Intercrops improve the drought resistance of young rubber trees
The expansion of rubber cultivation into drought prone areas calls for innovative management to increase the drought resistance of the trees. The competition for water exerted by an intercrop in the upper soil layers will likely stimulate the growth of young rubber tree roots into deeper soil layers where water availability is more stable. This study examined the effects of a legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) and a grass (Vetiveria zizanoides) intercrop, on the fine root traits of young rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.) established along a toposequence covering a range of soil depths in northeast Thailand. Two plots with and without the intercrops were set up in a 3-year-old rubber plantation. Tree girth, mortality rate, nutrient content in the leaves, predawn leaf water potential, and soil water content profiles were monitored over four successive years. Fine root length density, specific root length, fine root biomass, and fine root diameter of the rubber trees were measured in the fourth year. In shallow soils, the trees with the legume intercrop had a higher growth rate, a higher leaf nutrient content, and a higher fine root length density in the deepest soil layers than the controls, supporting the hypothesis of an adaptive root response, increasing drought resistance. However, the trees with the grass intercrop did not show this effect. In deep soils, specific root length was highest without the intercrops, and the soil water profile and predawn leaf water potential suggested that trees with intercrops benefited from increased water extraction below 110 cm depth. We showed, for the first time, that rubber tree root traits can be manipulated through intercropping to improve drought resistance. However, our results suggest intercropping might not reduce risks of tree mortality caused by drought in the shallowest soils of the subhumid area of northeast Thailand.
KeywordsHevea brasiliensis Pueraria phaseoloides Vetiveria zizanoides Intercrop FRLD SRL Predawn leaf water potential Soil water profile Soil depth Agroforestry Northeast Thailand
We would like to thank many people for their contribution to the field data collection and processing, in particular, Vincent Cheylan (IRD), Weerawut Yotjamrut, and Nitjaporn Koonklang (LDD).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Clermont-Dauphin C, Suvannang N, Pongwichian P, Cheylan V, Hammecker C, Harmmand JM (2016) Dinitrogen fixation by the legume cover crop Pueraria phaseoloides and transfer of fixed N to Hevea brasiliensis—impact on tree growth and vulnerability to drought. Agric Ecosyst Environ 217:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delabarre M (1998) Rapport final: fonctionnement des cultures associées à base d’hévéa, Troisième programme STD, Numéro de contrat TS3-CT92-148, Cirad, pp 1992–1995Google Scholar
- Ford HW (1952) The distribution of feeder roots of orange and grapefruit trees on rough lemon rootstock. Citrus Mag 14:22–23Google Scholar
- Jessy MD, Prasannakumari P, Nair RB, Vijayakumar KR, Nair NU (2010) Influence of soil moisture and nutrient status on fine root dynamics of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). J Plant Crop 38:92–96Google Scholar
- Lemaire G, Gastal F (1997) N Uptake and distribution in plant canopies. Diagnosis of the nitrogen status in crops. In: G. Lemaire (ed) Springler Verlag, New-York, pp 3–44Google Scholar
- Maeght JL, Gonkhamdee S, Clément C, Isarangkool Na Ayutthaya S, Stokes A, Pierret A (2015) Seasonal patterns of fine root production and turnover in a mature rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.) stand-differentiation with soil depth and implications for soil carbon stocks. Front Plant Sci 6:1022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ostonen I, Püttsepp Ü, Biel C, Alberton O, Bakker MR, Lõhmus K, Majdi H, Metcalfe D, Olsthoorn AFM, Pronk A, Vanguelova E, Weih M, Brunner I (2007) Plant Biosystems 141 (3):426–442Google Scholar
- Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0293:FRAONN]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- Roumet C, Birouste M, Picon-Cochard C, Ghestem M, Osman N, Vrignon-Brenas S, Kf C, Stokes A (2016) Root structure–function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. New Phytol 210(3):815–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13828 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soong NK (1976) Feeder root development of Hevea brasiliensis in relation to clones and environment. J Rubber Res Inst Malays 24:283–298Google Scholar