global and sectoral aspects. In: Field, CB et al., eds, Climate change 2014: contribution of working group II (WG2) to 5th assessment report (AR5), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32.
- Janowiak MK, Swanston CW, Nagel LM, Brand LA, Butler PR, Handler SD, Shannon DP, Iverson LR, Matthews SN, Prasad A, Peters MP (2014) A practical approach for translating climate change adaptation principles into forest management actions. J For 112:424–433Google Scholar
- Lempert RJ, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2003) Shaping the next one hundred years: new methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. MR-1626, RAND, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
- Puettmann KJ, Messier C, Coates KD (2013) Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: Building resilience to the challenge of global change. Routledge Pubs, London, New York, p 368Google Scholar
- Rigling A, Bigler C, Eilmann B, Feldmeyer-Christe E, Gimmi U, Ginzler C, Graf U, Mayer P, Vacchiano G, Weber P, Wohlgemuth T, Zweifel R, Dobbertin M (2013) Driving factors of a vegetation shift from Scots pine to pubescent oak in dry Alpine forests. Glob Chang Biol 19:229–240. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Hengeveld G, Reyer C, Hanewinkel M, Zimmermann NE, Cullmann D (2015) Alternative forest management strategies to account for climate change-induced productivity and species suitability changes in Europe. Reg Environ Chang 15:1581–1594. doi: 10.1007/s10113-10015-10788-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Paris Agreement (2015). http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php. Accessed: 10 March 2017