Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 773–782 | Cite as

Spatial evidence of cross-crop pesticide contamination in small-holder Thai farms

  • Rachel A. Dunn
  • C. Lindsay Anderson
  • Michael F. Walter
  • Warinthorn Songskiri
  • Chawis Srimanee
  • Pattarin Thunyapar
  • Tammo S. Steenhuis
Research Article

Abstract

Development efforts for the reduction of land use needs and the improvement of farmer livelihoods in northern Thailand have resulted in the introduction of new pesticide-intensive crop species. Cholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides pose a health risk to farmers and consumers, though pesticide exposure pathways are not well understood. Farmers believe that cross-crop pesticide contamination between ornamental chrysanthemums and food crops is a possible source of pesticide exposure. Therefore, we used spatial analysis to test the hypothesis that cross-crop pesticide contamination may be a pesticide exposure pathway. Data on cholinesterase inhibition detection on food crops from 2006 to 2008 were spatially correlated with crop field areas and chrysanthemum cultivation areas. Statistical analysis was used to determine factors that influence the likelihood of cholinesterase inhibition detection on a crop. Our results show that the application of cholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides to a food crop contributed significantly to the likelihood that the crop would exhibit cholinesterase inhibition, but accounted for less than 10 % of the total cases of detection. Demonstration of cross-crop pesticide contamination is given by greater detection for crops grown closer to chrysanthemum cultivation areas, crops tested on days of the week when samples were taken directly from the field based on proximity to chrysanthemum cultivation, and crops of species with more exposed edible parts. Mechanical barriers may be useful in reducing the risk of cross contamination.

Keywords

Cholinesterase inhibiting pesticides Pesticide drift Cross-crop pesticide contamination Food cultivation Flower cultivation Chrysanthemum Intercropping GIS analysis Thailand 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Education through the Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi’s Royal Project Initiatives Program, Chulalongkorn University’s Empowering Networks of International Thai Studies program, and Cornell University’s Richard Bradfield Research Award and International Research Travel Grants. This research would not have been possible without the support of the National Research Council of Thailand. The authors would also like to thank Ms. Branee Thanatwan, Mr. Nilaan Bakpaksaan, Mr. Manut Salee, Mr. Boontum Jarunsongsuem, and Mr. Boontawng Kajeewongwilai for their assistance collecting the data used for this research. Finally, this paper was much improved with the help of anonymous reviewers, and assistance from Dr. Asawin Meechai, Dr. Kurt Frey, and Dr. Xuemao Zhang.

References

  1. Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A, Eddleston M, Gunnell D (2006) Deaths from pesticide poisoning: a global response. Br J Psychiatr 189(3):201–203. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davies R, Ahmed G, Freer T (2000) Chronic exposure to organophosphates: background and clinical picture. Adv Psychiatr Treat 6(3):187–192. doi:10.1192/apt.6.3.187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de la Huerga J, Yesinick C, Popper H (1952) Colorimetric method for the determination of serum cholinesterase. Am J Clin Pathol 22(11):1126Google Scholar
  4. de Snoo G (1999) Unsprayed field margins: effects on environment, biodiversity and agricultural practice. Landsc Urban Plan 46(1):151–160. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00039-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ecobichon DJ (2001) Pesticide use in developing countries. Toxicology 160(1):27–33. doi:10.1016/S0300-483X(00)00452-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. GT Trading (2004) Introduction to GT test kit. http://www.gttestkit.com/gttestkit_eng/intro_method.htm. Accessed 4 April 2011
  7. Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M, Soto A, Shingre A, Zambrano D, Guerrero W (2003) Pesticide use among farmers in the Amazon basin of Ecuador. Arch Environ Health 58(4):223–230. doi:10.3200/AEOH.58.4.223-228 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ibitayo OO (2006) Egyptian farmers’ attitudes and behaviors regarding agricultural pesticides: implications for pesticide risk communication. Risk Anal 26(4):989–996. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00794.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeyaratnam J (1990) Acute pesticide poisoning: a major global health problem. World Health Stat Q 43(3):139–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jokanovi’c M, Kosanovi’c M (2010) Neurotoxic effects in patients poisoned with organophosphorus pesticides. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 29(3):195–201. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2010.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kunstadter P, Prapamontol T, Mevatee U, Thawsirichuchai R, Yangyernkun W (2007) Seasonal and annual changes in pesticide exposure: Hmong highland villagers in Northern Thailand. In: Kunstadter P (ed) Pesticides in Southeast Asia. Sanga Sabhasri Research Foundation, Bangkok, pp 109–130Google Scholar
  12. Leilanie Lu J (2005) Risk factors to pesticide exposure and associated health symptoms among cut-flower farmers. Int J Environ Health Res 15(3):161–169. doi:10.1080/09603120500105638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lykke AM, Barford AS (2000) Studies and mapping of ecosystem diversity in Northern Thailand. Aims and methods. Research Centre on Forest and People in Thailand. University of Aarhus, Denmark: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences. http://www.forestandpeople.org. Accessed 21 Feb 2007
  14. Malézieux E, Crozat Y, Dupraz C, Laurans M, Makowski D, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Rapidel B et al (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29(1):43–62. doi:10.1051/agro:2007057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maltby L, Hills L (2008) Spray drift of pesticides and stream macroinvertebrates: experimental evidence of impacts and effectiveness of mitigation measures. Environ Pollut 156(3):1112–1120. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McKinlay R, Plant JA, Bell JNB, Voulvoulis N (2008) Calculating human exposure to endocrine disrupting pesticides via agricultural and non-agricultural exposure routes. Sci Total Environ 398:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.056 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mekonnen Y, Agonafir T (2002) Pesticide sprayers’ knowledge, attitude and practice of pesticide use on agricultural farms of Ethiopia. Occup Med 52(6):311–317. doi:10.1093/occmed/52.6.311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Orgell WH, Vaidya KA, Dahm PA (1958) Inhibition of human plasma cholinesterase in vitro by extracts of solanaceous plants. Science 128(3332):1136–1137. doi:10.1126/science.128.3332.1136 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Panuwet P, Prapamontol T, Chantara S, Barr DB (2009) Urinary pesticide metabolites in school students from Northern Thailand. Int J Hyg Environ Health 212(3):288–297. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.07.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M, Nelson J, Lipner V et al (1992) Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. Bioscience 42(10):750–760. doi:10.2307/1311994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Plianbangchang P, Jetiyanon K, Wittaya-areekul S (2009) Pesticide use patterns among small-scale farmers: a case study from Phitsanulok, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 40(2):401–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Recena MCP, Caldas ED, Pires DX, Pontes ERJC (2006) Pesticides exposure in Culturama, Brazil - knowledge attitudes, and practices. Environ Res 102:230–236. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2006.01.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sahunalu P, Teejuntuk S, Sungpalee C, Methavararuk A (1999) Study on the vegetation zonation in Doi Inthanon National Park and its application to environmental education. http://www.nacsj.or.jp/pn/houkoku/h10/h10-no15.html. Accessed 4 April 2011
  24. Salameh PR, Baldi I, Brochard P, Abi Saleh B (2004) Pesticides in Lebanon: a knowledge, attitude, and practice study. Environ Res 94:1–6. doi:10.1016/S0013-9351(03)00092-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schreinemachers P, Sringarm S, Sirijinda A (2011) The role of synthetic pesticides in the intensification of highland agriculture in Thailand. Crop Prot 30(11):1430–1437. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stallones L, Beseler C (2002) Pesticide illness, farm practices, and neurological symptoms among farm residents in Colorado. Environ Res 90(2):89–97. doi:10.1006/enrs.2002.4398 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thapinta A, Hudak PF (2000) Pesticide use and residual occurrence in Thailand. Environ Monit Assess 60(1):103–114. doi:10.1023/A:1006156313253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trebuil G, Ekasingh B, Ekasingh M (2006) Agricultural commercialisation, diversification, and conservation of renewable resources in northern Thailand highlands. Moussons 9–10:131–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wibulpolprasert S (2005) Thailand health profile 2001-2004. Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Public Health, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  30. Yildirim E, Guvenc I (2005) Intercropping based on cauliflower: more productive, profitable and highly sustainable. Eur J Agron 22(1):11–18. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2003.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel A. Dunn
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Lindsay Anderson
    • 2
  • Michael F. Walter
    • 2
  • Warinthorn Songskiri
    • 1
  • Chawis Srimanee
    • 3
  • Pattarin Thunyapar
    • 1
  • Tammo S. Steenhuis
    • 2
  1. 1.King Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiThungkruThailand
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Environmental EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Far Eastern UniversityMuangThailand

Personalised recommendations