Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp 647–656 | Cite as

Fall fertilization of Holm oak affects N and P dynamics, root growth potential, and post-planting phenology and growth

  • Juan A. OlietEmail author
  • José M. Salazar
  • Rafael Villar
  • Eduardo Robredo
  • Fernando Valladares
Original Paper



For Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.), a flush growing species, nutrient loading during the growing season is difficult and can lead to a low nutrient status of the seedlings. To provide insights about Holm oak nutrient dynamics during fall in the nursery and subsequent planting performance, a factorial nursery experiment was conducted in a mild fall–winter area testing the effects of timing of fertilization (early and late fall) and rate (two doses of a NPK fertilizer that applied 28 and 56 mg N per seedling), followed by an experimental plantation.


Biomass, allocation pattern, shoot N and K, and root K were unaffected by both rate and timing of fall fertilization. However, shoot P concentration of fall fertilized plants was significantly increased, and root P concentration was enhanced by applying fertilizer at either the highest rate or during early fall. This revealed a different nutrient dynamics during fall that was dependent on the specific nutrient and plant component.


Root growth potential was positively correlated to nursery root P concentration. Six months after planting, fall fertilized plants showed higher shoot biomass, higher proportion of new leaves, and faster development, producing leaves earlier compared with unfertilized plants.


It is concluded that early fall fertilization promotes nutrient loading of P in Holm oak, with significant effects on root growth potential and field growth by means of a phenologically earlier development and a higher aboveground biomass.


Late season fertilization Quercus ilex Nutrient loading Phosphorus Root growth potential 



We thank Francisco Conde for the help in the plantation. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the University of Córdoba and Andalucía Research Programs to promote research groups activities. Additionally, this research was partially supported by MEC projects Dinamed (CGL2005-05830-C03-02), Interbos (CGL2008-04503-CO3-02), and Encinut (AGL2006-12609-CO2-01) and co-financed by FEDER funds. The comments of two anonymous reviewers substantially improved the manuscript.


  1. Bocio I, Navarro FB, Ripoll MA, Jiménez MN, De Simón E (2004) Holm oak (Quercus rotundifolia Lam.) and Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) response to different soil preparation techniques applied to forestation in abandoned farmland. Ann For Sci 61:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boivin JR, Salifu F, Timmer VR (2004) Late-season fertilization of Picea mariana seedlings: intensive loading and outplanting response on greenhouse bioassays. Ann For Sci 61:737–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fernández M, Alejano R, Domínguez L, Tapias R (2008) Temperature controls cold hardening more effectively than photoperiod in four Mediterranean broadleaf evergreen species. Tree Forest Sci Biotechnol 2(1):43–49Google Scholar
  4. Floistad IS, Kohmann K (2004) Influence of nutrient supply on spring frost hardiness and time of bud break in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings. New For 27:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Folk RS, Grossnickle S (2000) Stock-type patterns of phosphorus uptake, retranslocation, net photosynthesis and morphological development in interior spruce seedlings. New For 19:27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heiskanen J, Rikala R (1998) Influence of different nursery container media of Scots pine and silver birch seedling after transplanting. New For 16:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Imsande J, Touraine B (1994) N demand and the regulation of N uptake. Plant Physiol 105:3–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Islam MA, Apostol KG, Jacobs DF, Dumroese RK (2009) Fall fertilization of Pinus resinosa seedlings: nutrient uptake, cold hardiness, and morphological development. Ann For Sci 66(7):704. doi: 10.1051/forest/2009061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs DF, Salifu KF, Davis AS (2009) Drought susceptibility and recovery of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings in relation to root system morphology. Ann For Sci 66(504):12Google Scholar
  10. Landis TD, Van Steenis E (2004) Macronutrients—phosphorus. In: Dumroese RK, Landis T (eds) Forest nursery notes. USDA Forest Service, R6-CP-TP-07-04, pp 6–14Google Scholar
  11. Mediavilla S, Garcia-Ciudad A, Garcia-Criado B, Escudero A (2008) Testing the correlations between leaf life span and leaf structural reinforcement in 13 species of European Mediterranean woody plants. Funct Ecol 22:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (1994) Métodos oficiales de análisis. Secretaría General Técnica, Dirección General de Política Alimentaria, Madrid, 782 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (2000) Catálogo Nacional de Regiones de Procedencia de especies forestales. Boletín Oficial del Estado 114:17467–17488Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Forestry and Range (2007) ANOVA: factorial designs with a separate control. Biometrics Information Pamphlets #14.
  15. Mollá S, Villar-Salvador P, García-Fayos P, Peñuelas JL (2006) Physiological and transplanting performance of Quercus ilex L. (Holm oak) seedlings grown in nurseries with different winter conditions. For Ecol Manage 237:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oliet J, Planelles R, Artero F, Jacobs D (2005) Nursery fertilization and tree shelters affect long-term field response of Acacia salicina Lindl. planted in Mediterranean semiarid conditions. For Ecol Manage 215:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oliet J, Planelles R, Artero F, Valverde R, Jacobs D, Segura ML (2009a) Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition. New For 37:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliet J, Tejada M, Salifu F, Collazos A, Jacobs DF (2009b) Performance and nutrient dynamics of Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) seedlings in relation to nursery nutrient loading and post-transplant fertility. Eur J For Res 128:253–263Google Scholar
  19. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2007) Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought. Funct Ecol 21:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Poorter L, Van de Plassche M, Willems S, Boot RGA (2004) Leaf traits and herbivory rates of tropical tree species differing in successional status. Plant Biol 6:1–9Google Scholar
  21. Puértolas J, Gil L, Pardos JA (2003) Effects of nutritional status and seedling size on field performance of Pinus halepensis planted on former arable land in the Mediterranean basin. Forestry 76(2):159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rikala R, Repo T (1997) The effect of late summer fertilization on the frost hardening of second-year Scots pine seedlings. New For 14:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rikala R, Heiskonen J, Lathy M (2004) Autumn fertilization in the nursery affects growth of Picea abies container seedlings after transplanting. Scand J For Res 19:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salifu KF, Apostol KG, Jacobs DF, Islam MA (2008) Growth, physiology, and nutrient retranslocation in nitrogen-15 fertilized Quercus rubra seedlings. Ann For Sci 65:101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanz-Pérez V, Castro P, Valladadres F (2007) Growth versus storage: responses of Mediterranean oak seedlings to changes in nutrient and water availabilities. Ann For Sci 64:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sardans J, Peñuelas J, Rodà F (2006a) Plasticity of leaf morphological traits, leaf nutrient content, and water capture in the Mediterranean evergreen oak Quercus ilex subsp. ballota in response to fertilization and changes in competitive conditions. EcoSci 13:258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sardans J, Rodà F, Peñuelas J (2006b) Effects of a nutrient pulse supply on nutrient status of the Mediterranean trees Quercus ilex subsp. ballota and Pinus halepensis on different soils and under different competitive pressure. Trees 20:619–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silla F, Escudero A (2003) Uptake, demand and internal cycling of nitrogen in saplings of Mediterranean Quercus species. Oecologia 136:28–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sloan JL, Jacobs DF (2008) Carbon translocation patterns associated with new root proliferation during episodic growth of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings. Tree Physiol 28:1121–1126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. South DB, Donald DGM (2002) Effect of nursery conditioning treatments and fall fertilization on survival and early growth of Pinus taeda seedlings in Alabama, U.S.A. Can J For Res 32:1171–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sung SS, Black CC, Kormanik TL, Zarnoch SJ, Kormanik PP, Counce PA (1997) Fall nitrogen fertilization and the biology of Pinus taeda seedling development. Can J For Res 27:1406–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Terradas J, Savè R (1999) Holm oak and Holm oak forests: an introduction. In: Rodà F, Retana J, Gracia C, Bellot J (eds) Ecology of Mediterranean evergreen oak forests. Ecological Studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  33. Timmer VR, Aidelbaum AS (1996) Manual for exponential nutrient loading of seedlings to improve outplanting performance on competitive forest sites. NODA/NFP Tech. Rep., TR-25. Nat. Resour. Can., Canadian Forest Service, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, 21 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A (2010) Nursery fertilization affects seedling traits but not field performance in Quercus suber L. J Arid Environ 74:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valladares F, Martínez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Pérez-Corona E, Manrique E (2000) Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy? New Phytol 148:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Villar-Salvador P, Planelles R, Enriquez E, Peñuelas JL (2004) Nursery cultivation regimes, plant functional attributes, and field performance relationships in the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex L. For Ecol Manage 196:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA (2005) Differential effects of N, P and K on photosynthesis and partitioning of N in Pinus pinaster needles. Ann For Sci 62(1–8):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan A. Oliet
    • 1
    Email author
  • José M. Salazar
    • 2
  • Rafael Villar
    • 3
  • Eduardo Robredo
    • 2
  • Fernando Valladares
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Departamento de Silvopascicultura, ETS Ingenieros de MontesUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería ForestalUniversidad de CórdobaCórdobaSpain
  3. 3.Area de EcologíaUniversidad de CórdobaCórdobaSpain
  4. 4.Instituto de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Ciencias MedioambientalesMadridSpain
  5. 5.Departamento de Biologia y Geología, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y TecnologíaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations