Dairy Science & Technology

, Volume 96, Issue 5, pp 623–636 | Cite as

Acquisition of PrtS in Streptococcus thermophilus is not enough in certain strains to achieve rapid milk acidification

  • Wessam Galia
  • Nawara Jameh
  • Clarisse Perrin
  • Magali Genay
  • Annie Dary-Mourot
Original Paper


The acquisition of prtS by Streptococcus thermophilus strains allowed hydrolysis of caseins into peptides and then to increase their growth in milk. This leads to faster milk acidification, which is important in dairy industry. However, some strains harboring the same allele of prtS present different acidification rates, which could be explained by a difference in the regulation of prtS expression. We chose two strains with the same allele of prtS (including the same promoter region): one, PB302, is with high acidification rate while the other, PB18O, is without. They exhibited similar growth in M17, but not in milk, where PB302 showed better growth. The expression of prtS and activity of PrtS were lower in PB18O, in the two media tested. We demonstrated that other genes known to be involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism were overexpressed in PB302. Interestingly, these genes were overexpressed in milk compared to M17. Nearly all these genes possessed a putative CodY-box in their promoter region. Taken together, difference of gene expression detected in PB302 between milk (low-peptide medium) and M17 (rich-peptide medium) and presence of a putative CodY-box is a feature of the transcriptional pattern of CodY-regulated genes. Altogether, our results propose that acquisition of prtS is not enough in certain strains to achieve rapid milk acidification. High transcriptional level of dtpT, amiF, ilvC, ilvB, bcaT, livJ, ackA, codY, and prtS in fast acidifying strain suggests that this transcriptional pattern could be required for fast milk acidification in Streptococcus thermophilus.


Proteolytic system Transcriptional regulation PrtS CodY Streptococcus thermophilus 

1 Introduction

Milk acidification rate, which is of major technological importance in dairy industry, is dependent on the growth rate of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Among them, Streptococcus thermophilus is widely used for its ability to acidify the milk and to produce aromatic compounds. Several studies have demonstrated the existence of a link between rapid growth of Streptococcus thermophilus in milk, high acidifying capacity, and presence of an efficient proteolytic system (Courtin et al. 2002; Dandoy et al. 2011; Galia et al. 2009). Indeed, the concentration in small peptides and free amino acids in milk is low. To grow at a high cellular density, LAB need to overcome their auxotrophy for certain amino acids by hydrolyzing milk caseins to benefit from an amino acid source. For this, LAB possess a proteolytic system which is generally composed of a cell-envelope proteinase (CEP) that initiates the casein breakdown, transport systems which internalize resulting oligopeptides through the membrane and various intracellular peptidases which hydrolyze them to free amino acids (Savijoki et al. 2006). Most of LAB possess only one CEP but some lactobacilli strains harbor two or more CEPs (Genay et al. 2009; Broadbent et al. 2011). In Streptococcus thermophilus, prtS belongs to a genomic island probably acquired by horizontal transfer from a commensal and/or pathogenic species close to Streptococcus suis (Delorme et al. 2010). It has been shown in Streptococcus thermophilus that the presence of the cell-envelope proteinase PrtS was a prerequisite for a high acidification rate of milk (Galia et al. 2009; Dandoy et al. 2011; Urshev et al. 2014), but some strains possessing the prtS gene exhibited nevertheless a low acidification rate (Galia et al. 2009). This difference in acidifying rate did not result from a mutation in the prtS gene, as fast acidifying and lower acidifying strains harbored a 100% identical allele including the promoter region (Galia et al. 2009). These results suggest that the expression of prtS may be regulated differently in the different strains. Analysis of the upstream region of prtS revealed the presence of a binding motif recognized by the protein CodY (Galia et al. 2009), and gel shift experiments have confirmed that the CodY protein of Streptococcus thermophilus was able to bind to the promoters of 14 genes belonging to proteolytic system including prtS (Liu et al. 2009). This suggests that the variation of the acidifying capacity observed between the different strains of Streptococcus thermophilus could be due to a different regulation of the expression of prtS and may be through CodY.

CodY is a pleiotropic transcriptional regulator found in Gram-positive bacteria with low-GC percent, which represses the expression of over 100 to 200 genes involved in various metabolic pathways and functions (Guédon et al. 2005; den Hengst et al. 2005; Lu et al. 2015). In pathogenic streptococci, CodY is also a key regulator and controls several factors of virulence such as the adhesion of Streptococcus pyogenes (Hendriksen et al. 2008). A consensus DNA binding sequence of CodY (AATTTTCWGAAAATT) has been established in Lactococcus lactis, Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes, and Streptococcus thermophilus (Belintsky and Sonenshein 2008; Guédon et al. 2005; den Hengst et al. 2005; Lu et al. 2015). CodY is mostly known to be a repressor although it can sometimes function as an activator, as it is the case for the bsrF and the ackA (acetate kinase) genes in Bacillus subtilis (Preis et al. 2009; Shivers et al. 2006). In Streptococcus thermophilus, CodY repressed the conversion of carbon source into amino acids and improved lactose utilization, allowing the bacterium to adapt to the milk environment (Lu et al. 2015).

The objective of this work was to investigate why some strains of Streptococcus thermophilus having the same allele of prtS may exhibit significantly different proteolytic activity at the cell surface. For this, we focused on two strains phylogenetically close (Junjua et al. 2016): the PB302 strain presents a high acidification rate and a significant proteolytic activity, whereas PB18O, which carries the same allele of prtS as PB302, seems to be slightly proteolytic, with a much slower milk acidification rate (Galia et al. 2009). We particularly studied in these two strains the expression of prtS and other genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism, in order to identify the transcriptional pattern that could be correlated with the fast acidifying phenotype of Streptococcus thermophilus in milk.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The strains used in this work, PB302, isolated from yoghurt, and PB18O, isolated from cheese, were stored at −80 °C in reconstituted skim milk (10% w/v). Cultures were incubated overnight at 42 °C in reconstituted skim milk before each experiment. Precultures were inoculated to 1% in milk or M17 (Terzaghi and Sandine 1975), and cultures were incubated at 42 °C without shaking until the required growth stage was reached. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring optical density (OD) at 650 nm for M17 or at 480 nm after clarification of the milk by a 10-fold dilution in 2 g.L−1 EDTA pH 12 (Thomas and Turner 1977).

2.2 Detection of proteolytic activity

The proteolytic activity present at the cell-surface of bacteria cultivated in milk or in M17 media was evaluated using the substrate Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA. The synthetic substrate was prepared at 2 mmol.L−1 in 1 volume of N,N-dimethylformamide and 9 volumes of Tris–HCl buffer 50 mmol.L−1 (pH 7.5) + 5 mmol.L−1 CaCl2. Another chromogenic substrate, Lys-pNA, prepared as for Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA, was used to check the absence of peptidase activity in the culture supernatant.

When strains were grown in M17 cultures, cells were recovered from 10-mL growth medium by centrifugation for 15 min at 3900g and 4 °C and pellets were washed and resuspended in Tris–HCl buffer 100 mmol.L−1 pH 7.0 to obtain a cell concentration of 5.108 CFU mL−1 (OD650nm = 1). When strains were grown in milk, caseins were first eliminated by adding to 40 volumes of fermented milk, 5.3 volumes of saline solution (NaCl 0.85%; sodium glycerophosphate 0.5%; Tween 80 0.1%; pH 7), and 1.3 volume of trisodium citrate 1 mol.L−1 (Chopard et al. 2001). Pellets were recovered by centrifugation for 15 min at 3900g and 4 °C, washed and resuspended in Tris–HCl buffer 100 mmol.L−1 pH 7.0 to obtain a cell concentration of 5.108 CFU mL−1. One hundred microliters of bacterial suspensions were incubated with 1 mL of substrate during 1h30 at 37 °C. After incubation, cells were removed by centrifugation and absorbance of supernatants determined at 410 nm by spectrometry (Uvikon, Kontron, Switzerland). Assays were performed in triplicate on cells obtained from two independently grown cultures.

2.3 Quantitative RT-PCR

After growth in 45 mL of M17, bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation for15 min at 3900 g and 4 °C, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. After growth in 80 mL of milk, caseins have been removed as described above (Chopard et al. 2001) and bacterial pellets were resuspended in 46.6 mL of cold extraction buffer (sodium phosphate 5 mmol.L−1; EDTA 1 mmol.L−1; β-mercaptoethanol 2 mmol.L−1; pH 7) (Derzelle et al. 2005; Guimont et al. 2002). After centrifugation for 15 min at 3900 g and 4 °C, pellets were frozen in liquid nitrogen at −80 °C. Total RNAs were extracted according to Chomczynski using TRIzol reagent (Chomczynski 1993; Chomczynski and Sacchi 1987). DNA was removed by incubating for 30 min at 37 °C in the presence of 10 U of DNAse I (Roche, Meylan, France) and 40 U of RNase inhibitor (Rnase OUT, Invitrogen, Saint Aubin, France). RNA was purified by phenol-chloroform extraction (Green and Sambrook 2012) and then precipitated by adding a volume of cold isopropanol. The pellet was recovered by centrifugation for 20 min at 12,000 g and 4 °C, washed with 70% ethanol and dissolved in MilliQ water. A second step of DNase was then performed using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion, Courtaboeuf, France) for 90 min at 37 °C. Total RNA was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm using a spectrophotometer Nanodrop-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France). Complementary DNAs (cDNA) were synthesized from total RNA by using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Saint Aubin, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) reactions were performed on MJ Opticon Monitor (Biorad) using MESA GREEN SYBR Assay No ROX (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) following the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR primers were designed with Primer3Plus software (Untergasser et al. 2007) to amplify approximately 130-bp fragments of tested genes (Table 1). Each reaction was carried out in triplicate and the overall experiment of qRT-PCR was done twice independently. Data were recorded as threshold cycles (CT), expressed as means ± SEM, and computed using the comparative critical threshold (2−ΔΔCT) method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). The results were normalized using the gene encoding the sigma factor σ70/σ32 as reference gene, as it was expressed at a constant level under our conditions. An expression ratio higher than 2 or lesser than 0.5 observed in the two independent experiments was considered.
Table 1

Sequence and hybridization position of primers used in quantitative RT-PCR experiments



Gene (STER_#)a

Distance from ATGb



amiF (1405)




amiF (1405)




ackA (1834)




ackA (1834)




ldh (1257)




ldh (1257)




livJ (0398)




livJ (0398)




relA (0200)




relA (0200)




murE (1233)




murE (1233)




ilvC (1848)




ilvC (1848)




ilvB (1850)




ilvB (1850)




dtpT (0984)




dtpT (0984)




bcaT (0635)




bcaT (0635)




pepC (0276)




pepC (0276)




pepN (1012)




pepN (1012)




pepXP (1633)




pepXP (1633)




codY (1599)



codY (1599)




prtS (0846)




prtS (0846)




σ70/σ32 (1448)




σ70/σ32 (1448)




aGene number according to the genome of Streptococcus thermophilus LMD-9

bRelative position in base pair from the ATG of the corresponding gene (− upstream, + downstream)

3 Results

3.1 Growth of Streptococcus thermophilus PB18O and PB302 in milk and M17 media

The strains PB302 and PB18O harbored the same allele of prtS (from 752 nt upstream of the start codon to 382 nt downstream of the stop codon), but proteolytic and acidifying properties were significantly different (Galia et al. 2009). Firstly, we followed their growth at 42 °C in M17 and milk media by pH measurement and determination of cell density.

In M17 medium, the growth of both strains appeared to be similar (results not shown). The time required to decrease from an extracellular pH of 6 to an extracellular pH of 5 (i.e., precisely in the exponential growth phase) was approximately the same for both strains (around 50 min). The maximum OD650 nm reached at the end of the exponential phase was about 3.6 ± 0.1 for PB302 and about 3.4 ± 0.2 for PB18O.

In milk, the differences in growth between the two strains were significantly marked: the time required to reach an extracellular pH of 5 from an initial pH of 6 was 86.5 ± 9.2 min for PB302 versus 122.5 ± 3.5 min for PB18O strain. Moreover, the maximum OD480 nm reached at the end of the exponential phase was 5.8 for PB302 versus 3.3 for PB18O.

3.2 Expression of prtS in PB302 and PB18O during growth in milk and M17 media

The expression of the prtS gene was followed during growth of PB302 and PB18O strains in milk and M17 media at two levels: transcriptional and posttranslational. For the first, the expression of prtS was determined by qRT-PCR, whereas for the second, the cell surface proteolytic activity was measured by incubating cells with the chromogenic substrate Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa. For M17 cultures, we focused on four stages of growth: early exponential phase (OD650 nm = 0.7); late exponential phase (OD650 nm = 2); early stationary phase (OD650 nm = 4); and 2 h after the beginning of the stationary phase (OD650 nm = 4.2). For milk medium, only two points were analyzed: early (extracellular pH 6) and late (extracellular pH 5.3) exponential phase because when bacterial cells reached the stationary phase, the milk coagulated which prevented the cell recovery and the obtaining of mRNA of sufficient quality.

3.2.1 Estimation of the cell surface proteolytic activity using synthetic substrate

As specified before, the proteinase activities of Streptococcus thermophilus PB302 and PB18O grown in milk and M17 media were followed by incubating cells with the chromogenic substrate Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa. To be sure that the detected proteolytic activity was due to the activity of PrtS and not to intracellular peptidases released from lysis, cells of the two strains were incubated in Tris–HCl buffer without substrate, then eliminated by centrifugation and culture supernatants were incubated with the synthetic substrate Lys-pNA to detect potential peptidase activity. As expected, no peptidase activity was detected with the Lys-pNA substrate for both strains and at each stages of growth tested. Proteinase activities are reported in Table 2.
Table 2

Cell envelope-associated proteinase activitiesa (milli absorbance unit at 410 nm) of Streptococcus thermophilus PB302 and PB18O grown in M17 medium (A) or in milk (B)



Early exponential phase

(OD650 nm = 0.7)

Late exponential phase

(OD650 nm = 2)

Early stationary phase

(OD650 nm = 4)

Late stationary phase

(OD650 nm = 4.2)


30 ± 1

40 ± 1

10 ± 2

1 ± 0.1


210 ± 10

210 ± 4

80 ± 2

30 ± 1



Early exponential phase

(pH = 6)

Late exponential phase

(pH = 5.3)


120 ± 30

210 ± 20


410 ± 60

520 ± 10

All the values are expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean expression fold change)

aAssays were performed in triplicate on cells obtained from two independently grown cultures

During growth in M17, the PB18O strain exhibited very little cell surface proteolytic activity (Table 2A). The proteolytic activity observed for PB302 was higher than that for the strain PB18O whatever the growth time tested. Indeed, the cell-surface proteolytic activity was 5–8-fold higher with the strain PB302 than with PB18O for the first three points tested (early/late exponential phase; early stationary phase) and up to 30-fold higher for the late stationary phase. For both strains, the proteinase activity was maximal throughout the exponential growth phase but dropped sharply at the beginning of stationary phase, reaching a very low value in the late stationary phase.

In milk, the proteolytic activity observed for both strains appeared to be higher than that for M17 medium (Table 2B). For both strains, activity is higher at late exponential phase than at the beginning, and at late exponential phase, the strains PB302 and PB18O exhibited, respectively, 2.5 and 5-fold higher proteolytic activities than did the same strains grown in the M17 broth. As observed in M17, the proteolytic activity detected with PB302 remained significantly higher than that of PB18O, around 3-fold higher.

3.2.2 Quantification of the expression of the prtS gene

The expression of the prtS gene was followed during the growth in milk and M17 media of Streptococcus thermophilus PB302 and PB18O. At each stage of growth tested, RNAs were extracted and reverse transcribed in cDNA. Specific cDNA corresponding to prtS were searched using the primers PrtSquantforprim/PrtSquantrevprim (Table 1). For cell grown in M17, mRNAs of sufficient quality were obtained for three points (early and late exponential phases and early stationary phase). For cells grown in milk, mRNAs extracted in the early and in the late exponential phase were of sufficient quality for the strain PB302 but not for the strain PB18O, for which only mRNAs of sufficient quality were extracted from the late exponential phase. As the proteolytic activity appeared to be constant throughout the exponential phase in M17 and highest in late exponential phase in milk (Table 2), we considered that these points were informative enough.

In M17, the level of expression of prtS appeared to be constant over time even if it seemed to increase (2-fold) at the early stationary phase for the PB302 strain (results not shown). The comparison of the expression level of prtS between the two strains (Table 3) showed that the prtS gene was more expressed in PB302 compared to PB18O, especially in early stationary phase (7-fold).
Table 3

Fold change (FC) valuesa in the mean transcript levels of the prtS gene in PB302 relative to PB18O cultures sampled in different growth phases in M17 medium or in milk


Phase of growth

Mean FC ± SEMb


Early exponential phase

(DO650 nm = 0.7)

4.03 ± 0.52

Late exponential phase

(DO650 nm = 2)

2.53 ± 0.65

Early stationary phase

(DO650 nm = 4)

7.47 ± 2.67


Late exponential phase

(pH = 5.3)

5.70 ± 2.36

aFold changes are means from PCR performed in triplicate on RNA purified from two independently grown cultures

bStandard error of the mean expression fold change

In milk, as observed in M17, PB302 presented a transcription level much higher than that of the PB18O strain (about 5-fold) (Table 3).

3.3 Quantification of the expression of genes involved in nitrogen and carbon metabolism in Streptococcus thermophilus

To understand the difference in the acidifying capacity between the two strains, PB18O and PB302, we decided to analyze for the first time the presence/absence of other genes known to be involved in the nitrogen or carbon metabolism, and for the second time, their expression levels. Thirteen genes were selected (Table 4). These genes are involved in transport of peptides or amino acid (ami operon, livJ, dtpT), in amino acid biosynthesis (bcaT, ilvB, ilvC), gene-encoding peptidases (pepC, pepN, pepX) and transcriptional regulators (relA, codY), and genes involved in carbon metabolism (ackA, ldh). First, one possible link between fast acidifying phenotype and genetic equipment was investigated by comparing their corresponding gene set determined by PCR. Genetic profiles did not appear to be linked to acidifying capacity because all the selected genes were detected in the two strains. These genes were then sequenced in both strains, including the promoter region (about 400 pb). No difference was observed between the two strains, neither in the open reading frames nor in the promoter/regulatory regions, indicating that the difference in acidifying capacity was not due to a mutation in one of these genes but perhaps a different transcriptional regulation. The analysis of their promoter region revealed that most of them harbored a putative CodY-box, which was deduced by searching for sequences resembling consensus sequence determined by den Hengst et al. (2005) (Table 4).
Table 4

Genes analyzed in real-time reverse transcription PCR experiments

Gene name

Locus (STER_no.)a

Functional assignment

CodY boxb

Distance from AUGc

AA/peptide transporter



Oligopeptide ABC transporter (amiACDEF)





Di/tripeptide transporter




Branched-chain AA transporter (livJHMGF)



Peptidases, proteases



Cysteine aminopeptidase C





Lysyl-aminopeptidase, aminopeptidase N





X-prolyl dipeptidyl peptidase





Subtilisin-like serine protease



Transcriptional regulator



Transcriptional pleiotropic repressor CodY





Guanosine polyphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase/synthetase ((p)ppGpp synthetase)


AA metabolism



Branched chain amino acid aminotransferase





Ketol-acid reductoisomerase





Acetolactate synthase (ilvDBN)






Acetate kinase





L-lactate dehydrogenase


Reference gene

σ 70/32


DNA-directed RNA polymerase, sigma subunit (σ70/σ32)


Small letters indicate mismatches from the derivatives of the consensus sequence AATTTTCWGAAAATT established by den Hengst et al. (2005) in Lactococcus lactis (W = A or T)

aBased on annotation of the LMD-9 genome (Bolotin et al. 2004; Makarova et al. 2006).

bSequences obtained from the strains PB302 and PB18O

cRelative position in base pairs of the CodY-box relative to the translational start codon (AUG) of the corresponding gene (or the first gene of the operon)

Their expression has thus been followed during growth in milk and M17 using the same cDNA as those used for the quantification of prtS.

During the growth in M17, when comparing the transcription level of the different genes between the two strains (Table 5), it appears that most of them are expressed similarly, which is consistent with the similarity of the growth curves of these strains in this medium. Only a few genes are expressed differently: bcaT is less expressed in PB302 at the three stages of growth tested; amiF (so the ami operon) is less expressed in PB302 in early stationary phase; on the contrary, livJ and ackA are more expressed in PB302 in early stationary phase (Table 5).
Table 5

Fold change (FC) valuesa in the mean transcript levels of the listed genes in PB302 relative to PB18O cultures sampled in early, late exponential or early stationary phase of growth in M17 medium and late exponential phase of growth in milk





Early exponential phase

Late exponential phase

Early stationary phase

Late exponential phase


0.80 ± 0.04

0.52 ± 0.17

0.19 ± 0.02

1.11 ± 0.44


2.76 ± 2.50

1.52 ± 0.27

2.98 ± 1.98

1.82 ± 1.33


1.84 ± 0.64

1.19 ± 0.83

7.28 ± 2.62

2.71 ± 0.06


2.31 ± 1.21

1.27 ± 0.48

1.54 ± 0.91

2.25 ± 1.92


1.18 ± 0.36

1.30 ± 0.56

0.82 ± 0.13

1.06 ± 0.10


1.23 ± 0.21

1.09 ± 0.20

1.75 ± 0.21

0.88 ± 0.47


1.21 ± 0.95

0.80 ± 0.10

2.23 ± 0.60

3.92 ± 0.84


0.94 ± 0.35

1.11 ± 0.16

1.38 ± 0.29

2.65 ± 0.69


0.40 ± 0.16

0.34 ± 0.11

0.28 ± 0.16

1.40 ± 1.16


1.19 ± 0.46

1.59 ± 0.46

1.90 ± 0.57

4.20 ± 0.73


1.33 ± 0.57

1.42 ± 0.06

1.43 ± 0.49

6.48 ± 5.16


1.66 ± 1.09

1.71 ± 0.24

2.03 ± 0.04

3.62 ± 2.19


0.60 ± 0.15

0.65 ± 0.24

0.86 ± 0.10

1.13 ± 0.59

Standard error of the mean expression fold change was calculated for all the values. Values in bold and underlined represent an expression ratio higher than 2 or lesser than 0.5 observed in the two independent experiments

aFold changes are means from PCR performed in triplicate on RNA purified from two independently grown cultures

In milk, differences appear to be more marked. Four of the tested genes (codY, ilvC, livJ, and relA) appeared to be significantly more expressed in the strain PB302 during the late exponential phase in milk.

Interestingly, when we consider only the strain PB302, none of the tested genes was less expressed in milk than in M17. Indeed, eight genes (codY, dtpT, amiF, ilvC, ilvB, bcaT, livJ, and ackA) were more expressed in milk than in M17 at the early exponential phase and three at the late exponential phase (Table 6). In contrast, for PB18O, the expression of the tested genes appeared to be similar between the two media (data not shown). This suggests that the genes overexpressed in milk in PB302 could be important for an optimal growth in milk and that their non-induction in PB18O could be responsible for the slow growth of this strain in milk.
Table 6

Fold change (FC) valuesa in the mean transcript levels of the listed genes in PB302 cultures sampled of growth in milk relative to M17 medium


Early exponential phase

Late exponential phase


14.14 ± 2.67

2.56 ± 0.03


3.14 ± 1.16

2.47 ± 0.98


4.07 ± 1.68

1.77 ± 0.40


6.80 ± 0.98

2,83 ± 0.77


3.0 ± 0.52

2.34 ± 1.17


6.22 ± 3.18

4.62 ± 2.12


20.30 ± 14.52

2.32 ± 1.16


1.45 ± 0.64

0.87 ± 0.14


3.64 ± 1.72

1.28 ± 0.01


1.80 ± 0.26

0.51 ± 0.28


1.20 ± 0.64

1.17 ± 0.68


1.94 ± 0.42

1.0 ± 0.09


1.08 ± 0.21

1.21 ± 0.23

Standard error of the mean expression fold change was calculated for all the values. Values in bold and underlined represent an expression ratio higher than 2 or lesser than 0.5 observed in the two independent experiments

aFold changes are means from PCR performed in triplicate on RNA purified from two independently grown cultures

4 Discussion

In a previous work, we showed that strains of Streptococcus thermophilus harboring the same allele of the prtS gene presented significantly different acidification capacity and growth rate in milk (Galia et al. 2009), as it is the case of the strains PB302 and PB18O selected for this study. We showed that these strains had a similar growth in M17 medium while in milk, the PB18O strain acidified more slowly and reached a maximum OD650 nm lower than that of the PB302 strain. Hence, we formulated the hypothesis that this difference could mainly result from a difference in the expression of the proteolytic system between the two strains. Indeed, both media contain lactose as the carbon source, but M17 contains an immediately available nitrogen source contrary to the milk. In M17, bacterial cells do not require the cell surface proteolytic activity to benefit from a source of nitrogen, in opposition to milk in which strains expressing a proteolytic system could be advantaged.

So, we were committed to explain these differences of growth by comparing the expression of the prtS gene by quantitative RT-PCR and measurement of the cell surface proteolytic activity in these two strains. The quantitative RT-PCR results demonstrated that the prtS gene was more expressed in PB302 than in PB18O, either in M17 or in milk, the difference being more pronounced in milk during late exponential phase. The quantitative RT-PCR results were corroborated by the measure of the cell surface proteolytic activity using the synthetic substrate Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA. Thus, the culture medium, probably through the available nitrogen source, had a significant effect on the expression and hence on the activity of the PrtS proteinase of the strains PB302 and PB18O. Indeed, the M17 medium is rich in peptides and free amino acids whereas milk is principally composed of complex proteins. Similar observations have been made for proteinase production in different streptococcal and lactococcal strains. Indeed, the cell wall proteinases of Streptococcus thermophilus CNRZ703 and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis NCDO 763 are inducible according to the growth medium (Monnet et al. 1987; Shahbal et al. 1993). In our conditions, a cell surface proteolytic activity was observed over time for the two strains and regardless of the medium. Letort et al. (2002) highlighted a diauxic growth of Streptococcus thermophilus in milk, the protease PrtS being expressed only during the second phase. For PB302 and PB18O, as well as for the other PrtS+ strains of our collection, a cell surface proteolytic activity was detected from the early exponential phase of growth in both mediums. This suggests that the regulation of prtS could differ from one strain to another.

All these results therefore suggest that the difference of growth rate in milk between the two strains could be explained by a difference of prtS expression since the PB302 strain, which possesses a high acidifying capacity, has a higher cell surface proteolytic activity and a higher prtS expression level than the other one has. Moreover, in the M17 medium, the acidification rate was similar between the two strains, whereas both the prtS expression level and the cell surface proteolytic activity were higher in PB302 compared to PB18O. These findings support that other components could be involved in acidification rate.

We decided to enlarge the quantitative RT-PCR experiments to 13 other genes known to be involved in nitrogen or carbon metabolism. Firstly, these genes were sequenced and for each of them, the same allelic version was found in both strains. Most of these genes harbored a CodY-box in their promoter region. At the expression level, most of the genes were expressed at a similar rate in the two strains in M17 medium, whereas in milk, some genes, particularly those involved in nitrogen metabolism, appeared to be more expressed in the strain PB302. Of the five genes overexpressed in milk in PB302 compared to PB18O (codY, ilvC, livJ, prtS, and relA), all but relA possess upstream of their promoter a CodY-box, deduced from the consensus sequence determined by den Hengst et al. (2005), and could therefore belong to the CodY regulon. It is interesting to note that we detected upstream of these genes only one CodY-box which differs from that established in Lactococcus lactis where several CodY-box were detected upstream certain genes or operons highly regulated by CodY (den Hengst et al. 2005). Our results support what was previously reported by Lu et al. (2015) who have shown in the ST2017 strain of Streptococcus thermophilus that CodY regulated among others ilvB, ilvC, livJ, and bcaT. Moreover, recent studies demonstrated in vitro a direct interaction of CodY with a number of functional promoters of Streptococcus thermophilus including that of prtS (Liu et al. 2009) and livJ (Lu et al. 2015).

The differences in gene expression between the two strains PB302 and PB18O were more pronounced in milk than in M17, during the late exponential phase. In addition, it is interesting to note that when we consider only one strain, the nine genes (codY, dtpT, amiF, ilvC, ilvB, bcaT, livJ, prtS, and ackA) overexpressed in milk in PB302 could be important for an optimal growth in milk and that their non-induction in PB18O could be responsible for the slow growth of this strain in milk. These genes are involved in the proteolytic system (prtS, dtpT, amiF) and synthesis/transport of branched chain amino acids (bcaT, ilvB, ilvC, livJ), which is consistent for milk growth. The cellular role of ackA is 2-fold. The coupled activities of phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase generate ATP by substrate-level phosphorylation. This activity can be an important source of ATP during fermentative growth. In addition, excretion of acetate is a means of removing excess end-products of glucose metabolism (e.g., pyruvate and acetyl CoA) (Dauner et al. 2001).

Except dtpT, all the genes mentioned above possess a potential CodY-box and might therefore belong to the same regulon. This means that CodY could play a key role in the regulation of gene expression in milk. In PB302, the overexpression of ilvB, ilvC, and livJ genes in milk should allow the intracellular concentration of BCAA to increase and therefore CodY to be active, as proposed by den Hengst et al. (2005).

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, the regulation of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism is complex in Streptococcus thermophilus. To our knowledge, gene expression of LAB linked to acidifying capacity is not frequently reported in the literature. The difference in acidifying capacity between Streptococcus thermophilus strains could be due to the differential expression of several metabolic-related genes. If PB302 and PB18O have both acquired the same allele of the prtS gene by horizontal gene transfer, the regulation scheme in which it is inserted determined its potential for expression. CodY could also play an important role in the acidifying capacity of Streptococcus thermophilus through the regulation of nitrogen and carbon metabolism. Moreover, a deep understanding of prtS regulatory mechanisms may help to improve Streptococcus thermophilus growth in milk.



This work was supported by “Le Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche”.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Belintsky BR, Sonenshein AL (2008) Genetic and biochemical analysis of CodY-binding sites in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 190:1224–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Renault P, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD, Kulakauskas S, Lapidus A, Goltsman E, Mazur M, Pusch GD, Fonstein M, Overbeek R, Kyprides N, Purnelle B, Prozzi D, Ngui K, Masuy D, Hancy F, Burteau S, Boutry M, Delcour J, Goffeau A, Hols P (2004) Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nat Biotechnol 22:1554–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadbent JR, Cai H, Larsen RL, Hughes JE, Welker DL, De Carvalho VG, Tompkins TA, Ardö Y, Vogensen F, De Lorentiis A, Gatti M, Neviani E, Steele JL (2011) Genetic diversity in proteolytic enzymes and amino acid metabolism among Lactobacillus helveticus strains. J Dairy Sci 94:4313–4328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomczynski P (1993) A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA. DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. Biotechniques 15(532–534):536–537Google Scholar
  5. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chopard MA, Schmitt M, Perreard E, Chamba JF (2001) Aspect qualitatif de l’activité protéolytique des lactobacilles thermophiles utilisés en fabrication de fromages à pâte pressée cuite. Lait 81:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Courtin P, Monnet V, Rul F (2002) Cell-wall proteinases PrtS and PrtB have a different role in Streptococcus thermophilus/Lactobacillus bulgaricus mixed cultures in milk. Microbiology 148:3413–3421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dandoy D, Fremaux C, de Frahan MH, Horvath P, Boyaval P, Hols P, Fontaine L (2011) The fast milk acidifying phenotype of Streptococcus thermophilus can be acquired by natural transformation of the genomic island encoding the cell-envelope proteinase PrtS. Microb Cell Factories 10(Suppl 1):S21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dauner M, Storni T, Sauer U (2001) Bacillus subtilis metabolism and energetics in carbon-limited and excess-carbon chemostat culture. J Bacteriol 183:7308–7317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delorme C, Bartholini C, Bolotine A, Dusko Ehrlich S, Renault P (2010) Emergence of a cell wall protease in the Streptococcus thermophilus population. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. den Hengst CD, van Hijum SA, Geurts JM, Nauta A, Kok J, Kuipers OP (2005) The Lactococcus lactis CodY regulon: identification of a conserved cis-regulatory element. J Biol Chem 280:34332–34342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derzelle S, Bolotin A, Mistou MY, Rul F (2005) Proteome analysis of Streptococcus thermophilus grown in milk reveals pyruvate formate-lyase as the major upregulated protein. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8597–8605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galia W, Perrin C, Genay M, Dary A (2009) Variability and molecular typing of Streptococcus thermophilus strains displaying different proteolytic and acidifying properties. Int Dairy J 19:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Genay M, Sadat L, Gagnaire V, Lortal S (2009) prtH2, Not prtH, is the ubiquitous cell wall proteinase gene in Lactobacillus helveticus. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3238–3249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green MR, Sambrook J (2012) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, N. YGoogle Scholar
  16. Guédon E, Sperandio B, Pons N, Ehrlich SD, Renault P (2005) Overall control of nitrogen metabolism in Lactococcus lactis by CodY, and possible models for CodY regulation in Firmicutes. Microbiology 151:3895–3909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guimont C, Chopard MA, Gaillard JL, Chamba JF (2002) Comparative study of the protein composition of three strains of Streptococcus thermophilus grown either in M17 medium or in milk. Lait 82:645–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendriksen WT, Bootsma HJ, Estevao S, Hoogenboezem T, de Jong A, de Groot R, Kuipers OP, Hermans PW (2008) CodY of Streptococcus pneumoniae: link between nutritional gene regulation and colonization. J Bacteriol 190:590–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Junjua M, Kechaou N, Chain F, Awussi AA, Roussel Y, Perrin C, Roux E, Langella P, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Le Roux Y, Chatel JM, Dary-Mourot A (2016) A large scale in vitro screening of Streptococcus thermophilus strains revealed strains with a high anti-inflammatory potential. LWT-Food Sci Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.006 Google Scholar
  20. Letort C, Nardi M, Garault P, Monnet V, Juillard V (2002) Casein utilization by Streptococcus thermophilus results in a diauxic growth in milk. J Appl Microbiol 68:3162–3165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu F, Du L, Du P, Huo G (2009) Possible promoter regions within the proteolytic system in Streptococcus thermophilus and their interaction with the CodY homolog. FEMS Microbiol Lett 297:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−ΔΔCt) method. Methods Enzymol 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu WW, Wang Y, Wang T, Kong J (2015) The global regulator CodY in Streptococcus thermophilus controls the metabolic network for escalading growth in the milk environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:2349–2358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee JH, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D (2006) Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15611–15616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Monnet V, Bars DL, Neviani E, Gripon JC (1987) Partial characterization and comparison of cell wall proteinases from 5 strains of Streptococcus lactis. Lait 67:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Preis H, Eckart RA, Gudipati RK, Heindrich N, Brantl S (2009) CodY activates transcription of a small RNA in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 191:5446–5457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Savijoki K, Ingmer H, Varmanen P (2006) Proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:394–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shahbal S, Hemme D, Renault P (1993) Characterization of a cell envelope-associated proteinase activity from Streptococcus thermophilus H-strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:177–182Google Scholar
  29. Shivers RP, Dineen SS, Sonenshein AL (2006) Positive regulation of Bacillus subtilis ackA by CodY and CcpA: establishing a potential hierarchy in carbon flow. Mol Microbiol 62:811–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Terzaghi BE, Sandine WE (1975) Improved medium for lactic Streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol 29:807–813Google Scholar
  31. Thomas TD, Turner KW (1977) Preparation of skim milk to allow harvesting of starter cells from milk cultures. NZ J Dairy Sci Technol 12:15–21Google Scholar
  32. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JAM (2007) Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W71–W74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Urshev Z, Ninova-Nikolova N, Ishlimova D, Pashova-Baltova K, Michaylova M, Savova T (2014) Selection and characterization of naturally occurring high acidification rate Streptococcus thermophilus strains. Biotechnol Biotec Equip 28:899–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wessam Galia
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Nawara Jameh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Clarisse Perrin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Magali Genay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Annie Dary-Mourot
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Unité de Recherche Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux, Equipe Protéolyse et Biofonctionnalité des Protéines et des PeptidesUniversité de LorraineVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance
  2. 2.UR AFPA Unité Sous Contrat 340INRAVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance
  3. 3.Research Group on Bacterial Opportunistic Pathogens and Environment, UMR 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, CNRS, VetAgro Sup, and Université Lyon 1Université de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations