Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 68, Issue 4, pp 849–860 | Cite as

Comparison of manure compost and mineral fertilizer for hybrid poplar plantation establishment on boreal heavy clay soils

  • Marie LarchevequeEmail author
  • Annie Desrochers
  • Guy R. Larocque
Original Paper



Clay soils are typically rich in nutrients but are often compact and hard during summer increasing planting shock by limiting root development. Recycling farm manure in hybrid poplar plantations may offer additional benefits to mineral fertilizer as organic amendment can create better conditions for the early development of roots in addition to nutrient release.

Material and methods

Composted sheep manure (10 and 20 kg/tree) at planting was compared to N and P mineral fertilization (15 g 34.5–0–0 with 15 g 0–45–0, provided by placed fertilization and 30 g 34.5–0–0 with 30 g 0–45–0).


The highest dose of mineral fertilization was the most efficient approach to increase poplar growth (height, diameter, biomass, leaf, and root development) for the three tested clones. However, trees were more water stressed with less negative δ13C in leaves the second year of growth.


Contrary to what we expected, compost treatments neither increased root development nor tree water status even if they succeeded in improving soil water-holding properties. This may be due to the type of planting stock (rootstock with pruned stems), which reduce water stress by synchronizing leaf and root development, or to compost high maturity and slow mineralization rate under boreal climate. However, compost manure also gave positive growth benefits and could represent a cheaper alternative to synthetic fertilizers in the vicinity of animal feedlots.


Fast-growing plantation Growth Root development Soil water-holding capacity Water stress 



This research was funded by the Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Volet1 and Volet 2 programs), Norbord, Alpac, Natural Resources Canada and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through a Collaborative and Research Development grant to AD.We also thank MRC Abitibi, Réseau Ligniculture Québec, Centre d’Étude de la Forêt, and Chaire CRSNG-UQAT-UQAM en Aménagement forestier durable.


  1. Adegbidi HG, Briggs RD, Volk TA, White EH, Abrahamson LP (2003) Effects of organic amendments and slow-release fertilizer on willow biomass production and soil chemical characteristics. Biomass Bioenergy 25:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassel, D.K., and Nielsen, D.R. (1986) Field capacity and available water capacity. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 1—physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy Series No 9. ASA, Inc., SSSA, Inc: Madison, WO, USA. pp. 901–926.Google Scholar
  3. Coleman MD, Friend AL, Kern CC (2004) Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developing Populus deltoides plantation. Tree Physiol 24:1347–1357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. DesRochers A, Tremblay F (2009) The effect of root and shoot pruning on early growth of hybrid poplars. For Ecol Manage 258:2062–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JE, Richardson J (2001) Poplar culture in North America. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, ON, Canada, p 397Google Scholar
  6. Environment Canada, 2004. National climate archives. Available from: Accessed 17 May 2011
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009) Available from: Accessed 17 May 2011
  8. Grigal DF (2000) Effects of extensive forest management on soil productivity. For Ecol Manage 138:167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossnickle SC (2005) Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New For 30:273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gryndler M, Larsen J, Hršelová H, Řezáčová V, Gryndlerová H, Kubát J (2006) Organic and mineral fertilization, respectively, increase and decrease the development of external mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a long-term field experiment. Mycorrhiza 16:159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guillemette T, Desrochers A (2008) Early growth and nutrition of hybrid poplars fertilised at planting in the boreal forest of western Quebec. For Ecol Manage 255:2981–2989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Güsewell S (2004) N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. Tansley review. New Phytol 164:243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen EA, McLaughlin RA, Pope PE (1988) Biomass and nitrogen dynamics of hybrid poplar on two different soils: implications for fertilization strategy. Can J For Res 18:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvey HP, van den Driessche R (1999) Nitrogen and potassium effects on xylem cavitation and water-use efficiency in poplars. Tree Physiol 19:943–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Isebrands JG, Nelson ND (1983) Distribution of [14C]-labelled photosynthates within intensively cultured Populus clones during the establishment year. Physiol Plant 59:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs DF, Rose R, Haase DL, Alzugaray PO (2004) Fertilization at planting impairs root system development and drought avoidance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings. Ann For Sci 61:643–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larchevêque M, Baldy V, Montès N, Fernandez C, Bonin G, Ballini C (2006a) Short-term effects of sewage sludge compost on a degraded Mediterranean soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1178–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larchevêque M, Ballini C, Korboulewsky N, Montès N (2006b) The use of compost in afforestation of Mediterranean areas: effects on soil properties and young tree seedlings. Sci Tot Environ 369:220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic, London, UK, p 889Google Scholar
  20. N’Dayegamiye A, Royer R, Audesse P (1997) Nitrogen mineralization and availability in manure composts from Quebec biological farms. Can J Soil Sci 77:345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pagliali M, Guidi G, La Marca M, Giachetti M, Lucamente G (1981) Effect of sewage sludge and composts on soil porosity and agregation. J Environ Qual 10:556–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stanturf JA, van Oosten C, Netzer DA, Coleman MD, Portwood CJ (2001) Ecology and silviculture of poplar plantations. In: Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JE, Richardson J (eds) Poplar culture in North America. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp 153–206Google Scholar
  23. van den Driessche R (1999) First-year growth response of four Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoïdes clones to fertilizer placement and level. Can J For Res 29:554–562Google Scholar
  24. Xie XH, MacKenzie AF, Xie RJ, Fyles JW, O’Halloran IP (1995) Effects of ammonium lignosulphonate and diammonium phosphate on soil organic carbon, soil phosphorous fractions and phosphorous uptake by corn. Can J Soil Sci 75:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Larcheveque
    • 1
    Email author
  • Annie Desrochers
    • 1
  • Guy R. Larocque
    • 2
  1. 1.Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Chaire Industrielle CRSNG-UQAT-UQAM en Aménagement Forestier DurableAmosCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry CentreQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations