Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 68, Issue 4, pp 747–757

Genetic variation of xylem hydraulic properties shows that wood density is involved in adaptation to drought in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.))

  • Guillermina Dalla-Salda
  • Alejandro Martinez-Meier
  • Hervé Cochard
  • Philippe Rozenberg
Original Paper
  • 266 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Relationships between wood density and hydraulic efficiency and safety (hydraulic specific conductivity and vulnerability to cavitation, respectively) could clarify the physiological process explaining the impact of density on fitness. We have used new, relatively high-throughput phenotyping methods to estimate genetic variation of wood hydraulic specific conductivity (ks) and vulnerability to cavitation (VC) as an important step toward demonstrating the adaptive value of wood density.

Objective

The first aim of this study is to test if, in Douglas-fir, there is a relationship between wood hydraulic properties (ks and VC) and wood density. The second objective is to estimate genetic variation of wood ks and VC. These results could aid understanding of the role of wood density in the hydraulic properties of xylem and may clarify the role of wood density in adaptation to drought.

Results

Many significant relationships were found between wood density and wood hydraulic properties at clone and tree level, as well as significant genetic variation for ks and VC. We have also found positive correlations between tree height, specific conductivity and vulnerability to cavitation, but no relation was found between radial growth and hydraulic variables.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that wood density has an adaptive value and that microdensity can be used to study adaptation to drought in Douglas-fir. The novel methods used to measure ks and VC proved to be interesting alternatives for localized measurement of wood hydraulic properties and were compatible with a robust estimation of genetic variation.

Keywords

Adaptation to drought Wood density Douglas-fir Hydraulic efficiency Hydraulic safety 

References

  1. Bond B, Kavanagh K (1999) Stomatal behaviour of four woody species in relation to leaf-specific hydraulic conductance and threshold water potential. Tree Physiol 19:503–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Scholz FG, Franco AC, Bustamante M (2004) Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant. Tree Physiol 24:891–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavender-Bares J, Holbrook NM (2001) Hydraulic properties and freezing-induced cavitation in sympatric evergreen and deciduous oaks with contrasting habitats. Plant Cell Environ 24:1243–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochard H (2002) A technique for measuring xylem hydraulic conductance under high negative pressures. Plant Cell Environ 25:815–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cochard H, Damour G, Bodet C, Tharwat I, Poirier M, Améglio T (2005) Evaluation of a new centrifuge technique for rapid generation of xylem vulnerability curves. Physiol Plant 124:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornelius J (1994) Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Can J For Res 24:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruiziat P, Cochard H, Améglio T (2002) Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Ann For Sci 59:723–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalla-Salda G, Martinez-Meier A, Cochard H, Rozenberg P (2009) Variation of wood density and hydraulic properties of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) clones related to a heat and drought wave in France. For Ecol Manag 257:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decoux V, Varcin E, Leban J (2004) Relationships between the intra-ring wood density assessed by X-ray densitometry and optical anatomical measurements in conifers. Consequences for the cell wall apparent density determination. Ann For Sci 61:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 12 Dec 2009
  11. Domec JC, Gartner BL (2001) Cavitation and water storage capacity in bole xylem segments of mature and young Douglas-fir trees. Trees 15:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domec JC, Gartner BL (2002a) Age and position-related changes in hydraulic vs. mechanical dysfunction of xylem: inferring the design criteria for Douglas-fir wood structure. Tree Physiol 22:91–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Domec JC, Gartner BL (2002b) How do water transport and water storage differ in coniferous earlywood and latewood? J Exp Bot 53:2369–2379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Domec JC, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Housset J (2007) Dynamic variation in sapwood specific conductivity in six woody species. Tree Physiol 27:1389–1400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutilleul P, Herman M, Avella-Shaw T (1998) Growth rate effects on correlations among ring width, wood density, and mean tracheid length in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Can J For Res 28:56–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guay R, Gagnon R, Morin H (1992) A new automatic and interactive tree ring measurement system based on a line scan camera. For Chron 68:138–141Google Scholar
  17. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA (2001a) Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia 126:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hacke UG, Stiller V, Sperry JS, Pittermann J, McCulloh KA (2001b) Cavitation fatigue: embolism and refilling cycles can weaken cavitation resistance of xylem. Plant Physiol 125:779–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson GR, Gartner BL (2006) Genetic variation in basic density and modulus of elasticity of coastal Douglas-fir. Tree Genet Genomes 3:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martinez-Meier A, Sanchez L, Pastorino M, Gallo L, Rozenberg P (2008) What is hot in tree rings? The wood density of surviving Douglas-firs to the 2003 drought and heat wave. For Ecol Manag 256:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayr S, Cochard H (2003) A new method for vulnerability analysis of small xylem areas reveals that compression wood of Norway spruce has lower hydraulic safety than opposite wood. Plant Cell Environ 26:1365–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McElrone AJ, Pockman WT, Martínez-Vilalta J, Jackson RB (2004) Variation in xylem structure and function in stems and roots of trees to 20 m depth. New Phytol 163:507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neufeld HS, Grantz DA, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Crisosto GM, Crisosto C (1992) Genotypic Variability in Vulnerability of Leaf Xylem to Cavitation in Water-Stressed and Well-Irrigated Sugarcane. Plant Physiol 100:1020–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittermann J, Sperry J, Hacke U, Wheeler J, Sikkema E (2006) Inter-tracheid pitting and the hydraulic efficiency of conifer wood: the role of tracheid allometry and cavitation protection. A J Bot 93:1265–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polge H (1966) Etablissement des courbes de variations de la densité du bois par exploration densitométrique de radiographies d’échantillons prélevés à la tarière sur des arbres vivants. Application dans les domaines technologiques et physiologiques. PhD thesis, Université de Nancy, Nancy 215 pGoogle Scholar
  26. Rathgeber C, Decoux V, Leban J (2006) Linking intra-tree-ring wood density variations and tracheid anatomical characteristics in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Ann For Sci 63:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosner S, Klein A, Müller U, Karlsson B (2007) Hydraulic and mechanical properties of young Norway spruce clones related to growth and wood structure. Tree Physiol 27:1165–1178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosner S, Klein A, Müller U, Karlsson B (2008) Tradeoffs between hydraulic and mechanical stress responses of mature Norway spruce trunk wood. Tree Physiol 28:1179–1188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sparks JP, Black RA (1999) Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa: the role of stomatal control in preventing xylem cavitation. Tree Physiol 19:453–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sperry JS (1995) Limitations on stem water transport and their consequences. In: Gartner B (ed) Plant stems: physiology and functional morphology. Academic, New York, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  31. Sperry JS, Ikeda T (1997) Xylem cavitation in roots and stems of Douglas-fir and white fir. Tree Physiol 17:275–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sperry JS, Tyree MT (1990) Water-stress-induced xylem embolism in three species of conifers. Plant Cell Environ 13:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sperry JS, Meinzer F, McCulloh K (2008) Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees. Plant Cell Environ 31:632–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spicer R, Gartner BL (2001) The effects of cambial age and position within the stem on specific conductivity in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) sapwood. Trees 15:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stiller V (2009) Soil salinity and drought alter wood density and vulnerability to xylem cavitation of baldcypress (Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.) seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 67:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stratton L, Goldstein G, Meinzer F (2000) Stem water storage capacity and efficiency of water transport: their functional significance in a Hawaiian dry forest. Plant Cell Environ 23:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tyree M, Kolb K, Rood S, Patiño S (1994) Vulnerability to drought induced cavitation of riparian cottonwoods in Alberta: a possible factor in the decline of the ecosystem? Tree Physiol 14:455–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vander WC, Pammenter NW (1998) Relationship between growth and xylem hydraulic characteristics of clones of Eucalyptus spp. at contrasting sites. Tree Physiol 18:595–600Google Scholar
  39. Zobel B, Sprague J (1998) Juvenile wood in Forest trees. Springer series in wood science. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillermina Dalla-Salda
    • 1
  • Alejandro Martinez-Meier
    • 2
  • Hervé Cochard
    • 3
  • Philippe Rozenberg
    • 4
  1. 1.Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) BarilocheUnidad de Ecología ForestalSan Carlos de BarilocheArgentina
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) BarilocheUnidad de Genética Ecológica y Mejoramiento ForestalSan Carlos de BarilocheArgentina
  3. 3.Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) Clermont-Ferrand, PIAFClermont-FerrandFrance
  4. 4.Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) OrléansUnité Amélioration Génétique et Physiologie ForestièresOrléans Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations