Free-air CO2 enrichment modifies maize quality only under drought stress
- 566 Downloads
Climate scenarios show that atmospheric CO2 concentrations will continue to increase. As a consequence, more frequent and severe drought periods are expected. Drought will thus modify plant growth. Although maize is a major crop globally, little information is available on how atmospheric and climatic changes will change maize quality. Here, in a field experiment, maize was grown in 2007 and 2008 under ambient (380 ppm) and elevated CO2 (550 ppm) using free-air CO2 enrichment. In 2007, maize was grown under well-watered conditions only. In 2008, we applied a drought stress treatment in which the plants received only half the amount of water of the well-watered treatment. We measured the concentrations of minerals and quality-related traits in aboveground biomass and kernels at the end of each growing season. Results show first the absence of effect of elevated CO2 under well-watered conditions. By contrast, drought stress modified several traits and interactions under elevated CO2. These results support the hypothesis that the C4 plant maize does not react to an increase in atmospheric CO2 as long as no drought stress is prominent. This finding contrasts with the impact of elevated CO2 on C3 plants. Several drought stress effects found in our study will have important implications for food and feed use. However, the effects of drought stress on the traits were less pronounced under elevated CO2 than under ambient CO2 level. Hence, an elevated CO2 concentration mitigates the drought stress impacts on elemental composition and quality traits of maize.
KeywordsCarbon dioxide Climate change FACE Fiber fractions Food and feed Free-air CO2 enrichment Microelements Minerals Protein fractions Rain shelter Stoichiometry Water availability Water deficit Zeamaize
This research was part of the research project LandCaRe 2020 funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). The FACE apparatus was engineered by Brookhaven National Laboratory and we are grateful to Dr. George Hendrey, Keith Lewin, and Dr. John Nagy for their support. We acknowledge the technical assistance and the work of the people from the Thünen-Institutes of Biodiversity and Climate-Smart Agriculture and from the Institute of Animal Nutrition of the Friedrich Loeffler-Institut contributing to the Braunschweig FACE experiment. The experimental station of the Friedrich Loeffler-Institut, Braunschweig, is thanked for carrying out the agricultural measures at the experimental area.
- Ainsworth EA, Beier C, Calfapietra C, Ceulemans R, Durand-Tardif M, Farquhar GD, Godbold DL, Hendrey GR, Hickler T, Kaduk J, Karnosky DF, Kimball BA, Körner C, Koornneef M, Lafarge T, Leakey ADB, Lewin KF, Long SP, Manderscheid R, McNeil DL, Mies TA, Miglietta F, Morgan JA, Nagy J, Norby RJ, Norton RM, Percy KE, Rogers A, Soussana J-F, Stitt M, Weigel H-J, White JW (2008) Next generation of elevated [CO2] experiments with crops: a critical investment for feeding the future world. Plant Cell Environ 31:1317–1324. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01841.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Erbs M, Manderscheid R, Jansen G, Seddig S, Pacholski A, Weigel H-J (2010) Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on grain quality parameters and elemental composition of wheat and barley grown in a crop rotation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2011) FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. Accessed 31 Jan 2013
- Högy P, Wieser H, Koehler P, Schwadorf K, Breuer J, Franzaring J, Muntifering R, Fangmeier A (2009) Effects of elevated CO2 on grain yield and quality of wheat: results from a 3-year free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. Plant Biol 11:60–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00230.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leakey ADB, Uribelarrea M, Ainsworth EA, Naidu SL, Rogers A, Ort DR, Long SP (2006) Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO2 concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiol 140:779–790. doi: 10.1104/pp. 105.073957 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lohölter M, Meyer U, Manderscheid R, Weigel H-J, Erbs M, Flachowsky G, Daenicke S (2012) Effects of free air carbon dioxide enrichment and drought stress on the feed value of maize silage fed to sheep at different thermal regimes. Arch Anim Nutr 66:335–346. doi: 10.1080/1745039x.2012.697352 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of the working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–845Google Scholar
- Pingali PL (2009) CIMMYT 1999–2000 World maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, Mexico. ISSN: 0257–8743Google Scholar
- VDLUFA Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (2006) Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Handbuch der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik (VDLUFA-Methodenbuch), Band III. Darmstadt, Germany. VDLUFA-Verlag. ISSN: 3-922712-94-0Google Scholar
- Wroblewitz S, Hüther L, Manderscheid R, Lebzien P, Danicke S (2013) The effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) during maize cultivation on the in sacco degradability of the grains. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol 22:118Google Scholar