The incorporation of extreme drought events improves models for beech persistence at its distribution limit
- 311 Downloads
Projections of species distribution models under future climate are usually based on long-term averages. However, singular extreme drought events presumably contribute to the shaping of distribution limits at the retreating low-elevation xeric limits.
The objectives of this study were to set up a distribution model based on extreme drought events (EDM), which uses sanitary logging information as a proxy of vitality response of beech, and compare it with the results of classical species distribution models (SDMs).
Predictions of the EDM for 2025 were in agreement with those of the SDM, but EDM predicted a more serious decline in all regions of Hungary towards the end of the century.
These results suggest that the predicted increase in frequency and severity of drought events may further limit the distribution of beech in the future.
KeywordsBeech Trailing edge Climate change Xeric limit Predictive modelling
We would like to acknowledge Dr Tibor Szép who helped in providing the occurrence and sanitary logging data. We also thank Prof. Dr Hubert Hasenauer for his personal communication regarding the methods of modelling.
This research was funded by the Austrian–Hungarian Transboundary Cooperation 2007–2013 (‘FaKlim’ project—L00044), by TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012–0013 and by the FORGER (‘Towards the Sustainable Management of Forest Genetic Resources in Europe’—289119) project.
- AGROTOPO (2002) AGROTOPO database of RISSAC, HAS, BudapestGoogle Scholar
- Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Budyko MI (1974) Climate and life. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
- Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lucia G, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JMC, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson KS, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellenberg H (1986) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 4th edn. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Halász G (ed) (2006) Magyarország erdészeti tájai [Forest regions of Hungary]. Állami Erdészeti Szolgálat, Budapest (In Hungary)Google Scholar
- Horvat I, Glavac V, Ellenberg H (1974) Vegetation Südosteuropas. Fischer, Stuttgart, 768 ppGoogle Scholar
- Lakatos F, Molnár M (2009) Mass mortality of beech in Southwest Hungary. Acta Silv Lign Hung 5:75–82Google Scholar
- Mátyás C (2007) What do field trials tell about the future use of forest reproductive material? In: Koskela J, Buck A, Teissier Du Cros E (eds) Climate change and forest genetic diversity: implications for sustainable forest management in Europe. Bioversity International, Rome, pp 53–69Google Scholar
- Mátyás C, Berki I, Czúcz B, Gálos B, Móricz N, Rasztovits E (2010) Future of beech in Southeast Europe from the perspective of evolutionary ecology. Acta Silv Lign Hung 6:91–110Google Scholar
- Péczely G (1979) Éghajlattan. [Climatology] Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, in HungarianGoogle Scholar
- Piovesan G, Biondi F, di Filippo A, Alessandrini A, Maugeri M (2008) Drought-driven growth reduction in old beech (Fagus sylvativa L.) forests of the central Apennines, Italy. Glob Chang Biol 14:1–17Google Scholar
- Zeileis A, Leisch F, Hornik K, Kleiber C (2002) Strucchange, an R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. J Stat Softw 7:1–38Google Scholar