Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 69–80 | Cite as

Genetic worth and diversity across 18 years in a Nordmann fir clonal seed orchard

  • Ulrik B. NielsenEmail author
  • Ole K. Hansen
Original Paper

Abstract

• Context

Many tree breeding programmes rely entirely on clonal seed orchards as the link between breeding activities and forestry, and are thereby also exposed to yearly fluctuations in the orchard crops.

• Aims

The main objective was to study the impact of year and clone fluctuations in strobili production on genetic worth, as well as on genetic diversity, of 18 consecutive commercial seed orchard crops.

• Methods

In a mature Abies nordmanniana clonal seed orchard, a yearly visual assessment of female and male strobili was carried out on a total of 18 clones (260 ramets), and coupled with clone breeding values.

• Results

Despite large annual and clone variation, and year-by-clone interaction in strobili production, the orchard’s genetic worth was somewhat uniform when considering four evaluated traits in the 11 years of superior or medium crop size. These years accounted for 95% of the accumulated cone crop over the whole period (18 years). Noteworthy deviations were only seen in the seven poorest seed years, comprising the remaining 5% of the total cone crop, where genetic diversity measures were also low.

• Conclusion

Avoiding small crop years seems to be a reasonable way to avoid fluctuations in the commercial seed orchard product.

Keywords

Clonal seed orchard Variation in flowering Genetic worth Strobili scoring Genetic diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The initial inspiration for the study was provided by our retired colleague, Hubert Wellendorf. We are thankful to Hans Kristian Kromann who carried out the majority of the visual evaluations. The final part of this study was supported by the Production Fee Foundation for Christmas Trees and Greenery Grant 2006–0021.

References

  1. Achere V, Rampant PF, Paques LE, Prat D (2004) Chloroplast and mitochondrial molecular tests identify European x Japanese larch hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 108:1643–1649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. Twentieth annual report on cooperative tree improvement and hardwood research program. 1 2976. Raleigh, NC, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  3. Askew GR (1988) Estimation of gamete pool compositions in clonal seed Orchards. Silvae Genet 37:227–232Google Scholar
  4. Choi WY, Kang KS, Jang KW, Han SU, Kim CS (2004) Sexual asymmetry based on flowering assessment in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus densiflora. Silvae Genet 53:55–59Google Scholar
  5. El-Kassaby YA, Thomson AJ (1996) Parental rank changes associated with seed biology and nursery practices in Douglas-fir. For Sci 42:228–234Google Scholar
  6. El-Kassaby YA, Fashler AMK, Crown M (1989) Variation in fruitfulness in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its effect on crop-management decisions. Silvae Genet 38:113–121Google Scholar
  7. El-Kassaby YA, Funda T, Lstiburek M, Lachout P, Klapste J (2009) Optimization of combined genetic gain and diversity for collection and deployment of seed orchard crops. Tree Genet Genomes 5:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Kassaby YA, Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Fundova I, Lai BSK, Walsh C, Van Niejenhuis A, Cook C, Graham H, Woods J (2011) Congruence between parental reproductive investment and success determined by DNA-based pedigree reconstruction in conifer seed orchards. Can J For Res 42:380–389Google Scholar
  9. Eriksson G, Jonsson A, Lindgren D (1973) Flowering in a clonal trial of Picea abies Karst. Stud For Suec 110:4–45Google Scholar
  10. Funda T, Chen CC, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Kenawy AMA, El-Kassaby YA (2008) Pedigree and mating system analyses in a western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) experimental population. Ann For Sci 65:705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffin AR (1982) Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards.1. Some flowering, cone and seed production traits. Aust For Res 12:295–302Google Scholar
  12. Hansen OK (2008) Mating patterns, genetic composition and diversity levels in two seed orchards with few clones—impact on planting crop. For Ecol Manage 256:1167–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen OK, Kjær ED (2006) Paternity analysis with microsatellites in a Danish Abies nordmanniana clonal seed orchard reveals dysfunctions. Can J For Res 36:1054–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen OK, McKinney LV (2010) Establishment of a quasi-field trial in Abies nordmanniana—test of a new approach to forest tree breeding. Tree Genet Genomes 6:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen OK, Nielsen UB (2010) Microsatellites used to establish full pedigree in a half-sib trial and correlation between number of male strobili and paternal success. Ann For Sci 67:703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang KS, Lindgren D (1998) Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora. Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet 47:196–201Google Scholar
  17. Kjær ED (1996) Estimation of effective population number in a Picea abies (Karst.) seed orchard based on flower assessment. Scan J For Res 11:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kjær ED, Barner H (1998) Evaluation of three Pinus sylvestris clonal seed orchard progenies in a 14 years old field trial. [Valg af skovfyrsprovenienser til klitten: Afprøvning af tre frøplantageafkom i et 14 år gammelt proveniensforsøg]. Dansk Skovbrugs Tidsskrift 83:25–36Google Scholar
  19. Kjær ED, Wellendorf H (1997) Variation in flowering and reproductive success in a Danish Picea abies (Karst.) seed orchard. For Genet 4:181–188Google Scholar
  20. Kjær ED, Wellendorf H (1998) Studies on the effect of unequal flowering on the effective population number in Danish seed orchard crops. For Tree Improv 26:56–64Google Scholar
  21. Kjær ED, Graudal L, Myrthue AK (1995) Assessment of genetic variation in clone seed plantations—illustrated with an example from sitka spruce[Vurdering af genetisk variation i klonfroplantager - belyst med et eksempel fra sitkagran]. DST Dansk Skovbrugs Tidsskrift 80:57–77Google Scholar
  22. Kroon J, Wennstrom U, Prescher F, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (2009) Estimation of clonal variation in seed cone production over time in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seed orchard. Silvae Genet 58:53–62Google Scholar
  23. Lai BSK, El-Kassaby YA, Funda T (2010) Female reproductive success variation in a Pseudotsuga menziesii seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction from a bulk seed collection. Heredity 101:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1998) Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can J For Res 28:276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindgren D, Cui JG, Son SG, Sonesson J (2004) Balancing seed yield and breeding value in clonal seed orchards. New Forests 28:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moriguchi Y, Taira H, Tani N, Tsumura Y (2004) Variation of paternal contribution in a seed orchard of Cryptomeria japonica determined using microsatellite markers. Can J For Res 34:1683–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nielsen UB, Chastagner GA (2005) Genetic variation in postharvest needle retention among Nordmann fir families and grafted clones. Scan J For Res 20:304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen U.B. and Hansen O.K., 2000. Clonal progenies of Nordmann fir for Christmas Tree Production. In: Christensen C.J. (ed.) Improvements in Christmas tree and greenery quality. Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and Planning, Reports 7: 58–61, Denmark.Google Scholar
  29. Nielsen UB, Hansen OK (2010) Response to selfing in seed set, seedling establishment and nursery growth based on controlled crosses of Abies nordmanniana clones. Silvae Genet 59:90–98Google Scholar
  30. Nielsen UB, Hansen JK, Kromann HK (2010) Impact of site and provenance on economic return in Nordmann fir Christmas tree production. Scan J For Res 26:74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nikkanen T, Ruotsalainen S (2000) Variation in flowering abundance and its impact on the genetic diversity of the seed crop in a Norway spruce seed orchard. Silva Fenn 34:205–222Google Scholar
  32. Schmidtling RC (1983) Genetic variation in fruitfulness in a Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L) seed orchard. Silvae Genet 32:76–80Google Scholar
  33. Sirikul W, Wellendorf H, Granhof J (1991) Provenance x site interaction in cone settings of Pinus caribaea var. Hondurensis in Thailand. For Tree Improv 24:1–29Google Scholar
  34. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Adams WT (2005) Pollen contamination and mating patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers. Can J For Res 35:1592–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoehr M, Webber J, Woods J (2004) Protocol for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia: quantifying genetic gain and diversity. Forestry 77:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA / Springer-Verlag France 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and PlanningUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark

Personalised recommendations