Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 70, Issue 5, pp 493–502 | Cite as

Mast seeding in deciduous forests of the northern Apennines (Italy) and its influence on wild boar population dynamics

  • Andrea CutiniEmail author
  • Francesco Chianucci
  • Roberta Chirichella
  • Emanuela Donaggio
  • Luca Mattioli
  • Marco Apollonio
Original Paper



Pulsed food resources may strongly affect the population dynamics of several consumer species, with consequences on the ecosystem. One of the most common pulsed resources is forest mast seeding.


We analysed mast seeding in deciduous forests in a mountainous area of northern Apennines and its effect on population dynamics of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.).


We performed a quantitative, 20-year analysis on annual seed production in Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) forest stands using litter traps. The wild boar population density was estimated by means of drive censuses and hunting bag records. The role of other biotic (density of predators) and abiotic (climate) factors potentially affecting wild boar mortality was also investigated.


Turkey oak and chestnut showed high levels of seed production, whereas lower levels were found in beech. The pulsed resources of chestnut and Turkey oak positively affected piglet density. Analyses also highlighted the influence of snow cover and wolves on wild boar population dynamics.


Wild boar can be considered a pulse rate species, the management of which can be improved by annual monitoring of seed production.


Forest seed production Pulsed resource Forest management Sus scrofa L. Silvicultural treatment Game management 



We are grateful to the Province of Arezzo, Comunità Montana del Casentino, DREAm Italia and, especially, to Piero Pedone, Fabio Polvani, Alfredo Bresciani and Ivana Fantoni for logistical support and assistance. We thank Marco Mencucci (Corpo Forestale dello Stato) for providing meteo data. We also wish to thank all the technicians of the Forestry Research Centre and all the students and volunteers for their help during field data collection, with particular thanks to Tessa Giannini, Umberto Cerofolini, Luigi Mencacci, Giovanni Venturi and Claudia Becagli. The English language was reviewed and edited by George Falk. We wish to thank three anonymous reviewers, which help us to greatly improve the manuscript.


This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture and Forest Policy, within the framework of the national research project “The implementation of game management in rural and mountainous areas”. The study was also funded by Province of Arezzo, within the research project “Behavioural ecology of wild boar and relations with damages to agriculture and forestry (CIDAN)” and by “Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze” within the “Jacopo FICAI” fellowship “Relationship between forest and wildlife”.


  1. Apollonio M, Mattioli L, Scandura M, Mauri L, Gazzola A, Avanzinelli E (2004) Wolves in the Casentinesi Forests: insights for wolf conservation in Italy from a protected area with a rich wild prey community. Biol Conserv 120:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bieber C, Ruf T (2005) Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa, ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. J Appl Ecol 42:1203–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioural ecology, some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 65:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahill S, Llimona F, Cabañeros L, Calomardo F (2012) Characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) habituation to urban areas in the collserola natural park (Barcelona) and comparison with other locations. Anim Biodivers Conserv 35:221–233Google Scholar
  6. Chianucci F, Cutini A (2013) Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography. Agric For Meteorol 168:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clotfelter ED, Pedersen AB, Cranford JA, Ram N, Snajdr EA, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED (2007) Acorn mast drives long-term dynamics of rodent and songbird populations. Oecologia 154:493–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conedera M, Krebs P, Tinner W, Pradella M, Torriani D (2004) The cultivation of Castanea sativa (Mill.) in Europe, from its origin to its diffusion on a continental scale. Veg Hist Archaeobot 13:161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curran LM, Leighton M (2000) Vertebrate responses to spatiotemporal variation in seed production of mast fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecol Monogr 70:101–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutini A (2000) Biomass, litterfall and productivity in chestnut coppices of various age at Monte Amiata (central Italy). Ecol Mediterr 26:33–41Google Scholar
  11. Cutini A (2002) Litterfall and Leaf Area Index in the CONECOFOR permanent plots. J Limnol 61:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cutini A, Bongi P, Chianucci F, Pagon N, Grignolio S, Amorini E, Apollonio M (2011) Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) browsing effects and use of chestnut and Turkey oak coppiced areas. Ann For Sci 68:667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cutini A, Chianucci F, Giannini T (2009). Effetti del trattamento selvicolturale su caratteristiche della copertura, produzione di lettiera e di seme in cedui di faggio in conversione. Ann Centro Ric Selvic 36: 109–124. Accessed 7 February 2013.
  14. Davis ML, Stephens PA, Willis SG, Bassi E, Marcon A, Donaggio E, Capitani C, Apollonio M (2012) Prey selection by an apex predator: the importance of sampling uncertainty. PLoS One 7:1–10Google Scholar
  15. DeGange AR, Fitzpatrick JW, Layne JN, Woolfenden GE (1989) Acorn harvesting by Florida scrub jays. Ecology 70:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drobyshev I, Övergaard R, Saygin I, Niklasson M, Hickler T, Karlsson M, Sykes MT (2010) Masting behaviour and dendrochronology of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag 259:2160–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elkinton JS, Healy WM, Buonaccorsi JP, Hazzard AM, Smith HR, Liebhold AM (1996) Interactions among gypsy moths, whitefooted mice, and acorns. Ecology 77:2332–2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernàndez-Llario P, Carranza J (2000) Reproductive performance of the wild boar in a Mediterranean ecosystem under drought condition. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fonseca C, da Silva AA, Alves J, Vingada J, Soares AMVM (2011) Reproductive performance of wild boar females in Portugal. Eur J Wildl Res 57:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Formosoff AN (1933) The crop of cedar nuts, invasions into Europe of the Siberian nutcracker (Nucifuga cariocatastes macrorynchus) and fluctuation in numbers of squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). J Anim Ecol 2:70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gazzola A, Avanzinelli E, Mauri L, Scandura M, Apollonio M (2002) Temporal changes of howling in south European wolf packs. Ital J Zool 69:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geisser H, Reyer HU (2004) Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. J Wildl Manag 68:939–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geisser H, Reyer HU (2005) The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boar Sus scrofa in the Thurgau (Switzerland). J. Zool 267:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1995) Modelling carrying capacity for wild boar Sus scrofa scrofa in a forest/heathland ecosystem. Wildl Biol 1:81–87Google Scholar
  25. Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1996) Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conserv Biol 10:1059–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E, van der Voot H (2009) Diet and condition of wild boar, Sus scrofa, without supplementary feeding. J. Zool 233:631–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hannon SJ, Mumme RL, Koening WD, Spon S, Pitelka FA (1987) Poor acorn crop, dominance, and decline in numbers of acorn woodpeckers. J Anim Ecol 56:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herrero J, García-Serrano A, García-González R (2008) Reproductive and demographic parameters in two Iberian wild boar Sus scrofa populations. Acta Theriol 53:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jedrzejewska B, Jedrzejewski W, Bunevich AN, Milkowski L, Krasinski A (1997) Factors shaping population densities and increased rates of ungulates in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland and Belarus) in the 19th and 20th centuries. Acta Theriol 42:399–451Google Scholar
  30. Jansen A, Luge E, Guerra B, Wittschen P, Gruber AD, Loddenkemper C, Schneider T, Lierz M, Ehlert D, Appel B, Stark K, Nöckler K (2007) Leptospirosis in urban wild boars, Berlin. Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis 13:739–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lagos L, Picos J, Valero E (2012) Temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 58:661–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langbein J, Putman R, Pokorny B (2011) Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation. In: Putman R, Apollonio M, Andersen R (eds) Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. Cambridge University Press, pp 215–259Google Scholar
  33. Lebret M, Nys C, Forgeard F (2001) Litter production in an Atlantic beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) time sequence. Ann For Sci 58:755–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massei G, Genov PV, Staines BW (1996) Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area. Acta Theriol 41:307–320Google Scholar
  35. Massei G, Genov PV, Staines BW (1997) Factors influencing home range and activity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal area. J. Zool 242:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mattioli L, Apollonio M, Mazzarone V, Centofanti E (1995) Wolf food habits and wild ungulate availability in the Foreste Casentinesi National Park, Italy. Acta Theriol 40:387–402Google Scholar
  37. Mattioli L, Capitani C, Gazzola A, Scandura M, Apollonio M (2011) Prey selection and dietary response by wolves in a high-density multi-species ungulate community. Eur J Wildl Res 57:909–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melis C, Szafranska PA, Jedrzejewska B, Bartòn K (2006) Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia. J Biogeogr 33:803–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mencuccini M, Piussi P, Zanzi Sulli A (1995) Thirty years of seed production in a subalpine Norway spruce forest, Patterns of temporal and spatial variation. For Ecol Manag 76:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Okarma H, Jedrzejewski B, Jedrzejewska W, Krasinski Z, Milkowski L (1995) The role of predation, snow cover, acorn crop, and man-related factors on ungulate mortality in Bialoweza Primeval Forest. Poland. Eur. J. Wildl. Res 40:197–217Google Scholar
  41. Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Tree 15:232–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards SA, Wittingham MJ, Stephens PA (2011) Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology, the utility of IT-AIC framework. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saez-Royuela C, Telleria JL (1986) The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal. Rev2 16:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scandura M (2005) Individual sexing and genotyping from blood spots on the snow: a reliable source of DNA for noninvasive genetic surveys. Conserv Genet 6:871–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scandura M, Capitani C, Iacolina L, Apollonio M (2006) An empirical approach for reliable microsatellite genotyping of wolf DNA from multiple noninvasive sources. Conserv Genet 7:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schley L, Dufrêne M, Krier A, Frantz AC (2008) Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. Eur J Wildl Res 54:589–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Rev 33:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Servanty S, Gaillard JM, Allainéb D, Brandta S, Baubeta E (2007) Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species, the wild boar. Behav Ecol 18:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silvertown JW (1980) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Biol J Linn Soc 14:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freedman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Symonds MRE, Mousalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tufto J, Andersen R, Linnel J (1996) Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid, the roe deer. J Anim Ecol 65:715–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yasaka M, Terazawa K, Koyama H, Kon H (2003) Masting behaviour of Fagus crenata in northern Japan, spatial synchrony and pre-dispersal seed predation. For Ecol Manag 184:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Cutini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Chianucci
    • 1
  • Roberta Chirichella
    • 2
  • Emanuela Donaggio
    • 2
  • Luca Mattioli
    • 3
  • Marco Apollonio
    • 2
  1. 1.Consiglio per la ricerca e la sperimentazione in agricolturaForestry Research Centre (CRA-SEL)ArezzoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Science for Nature and Environmental ResourcesUniversity of SassariSassariItaly
  3. 3.Province of ArezzoArezzoItaly

Personalised recommendations