Advertisement

Enhancing agroecosystem productivity with woody perennials in semi-arid West Africa. A meta-analysis

  • Georges F. Félix
  • Johannes M. S. Scholberg
  • Cathy Clermont-Dauphin
  • Laurent Cournac
  • Pablo Tittonell
Open Access
Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Soil degradation in semi-arid West Africa can be reversed through an intensified application of organic matter, especially on coarse soils. Woody perennials have been promoted in the region to secure organic matter sources and improve soil productive capacity, yet the mechanisms by which perennials provide benefits to soils and crops remain poorly understood, and no effective, generalizable agronomic recommendations exist. Here, we reviewed the effects of trees and shrubs on soil properties and on crop yields in semi-arid West Africa (< 1000 mm year−1). Specific objectives of this meta-analysis were to (i) describe and (ii) quantify the effects of the presence of woody perennials and of ramial wood amendments on crop productivity and soil characteristics, and (iii) identify general recommendations on the integration of perennials with crops. An iterative keyword search was conducted to gather relevant literature. The search string consisted of four parts: source, practice, responses, and countries of interest. In total, 26 references on agroforestry parklands and 21 on woody amendments were included in the meta-database (314 entries, 155 for parklands, and 159 for ramial wood). We show that (1) the presence of shrubs and trees on agricultural fields had an overall positive but variable effect on soil total C (i.e. + 20 to 75%); (2) millet and sorghum yields were often higher in the presence of shrubs (− 25 to + 120%); (3) more variability was observed in the presence of trees (− 100 to + 200%); and (4) the use of shrub- and tree-based ramial wood resulted in equal or higher cereal yields as compared to the control (− 30 to + 100%). Upscaling the use of biodiversity-driven processes in farming systems of West Africa may provide benefits to overall ecosystems, but species’ choice and trade-offs perceived at the farm level, including labour management and low ramial wood availability, should be addressed through future research.

Keywords

Agroforestry Mulch Sahel Shrub-crop associations Woody amendments 

1 Introduction

Agricultural-based economies prevail in semi-arid West Africa (SWA), yet harsh growing conditions such as extreme temperatures, erratic and low rainfall, and strong erosive winds on already nutrient-depleted soils typically result in very low productivity or at times complete crop failure (Diarisso et al. 2015). Traditional agricultural areas near population centres are lost due to urban development, and agriculture is pushed onto both marginal land and forested areas (Reij et al. 2005; Doso Jnr 2014). The human population of West Africa (WA) has increased from 106 million in 1970 to 305 million in 2010, and the current annual growth rate of 2.78% is one of the highest in the world (World Bank 2016). Population growth in rural areas intensifies pressure on land resources for subsistence farming (Andrieu et al. 2015) by limiting the traditional practice of keeping fallow periods to restore soil fertility (Bonetti and Jouve 1999).

Continuously cultivated crop fields and reduced fallow periods are short-chained soil restoration processes which do not compensate for the decline in soil organic matter in most soils used for agriculture in the region (Kintché et al. 2015). Especially when coinciding with poor soil management and/or more extreme weather conditions, acute soil degradation may be the final outcome. This vicious circle of soil fertility decline (Lal 2008) often results in the formation of non-responsive, degraded soils (Tittonell and Giller 2013), represented on almost 600,000 km2 of WA, half of which are featured by intensively weathered and inherently infertile soils in semi-arid environments (Bai et al. 2008).

Concentrated efforts to reverse soil degradation by restoring soil productive capacity of marginal agricultural lands are essential to feed and sustain the livelihoods of a continuously growing population (Tittonell 2016). SWA soils are coarse and intensively weathered, and this translates into limited capacity to store and protect soil organic matter (Bationo et al. 2007). Organic matter accumulation in the soil can be achieved by increasing C-rich inputs and reducing C outputs from the soil. Organic inputs or amendments such as animal manure or crop residue mulches play a key role in soil restoration. Sources of organic matter in SWA landscapes are not so abundant and rather scattered (Gijsbers et al. 1994; Sop et al. 2011). Therefore, novel options to secure organic matter inputs to soil are required.

Crop residues are preferentially used to feed domestic ruminants or as fuel (de Ridder et al. 2004; Giller et al. 2009), so woody vegetation can provide an in situ source of leaf and branch biomass for soil amendment (Bayala et al. 2003; Diack et al. 2010; Dossa et al. 2012a; Diedhiou-Sall et al. 2013; Dossa et al. 2013; Yélémou et al. 2014). Ramial wood (RW) amendment availability relies on existing tree and shrub vegetation. The mechanisms by which woody amendments may provide benefits to soils and crops remain poorly understood, and no effective agronomic recommendations on the use of leaf and branch material currently exist in the SWA context (Bayala et al. 2003; Barthès et al. 2015; Félix et al. 2018).

The use of leaf and branch litter as soil amendments has been extensively evaluated in Canada and in temperate areas of Europe (Barthès et al. 2010) where the application of large amounts of ramial chipped wood mulch (RCW; in French bois raméal fragmenté, BRF) improved soil structure, enhanced fungal activity (i.e. Basidiomycetes), and increased crop yields (i.e. + 30% in potatoes and + 300% in strawberries) (Lemieux 2001).

In semi-arid West Africa (SWA), the question remains as to whether biomass derived from trees and shrubs can provide an adequate soil amendment to improve soil quality and crop productivity, in a way that is sustainable and accessible to farmers. A systematic literature review was conducted to compile relevant case studies in SWA and elucidate the effects and corresponding mechanisms by which the woody perennials and the biomass they produce may help to regenerate or enhance soil productive capacity. Specific objectives of this meta-analysis were (i) to describe interactions between agroecosystem components, (ii) to quantify the effects of the presence of woody perennials and the use of ramial wood amendments on crop productivity and soil characteristics, and (iii) to identify general recommendations on the integration of perennials with crops. Materials and methods for the selection of studies and indicators examined in this meta-analysis are described in the next section, followed by the results and discussion on the effects, feasibility, and trade-offs of scaling up the use of woody perennials in agricultural landscapes of SWA.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Geographical zone and farming systems

Agricultural landscapes of West Africa (WA) are heterogeneous (Fig. 1; Zorom et al. 2013), ranging from deserts and semi-arid ecosystems to moist savannah, humid forests, and swamps (Jalloh et al. 2012). Increasing rainfall from north to south drives an increasing complexity of land use in WA, including agropastoral systems in the driest areas and cropping or mixed farming systems in the wetter zones (Table 1). Agricultural areas have increased at the expense of forest areas (Fig. 2a). The geographical range of this meta-analysis covers SWA, including part of Senegal, The Gambia, Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Northern Benin, Niger, Northern Nigeria, and Northern Cameroon (Fig. 2c). This semi-arid “belt” also corresponds partly to the location of the “Great Green Wall” project, an international effort to counter the advancement of desertification (Dia and Duponnois 2012). The region of study features a range of 300–1000 mm annual rainfall, concentrated in a single and relatively short period (unimodal rainfall pattern of 60 to 120 days) each year (Dixon et al. 2001; West et al. 2008). In the absence of irrigation, it is possible to successfully cultivate millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), as well as maize (Zea mays) towards the wetter southern parts of the rainfall gradient. Millet and sorghum crop yields (grain and biomass) were selected as indicators for our quantitative analysis.
Fig. 1

Remnant woody perennials during dry season drive soil heterogeneity of agricultural fields via above- and belowground interactions. Shea nut trees provide abundant leaf litter and support nutrient recycling (a). Piliostigma shrubs are managed as an off-season micro-fallowing system (b). Finally, bare fields will usually require more external inputs, including livestock manure, chemical fertiliser, or crop residues, to support nutrient balances (c). Photos: G. Félix, Yilou, Burkina Faso

Table 1

Sub-regions, ecosystems, and farming systems of West Africa

Climatic sub-region

Months of rain

Annual rainfall (mm)

Average annual temperature (°C)

Land cover

Dominant farming system

Saharo-Sahelian

1–2

250–500

24.4–28.5

Steppe with thorny bushes and annual grasses

Agropastoral—millet farming system. Mostly pastoral (transhumant herding) with pockets of subsistence farming based on millet, sorghum, and cowpea

Sahelian

1–3

300–550

24.4–28.5

Steppe with thorny bushes and annual grasses

Agropastoral—millet/sorghum farming system. Mostly pastoral (transhumant herding) with pockets of subsistence farming based on millet, sorghum, and cowpea

Sudano-Sahelian

2–3

350–600

23.7–25

Steppe with Combretum and annual grasses

Agropastoral—millet/sorghum farming system. Combination of transhumant herding and sedentary agropastoral agriculture. Subsistence farming based on millet, sorghum, and cowpea

Sudanian

3–4

500–900

23.7–25

Savannahs with trees (Balanites aegyptiaca, Acacia spp) and shrubs

Cereal-root crop farming system. Mix of agricultural and agropastoral activities. Sedentary farming dominant, including sedentary village stock raising and permanent cropping of sorghum, millet, cowpea, cassava, cotton, and groundnut, with transhumant pastoralism during the dry season

Sudano-Guinean

4–5

750–1200

24.5–28.8

Savannah with trees or shrubs, sparse forests

Cereal-root crop farming system. Agricultural area characterised by perennial crops (mangos, citrus, cashew, etc.), cotton, cassava, yam, and cereals (sorghum, millet, and maize). Sedentary village stock bull rearing, with transhumant grazing during the dry season

Adapted from Arbonnier 2000; Dixon et al. 2001

Fig. 2

Agricultural area (cropland) in West African countries increases at the expense of forest land; data source: FAOstats—Land Use Indicators, average share of land (%) for Benin, Burkina Faso, The Gambia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, and Senegal (a). Cumulative number of publications on the impacts of agroforestry systems and woody mulch application on soil fertility and crop yields in semi-arid West Africa between 1987 and 2015 (b). Map of the region considered in this literature review (c)

Landscapes across SWA include trees and woody shrubs growing in or around the cropping fields, often reproducing the structure of an open savannah, or hereafter “parklands” (Boffa 1999). Trees are present in hedgerows or interspaced between crop plants within cropping fields, sometimes mixed with woody shrubs (Fig. 3). Potential in situ amounts of woody material available for soil amendment depend largely on agroecosystem design and woody perennial integration at the cropping system level (Sop and Oldeland 2013; Feur 2014; Cheriere 2015).
Fig. 3

Conceptual agroecosystem designs for soil management with woody perennials, defined by local availability of woody species for soil amendment as a function of woody species diversity at field level. Intensification level refers to the degree of transformation of the original landscape (i.e. fallow)

2.2 Selection of criteria used for the literature review

A three-step procedure was employed to select papers related to woody perennial-based cropping systems in SWA. The first step was an iterative keyword search to capture relevant literature related to the effects of woody perennial species and associated leaf and branch material on restoration of soil productive capacity in semi-arid cropping systems. The search string consisted of four parts: the first search terms related to the source of the woody perennial (“tree” or “shrub”), the second to the management practice (“mulch” or “(inter)cropping”), the third to the response variables (e.g. soil properties and crop productivity), and the last one related to the specific environmental context (specific countries within SWA). The final combination of search keywords (Table 2) yielded 91 results in Scopus (based on titles, abstracts, and keywords) and 267 results on ISI Web of Science (based on topic).
Table 2

Search terms and strings used during the literature retrieval

Search terms related to

Keywords

Scopus

Web of Science™ core collection

Source

(shrub* OR bush* OR wood* OR branch* OR leaf* OR tree* OR biomass)

91

267

Practice

AND (mulch* OR *crop*)

Response

AND (soil fertility OR soil restoration OR soil quality OR productivity OR yield*)

Context

AND (semi*arid OR arid OR sudan* OR soudan* OR sahel* OR senegal OR gambia OR mali OR mauritania OR burkina faso OR niger OR nigeria OR benin)

The second step consisted of manual screening of titles and abstracts of citations using the following criteria:
  1. a.

    Studies that were conducted in the defined environmental context (rainfall < 1000 mm year−1 in semi-arid agroecosystems of Sudano-Sahelian Africa, including Senegal, The Gambia, Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Northern Benin, Niger, Nigeria, and Northern Cameroon).

     
  2. b.

    Studies that included woody amendments as a management practice (surface-mulched or buried branches and/or leaves, but not biochar), and describing local uses of woody residues, or the presence of woody shrub or tree vegetation in farmers’ fields, and reported effects on soil quality and/or crop productivity.

     
  3. c.

    Studies conducted on either farmers’ fields or experimental stations were typically included with corresponding field data; pure modelling results were excluded.

     
  4. d.

    Literature reviews were excluded from the meta-analysis but were used to cross-check data, methods, and references.

     

From the total of 91 references of the Scopus search, 71 titles and abstracts did not meet one or more of the above-listed criteria. Only 15% of the references were included in our database; these had clearly described treatments and experimental results. Additional references retrieved from ISI Web-of-Knowledge often concerned areas outside our study region (China or other parts of Africa). Thus, we only included those that were also present from the Scopus search and those relevant for the construction of our database (contributing with six additional references).

During a third step, papers were reviewed in full detail and key parameters and figures regarding production environment, management practices, and response variables were compiled in a spreadsheet, checking for consistency in terms of scales and units and recalculating when necessary to obtain a common measure (and unit) for each target variable.

This information was complemented by grey literature, including one BSc thesis, three MSc theses, four PhD theses, and four reports by international organisations. Most of this literature was retrieved from the Wageningen University Library, The Netherlands, and from the library of Centre d’Information Commun sur la Recherche et le Développment (CICRD) located at the IRD/CIRAD campus in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Supplementary data presented in the online version of a review paper by Bayala et al. (2014) were added to our dataset to analyse effects of trees in parklands, contributing 16 additional references. In total, 47 references (Table 3) were included in the meta-database that was eventually analysed (26 references on parklands, 21 on ramial wood amendment applications).
Table 3

List of publications, the study locations within semi-arid West Africa, the woody species (or RW source), and the crop of study

Authors

Source

Country of study

Woody species (or source)

Crop of study

Yield data rows

Agroforestry

 Bayala (2002)

PhD thesis

Burkina Faso

Parkia biglobosa, Vitellaria paradoxa

Sorghum, millet

8

 Boffa (1999)

Agroforestry Systems

Burkina Faso

V. paradoxa

Sorghum

2

 Charreau and Vidal (1965)

Agronomie Tropicale

Senegal

Faidherbia albida

Millet

2

 Depommier et al. (1992)

Proceedings

Burkina Faso

F. albida

Sorghum

6

 Diakhaté et al. (2013)

European Journal of Agronomy

Senegal

Piliostigma reticulatum

Millet

1

 Dibloni et al. (1999)

Report

Burkina Faso

Albizzia lebbeck, F. albida, Prosopis africana

Sorghum

18

 Dossa et al. (2012)

Agronomy Journal

Senegal

Guiera senegalensis

Groundnut, millet

7

 Dossa et al. (2013)

Agronomy Journal

Senegal

P. reticulatum

Groundnut, millet

7

 Dan Lamso et al. (2016)

International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences

Niger

G. senegalensis, Hyphaene thebaica

Millet

4

 Harmand et al. (1996)

Cahiers Scientifiques

Cameroon

F. albida

Sorghum

4

 Jonsson et al. (1999)

Experimental Agriculture

Burkina Faso

P. biglobosa, V. paradoxa

Millet

4

 Kizito et al. (2007)

Journal of Arid Environments

Senegal

P. reticulatum, G. senegalensis

Millet

2

 Louppe et al. (1996)

Cahiers Scientifiques

Senegal

F. albida

Groundnut, millet

18

 Maiga (1987)

MSc thesis

Burkina Faso

F. albida, P. biglobosa, V. paradoxa

Millet, sorghum

6

 Oliver et al. (1996)

Cahiers Scientifiques

Burkina Faso

F. albida

Sorghum

6

 Pouliot et al. (2012)

Agroforestry Systems

Burkina Faso

P. biglobosa

Chili pepper, eggplant, millet, taro

6

 Sanou et al. (2011)

PhD thesis

Burkina Faso

Adansonia digitata, P. biglobosa

Millet, taro

4

 Sidibe (2010)

PhD thesis

Mali

Tamarindus indica

Eggplant local, sorghum

6

 Wezel (2000)

Agroforestry Systems

Niger

G. senegalensis

Millet

8

 Wilson et al. (1998)

Experimental Agriculture

Burkina Faso

P. biglobosa

Sorghum

2

 Yaméogo (2008)

PhD thesis

Burkina Faso

Borassus akeassii, F. albida

Maize

2

 Yélémou et al. (2013)

Tropicultura

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Sorghum

18

 Zomboudré et al. (2005)

Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ.

Burkina Faso

V. paradoxa

Maize

4

Ramial wood (buried)

 Barthès et al. (2015)

Agroforestry Systems

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Sorghum

12

 Roose et al. (1999)

Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation

Burkina Faso

Azadirachta indica

Sorghum

8

 Samba (2001)

Annals of Forest Science

Senegal

Cordyla pinnata

Millet, peanut

9

 Soumare et al. (2002)

Biological Agriculture and Horticulture

Senegal

Casuarina equisetifolia

Tomato

6

Ramial wood (mulch)

 Barthès et al. (2015)

Agroforestry Systems

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Sorghum

6

 Bayala et al. (2003)

Arid Land Research and Management

Burkina Faso

P. biglobosa, V. paradoxa

Millet

16

 Belliard (2014)

BSc thesis

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Cowpea, sorghum

6

 Chiroma et al. (2006)

Experimental Agriculture

Nigeria

Wood waste

Sorghum

12

 Ibrahim et al. (2015)

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Niger

Acacia tumida

Millet

12

 Mando and Stroosnijder (1999)

Soil Use and Management

Burkina Faso

Pterocarpus lucens

Natural vegetation

8

 Ouédraogo (2014)

MSc thesis

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Cowpea

6

 Salau et al. (1992)

Soil & Tillage Research

Nigeria

Wood shavings

Plantain

1

 Sanou (2015)

MSc thesis

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Sorghum

6

 Shiyam et al. (2011)

World Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Nigeria

Sawdust mulch

Cocoyam, plantain

8

 Somé (2014)

MSc thesis

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Sorghum

6

 Tilander and Bonzi (1997)

Plant and Soil

Burkina Faso

Acacia holocericea, A. indica

Sorghum

6

 Wezel and Böcker (1999)

Soil & Tillage Research

Niger

G. senegalensis

Millet

4

 Yélémou et al. (2014)

Journal of Plant Studies

Burkina Faso

P. reticulatum

Sorghum

12

 Yossi et al. (2002)

Report

Mali

P. africana

Millet

2

In the selected studies, experimental treatments were located under tree canopy or, in the case of shrubs, within the vicinity of their canopy projection. Control data were from outside the area of canopy influence. Data concerning use of ramial wood (RW) amendments (mulched or buried) were considered with control treatments that did not apply RW as soil amendment.

2.3 Search metrics and overview

The earliest publication retrieved in our search on the effect of parkland agroforestry on soil and crop productivity was published in 1965 with the example of Faidherbia albida in Senegal (Charreau and Vidal 1965). The oldest publication retrieved on ramial wood amendments in SWA is dated 1997 and was linked to keyword “agroforestry mulches” (Tilander and Bonzi 1997). The number of publications retrieved that reported on the use of biomass from woody perennials for soil amendment, whether through interactions in agroforestry parklands or as biomass transfer (cut and carry), plus the corresponding impacts on soil quality and crop yields in SWA, increased from less than ten prior to 1996 to about 20 between 1997 and 2005; another 20 publications appeared between 2005 and 2015 (Fig. 2b; Table 3). Most of the studies retrieved originated from Burkina Faso and Senegal, while Cameroon, Mali, Niger, and Nigeria were represented in a limited number of publications (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4

Variability of yield effect size per country (a) and per study (b)

No homogenised term for ramial wood amendment practice exists. As a consequence, across the literature, the following terms were identified as being similar or closely related to ramial wood amendments:
  • Agroforestry mulches (Tilander and Bonzi 1997)

  • Prunings (Bayala et al. 2003)

  • Leaf mulch (Bayala et al. 2005)

  • Woody perennial leaf biomass (Yélémou et al. 2014)

  • Woody biomass (Gruenewald et al. 2007; Debela et al. 2011)

  • Wood shavings (Chiroma et al. 2006; Gajalakshmi and Abbasi 2008)

  • Wood waste (Bulmer et al. 2007; Andry et al. 2011)

  • Woody debris (Brown and Naeth 2014)

  • Wood (Bonanomi et al. 2014)

  • Native agroforestry plant residues (Iyamuremye et al. 2000)

  • Native shrub residues (Dossa et al. 2009)

  • Branches of indigenous shrub (Wezel and Böcker 1999)

  • Shrub material (Chapuis-Lardy et al. 2015)

  • Ramial chipped wood (Gómez 1997; Robert et al. 2014)

  • Ramial wood amendments (Barthès et al. 2015; Félix et al. 2018)

  • Chopped twig wood (Aman et al. 1996)

  • Rameaux ligneux (Kabré 2010)

  • Bois raméal (Barthès et al. 2010)

  • Bois raméal fragmenté (Zongo 2009; Ba et al. 2014; Somé 2014)

A total of 19 woody species were documented in the literature reviewed (Table 4). Faidherbia albida (n = 48) gathered the most entries in our agroforestry parkland database, followed by the tree species Parkia biglobosa (n = 18) and Vitellaria paradoxa (n = 17), and the shrub species Piliostigma reticulatum (n = 25) and Guiera senegalensis (n = 21). P. reticulatum (n = 52) and G. senegalensis (n = 14) were the most represented species in experimental studies addressing the use of woody and leafy mulches as soil amendments in our database.
Table 4

Botanical families and Latin and English names of woody perennial species included in this meta-analysis

Botanical family

Latin name

English name

Anacardiaceae

Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst.

Marula nut

Arecaceae

Borassus akeassii Bayton, Ouédr. & Guinko

Palmyra palm

Arecaceae

Hyphaene thebaica L.

Doum palm

Bombacaceae

Adansonia digitata L.

Baobab

Casuarinaceae

Casuarina equisetifolia L.

Australian pine tree

Combretaceae

Guiera senegalensis J.F. Gmel.

Moshi medicine

Fabaceae—Cesalpinaceae

Cordyla pinnata Lepr. ex A. Rich.

Bush mango

Piliostigma reticulatum (DC) Hochst

Camel’s foot

Tamarindus indica L.

Tamarind

Fabaceae–Mimosaceae

Acacia holosericea Cunn. ex G. Don

Fish poison/soapy wattle

Acacia tumida F. Muell. ex Benth.

Pindan wattle

Albizzia lebbeck (L.) Benth.

Koko

Faidherbia albida Del.

Winter thorn

Parkia biglobosa Jacq.

Néré, African locust tree

Prosopis africana (Guill., Perrott. & Rich.) Taub.

Kirya, Ayan

Fabaceae–Papilionoideae

Pterocarpus lucens Lepr. ex Guill. et Perrott.

Barwood

Meliaceae

Azadirachta indica A. Juss.

Neem, Indian lilac

Sapotaceae

Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertn. (ex Butyrospermum)

Karité, Shea nut tree

Zygophyllaceae

Balanites aegyptiaca Del.

Desert date

2.4 Data analysis

The dataset consisted of 314 entries (155 for agroforestry; 159 for RW) including information on treatments, rainfall, woody species, and crop yields (grain and biomass). When available, we recorded data on soil carbon and organic matter, soil nutrient availability, soil hydrological properties, and soil biological properties. The results were presented and discussed in light of relative effect size or response ratio (RR), calculated as the natural log (ln) difference between treatment and control (Eq. 1).
$$ \mathrm{RR}=\ln \left(\frac{\mathrm{treatment}\ \mathrm{yield}}{\mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{yield}}\right) $$

An RR above zero denotes beneficial effects of treatment over control conditions.

3 Results and discussion

Sudano-Sahelian landscapes include a variety of perennial woody species that grow spontaneously in farmed agroforestry parklands and provide different forms of organic material useful for soil amendment: (a) when this vegetation is coppiced, fresh branches and leaves are used either as surface mulching material or slightly buried (Louppe 1991; Iyamuremye et al. 2000; Yélémou et al. 2007; Diack et al. 2010; Lahmar et al. 2012) and commonly combined with manure, crop residues, and/or compost prior to the growing season (Zongo 2009; Kabré 2010; Cabral 2011). Tree or shrub litter can be deposited in situ or transported (ex situ) to neighbouring fields that require organic biomass input. Alternatively, (b) when that vegetation is (partly) burned, farmers can incorporate the resulting ashes into the soil (Lufafa et al. 2008a; Lufafa et al. 2009).

Various structures of agroforestry systems may be identified in SWA, including parklands, fallows, hedgerows, and alley cropping (Fig. 3). Although not specifically captured through our literature retrieval strings, the Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR—or Regénération Naturelle Assistée) approach stands out in both the published and grey literature from West Africa as an agroforestry strategy based on higher tree and shrub densities per hectare than traditional parklands. FMNR entails intensive management of shrubs, pruning and coppicing by farmers, in order to achieve optimal synergies between crops and trees on farmland. There is considerable literature, notably by ICRAF and others on FMNR initiatives in the Sahel, claiming that farmers adopting FMNR since the 1990s have “re-greened” millions of hectares through increases in tree/shrub densities (Weston et al. 2015). It is therefore necessary to highlight that FMNR differs from more traditional, sparse-tree-density forms of parkland agroforestry. Yet most cases in our literature retrieval refer to traditional parkland agroforestry systems, and thus further distinction between these and FMNR was not possible in our analysis.

The influence of trees on crop yields and soil characteristics in parkland farming systems of SWA has been documented extensively (Fig. 4b), with largely positive effects on average (Sanou et al. 2011; Bayala et al. 2012; Sanou et al. 2012; Coulibaly et al. 2013; Sinare and Gordon 2015). Crop yield is a classical farmer indicator to assess the success of agricultural innovations, which is often documented in research papers as well. In Section 3.1, we analyse effects of woody perennials on economic (grain) and biological (biomass) yields, followed by effects on soil properties (carbon, nutrients, water, and biology). Management options and resource limitations around the use of woody perennials in SWA are discussed in Sections 3.2 and 3.3, respectively.

3.1 Crop yields and soil properties under parklands

3.1.1 Crop yields

The phenomenon of resource islands, or fertility hotspots, has been documented with the use of P. reticulatum shrubs as nursing trees for young mango trees, which increased chances of fruit production in semi-arid to arid conditions in Senegal (Hernandez et al. 2015). In a study from Niger, average grain yields reported in the vicinity of G. senegalensis shrubs were 773 kg ha−1 whereas yields in open fields (1.2-m radius from shrub) were only 382 kg ha−1 (Wezel 2000). Yield responses of sorghum and millet in parklands or with application of RW seem to be more important at low-rainfall sites, an effect that decreases with increasing rainfall (Fig. 5a). When environmental conditions for crop growth are not favourable (i.e. control yields are low), then sorghum and millet grain yields are less frequently affected next to the canopy of shrubs than under the canopy of trees (Fig. 5b). Overall, crops performed best when grown nearby F. albida and in the vicinity of shrubs such as G. senegalensis and P. reticulatum. Crops grown in the vicinity of species such as Sclerocarya birrea, Albizzia lebbeck, and Balanites aegyptiaca obtained less yields than those grown without the influence of these perennials (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 5

Effect size (response ratio) on yield over a rainfall gradient for all crops recorded in our meta-analysis (a) and effect size on millet and sorghum grain yields with treatments in function of the control grain yields (b)

Fig. 6

Effect size (RR) of yields per crop studied (a), per woody resource used (b), and per soil type (c)

In the vicinity of trees, taro and chili pepper performed better than maize and eggplant (Fig. 6a). Early studies on the effect of F. albida on groundnut productivity show no significant differences between the presence and the absence of trees (Louppe et al. 1996). Data from a long-term experiment in Senegal show that groundnut response is not significantly different when intercropped with shrubs (G. senegalensis) as compared to no shrubs (Dossa et al. 2013). Millet yields, however, increased in the presence of shrubs from the third to the 11th year of intercropping in the same trial (Bright et al. 2017).

In the case of V. paradoxa, Bazié et al. (2012) showed that chemical fertilisation on millet yields grown under the canopy of a tree would only show significantly higher results when the canopy of the tree was partially or totally pruned as compared to unpruned trees. Radiation is a major limiting factor to crop growth and development. When the crown is selectively pruned, then more light may be intercepted by crops growing underneath tree canopies. Pruning of the tree crown is particularly beneficial to cereals (C4 crops), yet growing shade-tolerant C3 crops (i.e. taro) may help lift the labour constraint of pruning the trees (Pouliot et al. 2011).

Coppiced material from woody perennials applied as mulch or buried ramial wood (RW) amendments had in most cases a positive effect on crop yields. As rainfall in the study area increased, the effect size of RW on crop yields decreased (Fig. 5a). In more than 70% of the cases, the yield responses were positive for cereal grain with the use of RW (Fig. 5b). Overall positive effects were noticeable for all crops (except peanut under RW buried; see Fig. 6a). Beneficial effects were observed for any given source of woody material employed as RW (except for P. biglobosa; see Fig. 6b).

Bayala et al. (2003) found that applying mulch of N-rich P. biglobosa leaves reduced millet grain and biomass yields while the N-rich leaf material of V. paradoxa increased millet yield as compared to control conditions. This effect was linked to the recalcitrant nature of the lignin (lig) and cellulose (cellu) composition of P. biglobosa leaves (C:N of 22, lig:cellu of 1.28) as compared to V. paradoxa leaves (C:N of 31, lig:cellu of 0.82).

P. reticulatum leaf biomass applied as a mulch at 1.25 or 2.25 t DM ha−1 on a tropical ferruginous soil (Lixisol) in Burkina Faso increased sorghum grain yields by 14 and 28%, respectively, compared to a non-mulched control treatment (Yélémou et al. 2014). A study in semi-arid Niger reported that applying 2 t DM ha−1 of G. senegalensis mulch during two consecutive years resulted in increased millet grain yields by 76% during the first year and by 94% during the second year as compared to the non-mulch control (Wezel and Böcker 1999). Another experiment conducted on sandy-loam soils in Burkina Faso showed that yields decreased over the years on continuously cultivated plots, declining drastically during the second and third year for all treatments and control (Barthès et al. 2015). In that experiment, the use of 1.5 t DM ha−1 of P. reticulatum leaf and branch material as mulch did not significantly increase sorghum yields as compared to the control. The addition of RW does not automatically translate into increased crop yields, but the effects of RW use are rarely negative on crops (Figs. 5 and 6).

3.1.2 Soil carbon

Higher total soil C content (+ 20 to 75%) under canopies of woody perennials (Fig. 7a) is normally ascribed to litter deposition and sediment trapping. “Fertility” islands under perennial shrub canopies are also linked to fine root decay (Manlay et al. 2004) and effective entrapment of wind-blown sediments (Wezel et al. 2000; Leenders et al. 2007), with sediment capture efficiency as a function of shrub density and canopy size (Mudrak et al. 2014). This effect may also be related to the presence (and decomposition) of herbaceous plants whose growth is favoured underneath the shrub crown (Yélémou et al. 2012). The presence of perennial species in agricultural fields may also create a microclimate due to shading and deposition of above- and belowground organic material, resulting in pedospheres with increased capacity for C sequestration. Measurements of soil δ13C isotopic content in Burkina Faso showed that soil C in the vicinity of tree trunks was mainly from tree origin (C3) and that C4-derived soil C (from cereals) was similar in the open field and nearby the perennials (Bayala et al. 2006).
Fig. 7

Effect size (RR) of treatments considered as a function of the value in control for soil total carbon (a), total nitrogen (b), and phosphorus (c) available

In the vicinity of woody perennials, there is both decomposed and non-decomposed organic material (including fine roots). This enhances soil moisture retention and reduces evaporation. Additionally, when livestock consume parts of a shrub plant (e.g. P. reticulatum fruits) or rest under the shade of woody perennials, nutrients tend to be concentrated via livestock depositions. Moreover, migratory and resident birds find refuge and food in perennial vegetation of agricultural zones of the Sahel (Stoate et al. 2001) very likely further enriching soils in the vicinity of trees (i.e. F. albida) through deposition of organic droppings (Jonsson et al. 1999; Sileshi 2016).

Literature on soil C dynamics in response to woody biomass amendments reports different results. On the one hand, a study testing P. reticulatum shrub material as soil amendment in an experimental station reported slight (and non-significant) increases in soil C of less than 2% as compared to non-mulched conditions, and significantly lower with N addition, after 3 years (Barthès et al. 2015). On the other hand, a study on the use of Cordyla pinnata at a rate of 156 kg of mulch per t of soil reported extremely high increases of soil C of + 600% in a timeframe of 120 days as compared to no mulch (Samba 2001).

Soils amended with coppiced material as mulch tended to result in higher C contents than control soils that did not receive organic amendment, and higher than buried RW (Fig. 7a). As reported in the study of Bayala et al. (2003), V. paradoxa prunings increased soil C contents by 12% as compared to no-mulch conditions, while soils amended with P. biglobosa prunings enhanced soil C by 70% on average.

3.1.3 Soil nutrients

Soil total N and available P contents increased in the presence of woody perennials over situations without perennials, a probable indication of increased N and P deposition through litter and dust trapping, and potentially also in the case of N through some enhanced N2 fixation and/or enhanced conditions for N retention in soil around these vegetation structures (Fig. 7b, c). Soil N and P concentrations underneath scattered shrubs in semi-arid Niger were indeed 38 and 51% higher than in open fields, respectively (Wezel et al. 2000). In a study in Burkina Faso, total N was generally higher under P. reticulatum and P. thonningii than outside the shrub influence area (Yélémou et al. 2012), an effect observed in Niger as well, where soil N content was significantly higher in the vicinity of shrubs compared to zones more than 2 m away from the shrubs (Wezel 2000). This effect may be explained by greater nutrient input from organic material deposition, which itself can induce enhanced conditions for nitrifying bacteria. In a study in Senegal, soil total N, ammonium (NH4+), and total P contents in non-cropped areas were higher under canopies of P. reticulatum shrubs than on soils without shrubs, pointing towards enhanced nitrification processes nearby the perennials (Diakhaté et al. 2013).

Application of RW mulch had beneficial effects on soil N overall, but this effect was not so clear for RW buried (Fig. 7b). P. biglobosa, V. paradoxa, and G. senegalensis contributed 25 to 50% on average to soil N contents as compared to control treatments. P. biglobosa release of allelopathic components or lignin-to-N ratios may influence nutrient mineralisation rates (Bayala et al. 2005). Choice of species to use as RW amendments should be further explored in the light of C:N and lignin contents and the relation to N-immobilisation, particularly when amendments are buried. Effects of RW on available P followed a similar trend as for soil N (Fig. 7c).

3.1.4 Soil water

Systems with intercropped perennials show higher soil water content, making water more available for crop uptake. These results are largely due to belowground interactions, including (1) between roots and increased water infiltration that create preferential flows into deep layers of the soil (Bargues Tobella et al. 2014), (2) a reduction in soil evaporation under tree canopies (Jonsson et al. 1999), and (3) the hydraulic lift effect transporting deep-water and rewetting of surface soil water content, usually overnight (Bayala et al. 2008; Kizito et al. 2012).

In Burkina Faso, crops grown under P. biglobosa benefited from a 24% increase in soil water content as compared to control conditions (Wilson et al. 1998). In Senegal, soil water content was higher by 20 and 28% in millet cropping systems with P. reticulatum and G. senegalensis, under shrub crown (i.e. soils were moister) (Kizito et al. 2007). In this last study using neutron probes, the water balance for P. reticulatum and G. senegalensis shrubs intercropped with millet was superior to open-field observations, a difference explained by “hydraulic lift”. This phenomenon implies that water is transferred from deeper subsoil layers to the surface by deep-rooted perennials, and contributing to rewetting of upper soil horizons in the case of shrubs P. reticulatum and G. senegalensis (Kizito et al. 2012) and trees P. biglobosa and V. paradoxa (Bayala et al. 2008).

Enhanced infiltration rates may also result in higher water retention and storage in the upper layers of soil profiles underneath the canopy of the perennial species (Bargues Tobella et al. 2014). Woody and herbaceous species co-exist in semi-arid landscapes and differences in root proliferation zones may be such that different vegetation components do not seem to compete for water resources (Seghieri 1995).

V. paradoxa and P. biglobosa leaf applications as mulch in millet-based cropping systems were reported to decrease water ponding time in Burkina Faso (Bayala et al. 2003), with more pronounced effects under V. paradoxa mulch than under that of P. biglobosa. RW applications increase soil organic matter content which likely result in enhanced soil water contents (Chiroma et al. 2006). Moreover, organic matter additions will trigger termite activity, eventually leading to increased infiltration capacity (Mando 1997b; Mando and Miedema 1997; Ouédraogo et al. 2004).

3.1.5 Soil biology

Nutrient concentration in termite mounds as compared to that in adjacent soils may have both a biological origin from metabolic processes (saliva, faeces, plant debris) and a mineral origin from clay accumulation within nest structures (Sileshi et al. 2010). Termite-mediated processes increased nutrient recycling, promoted soil formation, and enhanced soil moisture retention and infiltration in several trials conducted on drylands (Mando 1997a, b; Mando and Miedema 1997; Mando 1998; Léonard and Rajot 2001; Laguemvare 2003; Mando and Stroosnijder 2006; Ouédraogo et al. 2007). Some of the species of Termitidae in semi-arid Burkina Faso include Odontotermes smeathmani, Microtermes lepidus, and Macrotermes bellicosus (Ouédraogo et al. 2004). Their diets include dry-wood, damp-wood, litter, and grass (Ouédraogo et al. 2007; Kaiser et al. 2015). There is a general consensus that termite foraging activity in SWA improves crop rainfall use efficiency when soils are mulched with either crop residues or ramial wood or with a combination of both (Léonard and Rajot 2001; Brussaard et al. 2007; Sileshi et al. 2010). Water infiltration may be reduced in the presence of subterranean termites (Odontotermes genus) because water-repellent particles such as organic matter and silt are being transported towards the surface layer, making it more impermeable locally (Mettrop et al. 2013). Termites in African savannahs contribute greatly to landscape heterogeneity (Davies et al. 2016), but further study is required to understand the effect of particular termite species on soil nutrient dynamics at a landscape scale and their influence on the spatial distribution of perennials (Kaiser et al. 2015).

Higher microbial biomass activity may support a wider range of biogeochemical processes through faster decomposition rates of catabolites within the rhizosphere of P. reticulatum-millet intercrops (Diakhaté et al. 2016). Yélémou et al. (2013) found that microbial respiration increased by 13 and 266% under the canopies of P. reticulatum and P. thonningii in agriculural fields. Diedhiou et al. (2009) showed that soil microbial communities from “resource islands” exhibited higher biomass and greater diversity, and exhibited much more fungal flora as compared to outside of the woody perennials’ area of influence (G. senegalensis and P. reticulatum). Their explanation of the process alludes to lower water stress and increased stimulation for litter decomposition processes. Diedhiou-Sall et al. (2013) studied, in controlled conditions, the effects of a composed substrate of P. reticulatum leaves and stems on soil microorganisms of Senegal that had never received woody amendments. The organic substrate input increased microbial biomass, as well as the levels of cellulase and β-glucosidase enzyme activities, which are closely related to C-mineralisation.

Hernandez et al. (2015) confirmed observations regarding the abundance, diversity, and higher activity of microorganisms within P. reticulatum resource islands in Senegal. Other studies have described microbial communities by focusing on the densities of predators, i.e. bacterivores, fungivores, and others. The presence of shrubs in Senegal increased the abundance of bacteria-feeding nematodes over that of plant-feeding nematodes (Diakhaté et al. 2013). This has important implications on nutrient cycling and availability since P. reticulatum influence tends to increase bacterivores and decrease plant-feeding nematodes (Diakhaté et al. 2013).

3.2 Management options

The original forest landscape of SWA has been gradually cleared for crop cultivation at intensities that vary across the region (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). The cutting of native trees and overstocking of transhumant cattle have contributed to desertification and degradation of fragile soils (Dongmo et al. 2012). Farming families in SWA have developed and/or adopted erosion and desertification control practices since the 1970s in order to counter drought (Critchley et al. 1994; West et al. 2008). This resulted in halting land degradation in SWA according to some views, which recognise a recent re-greening of the region thanks to soil restoration techniques (Mazzucato and Niemeijer 1998; Niemeijer and Mazzucato 2002; Farage et al. 2007; van Walsum et al. 2014). Tree-crop integrated systems, a form of agroforestry, occupy an increasingly important place in the development of sustainable farming systems in SWA (Gijsbers et al. 1994; Ouédraogo and Alexandre 1994; Yaméogo et al. 2013). These systems have been shown to be resilient and adaptive despite the ecological and economic crises that have affected Sudano-Sahelian agriculture in the past four decades (de Ridder et al. 2004; Aune and Bationo 2008; Reij and Smaling 2008; Hien et al. 2010; Settle and Garba 2011).

While woody perennials seem clearly linked to soil fertility hotspots, Bayala et al. (2015) advance that farming families would benefit more from the presence of trees on parklands by either (a) pruning dense tree canopies to minimise light competition with cereals or (b) maintaining the canopy but replacing cereals with shade-tolerant-species (i.e. taro). Identifying crop species and selection of woody perennials to associate with cereals will require mobilisation of ecological knowledge. Planting patterns that take into account environmental constraints (i.e. taro under V. paradoxa crown and cereals in the open fields) may further result in increased ecosystem service provision (i.e. biodiversity and improved household nutrition). Livestock breeders may also see yield benefits derived from tree- or shrub-based fodder as a complement to crop residues for animal nutrition. Woody perennials may furthermore provide renewable resources for fuelwood, construction material, and medicine (Yélémou et al. 2007; Sop et al. 2012). Applying FMNR is a low-investments method that can reconcile food production with reforestation and could furthermore improve economic and nutritional benefits from agriculture, including the improvement of health and psycho-social conditions (Weston et al. 2015).

3.3 Resource limitations

Woody perennials prevailing in SWA tend to produce organic matter in the form of branches and leaves at relatively high rates despite being coppiced on a frequent basis. To illustrate woody and leafy biomass availability for soil amendments in a Sudano-Sahelian landscape, let us examine the example of a study led in Guié, a 47-km2 village of Centre-North Burkina Faso (Kabré 2010). In this locality, only six species were responsible for 63% of the stems sampled in a systematic forestry inventory (Table 5). Acacia macrostachya was the most abundant species, representing 17% of the sampled stems, yet this species has thorns and yields little leaf biomass. Therefore, when it occurs on the fields, it is usually slashed and burnt to ashes by farmers to clear cropping fields prior to the rainy season. V. paradoxa or shea butter tree, on the other hand, is abundant and accounts for higher biomass rates. Nevertheless, from the 829 kg DM ha−1 assessed in the study presented in Table 5, the biomass attributed to shea butter trees would be inaccessible as a source of soil amendments. This particular species is regulated in local and national policies since its products are consumed in local cuisine and exported as raw material for the international cosmetic industry. V. paradoxa is deciduous. The leaf biomass is often burnt while it could be composted or used directly as mulch. As a result, the remaining “available” woody and leafy biomass to apply on soils at Guié, Burkina Faso, includes three shrubs (Combretum micranthum, G. senegalensis, and P. reticulatum) and one tree species (Cassia sieberiana), accounting for less than 250 kg DM ha−1 (Kabré 2010).
Table 5

Potential woody biomass of three trees and three shrubs on a village territory of 47 km2 in Guié, Centre-North Burkina Faso. Data source: Kabré (2010)

Species

Woody plant type

% stems sampled

Woody branches biomass sampled

< 7 cm (kg DM ha−1)

Woody twigs biomass sampled

< 2 cm (kg DM ha−1)

Total woody biomass sampled (kg DM ha−1)

Acacia machrostachya

Tree

17

nd

nd

nd

Combretum micranthum

Shrub

13

32

18

50

Cassia sieberiana

Tree

13

61

38

99

Vitellaria paradoxa

Tree

11

356

290

646

Guiera senegalensis

Shrub

5

8

6

14

Piliostigma reticulatum

Shrub

4

10

10

20

Total

 

63

467

362

829

nd no data available

In Senegal, P. reticulatum accounted for ca. 1 t ha−1 while G. senegalensis for 1–2 t ha−1 of C-rich biomass (Lufafa et al. 2008b). Earlier studies in Senegal measured no more than 500 kg DM ha−1 of G. senegalensis (Louppe 1991). These are rather low amounts as compared to the 1–6 t DM ha−1 that is applied in experiments documented in scientific literature. It is essential to take into account that the feasibility of RW use depends on:
  1. 1.

    Effect of soil amendments on yield, nutrient cycling, and soil C-sequestration rates

     
  2. 2.

    Richness and composition of woody perennials in the ecosystem

     
  3. 3.

    Frequency of pruning

     
  4. 4.

    Proximity between source and sink sites

     

The intrinsic capacity of a given species to re-sprout vigorously and produce a large biomass is a trait that is mediated by the environment and management. Identifying species with such trait is key and might be one of the future investigation areas. Transferring leaves and branches over long distances to apply on degraded soils represents an appreciable workload that may conflict with other on-farm or off-farm labour demands. Attention must also be given to local land tenure rules on the use, management, and plantation of trees and shrubs on agricultural fields, which may sometimes be disconnected from those promoted by institutions (Rousseau et al. 2017).

4 Conclusion

The objective of this meta-analysis was to qualify and quantify the effects that woody perennials have on crop productivity and soil characteristics. We specifically studied the effects of woody perennials in agroforestry systems and the effects of coppiced material application as soil amendments (i.e. ramial wood, RW). Woody perennials in agroforestry systems locally create resource islands or fertility hotspots around their base, related to both aboveground (i.e. litter addition) and underground (i.e. hydraulic lift and root decay) processes. From this meta-analysis, it is possible to advance that shrubs in cereal-based cropping systems render similar benefits as trees (i.e. enhanced soil properties) with fewer trade-offs in terms of yield. These effects were more visible with low rainfall and at low site productivity.

RW amendments had overall beneficial effects on crop yields and on soil C and N contents, independent of source material. Considerations on the resource availability and sustainability of the practice need to be further studied. Application of RW material from shrubs and trees may be an option to improve agricultural soils of semi-arid West Africa in perennial-annual crop systems. The results of this meta-analysis highlight the need for research on the use and management of perennials (especially of shrubs), on the synergies that occur amongst biodiversity components at the cropping system level, and on the trade-offs at the farming system level.

In the light of discussions about “greening the Sahel” through tree planting, or the establishment of a “Great Green Wall in capital letters” south of the Sahara, our meta-analysis indicates that great potential in terms of increasing and stabilising soil productivity can be derived from the intensive management of existing native woody vegetation, in multifunctional landscapes that combine food crop production with other tree-mediated ecosystem services.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper contributes to the project Woody Amendments for Sudano-Sahelian Agriculture (WASSA; www.wassa-eu.org), funded by the European Union (ERA-ARD-II). The authors are grateful to Kees van Diepen for explanations on soil classification systems, to Karlyn Koughan for English revisions, and to the journal’s editor and the three anonymous referees for useful suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Statement of data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Wageningen University Library repository  https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:d60d11d6-cd5f-47b4-a5ad-4a4a97d41501.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aman SA, Despatie S, Furlan V, Pagé F, Lemieux G (1996) Effects of chopped twig wood on maize growth and yields in the forest-savanna transition zone of Côte d’Ivoire. Université de Laval, Canada, Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrieu N, Descheemaeker K, Sanou T, Chia E (2015) Effects of technical interventions on flexibility of farming systems in Burkina Faso: lessons for the design of innovations in West Africa. Agric Syst 136:125–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andry H, Inoue M, Moritani S (2011) Effectiveness of wood waste material for improving infiltration and reducing interrill soil loss in clay-rich volcanic soil. J Soil Water Conserv 66(2):97–103.  https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.2.97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aune JB, Bationo A (2008) Agricultural intensification in the Sahel—the ladder approach. Agric Syst 98(2):119–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ba MF, Colinet G, Samba SAN, Bassene E (2014) Étude de quelques caractéristiques des bois raméaux fragmentés (BRF) de <i>Guiera senegalensis</i> J. F. Gmel et de <i>Piliostigma reticulatum</i> (DC) Hochst et de leur influence sur des propriétés chimiques et biologiques. J Appl Biosci 81(1):7253.  https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v81i1.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manag 24(3):223–234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00169.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bargues Tobella A, Reese H, Almaw A, Bayala J, Malmer A, Laudon H, Ilstedt U (2014) The effect of trees on preferential flow and soil infiltrability in an agroforestry parkland in semiarid Burkina Faso. Water Resour Res 50(4):3342–3354.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Barthès BG, Manlay RJ, Porte O (2010) Effets de l’apport de bois raméal sur la plante et le sol une revue des résultats expérimentaux. Cahiers Agric 19(4):280–287.  https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2010.0412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barthès BG, Penche A, Hien E, Deleporte P, Clermont-Dauphin C, Cournac L, Manlay RJ (2015) Effect of ramial wood amendment on sorghum production and topsoil quality in a Sudano-Sahelian ecosystem (Central Burkina Faso). Agrofor Syst 89(1):81–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9743-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bationo A, Kihara J, Vanlauwe B, Waswa B, Kimetu J (2007) Soil organic carbon dynamics, functions and management in west African agro-ecosystems. Agric Syst 94(1):13–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bayala J (2002) Tree crown pruning as a management tool to enhance the productivity of parklands in West Africa. University of Wales, Bangor, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Bayala J, Mando A, Ouedraogo SJ, Teklehaimanot Z (2003) Managing Parkia biglobosa and Vitellaria paradoxa prunings for crop production and improved soil properties in the sub-Sudanian zone of Burkina Faso. Arid Land Res Manag 17(3):283–296.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15324980301596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bayala J, Mando A, Teklehaimanot Z, Ouedraogo SJ (2005) Nutrient release from decomposing leaf mulches of karité (Vitellaria paradoxa) and néré (Parkia biglobosa) under semi-arid conditions in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Soil Biol Biochem 37(3):533–539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bayala J, Balesdent J, Marol C, Zapata F, Teklehaimanot Z, Ouedraogo SJ (2006) Relative contribution of trees and crops to soil carbon content in a parkland system in Burkina Faso using variations in natural 13C abundance. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76(2–3):193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-1547-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bayala J, Heng LK, van Noordwijk M, Ouedraogo SJ (2008) Hydraulic redistribution study in two native tree species of agroforestry parklands of West African dry savanna. Acta Oecol 34(3):370–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2008.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bayala J, Sileshi GW, Coe R, Kalinganire A, Tchoundjeu Z, Sinclair F, Garrity D (2012) Cereal yield response to conservation agriculture practices in drylands of West Africa: a quantitative synthesis. J Arid Environ 78:13–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bayala J, Sanou J, Teklehaimanot Z, Kalinganire A, Ouédraogo SJ (2014) Parklands for buffering climate risk and sustaining agricultural production in the Sahel of West Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:28–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bayala J, Sanou J, Teklehaimanot Z, Ouedraogo SJ, Kalinganire A, Coe R, Noordwijk MV (2015) Advances in knowledge of processes in soil–tree–crop interactions in parkland systems in the west African Sahel: a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 205:25–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bazié HR, Bayala J, Zombré G, Sanou J, Ilstedt U (2012) Separating competition-related factors limiting crop performance in an agroforestry parkland system in Burkina Faso. Agrofor Syst 84(3):377–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9483-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Belliard P (2014) Mulching for soil restoration and crop productivity in agricultural systems of Burkina Faso. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. Boffa JM (1999) Agroforestry parklands in sub-Saharan Africa. FAO conservation guide 34. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  22. Bonanomi G, D’Ascoli R, Scotti R, Gaglione SA, Caceres MG, Sultana S, Scelza R, Rao MA, Zoina A (2014) Soil quality recovery and crop yield enhancement by combined application of compost and wood to vegetables grown under plastic tunnels. Agric Ecosyst Environ 192:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bonetti C, Jouve P (1999) Jachères et systèmes agraires en Afrique subsaharienne. CORAF & European Union, DakarGoogle Scholar
  24. Bright MBH, Diedhiou I, Bayala R, Assigbetse K, Chapuis-Lardy L, Ndour Y, Dick RP (2017) Long-term Piliostigma reticulatum intercropping in the Sahel: crop productivity, carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, and soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 242:9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown RL, Naeth MA (2014) Woody debris amendment enhances reclamation after Oil Sands Mining in Alberta, Canada. Restor Ecol 22(1):40–48.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121(3):233–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bulmer C, Venner K, Prescott C (2007) Forest soil rehabilitation with tillage and wood waste enhances seedling establishment but not height after 8 years. Can J For Res 37(10):1894–1906.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x07-063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cabral A-S (2011) Caractérisation de la ressource en bois raméal à l'échelle du terroir de Loukoura au Burkina Faso. MSc thesis, ENGREF-AgroParisTech, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  29. Chapuis-Lardy L, Diakhate S, Djigal D, Ba AO, Dick RP, Sembene PM, Masse D (2015) Potential of Sahelian native shrub materials to suppress the spiral nematode Helicotylenchus dihystera. J Nematol 47(3):214–217PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Charreau C, & Vidal P (1965) Influence de l'Acacia albida Del. sur le sol, nutrition minérale et rendements des Mils Pennisetum au Sénégal. Agronomie Tropicale (6–7):600–625Google Scholar
  31. Cheriere T (2015) Woody vegetation characterization in Yilou, Burkina Faso: woody species inventories in farmer’s fields, Piliostigma reticulatum fertility island description. Wageningen University & Research, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  32. Chiroma AM, Folorunso OA, Alhassan AB (2006) Soil water conservation, growth, yield and water use efficiency of Sorghum as affected by land configuration and wood-shavings mulch in semi-arid Northeast Nigeria. Exp Agric 42(02):199.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479705003376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Coulibaly YN, Mulia R, Sanou J, Zombré G, Bayala J, Kalinganire A, van Noordwijk M (2013) Crop production under different rainfall and management conditions in agroforestry parkland systems in Burkina Faso: observations and simulation with WaNuLCAS model. Agrofor Syst 88(1):13–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9651-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Critchley WRS, Reij C, Willcocks TJ (1994) Indigenous soil and water conservation: a review of the state of knowledge and prospects for building on traditions. Land Degrad Dev 5(4):293–314.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3400050406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dan Lamso N, Guero Y, Tankari Dan-Badjo A, Lahmar R, Bationo BA, Djamen P, Tidjani AD, Ado Maman N, & Karimou AJM (2016) Effet des touffes de Hyphaene thebaica (Mart) sur la production du mil dans la région de Maradi (Niger). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 9(5).  https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v9i5.19
  36. Davies AB, Baldeck CA, Asner GP (2016) Termite mounds alter the spatial distribution of African savanna tree species. J Biogeogr 43(2):301–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Depommier D, Janodet E, Oliver R (1992) Faidherbia albida parks and their influence on soils and crops at Watinoma, Burkina Faso. In: Vandenbeldt RJ (ed) Faidherbia albida in the west African semi-arid tropics : proceedings of a workshop, 22–26 Apr 1991. Niamey, Niger, pp 111–115Google Scholar
  38. de Ridder N, Breman H, van Keulen H, Stomph TJ (2004) Revisiting a ‘cure against land hunger’: soil fertility management and farming systems dynamics in the west African Sahel. Agric Syst 80(2):109–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Debela F, Thring RW, Arocena JM (2011) Immobilization of heavy metals by co-pyrolysis of contaminated soil with woody biomass. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(3):1161–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0934-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dia A, Duponnois R (2012) La Grande Muraille Verte: Capitalisation des recherches et valorisation des savoirs locaux. IRD Editions, Marseille, FranceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Diack M, Sene M, Badiane AN, Diatta M, Dick RP (2010) Decomposition of a native shrub, Piliostigma reticulatum, litter in soils of semiarid Senegal. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 14(3):205–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/089030600406626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Diakhaté S, Villenave C, Diallo NH, Ba AO, Djigal D, Masse D, Sembène PM, Chapuis-Lardy L (2013) The influence of a shrub-based intercropping system on the soil nematofauna when growing millet in Senegal. Eur J Soil Biol 57:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Diakhaté S, Gueye M, Chevallier T, Diallo NH, Assigbetse K, Abadie J, Diouf M, Masse D, Sembène M, Ndour YB, Dick RP, Chapuis-Lardy L (2016) Soil microbial functional capacity and diversity in a millet-shrub intercropping system of semi-arid Senegal. J Arid Environ 129:71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Diarisso T, Corbeels M, Andrieu N, Djamen P, Douzet J-M, Tittonell P (2015) Soil variability and crop yield gaps in two village landscapes of Burkina Faso. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 105(3):199–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9705-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dibloni OT, Ouédraogo SJ, Koala J (1999) Rapport technique d’activités. Programme collaboratif ICRAF-SALWA INERA-DPF, Ouagadougou, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  46. Diedhiou S, Dossa EL, Badiane AN, Diedhiou I, Sène M, Dick RP (2009) Decomposition and spatial microbial heterogeneity associated with native shrubs in soils of agroecosystems in semi-arid Senegal. Pedobiologia 52(4):273–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2008.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Diedhiou-Sall S, Dossa EL, Diedhiou I, Badiane AN, Assigbetsé KB, Ndiaye Samba SA, Khouma M, Sène M, Dick RP (2013) Microbiology and macrofaunal activity in soil beneath shrub canopies during residue decomposition in agroecosystems of the Sahel. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77(2):501.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dixon J, Gulliver A, Gibbon D (2001) Farming systems and poverty: improving farmer’s livelihoods in a changing world. FAO & World Bank, Rome & Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Dongmo AL, Djamen P, Vall É, Mian-Oudanang K, Coulibaly D, Lossouarn J (2012) Du nomadisme à la sédentarisation. Revue d’ethnoécologie 1.  https://doi.org/10.4000/ethnoecologie.779
  50. Doso Jnr S (2014) Land degradation and agriculture in the Sahel of Africa: causes, impacts and recommendations. Journal of Agricultural Science and Applications 03(03): 67–73.  https://doi.org/10.14511/jasa.2014.030303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Dossa EL, Khouma M, Diedhiou I, Sene M, Kizito F, Badiane AN, Samba SAN, Dick RP (2009) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization potential of semiarid Sahelian soils amended with native shrub residues. Geoderma 148(3–4):251–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dossa EL, Diedhiou I, Khouma M, Sene M, Lufafa A, Kizito F, Samba SAN, Badiane AN, Diedhiou S, & Dick RP (2012) Crop Productivity and Nutrient Dynamics in a Shrub (Guiera senegalensis)–Based Farming System of the Sahel. Agron J 104(5):1255.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dossa EL, Diedhiou I, Khouma M, Sene M, Badiane AN, Ndiaye Samba SA, Assigbetse KB, Sall S, Lufafa A, Kizito F, Dick RP, Saxena J (2013) Crop productivity and nutrient dynamics in a shrub-based farming system of the Sahel. Agron J 105(4):1237.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Farage P, Ardo J, Olsson L, Rienzi E, Ball A, Pretty J (2007) The potential for soil carbon sequestration in three tropical dryland farming systems of Africa and Latin America: a modelling approach. Soil Tillage Res 94(2):457–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Félix GF, Clermont-Dauphin C, Hien E, Groot JCJ, Penche A, Barthès BG, Manlay RJ, Tittonell P, Cournac L (2018) Ramial wood amendments (Piliostigma reticulatum) mitigate degradation of tropical soils but do not replenish nutrient exports. Land Degrad Dev 29(8):2694–2706.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Feur G (2014) Woody biomass availability in a semi-arid landscape of Burkina Faso: the potential of ramial wood for soil aggradation. Wageningen University, The Netherlands, MSc thesisGoogle Scholar
  57. Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi SA (2008) Solid waste management by composting: state of the art. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 38(5):311–400.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701413633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gijsbers HJM, Kessler JJ, Knevel MK (1994) Dynamics and natural regeneration of woody species in farmed parklands in the Sahel region (province of Passore, Burkina Faso). For Ecol Manag 64(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90122-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Giller KE, Witter E, Corbeels M, Tittonell P (2009) Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crop Res 114(1):23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gómez ER (1997) Comparison of two sources of Ramial chipped wood on maize (Zea mays) yield. Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Urena (UNPHU), Santo Domingo, Dominican RepublicGoogle Scholar
  61. Gruenewald H, Brandt BKV, Schneider BU, Bens O, Kendzia G, Hüttl RF (2007) Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecol Eng 29(4):319–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Harmand JM, Njiti CF, Brugiere D, Jacotot N, Peltier R (1996) Plantations de Faidherbia albida au Nord-Cameroun. In: Peltier R (ed) les parcs à Faidherbia, pp 269–282Google Scholar
  63. Hernandez RR, Debenport SJ, Leewis M-CCE, Ndoye F, Nkenmogne KIE, Soumare A, Thuita M, Gueye M, Miambi E, Chapuis-Lardy L, Diedhiou I, Dick RP (2015) The native shrub, Piliostigma reticulatum , as an ecological “resource island” for mango trees in the Sahel. Agric Ecosyst Environ 204:51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hien E, Kaboré WT, Masse D, Dugué P (2010) Sustainable farming Systems in the sub-Sahelian Zone of Burkina Faso—key factors. Sustenabilidade em debate:127–140Google Scholar
  65. Ibrahim A, Abaidoo RC, Fatondji D, Opoku A (2015) Integrated use of fertilizer micro-dosing and Acacia tumida mulching increases millet yield and water use efficiency in Sahelian semi-arid environment. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 103(3):375–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9752-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Iyamuremye F, Gewin V, Dick RP, Diack M, Sene M, Badiane A (2000) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization potential of native agroforestry plant residues in soils of Senegal. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 14(4):359–371.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08903060050136469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jalloh A, Roy-Macauley H, Sereme P (2012) Major agro-ecosystems of West and Central Africa: brief description, species richness, management, environmental limitations and concerns. Agric Ecosyst Environ 157:5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jonsson K, Ong CK, & Odongo JCW (1999) Influence of Scattered Néré and Karité Trees on Microclimate, Soil Fertility and Millet Yield in Burkina Faso. Exp Agric 35(1):39–53.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479799001039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kabré GW (2010) Des rameaux ligneux pour fertiliser le sol de savane: Quelle disponibilité de la ressource dans le terroir villageois de Guié au Burkina Faso? École Nationale des Eaux et Forêts, Bobo-DioulassoGoogle Scholar
  70. Kaiser D, Croulaud Sylvain T-B, Yeo K, Konaté S, Linsenmair KE (2015) Species richness of termites (Blattoidea: Termitoidae) and ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) along disturbance gradients in semi-arid Burkina Faso (West Africa). Bonn Zoological Bulletin 64 64(1):16–31Google Scholar
  71. Kintché K, Guibert H, Bonfoh B, Tittonell P (2015) Long-term decline in soil fertility and responsiveness to fertiliser as mitigated by short fallow periods in sub-Sahelian area of Togo. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 101(3):333–350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9681-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kizito F, Sène M, Dragila MI, Lufafa A, Diedhiou I, Dossa E, Cuenca R, Selker J, Dick RP (2007) Soil water balance of annual crop–native shrub systems in Senegal's Peanut Basin: the missing link. Agric Water Manag 90(1–2):137–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kizito F, Dragila MI, Senè M, Brooks JR, Meinzer FC, Diedhiou I, Diouf M, Lufafa A, Dick RP, Selker J, Cuenca R (2012) Hydraulic redistribution by two semi-arid shrub species: implications for Sahelian agro-ecosystems. J Arid Environ 83:69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Laguemvare TA (2003) Reconstitution des sols dégradés et de la diversité biologique : «étude de la succession végétale et de l'action des termites dans un système de zai forestier (province du Yatenga, Burkina Faso) ». Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  75. Lahmar R, Bationo BA, Dan Lamso N, Guéro Y, Tittonell P (2012) Tailoring conservation agriculture technologies to West Africa semi-arid zones: building on traditional local practices for soil restoration. Field Crop Res 132:158–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363(1492):815–830.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Leenders JK, Boxel JHV, Sterk G (2007) The effect of single vegetation elements on wind speed and sediment transport in the Sahelian zone of Burkina Faso. Earth Surf Process Landf 32(10):1454–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lemieux G (2001) RCW technology and soil formation: a comprehensive vision in the African context. Groupe de Coordination sur les Bois Raméaux, Université de Laval 140Google Scholar
  79. Léonard J, Rajot JL (2001) Influence of termites on runoff and infiltration: quantification and analysis. Geoderma 104(1–2):17–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00054-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Louppe D (1991) Guiera senegalensis: Espèce agroforestière? Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 228:41–47Google Scholar
  81. Louppe D, N'Dour B, Samba SAN (1996) Influence de Faidherbia albida sur l'arachide et le mil au Sénégal: Méthodologie de mesure et estimation des effets d'arbres émondés avec ou sans parcage d'animaux. In: Peltier R (ed) Les parcs à Faidherbia, Cahier scientifiques, vol 12. CIRAD-Forêt, Montpellier, France, pp 123–138Google Scholar
  82. Lufafa A, Bolte J, Wright D, Khouma M, Diedhiou I, Dick RP, Kizito F, Dossa E, & Noller JS (2008a) Regional carbon stocks and dynamics in native woody shrub communities of Senegal's Peanut Basin. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 128(1-2):1–11  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lufafa A, Diédhiou I, Samba SAN, Séné M, Khouma M, Kizito F, Dick RP, Dossa E, & Noller JS (2008b) Carbon stocks and patterns in native shrub communities of Senegal's Peanut Basin. Geoderma 146(1-2):75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lufafa A, Diédhiou I, Ndiaye NAS, Séné M, Kizito F, Dick RP, Noller JS (2009) Allometric relationships and peak-season community biomass stocks of native shrubs in Senegal’s Peanut Basin. J Arid Environ 73(3):260–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Maiga A (1987) L’arbre dans les systèmes agroforestiers traditionels dans la province du Bazèga. Influence du karité, du néré et de Acacia albida sur le sorgho et le mil. IRBET/CNRST Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  86. Mando A (1997a) Effect of termites and mulch on the physical rehabilitation of structurally crusted soils in the Sahel. Land Degrad Dev 8:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mando A (1997b) The impact of termites and mulch on the water balance of crusted Sahelian soil. Soil Technol 11:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mando A (1998) Soil-dwelling termites and mulches improve nutrient release and crop performance on Sahelian crusted soil. Arid Land Res Manag 12(2):153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15324989809381505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mando A, Miedema R (1997) Termite-induced change in soil structure after mulching degraded (crusted) soil in the Sahel. Appl Soil Ecol 6(3):241–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1393(97)00012-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Mando A, Stroosnijder L (2006) The biological and physical role of mulch in the rehabilitation of crusted soil in the Sahel. Soil Use Manag 15(2):123–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00075.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Manlay RJ, Masse D, Chevallier T, Russell-Smith A, Friot D, Feller C (2004) Post-fallow decomposition of woody roots in the west African savanna. Plant Soil 260(1/2):123–136.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030176.41624.d7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mazzucato V, Niemeijer D (1998) Le Sahel: une dégradation des terres exagéré , un potentiel paysan sous-estiméGoogle Scholar
  93. Mettrop IS, Cammeraat LH, Verbeeten E (2013) The impact of subterranean termite activity on water infiltration and topsoil properties in Burkina Faso. Ecohydrology 6(2):324–331.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mudrak EL, Schafer JL, Fuentes-Ramirez A, Holzapfel C, Moloney KA (2014) Predictive modeling of spatial patterns of soil nutrients related to fertility islands. Landsc Ecol 29(3):491–505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9979-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Niemeijer D, Mazzucato V (2002) Soil degradation in the west African Sahel: how serious is it? Environment 44(2):20–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00139150209605596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Oliver R, Depommier, D., Janodet, E (1996) Influence de Faidherbia albida sur le sol et le sorgho: Observations dans le parc de Watinoma au Burkina Faso. In R Peltier (Ed.), Les parcs à Faidherbia. Cahiers Scientifiques (Vol. 12, pp. 141–152). Montpellier, France: CIRADForêtGoogle Scholar
  97. Ouédraogo JS, Alexandre DY (1994) Distribution des principales espèces agroforestières à Watinoma, terroir du Plateau Central burkinabè, une résultante des contraintes écologiques et anthropiques. Journal d'Agriculture Traditionelle et de Botanique Appliquée XXXVI(1):101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ouédraogo E, Mando A, Brussaard L (2004) Soil macrofaunal-mediated organic resource disappearance in semi-arid West Africa. Appl Soil Ecol 27(3):259–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ouédraogo E, Brussaard L, Stroosnijder L (2007) Soil fauna and organic amendment interactions affect soil carbon and crop performance in semi-arid West Africa. Biol Fertil Soils 44(2):343–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0211-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ouédraogo ZM (2014) Effets de la couverture du sol à base de Piliostigma reticulatum (DC) Hoscht sur les cultures de sorgho-niébé associés dans le village de Yilou, Province du Bam (Burkina Faso). Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, Institut du Développement RuralGoogle Scholar
  101. Pouliot M, Bayala J, Ræbild A (2011) Testing the shade tolerance of selected crops under Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) Benth. in an agroforestry parkland in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agrofor Syst 85(3):477–488.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9411-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Reij CP, Smaling EMA (2008) Analyzing successes in agriculture and land management in sub-Saharan Africa: is macro-level gloom obscuring positive micro-level change? Land Use Policy 25(3):410–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Reij C, Tappan G, Belemvire A (2005) Changing land management practices and vegetation on the central plateau of Burkina Faso (1968–2002). J Arid Environ 63(3):642–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Robert N, Tanguy M, Riss J, Gallois R (2014) Effects of ramial chipped wood amendments on weed control, soil properties and tomato crop yield. Paper presented at the 1st IS. on Organic Matter Management and Compost in Horticulture,Google Scholar
  105. Roose E, Kaboré V, Guénat C (1999) Zai practice: a West African traditional rehabilitation system for semiarid degraded lands, a case study in Burkina Faso. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 13(4):343–355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/089030699263230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rousseau K, Gautier D, Wardell DA (2017) Renegotiating access to Shea trees in Burkina Faso: challenging power relationships associated with demographic shifts and globalized trade. J Agrar Chang 17(3):497–517.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Salau OA, Opara-Nadi OA, Swennen R (1992) Effects of mulching on soil properties, growth and yield of plantain on a tropical ultisol in southeastern Nigeria. Soil Tillage Res 23(1–2):73–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(92)90006-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Samba SAN (2001) Effet de la litière de Cordyla pinnata sur les cultures: approche expérimentale en agroforesterie. Annales Des Sciences Forestieres 58:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sanou J, Bayala J, Teklehaimanot Z, Bazié P (2011) Effect of shading by baobab (Adansonia digitata) and néré (Parkia biglobosa) on yields of millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) in parkland systems in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agrofor Syst 85(3):431–441.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9405-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sanou J, Bayala J, BaziÉ P, Teklehaimanot Z (2012) Photosynthesis and biomass production by millet (Pennisetum Glaucum) and taro (Colocasia Esculenta) grown under baobab (Adansonia Digitata) and NÉrÉ (Parkia Biglobosa) in an agroforestry parkland system of Burkina Faso (West Africa). Exp Agric 48(02):283–300.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479712000014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Sanou BC (2015) Influence des apports ligneux sur la qualité et la productivité des sols : cas d’un sol ferrugineux tropical à Gampèla, Burkina Faso. Institut du Développement Rural (IDR), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  112. Seghieri J (1995) The rooting patterns of woody and herbaceous plants in a savanna; are they complementary or in competition? Afr J Ecol 33(4):358–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1995.tb01045.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Settle W, Garba MH (2011) Sustainable crop production intensification in the Senegal and Niger River basins of francophone West Africa. Int J Agric Sustain 9(1):171–185.  https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shiyam JO, Oko BFD, Obiefuna JC, Ofoh MC (2011) Optimizing the productivity of plantain/cocoyam mixture by mulching and fertilizer application. World J Agric Sci 7(5):633–637Google Scholar
  115. Sidibe DK (2010) Improving the management and productivity of Tamarindus indica and Ziziphus mauritiana in agroforestry parklands systems in Mali. Bangor University, Bangor, UK, West AfricaGoogle Scholar
  116. Sileshi GW (2016) The magnitude and spatial extent of influence of Faidherbia albida trees on soil properties and primary productivity in drylands. J Arid Environ 132:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sileshi GW, Arshad MA, Konaté S, Nkunika POY (2010) Termite-induced heterogeneity in African savanna vegetation: mechanisms and patterns. J Veg Sci 21(5):923–937.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01197.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sinare H, Gordon LJ (2015) Ecosystem services from woody vegetation on agricultural lands in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:186–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Somé SAC (2014) Influence des apports de Bois Raméaux Fragmentés (BRF) de Piliostigma reticulatum combinés à différentes sources d’azote sur la productivité des sols soudano-sahéliens: Cas de Gampéla. Institut du Développement Rural, Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  120. Sop TK, Oldeland J (2013) Local perceptions of Woody vegetation dynamics in the context of a ‘greening Sahel’: a case study from Burkina Faso. Land Degrad Dev 24(6):511–527.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sop TK, Oldeland J, Schmiedel U, Ouedraogo I, Thiombiano A (2011) Population structure of three woody species in four ethnic domains of the sub-Sahel of Burkina Faso. Land Degrad Dev 22(6):519–529.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sop TK, Oldeland J, Bognounou F, Schmiedel U, Thiombiano A (2012) Ethnobotanical knowledge and valuation of woody plants species: a comparative analysis of three ethnic groups from the sub-Sahel of Burkina Faso. Environ Dev Sustain 14(5):627–649.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9345-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Soumare MD, Mnkeni PNS, Khouma M (2002) Effects of Casuarina equisetifolia composted litter and Ramial-wood chips on tomato growth and soil properties in Niayes, Senegal. Biol Agric Hortic 20(2):111–123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2002.9754955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Stoate C, Morris RM, Wilson JD (2001) Cultural ecology of whitethroat (Sylvia communis) habitat management by farmers: winter in farmland trees and shrubs in Senegambia. J Environ Manag 62(4):343–356.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tilander Y, Bonzi M (1997) Water and nutrient conservation through the use of agroforestry mulches, and sorghum yield response. Plant Soil 197(2):219–232.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004263930096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tittonell P (2016) Feeding the world with soil science: embracing sustainability, complexity and uncertainty. SOIL Discussions:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2016-7
  127. Tittonell P, Giller KE (2013) When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crop Res 143:76–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. van Walsum E, van der Berg L, Bruil J, Gubbels P (2014) From vulnerability to resilience Agroecology for sustainable Dryland management. GRF Davos planet@risk 2 (1, special issue on desertification)Google Scholar
  129. West CT, Roncoli C, Ouattara F (2008) Local perceptions and regional climate trends on the central plateau of Burkina Faso. Land Degrad Dev 19(3):289–304.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Weston P, Hong R, Kabore C, Kull CA (2015) Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland West Africa. Environ Manag 55(6):1402–1417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wezel A (2000) Scattered shrubs in pearl millet fields in semiarid Niger: effect on millet production. Agrofor Syst 48(3):219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006382814180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wezel A, Böcker R (1999) Mulching with branches of an indigenous shrub (Guiera senegalensis) and yield of millet in semi-arid Niger. Soil Tillage Res 50(3–4):341–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(99)00008-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Wezel A, Rajot JL, Herbrig C (2000) Influence of shrubs on soil characteristics and their function in Sahelian agro-ecosystems in semi-arid Niger. J Arid Environ 44(4):383–398.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1999.0609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wilson TD, Brook RM, Tomlinson HF (1998) Interactions between NÉrÉ (Parkia Biglobosa) and under-planted sorghum in a parkland system in Burkina Faso. Exp Agric 34(1):85–99.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479798001069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. World Bank (2016) World development indicators—Burkina Faso country dataGoogle Scholar
  136. Yaméogo J (2008) Contribution des parcs à Borassus akeasii Bayton, Ouédraogo et Guinko au fonctionnement des systèmes de productions dans le sud-ouest du Burkina Faso. Université de Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  137. Yaméogo G, Yélémou B, Boussim IJ, Traoré D (2013) Gestion du parc agroforestier du terroir de Vipalogo (Burkina Faso) : contribution des ligneux à la satisfaction des besoins des populations. Int J Biol Chem Sci 7(3):1087.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v7i3.16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Yélémou B, Bationo BA, Yaméogo G, Millogo-Rasolodimby J (2007) Gestion traditionnelle et usages de Piliostigma reticulatum sur le Plateau central du Burkina Faso. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 291(1):55–66Google Scholar
  139. Yélémou B, Yaméogo G, Bationo BA, Millogo RJ, Hien V (2012) Les formations à Piliostigma en zone sahélo-soudanienne du Burkina Faso: Etat des peuplements, dynamique de la régénération sexuée et pression anthropique. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 6(5).  https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i5.17
  140. Yélémou B, Dayamba SD, Bambara D, Yaméogo G, & Assimi S (2013) Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics linked to Piliostigma species in ferugino-tropical soils in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of Burkina Faso, West Africa. J For Res 24(1):99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0329-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Yélémou B, Yaméogo G, Koala J, Bationo AB, & Hien V (2014) Influence of the Leaf Biomass of Piliostigma reticulatum on Sorghum Production in North Sudanian Region of Burkina Faso. Journal of Plant Studies 3(1).  https://doi.org/10.5539/jps.v3n1p80
  142. Yossi H, Traoré H, Dembélé F (2002) Mise au point de technologies agroforestières appropriées RFO 11. Rapport final. IER, Sikasso, MaliGoogle Scholar
  143. Zomboudré G, Zombré G, Ouedraogo M, Guinko S, Macauley HR (2005) Réponse physiologique et productivité des cultures dans un système agroforestier traditionnel : cas du maïs (Zea mays L.) associé au karité (Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn.) dans la zone est du Burkina Faso. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 9(1):75–85Google Scholar
  144. Zongo E (2009) Inventaire des pratiques d'amendments par les bois raméaux fragmentés au Burkina Faso: Caractérisation et impacts sur les rendements agricoles et les ressources naturelles. Université de Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, Mémoire LicenceGoogle Scholar
  145. Zorom M, Barbier B, Mertz O, Servat E (2013) Diversification and adaptation strategies to climate variability: a farm typology for the Sahel. Agric Syst 116:7–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Farming Systems EcologyWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Eco&Sols, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, IRD, Montpellier SupAgroIRDMontpellier Cedex 2France
  3. 3.LMI IESOLCentre IRD-ISRA de Bel AirDakarSenegal
  4. 4.Natural Resources and Environment ProgramCONICET-INTASan Carlos de BarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations