Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 651–662 | Cite as

Feeding the world: genetically modified crops versus agricultural biodiversity

  • Sven-Erik JacobsenEmail author
  • Marten Sørensen
  • Søren Marcus Pedersen
  • Jacob Weiner
Review Article


The growing demand for food poses major challenges to humankind. We have to safeguard both biodiversity and arable land for future agricultural food production, and we need to protect genetic diversity to safeguard ecosystem resilience. We must produce more food with less input, while deploying every effort to minimize risk. Agricultural sustainability is no longer optional but mandatory. There is still an on-going debate among researchers and in the media on the best strategy to keep pace with global population growth and increasing food demand. One strategy favors the use of genetically modified (GM) crops, while another strategy focuses on agricultural biodiversity. Here, we discuss two obstacles to sustainable agriculture solutions. The first obstacle is the claim that genetically modified crops are necessary if we are to secure food production within the next decades. This claim has no scientific support, but is rather a reflection of corporate interests. The second obstacle is the resultant shortage of research funds for agrobiodiversity solutions in comparison with funding for research in genetic modification of crops. Favoring biodiversity does not exclude any future biotechnological contributions, but favoring biotechnology threatens future biodiversity resources. An objective review of current knowledge places GM crops far down the list of potential solutions in the coming decades. We conclude that much of the research funding currently available for the development of GM crops would be much better spent in other research areas of plant science, e.g., nutrition, policy research, governance, and solutions close to local market conditions if the goal is to provide sufficient food for the world’s growing population in a sustainable way.


GMO Underutilized crops Andean crops Food production Agrobiodiversity Sustainability 


  1. AATF (African Agricultural Technology Foundation) (2012) Support biotechnology development in Africa—private sector urged. Press release AATF., 3 p.
  2. Ahmed I (2012) Killer seeds: the devastating impacts of Monsanto’s genetically modified seeds in India. Global Research. Accessed: 12 Jan 2012
  3. Alnwick D (1996) Significance of micronutrient deficiencies in developing and industrialized countries. In: Combs GF, Welch RM, Duxbury JM, Uphoff NT, Nesheim MC (eds) Food-based approaches to preventing micronutrient malnutrition. An international research agenda. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Barta P (2007) Feeding billions, a grain at a time. The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1. 28 July 2007
  5. Beyer P (2010) Golden rice and ‘golden’ crops for human nutrition. New Biotechnol 27:478–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borlaug NE (2000) Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiol 124:487–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouisa HE, Chassyb BM, Ochandac JO (2003) Genetically modified food crops and their contribution to human nutrition and food quality. Trends Food Sci Technol 14:191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookes G (2002) The farm level impact of using Bt maize in Spain. PG Economics, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Brun T, Reynaud J, Chevassus-Agnes S (1989) Food and nutritional impact of one home garden project in Senegal. Ecol Food Nutr 23:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullock JM, Pywell RF, Walker KJ (2007) Long-term enhancement of agricultural production by restoration of biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 44:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke M, Lobell D, Guarino L (2009) Shifts in African crop climates by 2050, and the implications for crop improvement and genetic resources conservation. Glob Environ Change 19:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter JE (2010) Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nat Biotechnol 28(4):319–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter JE (2011) Impacts of GE crops on biodiversity. ISB News Report June 2011, 4 p.Google Scholar
  14. Carpenter JE, Gianessi L (1999) Herbicide tolerant soybeans: why growers are adopting roundup ready varieties. AgBio-Forum 2(2):65–72Google Scholar
  15. Conner AJ, Mercer CF (2007) Breeding for success: diversity in action. Euphytica 154:261–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danish Ministry of Food Agriculture and Fisheries (2009) GM crops—what can it be used for? [in Danish: Fødevareministeriet GMO—Hvad kan vi bruge det til?], Fødevareministeriet. September 2009. 236 p.Google Scholar
  17. Dempewolf H, Bordoni P, Rieseberg LH, Engels JMM (2010) Food security: crop species diversity. Science 328:169–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duchin F (2005) Sustainable consumption of food: a framework for analyzing scenarios about changes in diets. J Ind Ecol 9:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enriquez J (2001) Green biotechnology and European competitiveness. Trends Biotechnol 19(4):135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Union (2010) A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010). ISBN 978-92-79-16344-9. doi: 10.2777/97784. 268 p
  21. Eyzaguirre PB, Linares OF (2004) Home gardens and agrobiodiversity. Smithsonian, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (2007) The state of food and agriculture. Rome, xiv. 222 p.Google Scholar
  23. FAO (2010) Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries: options and opportunities in crops, forestry, livestock, fisheries and agro-industry to face the challenges of food insecurity and climate change (ABDC-10). FAO International Technical Conference, Guadalajara, Mexico, 65 pGoogle Scholar
  24. Finckh MR, Gacek ES, Goyeau H, Lannou C, Merz U, Mundt CC, Munk L, Nadziak J, Newton AC, De Vallavielle-Pope C, Wolfe MS (2000) Cereal variety and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance. Agronomie 20:813–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer RA (2009) Farming systems of Australia: exploiting the synergy between genetic improvement and agronomy in crop physiology. In: Sadras V, Calderini D (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp 23–54Google Scholar
  26. Frison E (2009) Director General calls for investment in true food security. Biodiversity news.
  27. Frison E, Cherfas J, Hodgkin T (2011) Agricultural biodiversity is essential for a sustainable improvement in food and nutrition security. Sustainability 3:238–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galluzzi G, Eyzaguirre P, Negri V (2010) Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:3635–3654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gassmann AJ, Petzold-Maxwell JL, Keweshan R, Dunbar MW (2011) Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm. PLoS One 6(7):e22629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022629 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gepts P (2002) A comparison between crop domestication, classical plant breeding, and genetic engineering. Crop Sci 42(6):1780–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gepts P (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Sci 46:2278–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gouse M, Pray C, Schimmelpfennig D, Kirsten J (2006) Three seasons of subsistence insect-resistant maize in South Africa: have smallholders benefited? AgBioforum 9:15–22Google Scholar
  34. Gruère GP, Sun Y (2012) Measuring the contribution of Bt cotton adoption to India’s cotton yields leap. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01170, 28 p.Google Scholar
  35. Gruère GP, Giuliani A, Smale M (2008) Marketing underutilized plant species for the benefit of the poor: a conceptual framework. In: Kontoleon A, Pasqual U, Smale M (eds) Agrobiodiversity conservation and economic development. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp 73–87Google Scholar
  36. Grum M (2009) Threats to biodiversity. In: Rudebjer P, Van Schlagen B, Chakeredza S, Karnau H (eds). Proc. Learning agrobiodiversity: options for universities in Sub-Saharan Africa. 21–23 January 2009, Nairobi, Kenya, pp 78–80Google Scholar
  37. Guillaume P, Gruère, Purvi Mehta-Bhatt P, Sengupta D (2008) Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India, reviewing the evidence. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00808. International Food Policy Institute (IFPRI).
  38. Gurian-Sherman D (2009) Failure to yield—evaluating the performance of genetically engineered crops. Union of Concerned Scientists, 51 p.Google Scholar
  39. Hall L, Dexter J, Jhala A, McPherson M (2009) Biology matters: seed- and pollen-mediated gene flow in three oilseed crops, safflower, flax and oilseed rape. GMCC-09 Adelaide.
  40. Hector A, Loreau M (2005) Relationships between biodiversity and production in grasslands at local and regional scales. In: McGilloway DA (ed) Grassland: a global resource. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 295–304Google Scholar
  41. Huang J, Pray C, Rozelle S (2002) Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature 418:678–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. IAASTD (2009) Agriculture at a crossroads. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), 250 p.Google Scholar
  43. IFOAM (2009) Organic agriculture—a guide to climate change and food security.
  44. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report, contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds). IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pGoogle Scholar
  45. ISF (International Seed Federation) (2011) Agriculture under pressure.
  46. ISIS (2010) Farmer suicides and Bt cotton nightmare unfolding in India. ISIS Report 06/01/10., 17 p.
  47. Jacobsen S-E (2003) The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev Int 19:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jacobsen S-E (2011) The situation for Quinoa and its production in Southern Bolivia: from economic success to environmental disaster. J Agron Crop Sci 197:390–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jacobsen S-E, Mujica A, Ortiz R (2003) The global potential for quinoa and other Andean crops. Food Rev Int 19:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacobsen S-E, Jensen CR, Liu F (2012) Improving crop production in the arid Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Res 128:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jain HK (2010) Green revolution: history, impact and future. Studium Press, HoustenGoogle Scholar
  52. James C (2011) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2011. ISAAA Brief No. 43. ISAAA, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  53. Juma C (2011) The new harvest—agricultural innovations in Africa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 296Google Scholar
  54. Kolady DE, Lesser W (2012) Genetically-engineered crops and their effects on varietal diversity: a case of Bt eggplant in India. Agric Human Values 29:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lal R (2008) Soils and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010) The international year of biodiversity: an opportunity to strengthen the science–policy interface for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Editorial overview. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lawson LG, Larsen AS, Pedersen SM, Gylling M (2009) Perceptions of genetically modified crops among Danish farmers. Acta Agr Scand, C-F E 6(2):99–118Google Scholar
  58. Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Souchere V, Alberola C, Menassieu J (2009) Agronomy for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nair PKR (2001) Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agroforest Syst 53:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. NAS [National Academy of Sciences] (2010) The impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States. National Academies: NW Washington, D.C.
  61. Padulosi S, Heywood V, Hunter D, Jarvis A (2011) Underutilized species and climate change: current status and outlook. In: Yadav SS, Redden RJ, Hatfield JL, Lotze-Campen H, Hall AE (eds) Crop adaptation to climate change, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 507–521Google Scholar
  62. Parry MAJ, Hawkesford MJ (2012) An integrated approach to crop genetic improvement. J Integr Plant Biol 54:250–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pingali P, Raney T (2005) From the green revolution to the gene revolution: how will the poor fare? ESA working paper no. 05–09., 17 p.
  64. Pinstrup-Andersen P (2010a) Ny viden er farlig for en ideologi, som har spillet fallit. Jord og Viden 4:8–10Google Scholar
  65. Pinstrup-Andersen P (2010b) The advantages of genetic engineering in agriculture include increased food production and reduced hunger—benefits for hungry and malnourished in developing countries outweigh disadvantages.
  66. Porter JR, Challinor A, Ewert F, Falloon P, Fischer T, Gregory P, Van Ittersum MK, Olesen JE, Moore KJ, Rosenzweig C, Smith P (2010) Food security: focus on agriculture. Science 328:172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Potocnik J (2010) Green living. Parliament Magazine 31 May 2010, pp 40–41.Google Scholar
  68. Pretty JN, Morison JIL, Hine RE (2003) Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Agr Ecosyst Environ 95:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Proulx R, Wirth C, Voigt W, Weigelt A, Roscher C, Attinger S, Baade J, Barnard RL, Buchmann N, Buscot F, Eisenhauer N, Fischer M, Gleixner G, Halle S, Hildebrandt A, Kowalski E, Kuu A, Lange M, Milcu A, Niklaus PA, Oelmann Y, Rosenkranz S, Sabais A, Scherber C, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scheu S, Schulze E-D, Schumacher J, Schwichtenberg G, Soussana J-F, Temperton VM, Weisser WW, Wilcke W, Schmid B (2010) Diversity promotes temporal stability across levels of ecosystem organization in experimental grasslands. PLoS One 5:e13382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Qaim M (2009) The economics of genetically modified crops. Annu Rev Res Econ 1:665–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rudebjer P (2009) Agrobiodiversity in food systems, ecosystems and education systems. In: Rudebjer P, Van Schlagen B, Chakeredza S, Karnau H (eds). Proc. Learning agrobiodiversity: options for universities in Sub-Saharan Africa. 21–23 January 2009. Nairobi, Kenya, pp 28–33Google Scholar
  72. Salinger G (2012) Five agricultural innovations to improve biodiversity.
  73. Shackleton CM, Pasquini MW, Drescher AW (2009) African indigenous vegetables in urban agriculture. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Schiøler E, Pinstrup-Andersen P (2009) Seeds of contention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 164Google Scholar
  75. Scientific American (2009) Do seed companies control GM crop research? Sci Am 13 August 2009.
  76. Stone GD (2010) The anthropology of genetically modified crops. Annu Rev Anthropol 39:381–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sørensen M (2004) Supercrop—the yam bean. Nat Hist Mag 113(3):38–43Google Scholar
  78. Tari I, Laskay G, Takacs Z, Poor P (2012) Response of Sorghum to abiotic stresses: a review. J Agro Crop Sci. doi: 10.1111/jac.12017
  79. Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C (2001) Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tirado R, Johnston P (2010) Food security: GM crops threaten biodiversity. Science 328:170–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trewavas A (2002) GM food is the best option we have. In: Pence G (ed) The ethics of food, a reader for the twenty-first century. Rowman, Lanham, pp 148–155Google Scholar
  82. Ulukan H (2009) The evolution of cultivated plant species: classical plant breeding versus genetic engineering. Plant Syst Evol 280:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. UN (2010) 2015 Millenium development goals. United Nations Summit 20–22 September 2010, New York, High-level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly. UN Department of Public Information—DPI/2650 G,. September 2010Google Scholar
  84. USDA (2007/2010) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Agricultural Statistics Board, US Department of Agriculture Acreage.Google Scholar
  85. Vandana SV, Barker D, Lockhart C (2011) The GMO emperor has no clothes—a global citizens report on the state of GMOs, synthesis report. Navdanya International.
  86. Vidal J (2011a) GM foods: a “biotech revolution”?, 19 October 2011Google Scholar
  87. Vidal J (2011b) GM crops promote superweeds, food insecurity and pesticides, say NGOs., 19 October 2011Google Scholar
  88. Wang S, Just DR, Pinstrup-Andersen P (2008) Bt-cotton and secondary pests. Int J Biotechnol 10:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang ZJ, Lin H, Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C (2009) Bt cotton in China: are secondary insect infestations offsetting the benefits in farmer fields? Agr Sci China 8(1):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weiner J, Andersen SB, Wille WKM, Griepentrog HW, Olsen JM (2010) Evolutionary agroecology: the potential for cooperative, high density, weed-suppressing cereals. Evol Applic 3:473–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Welch RM, Graham RD (2004) Breeding for micronutrients in staple food crops from a human nutrition perspective. J Exp Bot 55:353–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven-Erik Jacobsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marten Sørensen
    • 1
  • Søren Marcus Pedersen
    • 2
  • Jacob Weiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Food and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations