Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 68, Issue 8, pp 1375–1383 | Cite as

Provenance effect on the ring structure of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) wood by X-ray microdensitometry

  • Michela Nocetti
  • Philippe RozenbergEmail author
  • Gilles Chaix
  • Nicola Macchioni
Original Paper

Abstract

• Context

Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) is a tropical timber which is appreciated worldwide and has been planted into many regions of the tropics. It is essential to obtain information about provenance variation of basic wood properties in order to preserve the wood quality of end-products derived from future plantations. Figuring is one of the wood characteristics valued for panelling and furniture and it is an important parameter to evaluate the quality of teak wood. The ring structure affects within-ring and between-ring colour variation and, therefore, the figure of wood and the related aesthetical aspects.

• Methods

By means of microdensity profiles, we constructed a segmented linear model that depicts the anatomical structure of the rings. It effectively distinguished ring porous and diffuse porous rings, leading to the development of an efficient ring porosity index, further used to study the provenance variation of the ring structure.

• Results

A significant provenance effect was detected for both wood density variables and ring anatomical structure. Although no correlation was detected between the ring structure and the precipitation level at the provenance origin, the two provenances from very wet climates were distinguished by low values of ring porosity index (diffuse porous ring).

• Conclusion

The progenies in our study, collected from origins with various climates, planted in a new climate, seem to maintain to some extent the wood characteristics typical of their mother trees, suggesting that these ring characteristics may be inherited.

Keywords

Tectona grandis Wood anatomy Aesthetic value Wood quality Provenances 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thanks Philippe Vigneron of CIRAD, coordinator of the EU project WAFT, Joe Cobbinah of FORIG in Kumasi (Ghana) for the support on the on-site sampling, Paulo Ricardo Gherardi Hein and Luciano Scaletti for the specimens processing and Frédéric Millier for X-Ray scanning.

Fundings

The work was done in the framework of the EU INCO-DEV Project “WAFT—Increasing productivity and quality of West Africa teak plantations using genetic diversity and sustainable management”.

References

  1. Behaghel I (1999) The state of teak (Tectona grandis) plantations worldwide. Bois For Trop 262:6–18Google Scholar
  2. Bhat KM (2000) Timber quality of teak from managed tropical plantations with special reference to Indian plantations. Bois For Trop 263:6–16Google Scholar
  3. Bhat KM, Indira EP (2005) Heritability and genetic gains in wood quality attributes of clonal teak (Tectona grandis L. F.). J Timber Dev Assoc India 51:30–35Google Scholar
  4. Bhat KM, Priya PB (2004) Influence of provenance variation on wood properties of teak from the Western Ghat Region in India. IAWA J 25:273–282Google Scholar
  5. Bhat KM, Priya PB, Rugmini P (2001) Characterisation of juvenile wood in teak. Wood Sci Technol 34:517–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Decoux V, Varcin E, Leban JM (2004) Relationships between the intra-ring wood density assessed by X-ray densitometry and optical anatomical measurements in conifers. Consequences for the cell wall apparent density determination. Ann For Sci 61:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Degron R, Nepveu G (1996) Methodology of microdensitometric measurement for oak wood (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea Liebl): proposal for a representative sampling of oak wood density within ring. Holzforschung 50:491–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egenti LC (1977, 1980) Observations on vigour and form of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) from local and international provenances in Nigeria. Obeche 13:53–69Google Scholar
  9. Egenti LC (1978) The Danish/FAO international provenance trials of Tectona grandis in Nigeria. Indian For 104:227–237Google Scholar
  10. Fofana IJ, Ofori D, Poitel M, Verhaegen D (2009) Diversity and genetic structure of teak (Tectona grandis L.f) in its natural range using DNA microsatellite markers. New For 37:175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guay R, Gagnon R, Morin H (1992) A new automatic and interactive tree ring measurement system based on a line scan camera. For Chron 68:138–141Google Scholar
  12. Hedegart T (1974) The Teak Improvement Centre: ten years after initiation. Vanasarn 32:342–358Google Scholar
  13. Hidalgo E, Moreno V, Morales N (1986) Performance of 15 provenances of teak (Tectona grandis) five years after planting in Itabo, Matanzas. Rev For Baracoa 16:65–75Google Scholar
  14. Indira EP, Bhat KM (1998) Effects of site and place of origin on wood density of teak (Tectona grandis) clones. J Trop For Sci 10:537–541Google Scholar
  15. Jane FW (1970) The structure of wood. Adam & Charles Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Jayasankar S, Babu LC, Sudhakara K, Unnithan VKG (1999) Provenance variation in seed and germination characteristics of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Seed Sci Technol 27:131–139Google Scholar
  17. Jayasankar S, Sudhakara K, Babu LC (2003) Provenance variation in growth, physiology, anatomical characteristics and foliar nutrient status of teak (Tectona grandis) seedlings. J Trop For Sci 15:37–50Google Scholar
  18. Kedharnath S, Chacko VJ, Gupta SK, Matthews JD (1963) Geographic and individual tree variation in some wood characters of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Silvae Genet 12:181–187Google Scholar
  19. Keiding H, Wellendorf H, Lauridsen EB (1986) Evaluation of an international series of teak provenance trials. Danida Forest Seed Centre, HumlebaekGoogle Scholar
  20. Kjaer ED, Lauridsen EB, Wellendorf H (1995) Second evaluation of an international series of teak provenance trails. Danida Forest Seed Centre, HumlebaekGoogle Scholar
  21. Kjaer ED, Kajornsrichon S, Lauridsen EB (1999) Heartwood, calcium and silica content in five provenances of teak (Tectona grandis L.). Silvae Genet 48:1–3Google Scholar
  22. Kokutse AD, Bailleres H, Stokes A, Kokou K (2004) Proportion and quality of heartwood in Togolese teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). For Eco Manag 189:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kokutse AD, Adjonou K, Kokou K (2009) Relationship between ecological indicators and teak wood characteristics in Tchorogo plantation (Togo). Int J Biol Chem Sci 3:483–491Google Scholar
  24. Kokutse AD, Stokes A, Kokutse NK, Kokou K (2010) Which factors most influence heartwood distribution and radial growth in plantation teak? Ann For Sci 67:407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macchioni N, Nocetti M, Rozenberg P (2007) Early detection of surface quality of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) through X-Ray microdensitometry. Test on West African plantations. In: Blanchet P (ed) Proc International Scientific Conference on Hardwood Processing (ISCHP), September 24–26, Québec City, Canada, pp. 311–316Google Scholar
  26. Madoffe SS, Maghembe JA (1988) Performance of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) provenances seventeen years after planting at Longuza, Tanzania. Silvae Genet 37:175–178Google Scholar
  27. Polge H (1978) Fifteen years of wood radiation densitometry. Wood Sci Technol 12:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Priya PB, Bhat KM (1999) Influence of rainfall, irrigation and age on the growth periodicity and wood structure in teak (Tectona grandis). IAWA J 20:181–192Google Scholar
  29. Purkayastha SK (1996) A manual of Indian timbers. Sribhumi, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available: http://www.r-project.org
  31. Rajput KS, Rao KS, Patil UG (2005) Cambial anatomy, development and structural changes in the wood of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) associated with insect defoliation. J Sustain For 20:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao PS, Venkaiah K, Murali V, Murti SSN, Sattar SA (2001) Evaluation of International Teak Provenance Trial plot in North East Andhra Pradesh. Indian For 127:415–422Google Scholar
  33. Rathgeber CBK, Decoux V, Leban JM (2006) Linking intra-tree-ring wood density variations and tracheid anatomical characteristics in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Ann For Sci 63:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roque RM, Tomazelo-Filho M (2007) Relationships between anatomical features and intra-ring wood density profiles in Gmelina arborea applying X-ray densitometry. Cerne 13:384–392Google Scholar
  35. Sanwo SK (1987) The characteristics of the crown-formed and stem-formed wood in plantation grown teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in Nigeria. J Inst Wood Sci 11:85–88Google Scholar
  36. Sauter UH, Mutz R, Munro D (1999) Determining juvenile-mature wood transition in Scots pine using latewood density. Wood Fiber Sci 31:416–425Google Scholar
  37. Thulasidas PK, Bhat KM, Okuyama T (2006) Heartwood colour variation in home garden teak (Tectona grandis) from wet and dry localities of Kerala, India. J Trop For Sci 18:51–54Google Scholar
  38. Titmuss FH (1971) Commercial timbers of the world. Technical Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Varghese M, Nicodemus A, Ramteke PK, Anbazhagi G, Bennet SSR, Subramanian K (2000) Variation in growth and wood traits among nine populations of teak in Peninsular India. Silvae Genet 49:201–205Google Scholar
  40. Verhaegen D, Fofana IJ, Logossa ZA, Ofori D (2009) What is the genetic origin of teak (Tectona grandis L.) introduced in Africa and in Indonesia? Tree Genet Genomes 6:717–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vivekanandan K (1977) First year results of the teak provenance trials in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka For 13:31–33Google Scholar
  42. Zobel BJ, Jett JB (1995) Genetics of wood production. Springer Series in Wood Science, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  43. Zobel BJ, Sprague JR (1998) Juvenile wood in forest trees. Springer Series in Wood Science, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  44. Zobel BJ, van Buijtenen JP (1989) Wood variation: its causes and control. Springer Series in Wood Science, SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag, France 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michela Nocetti
    • 1
  • Philippe Rozenberg
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • Gilles Chaix
    • 3
  • Nicola Macchioni
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie ArboreeCNR-IVALSASesto Fiorentino (FI)Italy
  2. 2.Unité Amélioration Génétique et Physiologie ForestièresINRA OrléansOlivet CedexFrance
  3. 3.BIOS Department—Genetic Diversity and Breeding of Forest SpeciesCIRADMontpellier Cedex 5France
  4. 4.INRA Orléans, UR0588Orleans Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations